• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Molecular transitions

Dalam dokumen Nickolas Hovanec Pilgram (Halaman 50-53)

Chapter II: Molecular Structure

2.9 Molecular transitions

where 𝑒 is the charge of the electron and 𝑄 is the quadrupole moment of the nucleus. π‘ž0is the expectation value of the electric field gradient over the electronic wavefunction

π‘ž0 =βˆ’2βŸ¨πœ‚,Ξ›|𝑇2

π‘ž=0(βˆ‡πΈ) |πœ‚,Ξ›βŸ©= βˆ’1 4πœ‹πœ–0β„Ž

βŸ¨πœ‚,Ξ›|βˆ‘οΈ

𝑖

(3π‘π‘œ 𝑠2πœƒπ‘–βˆ’1) π‘Ÿ3

𝑖

|πœ‚,Ξ›βŸ©, (2.76) whereπœ–0 is the electric constant,𝑇2

π‘ž=0(βˆ‡πΈ) is theπ‘ž =0 component of the second- rank spherical tensor describing the electric field gradient19, and the sum over𝑖 is now taken over all electrons.

In Eq. 2.75 we have only included terms diagonal in Ξ›; however, the electric quadrupole interaction also has terms off diagonal inΞ›. As with the dipolar interac- tions, the terms which mix states withΔΛ =Β±1 will cause electronic states to mix and will only become relevant at higher order. These terms are not included in the effective Hamiltionian. The off diagonal terms which connect states withΔΛ =Β±2 are included in the non-axial electric quadrupole effective Hamiltonian

Λ†

𝐻𝐸 𝑄2=βˆ’π‘’2𝑄 π‘ž2

(π‘’βˆ’2𝑖 πœƒπΌ+2+𝑒2𝑖 πœƒπΌβˆ’2)

4𝐼(2πΌβˆ’1) . (2.77)

π‘ž2is the non-axial electric quadrupole coupling parameter and is determined by the non-diagonal effects of the electric field gradient

π‘ž2 =βˆ’2

√ 6 βˆ‘οΈ

π‘ž=Β±2

βŸ¨πœ‚,Ξ› = Β±1|𝑇2

π‘ž(βˆ‡πΈ) |πœ‚,Ξ› =βˆ“1⟩, (2.78) where now the𝑇2

π‘ž=Β±2(βˆ‡πΈ)are theπ‘ž =Β±2 components of the second-rank spherical tensor describing the electric field gradient. ˆ𝐻𝐸 𝑄2 has the selection rulesΔΣ = 0 and ΔΛ = 2 and therefore will only connect states with ΔΩ = 2. Therefore, in a

2Ξ  state, ˆ𝐻𝐸 𝑄2 will only connect states from different spin orbit components, the Ξ© =1/2 andΞ© =3/2 states.

(a transitions between different rovibronic states) while the latter induces rotational transitions within a single vibronic state. By observing either the absorption or emission of photons when these transitions are driven, we can determine the tran- sition frequencies and ultimately the energies of the states involved. In addition to providing a means to observe and measure molecules, molecular transitions can also be utilized to control and manipulate molecules (laser cooling, coherent state preparation, etc.).

We are interested in understanding electric dipole transitions 20, how the electric dipole operator (first term in the multipole expansion of the electric field of the laser or microwaves) connects two different molecular states. For two given molecular states, the transition intensity or strength is given by the expectation value of the electric dipole operator, Λ†πœ‡, between the two states

𝐼 =|βŸ¨π›Ό|πœ‡Λ†|π›½βŸ©|2. (2.79) Here𝛼and𝛽describe all the quantum numbers of the ground and excited states.

Vibrational transitions

If we only consider vibronic transitions (e.g., the laser is broad enough that transitions from many rotational/fine/hyperfine states are excited at once so that the rotational, fine and hyperfine structure is unresolved) then the intensity is given by [81]

𝐼𝑣𝑖 π‘π‘Ÿ π‘œπ‘›π‘– 𝑐 =|βŸ¨πœ‚β€²β€², πœˆβ€²β€²|πœ‡Λ†|πœ‚β€², πœˆβ€²βŸ©|2= |βŸ¨πœˆβ€²β€²|πœˆβ€²βŸ©βŸ¨πœ‚β€²β€²|πœ‡Λ†|πœ‚β€²βŸ©|2=π‘žπœˆβ€²β€²,πœˆβ€²

πœ‡πœ‚β€²β€²,πœ‚β€²

2

, (2.80) where here we use πœ‚ and 𝜈 to describe the electronic vibrational wavefuctions respectively, and we have used the spectroscopic notation of the double prime and prime reffering to the ground and excited states respectively. In Eq. 2.80 we have used the fact Λ†πœ‡ does not operate on the vibrational coordinates. π‘žπœˆβ€²β€²,πœˆβ€² is known as the Frank Condon factor (FCF) which is the overlap integral of the vibrational wavefunctions

π‘žπœˆβ€²β€²,𝜈 =|βŸ¨πœˆβ€²β€²|πœˆβ€²βŸ©|2=

∫

πœ“πœˆβ€²β€²πœ“βˆ—

πœˆβ€²π‘‘ 𝜏

2

. (2.81)

If the electronic PES is known for both the ground and excited states,π‘žπœˆβ€²β€²,πœˆβ€² can be easily calculated. πœ‡πœ‚β€²β€²,πœ‚β€²is the transition dipole moment (TDM) and is dependent on the specific nature of the electronic wavefunctions. While it is possible to calculate

20There are also magnetic dipole, electric quadrupole, and higher-order transitions, however they are largely suppressed compared to electric dipole transitions and, for the transitions of interest here, are not discussed.

the TDM using numerical methods, it is often a measured quantity. For the set of different vibrational transitions between two electronic states,πœ‡πœ‚β€²β€²,πœ‚β€² is constant and the relative transition intensities are only dependent on the FCFs.

Following excitation to an excited state |πœ‚β€², πœˆβ€²βŸ©the molecule will decay back down to the ground state (or some other lower state). The probability that the molecule will decay to a given vibrational state |πœ‚β€²β€², πœˆβ€²β€²βŸ©is given by the vibrational branching ratio [91]

π‘πœˆβ€²β†’πœˆβ€²β€² =

π‘žπœˆβ€²β€²,πœˆβ€²πœ”3

πœˆβ€²β€²,πœˆβ€²

Í

πœˆβ€²β€²π‘žπœˆβ€²β€²,πœˆβ€²πœ”3

πœˆβ€²β€²,πœˆβ€²

, (2.82)

whereπœ”πœˆβ€²β€²,πœˆβ€² is the frequency of the transitions from |πœ‚β€²β€², πœˆβ€²β€²βŸ©to |πœ‚β€², πœˆβ€²βŸ©. Therefore the probability of a vibrational decay is dependent on the FCF. This fact becomes important when laser cooling molecules.

Vibrational selection rules

Whether or not a vibrational transition is allowed is determined by π‘žπœˆβ€²β€²,πœˆβ€². From Eq. 2.81 we know thatπ‘žπœˆβ€²β€²,πœˆβ€² = 0 if the productπœ“πœˆβ€²β€²πœ“βˆ—

πœˆβ€² is odd with respect to the origin of the coordinate system. This occurs when one of the wavefunctions is even and the other is odd. For a linear molecule, all stretching mode wavefunctions are even with respect to the origin and therefore nothing inherently prevents vibrational transitions between different stretching modes. However, for bending vibrations the situation is different. All bending wavefunctions with odd values of𝑙 are odd while even values of 𝑙 are even. This results in the following vibrational selection rules for linear molecules: Δ𝑙 =0 and thereforeΞ”πœˆπ‘ 𝑒𝑛𝑑 =0,Β±2,Β±4, ...More intuitively, this can be though of in the following way. Since the photon only interacts with the valence electron’s charge or the molecule’s dipole moment, it can not cause a change in the bending angular momentum (similar to how a photon can’t change the spin), andΔ𝑙 =0. For a more rigorous description of vibrational selection rules with respect to the molecular symmetry, see Ref. [81, 82].

It is important to note that forbidden Δ𝑙 β‰  0 transitions due occur and are due to mixing from vibronic perturbations such as the Renner-Teller effect. For example consider the case of a 2Ξ£+(πœˆπ‘ 𝑒𝑛𝑑 = 1) β†’2 Ξ 1/2(πœˆπ‘ 𝑒𝑛𝑑 = 0) transition which is normally forbidden. Vibronic and spin orbit interactions can mix the2Ξ 1/2(πœˆπ‘ 𝑒𝑛𝑑 = 0)state with the bending mode of an excitedΞ£βˆ’state so that the true wavefunction of the 2Ξ 1/2(πœˆπ‘ 𝑒𝑛𝑑 = 0) state is now πœ“ = |2Ξ 1/2(πœˆπ‘ 𝑒𝑛𝑑=0⟩ +πœ–|2Ξ£βˆ’(πœˆπ‘ 𝑒𝑛𝑑 = 1)⟩. The2Ξ£+(πœˆπ‘ 𝑒𝑛𝑑 =1) β†’2Ξ£βˆ’(πœˆπ‘ 𝑒𝑛𝑑 =1) transitions is not forbidden which will now

allow the2Ξ£+(πœˆπ‘ 𝑒𝑛𝑑 =1) β†’2Ξ 1/2(πœˆπ‘ 𝑒𝑛𝑑 =0) to occur via intensity borrowing. A thorough calculation and measurement of this β€œforbidden” vibrational branching for CaOH, SrOH, and YbOH was done in Ref. [95].

Rotational and rovibronic transitions

If the rotational, fine, and hyperfine structure are resolved, then the transition inten- sity will also depend on the specifics of the rotational/fine/hyperfine states involved.

Taking this into account, the transition intensity is given by πΌπ‘Ÿ π‘œπ‘£π‘– π‘π‘Ÿ π‘œπ‘›π‘– 𝑐 = |βŸ¨πœ‚β€²β€², πœˆβ€²β€², πœ…β€²β€²|πœ‡Λ†|πœ‚β€², πœˆβ€², πœ…β€²βŸ©|2=π‘žπœˆβ€²β€²,𝜈

πœ‡πœ‚β€²β€²,πœ‚β€²

2π‘†πœ…β€²β€²,πœ…β€² (2.83) whereπ‘†πœ…β€²β€²,πœ…β€²is the HΓΆnl-London factor andπœ…denotes the quantum numbers which de- scribe the rotational/fine/ hyperfine state. In a case (a) basis

|πœ‚, 𝜈, πœ…βŸ© = |πœ‚,Ξ›;𝜈, 𝑙;𝑆,Ξ£;𝐽 , π‘ƒβŸ©. In reality the state |πœ‚, πœ…βŸ© will be some linear combination of the basis functions which will be determined by diagonalizing ˆ𝐻𝑒 𝑓 𝑓 and therefore the values ofπ‘†πœ…β€²β€²,πœ…β€²will depend on the specifics of the effective Hamil- tonian.

Rotational and rovibronic transitions have the following selection rules for the total angular momentum and parity; Δ𝐽 = 0,Β±1 (Δ𝐹 = 0,Β±1 when there is hyperfine structure), and parity+ ↔ βˆ’[96]. There are also the following approximately good selection rules; Δ𝑆 = 0, ΔΣ = 0, ΔΛ = ΔΩ = 0,Β±1. The value of Δ𝐽 is used to label different rotational branches. Δ𝐽 =βˆ’1 transitions form the P branch,Δ𝐽 =0 transitions form the Q branch, andΔ𝐽 =+1 transitions form the R branch.

More specifically, each transition is labeled with the following branch designation,

Δ𝑁

Δ𝐽𝐹′ 𝑖,𝐹′′

𝑖 (𝑁′′) where Δ𝑁=O,P,Q,R,S for Δ𝑁 = βˆ’2,βˆ’1,0,1,2 and Δ𝐽=P,Q,R for -1,0,1. Here𝐹𝑖does not refer to the angular momentumFbut denotes the spin orbit and spin rotation components of the ground and excited states. For a 2Ξ£+ β†’2 Ξ  transitions𝐹′

𝑖 = 1 or 2 if the transition is to theΞ© =1/2 or 3/2 spin orbit components respectively and 𝐹′′

𝑖 = 1 or 2 if the transitions comes from the 𝐽 = 𝑁 +1/2 or 𝐽 =π‘βˆ’1/2 spin rotation components respectively [97]. An example of a2Ξ£+ β†’ 2Ξ  transitions with the branch designations is shown in Fig. 2.2.

Dalam dokumen Nickolas Hovanec Pilgram (Halaman 50-53)