Fig. 17.— Prehnite.
a side view of crystal a g g re-
gate similar to
that shown in FIGURE16.
barely perceptibly.
The main
portion of the crystalshows
inter- ference colors mostly insubnormal
blueand
liverbrown
with a very little first-order yellow. All portions of the pattern yield a similar interference figure in convergent hght,biaxial positive,
2V
approximately 10°,acute bisec- trix perpendicular to the table, axial plane parallel with the long direction,r>v
strong. These inter- ference figures aresomewhat hazy and
confused.This is
most
probably like the preceding, but the portions of scalesmaking up
the "hourglass" are so exceedingly thin that they do not greatly obscure the optical properties of themain
crystal, eventhough
the latter isitself very thin.The
explanation implyingan
overgrowthof scales isnotpurelyhypothetical,especially sinceany
of the crystalswhen
care- fullyexamined
un- der a lens doshow
such scales, indeed usually a
group
of them, curving
upward.
This issimilar to the tendency of the crys- tals ofprehniteto
form
sheaves
and
the flat crystals, with a thin overlyingscale, grade into bundles ofcurved, scalelike crystals.Two
such aggregates are illustrated in figures 16and
17; theform shown
in figure 17 is verymuch more common
thanany
otherand
has been referred to as "dumb-bell" prehnite.Drusy
surfaces are oftenmade up
of this type grading into stillmore
globular formsand
the crystals of the preceding descriptions rest,inmost
cases,upon
such shapes.In
an
east-west shear zone exposed just south of the centerof thequarry in August, 1923, there were foundsome
specimens ofprehnitemade up
of pale yellowish- greencolumnar
bladed crustsup
to 1 cm. thick lining anopen
space.The
surfaces ofthesecrusts aresmooth
botryoidalbutaremade up
ofthe terminationsofinnum-
erable closepacked crystals.Attached
to thiscrust as thoughlater are single. well-definecT crystals ofprehniteup
to 3mm.
broad,which
aremore abundant and more
perfectwhere
the spacebetween
thecrustsisnarrow. Thesehave
the crystalhabitshown m
figure 11,showing
the prismm
(110), the front pinacoid 94110—24 5Fig. 18.—Prehnite showing opticalstruc- ture OF CRYSTALS OF TTPE2.
c
mc:
Fig. 19.—prj-jj.
nite showing optical struc- ture ofcrys- tals of type3
66 PROCEEDINGS
OFTHE
NATIONAL,MUSEUM.
VOL.66.a (100),
and
the base c (001).They
are thick tabular, parallel to the base,and
areelongatedon
the haxis,as contrasted with the fore- going,which
are elongated on thed
axis.The
pinacoida
(100) isetched dull but the prismatic facesgive
good
reflections, indicating the anglem
(110)a m'"
(iTO)=
80° 39'.The
basal pinacoid is striated parallel to the h axis as indicated in the drawing.Between
crossed nicols these crystals alsoshow
optical anomalies, the patternbeingasshown
infigure 18.These
are inmany
respects like the ones previously described but they aresomewhat more com-
plicated.
When
the sectors cand
c' are at the position of extinc- tion a, a'and
hand
l' are similarly illuminatedand show
a uni-form
first-orderyellow interference color.These
sectors givesym-
metrical extinction of 8°on
either side of the dividing line.The
extinction is not uniform, however, but sweeps as a barfrom
the innertip of the sector outward.At
45° position all sectorsaresimilarly il-luminated, a
and
a', hand
b'shadefrom
a broad central yellow fielddownward
through blackto blueatthe edge, cand
c' shade similarly
from
a yellow central field through blackand
thenhave
a nar-row
outer border of higher colors.No segment
issimple.Even
thecand
c'sec- torswhich have homogeneous
parallel extinction give, in convergent fight,an
interferencefigure likethatobtainedfrom
twomuscovite plates superposed at right anglestoeach other,while theend
sectors give stillmore
complicated interference figurs8, suggesting 3mica
plates at 60° to each other.The
acute bisectrix of allof the intergrown crystal units is perpendicular to the table.The
simplest explanationwhich
will fit these several peculiarities is that the crystals aremade
up, as before, ofan
underlyinghomo-
geneouscrystalwhich, however,isnotofuniform thickness but thick- ens in all directionsfrom
the center. Thinningwould
produce thesame
resultbutthe thickening is actually noticeablewhen
the prehn-ite crystals are examined. This simple tapering crystal is overlain
by
layers having the arrangement of the sector pattern, figure 18.In c
and
c' there is one overlying plate with optical directions at right angles to those of thefundamental
crystal beneath. In a—
a'and
b—
h' three layers, thetwo upper
being oriented at 90° to each otherand
45° to the underlying crystal./\\^.
Fig. 20.
—
Datoliteoffirstgenera tion showing acutehabit.
.ABT.2.
PETROLOGY AT
GOOSECREEK SHANNON. 67
A
small vein in thesouthend
of thequarryvariedfrom
1 to 2 cm.wide
and was
filled with granular fine green porous prehnite.The
cavities are lined with brilliantlittle crystals
which
are elongatedon
the a axisand have
the crystal habitshown
in the orthographicand
clinographic drawings of figure 12.The
prism facesgave good measurements
indicating the prismatic angle to be 80° 59'.The
front pinacoid also gave
good
signals but the side pinacoid (010) is etched dull.The
base is horizontally striated as indicated.Between
crossed nicols these crystals gave the patternshown
in figure 19.Although
at first glance appearingmore
complicated, this is found to be only a variation of the structureshown
in figure 18,and
is capable of thesame
interpretation.These
interpretations are applicable only to the prehnites here describedand
thismineral seems to adopt
numerous
other con- fused intergrowths producing other effects asshown by
the discussions of Mallardand Emerson
abstracted in Dana's Mineralogy.The
greenprehnitefrom
oneof the sheeted veinswas
purified for analysisand
analyzed in theMuseum
laboratory yielding theresults given incolumn
1 below. Incolumn
2 are quoted the results obtainedon
analysis of prehnitefrom Admiralty
Inlet,and
incolumn
3 the theoretical composition.Fig.21.
—
Datolite of second generation showing moee prismatic habit by elonga- TIONON THEaAXIS
Analyses of prehnite.
68 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM.
vol. GG,The
comparison of theabove
analyses indicates that the prehnit©from
thislocahty is ordinary in composition except in beingrather higherthan
usualin ferric-iron,alittlehigher,in fact,than
theprehn-ite
from Admiralty
Inlet describedby
Johnston^^ towhich
the vari- etalname
" ferriprehnite" has been applied.That
the iron is pres- ent as ferric oxide replacingalumina
rather than as ferrous oxidere- placing limewas
definitely determined.The
optical properties of the analyzedpowder
werefound
verydifficult of determination.
The
confusedopticalstructures observed in the relatively simple crystals describedabove
are greatly multi- plied in the massivematerial.Although composed
of pure prehnite
the
sample gave
variable refractive indicesand
is clearlysomewhat zoned
withsome
variable constituent, probablyferricoxide, affecting the indices of the different zones.The
average indices,which
are the best that could be obtained, are«=
1.635, i8=1.640,7=
1.655.The
mineral is biaxial positiveand
the value for2V
variesfrom
nearly 0° to about 30° ormore
withan
average of 15°.The
dis- persion,r<v,
variesfrom weak
to extreme,most
intense in the grains of smallest axial angle. Confused interference figures giveextreme
crossed dispersion.Paragenetically the prehniteisearly, definitely earlierthanstilbite^
laumontite, apophyllite,
and
calcite. Inmost
specimens it precedes datolite but in other specimenscrusts of datolite crystals are over- lainby
clearly later crusts of"dumb-bell"
prehnite.Evidence
definitelyproving
whether
thismeans two
generations of prehnite ortwo
of datolitewas
notfound.From
the existence oftwo
types of crystallization of the datolite, however, it isassumed
that there aretwo
generations ofthe datoliteand
only one of prehnite.Datolite occurs in a large
number
of specimensand
has beenassumed
to be oftwo
generations because inmany
specimens it isunderlain
by
a thick crust of prehnite while in others the datolite crystalsaremore
orless coveredby
alatercrust ofprehnite, although bothgenerationsofdatolitewere nowhere found
inthesame
specimen.The
first datolitefound
in the quarry, in October, 1922,was
only yellowish transparent granular materialon
diabase, not associated withany
other mineral,although laumontite occurredon
theopposite sides of thesame
specimens. Thiswas
identifiedby
its character- istic optical propertieswhich
are: Biaxial, negative (—
),2V
large,r>v
weak,|8=1.653±.
002.•'R.A. A. Johnston,CanadaOeol.Surv.VictoriaMemorialMuseum,Bulletin1,p. 95,1913
ART.2.
PETROLOGY AT
GOOSECREEK SHANNON. 69 The
second lot of datolite specimenswas
obtainedfrom
a north- south fissure in April, 1923,and
containednumerous
crystals of datolite astheearliestmineraloftheveins,coveredby
later prehnite, laumontite,stilbite,and
calcite. Theseare greenishtransparentcrys- tals of acute pyramidal habit as illustrated in figure 20.They
average 3mm.
in lengthand
greatly resemblethecrystals of datolitefrom Bergen
Hill. Entirely similar crystals linenarrow
veins later solidlyfilled with white apophyllite.The
crystals are fairly simple in combination with the forms a (100),m
(110),n
(111),and
x (102)prominent
with smallerfaces of M (Tl4), e (Tl2),m^
(Oil),and
g (012).The
crystals of this typewhich
weremeasured
gave the following angles:
Measurementsof datolite crystals, Figure 20.
Form.