• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Perusal of NCU

Appendix A: Future Directions

A.7.3 Example for the Interaction of Structural, Aerodynamic,

9.3 Noncontact Ultrasonic Testing and Analysis of Materials

9.3.5 Perusal of NCU

material. An example of this is shown in Figure 9.59. Here we see the artificially embedded defects in a 4 mm thick panel of CFRP composite.

9.3.4.3 Single Transducer Pulse-Echo NCU

Under ambient conditions, it is very easy to obtain high-quality signals corresponding to the refl ection from the material surface

(Figure 9.60). By monitoring the amplitude and time of fl ight of surface refl ections, materials can be characterized for surface roughness, texture, etc. Figures 9.61 and 9.62 provide examples to this eff ect.

While highly desired, pulse-echo NCU technique to obtain the far side materials ref lection under ambient conditions is at best extremely arduous, if not impossible at the time of this writing. However, if the test is conducted under high air–gas pressure, then it is relatively easy to observe far side ref lections in pulse-echo NCU mode. Figure 9.63 shows an example of multiple thickness ref lections from 10 mm steel at 5 bar air pressure by using a special broadband 3 MHz transducer.

20

15

20 10 0 dB

15.0 8 0

0 9 18 27 36 45 54 63 72 81 90 99 108 117mm125

10

5 dB

40 60 80 100 120mm

FIGURE 9.52 Sintered alumina NCU transmission imaging and analysis of samples varying in density. Left : 65% (2.58 g/cc), middle: 70%

(2.8 g/cc), right: 77% (3.08 g/cc). Transducers: 500 kHz, 12.5 mm active diameter.

FIGURE 9.53 Fired silica refractory NCU imaging. Left : Defect-free. Right: Cracked. Transducers: 500 kHz, 12.5 mm active diameter.

FIGURE 9.54 Concrete NCU (200 mm) imaging showing internal defects. Transducers: Mixed 140 kHz.

0

39

50.0

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 mm

40

40 30 dB

30 dB mm 26 13 0

13 26 39 52 65 78 91 104 117 130 143 mm150

FIGURE 9.55 Oriented strand board (OSB) NCU imaging as a function of moisture content. Left to right: Dry, 30 min soak, 2 h soak, and 11 h soak. Transducers: 200 kHz. Note as the moisture content increases the NCU transmission decreases, which is more evident in the colored images.

FIGURE 9.56 Porous wood core NCU high-resolution imaging. Transducers: Mixed 1 MHz.

0

170 mm

30 20 10 0dB10 144

120 96 72 48 24 0

25 50 75 100 125 150 175mm200

FIGURE 9.57 Cheddar cheese NCU imaging. Left : Reduced fat. Right: Extra sharp. It appears as the fat content in cheese increases so does the ultrasound attenuation. Transducers: 1 MHz, 12.5 mm active area diameter.

FIGURE 9.58 NCU T-R pitch-catch refl ection technique showing far side (bottom surface) refl ection from a material. In this case the bottom surface of 12.5 mm thick aluminum with 1 MHz transducers.

10

mV 0

50

100

150

200

250 50 Receiving 100

transducer Transmitting

transducer Ambient

air

150 200 250

15 20 25 30 35 40

μS 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

Test material

FIGURE 9.59 Same side NCU image of a CFRP panel with embedded defects (left ). As a comparison, the right hand image shows similar image, but acquired by direct transmission mode. Transducers: 500 kHz, 12.5 mm active diameter.

20 228

mm 5 4 3 2 1

198 165 132 99 66 33 0

228 mm

5 4 3 2

1 1

2

3

4

5 198

165 132 99 66 33 0

0 32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352mm380 0 32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352mm380

30 40 50 60 70 80% % 20 40 60 80

FIGURE 9.60 NCU single transducer, pulse-echo technique showing surface refl ection signal from a material. In this case the surface of dense alumina with 3 MHz transducer.

30 0

mV

150

150 300

300 450

450

35 μS

40 45

Transmitting/

receiver

Material surface Ambient

air

FIGURE 9.61 Very high-resolution NCU surface images of familiar objects generated by 3 MHz sharply focused transducer.

FIGURE 9.62 Surface imaging of other materials: Left : Semiconductor polishing pad showing surface roughness. Right: Fine celled polymer foam showing its texture, the details of which are more evident in color image.

and other applications. A partial list of these organizations is as following:

Iowa State University, United States

University of Bordeaux, France

University of Irvine at California, United States

University of Ancona, Italy

Institute of Technical Ceramics, Spain

Yamanashi University, Japan

California State University at Carson, United States

Katholieke Hogeschool (KATHO), Belgium

Katholieke University at Leuven, Belgium

Stanford University at Stanford, United States

University of Windsor, Canada

Fraunhofer Institute at Saarbrucken, Germany

Penn State University at University Park, United States

Queens University at Kingston, Canada

Warwick University,

• United Kindom

National Physical Laboratory,

• United Kindom

Los Alamos National Laboratory, United States

Gas Technology Institute, United States

Southwest Research Institute, United States

Nagoya Institute of Technology, Japan

Johns Hopkins University, United States

It is our hope that the materials and biomedical industries, research institutes, and government agencies take a serious look at the status of modern ultrasound, particularly NCU transducers and associated testing know-how and its necessity in solving important process and quality-related material testing needs.

Th e advantages of NCU are too numerous and far beyond con- ventional ultrasound to be ignored. We believe sooner it is applied for specifi c tasks along with increment in practical edu- cational foundation, better it would be for our complex socio- technical world.

References

1. Brunk, J.A., Ultrasonic nondestructive testing and materi- als characterization, this volume.

2. Fox, J.D., Khuri-Yakub, B.T., and Kino, G.S., High fre- quency wave measurements in air, 1983 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 581–592, 1983.

3. Bhardwaj, M.C., Modern ultrasonic transducers, Comm- ercial Catalog, Ultran Laboratories, Inc., 1986.

4. Yano, T., Tone, M., and Fukumoto, A., Range fi nding and surface characterization using high frequency air trans- ducer, IEEE Trans. UFFC, 34(2), 222–236, 1987.

5. Haller, M.I. and Khuri-Yakub, B.T., 1–3 composites for ultra- sonic air transducer, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, pp.

937–939, 1992.

6. Bhardwaj, M.C., Ultrasonic transducer for high transduc- tion in gases and method for non-contact transmission in solids, U.S. Patent 6,311,573, November 6, 2001. Japan Patent 3225050, August 24, 2001. European Cooperation Treaty, Pending. WIPO, PCT/US98/12537.

7. Bhardwaj, M.C., Non-destructive evaluation: introduction of non-contact ultrasound, Encyclopedia of Smart Materials, M. Schwartz ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 690–714, 2002.

8. Bhardwaj, M.C., Gas matrix piezoelectric composite, U.S.

and international patents pending.

FIGURE 9.63 NCU single transducer, pulse-echo at high gas pressure. In this case, far side (bottom surface) refl ections from a 10 mm steel plate at 5 bar air pressure by using a broadband 3 MHz NCU transducer. (Reproduced from Gas Technology Institute, U.S.A.)

Transmitter/

receiver

High air/gas pressure

Test material

Tek Run

T

1

Ch1

T Trig’d

100mV M 4.00μs A Ext 397mV