1. Perlu ditingkatkan lagi kepada masyarakat tentang Infeksi Soil Transmitted Helminthes dengan Perilaku Hidup Bersih dan Sehat (PHBS).
2. Perlu penelitian lebih lanjut dengan melakukan pemeriksaan telur cacing menggunakan metode yang lain.
3. Diharapkan hasil penelitian ini bisa menambah referensi di perpustakaan STIKes Perintis Padang.
4. Diharapkan untuk penelitian selanjutnya perlu dilakukan identifikasi lokasi sumber sampel lebih lanjut saat penelitian.
43
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Aulia Maulida. 2016. Perbedaan Kualitas Sediaan Telur Cacing gelang (Ascaris lumbricoides, Linnaeus 1758) menggunakan pewarnaan eosin dan pewarnaan giemsa Skripsi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang.
Anita Oktari, Ahmad Mu’tamir. 2017. Optimasi Air Perasan Buah Merah (pandanus Sp.) pada pemeriksaan Telur cacing. Bandung
CDC. 2012. Parasites-Trichuris trichura (Diakses 8 januari 2019). Tersedia Dari : http://Www.Cdc.Gov/Parasites/tricriasis/Biology.Html.
CDC. 2013. Parasites-Ascariasis (Diakses 8 januari 2019). Tersedia Dari : Http://Www.Cdc.Gov/Parasites/Ascariasis/Biology.Html.
Depkes. 2012. Diagnosa Infeksi Cacing Tambang. Media Litbang Kesehatan.16 (4)
Depkes RI. 2016. Perilaku Hidup Bersih dan Sehat.
Ghassani, Atika. Hubungan Infeksi Cacing Usus STH Dengan Kebiasaan Bermain Tanah Pada SDN 09 Pagi Paseban Tahun 2011, Skripsi, FKUI, Jakarta.
2016. Dari http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20355046-S- Atika%20Ghassani.pdf
Gracia LS, Bruckner DA. 2014. Diagnostik Parasitologi Kedokteran. Jakarta : EGC, 138-54.
http://marcara.mahasiswa.unimus.ac.id/2017/05/02/pemeriksaan-parasitologi- universitas-muhammadiyah-semarang/. (0nline) diakses 23 Februari 2019 Himawan Wirahaditama, 2014. ” Tentang Perilaku Hidup Bersih Dan Sehat
(PHBS) Masyarakat Desa dalam Meningkatkan Kesehatan Masyarakat ”:
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan (Stikes), Surya Mitra husada.
Idehem, B., Pusarawati, S., 2012. Helmintologi Kedokteran. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 10-13.
Inayati, N, Tantotos Erlin Yustin , Fihirudin,. 2015. Infeksi Cacing Soil Transmitted Helminths pada penjual tanaman hias di Bintaro Kota Mataram.
Tesis. Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Mataram
Irianto K. 2013. Parasitologi Medis (Medical Parasitology). Dalam: Ascaris Lumbricoides (Cacing Perut). Bandung: Alfabeta CV. Hlm. 232-37.
Kementrian Kesehatan RI. 2017. Data dan Informasi Profil Kesehatan Indonesia.
Pusat Data Dan Informasi Kementrian Kesehatan : Jakarta.
44
Margono S, Tatang, RS, Sansongko A, Irawan HSJY, Subahar R. 2017. Result of a Control Program on Soil Transmitted Helminthiases in Primary Schools of East Jakarta Indonesia. Kuala Lumpur : Second International Congress of Parasitology and Tropical Medicine.
Margono. 2014. Gambaran Pengetahuan Ibu Tentang Infeksi Cacing Pada Anak 5-10 Tahun Di Desa Tanjung Ibus Kec. Secanggang Kab. Langkat Tahun 2014. Jurnal Ilmiah Malsitek (Online), Volume 2, No 4
Nursyahid M. A. 2014. Pengaruh Ekstrak Putri Malu (Mimosa Pudica, Linn.) Terhadap Mortalitas Ascaris Suum, Goeze In Vitro. Skripsi. Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta
Onggowaluyo JS. 2016. Parasitologi Medik I (Helmintologi). EGC : Jakarta.
O’lorcain P, Holland CV. 2012. The public health importance of Ascaris lumbricoides. J Parasitology, (121): S51-S71.
Prianto, J. L. A., Tjahaya, P.U., Darwanto. 2013. Atlas parasitologi kedokteran.
Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, pp: 3-17.
Purnamasari, Dewi. 2017. Hubungan Higiene Dan Sanitasi Terhadap InfeksiTelur Cacing Kremi (Enteribius vermicularis) Pada Murid Kelas 1 SD Islam Taqwiyatul Wathon Kelurahan Tanjung Mas Kecamatan Semarang Utara.
Karya Tulis Ilmiah. Poltekkes Semarang.
Risma. 2017. Hubungan status sosial ekonomi dengan kejadiankecacingan pada siswa sekolah dasar di makasar sulawesi selatan. Sripsi Universitas Hasanuddin Makasar
Safar R. 2013. Parasitologi kedokteran: prozoologi, entomologi dan helmintologi.
Edisi 1. Cv. Yrama Widya. Bandung.
Siregar C. 2015. Pengaruh Infeksi Cacing Usus yang Ditularkan melalui Tanah pada Pertumbuhan Fisik Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar. Sari Pediatri. 8(2): 112- 117.
Soedarmo, S.S.P., Garna, H., Hadinegoro, S.R.S., Satari, H.I. 2016. Buku Ajar Infeksi & Pediatri Trofis, Edisi Kedua, IDAI, Jakarta.
Tony pratama. 2013. Pengaruh penambahan edible coat kitosan sebagai anti jamur pada tepung kentang. Sripsi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
WHO. 2014. (201 I) Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil- transmitted helminthiasis. (www.who.int/entity/wormcontrol/documentsj oint_statements/en/ppc_uniceffinalreport).
World Health Organization (WHO). Worm Disease : Guidelines For Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention And Control. 2012 http://www.who.int/research
diakses pada 19 Desember 2014
World Health Organization. 2015. Intestinal worms, soil transmitted helminths.
Dalam http://www.who.int/intestinal_worms/en.Diakses pada tanggal 20 Sepetember 2014.
World Health Organization. 2017. Preventive Chemotherapy to control Soil Transmitted Helminth Infection in at Risk Group.tersedia dalam:
http://www.who.int/gho/neglected_diseases/soil_transmitted_helminthiases/
en/ .Diakses tanggal 2 Februari 2018.
Yuli Andriansyah, Desi Natalia Rahmantari. 2013. “ Penyuluhan dan Praktik PHBS (Perilaku Hidup Bersih Sehat) dalam Mewujudkan Masyarakat Desa
Peduli Sehat “ : Universitas Islam Indonesi
46 Lampiran 1. Surat Izin Penelitia
47 Lampiran 2. Surat Balasan Penelitian
48 Lampiran 3. Kuesioner Penelitian
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
Hubungan Infeksi Soil Transmitted Helminthes dengan Perilaku Hidup Bersih dan Sehat (PHBS) pada Siswa MI NO.02/E7 Maliki Air, Kecamatan Hamparan
Rawang, Kota Sungai Penuh Nama :
Kelas : Umur :
NO. PERTANYAAN KUESIONER YA TIDAK
1. Sering bermain dengan tanah
2. Selalu mencuci tangan setelah bermain tanah
3. Selalu mencuci tangan sebelum makan 4. Mencuci tangan dengan air mengalir 5. Kebiasaan mencuci tangan setelah BAB 6. Selalu memotong kuku 2x seminggu 7. Kebiasaan menggigit kuku
8. Kebiasaan menghisap jari
9. Kebiasaan memakai alas kaki ketika diluar rumah
10. Sering bermain di sungai/parit/selokan 11. Memiliki jamban dirumah
12. Kebiasaan BAB di sungai 13. Mengetahui tentang kecacingan
JUMLAH
49
Lampiran 4. Hasil Pemeriksaan 32 siswa MI NO.02/E7 Maliki Air di Kecamatan Hamparan Rawang, Kota Sungai Penuh.
NO Kode Sampel Ascaris lumbricoides
Trichuris trichiura
Ancylostoma duodenale dan
Necator americanus
1. MDD - - -
2 KNA - - -
3. SNA - - -
4. MS - - -
5. FMS - - +
6. LRE + - -
7. HA - - -
8. MA - - -
9. VK - - -
10. AR - - -
11. SAA - - -
12. MF - - -
13. SAE - - -
14. NS - - -
15. AKS + - -
16. MR - - -
17. DS - - +
18. RAK - - -
19. MA - - -
20. LZN - + -
21. NAD - - -
22. WFP - - -
23. RMA - - -
24. ADP - + -
25. FR - - -
26. CP - - +
27. MRA - - -
28. DIP - - -
29. PW - - -
30. NR - - -
31. TKN - - -
32. FWA + - -
50 Lampiran 5. Dokumentasi Penelitian
EOSIN 2% SLIDE SAMPEL
Telur Cacing Ascaris lumbricoides
Telur Cacing Trichuris trichiura
51
Telur Cacing Ancylostoma duodenale
52 Lampiran 6. Hasil Statistik Kecacingan Ascaris lumbricoides
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.505a 1 .220
Continuity Correctionb .328 1 .567
Likelihood Ratio 2.387 1 .122
Fisher's Exact Test .534 .310
Linear-by-Linear
Association 1.458 1 .227
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,94.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Trichuris trichiura
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .970a 1 .325
Continuity Correctionb .039 1 .844
Likelihood Ratio 1.559 1 .212
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .466
Linear-by-Linear
Association .939 1 .332
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,63.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
53 Ancylostoma duodenale
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.505a 1 .220
Continuity Correctionb .328 1 .567
Likelihood Ratio 2.387 1 .122
Fisher's Exact Test .534 .310
Linear-by-Linear
Association 1.458 1 .227
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,94.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
54 Lampiran 7. Hasil SPSS Kuesioner Pertanyaan 1
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan1 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan1 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan1
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 10 14 24
Positif 0 8 8
Total 10 22 32
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.848a 1 .028
Continuity Correctionb 3.103 1 .078
Likelihood Ratio 7.148 1 .008
Fisher's Exact Test .035 .030
Linear-by-Linear
Association 4.697 1 .030
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pertanyaan 2
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan2 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
55 Kecacingan * Pertanyaan2 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan2
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 13 11 24
Positif 5 3 8
Total 18 14 32
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .169a 1 .681
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .171 1 .679
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .504
Linear-by-Linear
Association .164 1 .685
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pertanyaan 3
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan3 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan3 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan3
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 22 2 24
Positif 7 1 8
Total 29 3 32
56 Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .123a 1 .726
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .116 1 .734
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .592
Linear-by-Linear
Association .119 1 .730
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,75.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pertanyaan 4
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan4 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan4 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan4
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 6 18 24
Positif 5 3 8
Total 11 21 32
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.740a 1 .053
Continuity Correctionb 2.263 1 .133
Likelihood Ratio 3.606 1 .058
Fisher's Exact Test .088 .068
Linear-by-Linear
Association 3.623 1 .057
57
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,75.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pertanyaan 5
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan5 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan5 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan5
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 12 12 24
Positif 7 1 8
Total 19 13 32
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.498a 1 .061
Continuity Correctionb 2.116 1 .146
Likelihood Ratio 3.930 1 .047
Fisher's Exact Test .101 .069
Linear-by-Linear
Association 3.389 1 .066
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,25.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
58 Pertanyaan 6
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan6 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan6 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan6
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 20 4 24
Positif 5 3 8
Total 25 7 32
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.524a 1 .217
Continuity Correctionb .549 1 .459
Likelihood Ratio 1.409 1 .235
Fisher's Exact Test .327 .224
Linear-by-Linear
Association 1.476 1 .224
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,75.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pertanyaan 7
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan7 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
59 Kecacingan * Pertanyaan7 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan7
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 7 17 24
Positif 2 6 8
Total 9 23 32
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .052a 1 .820
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .052 1 .819
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .602
Linear-by-Linear
Association .050 1 .823
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,25.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pertanyaan 8
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan8 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan8 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan8
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 4 20 24
Positif 0 8 8
Total 4 28 32
60 Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.524a 1 .217
Continuity Correctionb .381 1 .537
Likelihood Ratio 2.486 1 .115
Fisher's Exact Test .550 .295
Linear-by-Linear
Association 1.476 1 .224
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pertanyaan 9
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan9 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan9 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan9
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 19 5 24
Positif 7 1 8
Total 26 6 32
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .274a 1 .601
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .293 1 .588
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .524
Linear-by-Linear
Association .265 1 .607
61
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pertanyaan 10
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan *
Pertanyaan10 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan10 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan10
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 12 12 24
Positif 3 5 8
Total 15 17 32
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .376a 1 .539
Continuity Correctionb .042 1 .838
Likelihood Ratio .380 1 .537
Fisher's Exact Test .691 .421
Linear-by-Linear
Association .365 1 .546
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,75.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
62 Pertanyaan 11
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan *
Pertanyaan11 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan11 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan11
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 20 4 24
Positif 7 1 8
Total 27 5 32
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .079a 1 .779
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .082 1 .774
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .633
Linear-by-Linear
Association .077 1 .782
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,25.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pertanyaan 12
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan *
Pertanyaan12 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
63 Kecacingan * Pertanyaan12 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan12
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 3 21 24
Positif 3 5 8
Total 6 26 32
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.462a 1 .117
Continuity Correctionb 1.094 1 .296
Likelihood Ratio 2.215 1 .137
Fisher's Exact Test .148 .148
Linear-by-Linear
Association 2.385 1 .123
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pertanyaan 13
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kecacingan *
Pertanyaan13 32 100.0% 0 .0% 32 100.0%
Kecacingan * Pertanyaan13 Crosstabulation Count
Pertanyaan13
Total
Ya Tidak
Kecacingan Negatif 13 11 24
Positif 2 6 8
Total 15 17 32
64 Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.050a 1 .152
Continuity Correctionb 1.046 1 .306
Likelihood Ratio 2.135 1 .144
Fisher's Exact Test .229 .154
Linear-by-Linear
Association 1.986 1 .159
N of Valid Casesb 32
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,75.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table