gnathopod
2.The
genus resembles Ceradocus Costa closely but differsby
the biarticulate outerramus
of uropod 3.Liagoceradocuspusilliis,
new
species Figure 15Diagnosis:
With
the characters of the genus.Descriptive features:
The
mouthparts are generally like those of Ceradocus, although the third mandibular palp article is subfalcateand somewhat
stouter than inmost
species of Ceradocus; the third maxillipedal palp article is produced apically asshown
in the figure;eyes apparently are absent; lateral lobes of head broad
and
poorlyFigure 15. Liagoceradocuspusillus, new species, holotype, ?male, 1.5 mm., Abbott sta.
123-D-2:a,lateralview,somedetailsofpleonsegmentsobscure;b,lowerlip; c,articles
3^
ofmaxillipedal palp; d, e, gnathopods 1, 2;/, pereopod 1; g-i, uropods 1, 2, 3;j,telson.
506 PROCEEDINGS
OFTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM
vol. 117produced; third pleonal epimeron produced into a small tooth at the lower posterior corner.
Holotype:
USNM
106884, ?male, 1.5mm.
Type
locality:Abbott
station 123-D-2, IfalukAtoll, Oct. 18, 1953.Material: 2 specimens
from
the typelocality.Distribution: IfalukAtoll, Caroline Islands.
Genus Maera Leach
This is perhaps the
most abundant
genus in the collections. Itstaxonomy
isin aconfusedstateand
seriously inneed ofarevisionby
a single specialist.The
materials athand
are especially difficult to identify because of the lack of large suites of materialfrom
a single localityand
becausemost
of the specimens are immature.There
is little difficulty in identifyingM.
insignisand M.
othonopsisand
theproblem
liesinthosespecieshaving secondgnathopods withtransverse palms.Few
of these specimens aremature and
apparently themetamorphosis
of thepalmar
configuration into the adult sculpturing passes through several stages in both malesand
femalesand
all the initialstages are similar.Although
the adultpalms
inM.
inaequipes,M.
pacifica,and M.
quadrimana differ, they are alike in the juvenile stages.In order to identify these species, one
must
examine the telson.Each
lobe of the telson inM.
inaequipes is deeply notched (Schellen- berg 1938a, fig. 18) butto observe this character it is necessary to dissectand mount
the telson ofeach individual, a laboriousprocedure in such small animals.Maera
pacificaand M.
quadrimanahave
blunt telsonic lobes (Schellenberg 1938a, figs. 19, 22)and
often can be separatedfrom
each otherby
the stoutness of the second articleson
pereopods 3-5 ofM.
imcifica (see Schellenberg 1938a, figs. 19-22), Unfortunately,many
ofthespecimensathand have
lostthepereopods so that positive identification is impossible.When
one specimen in a lot can be identified as one or the otherspecies, Ihave
included the remainingdamaged
specimensin theidentification.All specimens of
Maera quadrimana
in the Reish collectionshave
stout basal articleson
the last 3 pairs of pereopods,formmg
a per- plexing exception to Schellenberg's otherwise neat separation ofM.
pacificaand M.
quadrimana. Ihave no doubt
that thesespecimens areM. quadrimana
asseen in thefigures of the gnathopodspresented here.As
there areno
clear differences in theyoung
ofM.
pacifica, onemust
relyonthelengthofthe definingpalmar
toothofgnathopod2 in theyoung
of both sexes, which is long inM.
pacificaand
short inM.
quadrimana.Key
tothe Femalesand JuvenilesofMaera
1. Pleonalsegment4with2sharp dorsalcarinae
M.
insignisPleonal segment 4 smooth 2
2. Telson with notched apices 3
Telsonwithblunt apices 4
3. Thirdpleonalepimeronsmoothbehind
M.
inaequipes Thirdpleonalepimeronserratebehind M. inaequipes serratus4. Gnathopod 2, palm oblique
M.
othonopsisGnathopod 2, palm transverse 5
5. Adult males with 3palmar teethon gnathopod 2, young males, females and juvenileshavingsmoothpalms, withshort definingtooth .
M.
quadrimana Adult males with one blunt palmer tooth on gnathopod 2, young males, females and juveniles having smooth palms, with long de-fining tooth
M.
pacificaMaerahamigera Haswell Figure 16
Moera [sic] hamigera Haswell, 1879b, p. 333, pi. 21, fig. 1; 1882, pp. 254-255.
Mcgamoerasuensis var.,Haswell, 1885, p. 103,pi. 15, figs. 1-4.
Maera hamigera.—Stehh'mg, 1906, p. 437.—Walker, 1909, p. 335.—Stebbing, 1910b, pp. 600-601, 642.—K. H. Barnard, 1916, pp. 196-197, pi. 27, figs.
11-12.—Chilton, 1921,p. 73.
Diagnosis:
No
segments dorsally dentate; posterior edge of third pleonal epimeron serrate, lower edge smooth;uropod
3 extendingmuch beyond
uropods 1and
2;palm
ofmale gnathopod
2 distinct from hindedge ofarticle 6; apices of telson notched; baseof article 7 ofmale gnathopod
2 strongly curved.Description:
Eyes
rather large, subreniform,ommatidia
not closelypacked; article 6 of onemale gnathopod
2 (figure 16^) rather slender but very massive,palm
nearly transverse but short, definedby
astrong toothbearing a large spine,palm
with 2 or 3 teeth; othermale
secondgnathopod
(figure 16;) (usually the left one) verysmall, of similarshape butpalm
lacking defining toothand
bearing several large spines, article 7 not strongly curved at base; gerontic females having gnathopods similar to males (figures 16a, /); other adult femaleshaving both second gnathopods like thesmall one ofgerontic females (figure 16e); smaller but still adult females having both second gnathopods small but thepalm
scarcely distinctfrom
the hindmargin of article 6 (figure 16m); finally an aberrantform was
found (figure IQi)havmg
article 6 ofgnathopod
2 stouter, thepalm
formed into about 7 small even teeth,and
the fingerswollen near itsapex (see
K. H.
Barnard, 1916).Thus
there arefiveprincipalformsofthisspecies in these collections.Remarks:
In light of the variability seen in this speciesand
inmy
initial difficulty in identifying females of this species until malescame
to light, it isnecessary toexplore itsrelationship to such species768-792