• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Beberapa saran yang dapat penulis berikan untuk penelitian selanjutnya yaitu:

1. Penelitian ini dapat menjadi tambahan referensi tentang perbankan syariah untuk peneliti maupun penelitian selanjutnya dengan menggunakan variabel Non Performing Financing (NPF) dan variabel lainnya yang diduga mempengaruhi profitabilitas.

2. Penelitian selanjutnya diharapkan menggunakan objek penelitian yang lebih luas dan menambahkan keunikan dalam penelitian serta periode penelitian yang terbaru dan lebih lama.

3. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan informasi tentang manajemen keuangan khususnya dibidang perbankan syariah untuk membuktikan mengenai perubahan profitabilitas melalui Capital Adequacy Ratio, Dana Pihak Ketiga, Financing Deposit Ratio, dan tingkat efesiensi (BOPO).

4. Untuk perbankan syariah, agar meningkatkan kinerja nya seperti memberikan pelayanan terbaik bagi nasabah dengan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam memilih nasabah.

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Anggreni, M. R., & Suardhika, I. M. S. (2014). Pengaruh Dana Pihak Ketiga, Kecukupan Modal, Resiko Kredit Dan Suku Bunga Kredit Pada Profitabilitas, 1, 27–37.

Asrina, P. (2015). Analisis Pengaruh PDB, Nilai Tukar Rupiah, Non Performing Financing (NPF), BOPO Terhadap Profitabilitas (ROA) Perbankan syariah di Indonesia Periode 2008-2013, 2(1), 1–13.

Bank Indonesia. (2005a). Kelembagaan Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/seri-kebanksentralan/Documents/

Bank Indonesia. (2005b). Pengertian Gambaran Umum Perbankan Syariah. Retrieved from https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/seri-kebanksentralan/Documents/

Dendawijaya. (2009). Manajemen Perbankan. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia

Faizan Iftikhar, S. (2016). The impact of financial reforms on bank’s interest margins:

a panel data analysis. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 8(1), 120–138.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-05-2015-0028

Ghozali, I. (2009). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS (4th ed.).

Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariative dengan Program IBM SPSS 19.

Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gujarati, D. N. (2006). Dasar - Dasar Ekonometrika Jilid 2. Erlangga.

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2010). Essentials Of Econometrics (4th ed.).

Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education.

Hakiim, N., & Rafsanjani, H. (2016). Pengaruh Internal Capital Adequency Ratio ( CAR ) , Financing To Deposit Ratio ( FDR ) , dan Biaya Operasional Per Pendapatan Operasional ( BOPO ) dalam Peningkatan Profitabilitas Industri Bank Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 14(1), 161–168.

kasmir. (2012). Menejemen Perbankan. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers (Raja Grafindo Grup) Kasmir. (2014). Bank Dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo

Persada.

Kurniasari, C., & Ghozali, I. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Rasio Camel Dalam Memprediksi Financial Distress Perbankan Indonesia. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 2(4), 1–10.

Mahmudah, N., & Harjanti, R. S. (2016). Analisis Capital Adequacy Ratio , Financing To Deposit Ratio , Non Performing Financing , Dan Dana Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Tingkat Profitabilitas Bank Umum Syariah, 1(28), 134–143.

Martono. (2010). Bank & Lembaga Keuangan Lain.

Masood, O., & Ashraf, M. (2012). Bank‐ specific and macroeconomic profitability determinants of Islamic banks. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 4(2/3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554171211252565

Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2016). The determinants of bank profitability: empirical evidence from European banking sector. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting (Vol. 14). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2015-0060

Mokoagow, S. W., & Fuady, M. (2015). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Profitabilitas Bank Syariah di Indonesia, 6(1), 33–62.

OJK. (2015). PERATURAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN NOMOR 64

/POJK.03/2016. Retrieved from

http://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/regulasi/lembaga-keuangan-mikro/peraturan- ojk/Documents/SAL-POJK PERIZINAN FINAL F.pdf

Olalekan, A., & Adeyinka, S. (2013). Capital Adequacy and Banks’ Profitability: an Empirical Evidence From Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(10), 87–93.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). Struktur Perbankan Syariah. Retrieved from http://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/tentang-syariah/Pages/PBS-dan-

Kelembagaan.aspx

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (n.d.). Undang - Undang Republik Indonesia No.21 tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah.

Riyadi, S., & Yulianto, A. (2014). Pengaruh pembiayaan bagi hasil, pembiayaan jual beli, financing deposit to ratio (FDR) dan non performing financing (NPF) terhadap profitabilitas bank umum syariah di Indonesia, 3(4), 466–474.

https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v3i4.4208

Sihombing, N. H., & Yahya, M. R. (2016). PENDAPATAN OPERASIONAL ( BOPO ), DANA PIHAK KETIGA, 1(2), 127–137.

Simatupang, A., & Franzlay, D. (2016). Capital Adequacy Ratio(CAR), Non Performing Financing (NPF), Efisiensi Operasional (BOPO) dan Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia, 4(2), 466–485.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R & D (1st ed.).

Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukma, Y. L. (2013). Pengaruh Dana Pihak Ketiga, Kecukupan Modal Dan Risiko Kredit Terhadap Profitabilitas (Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di BEI),

1(2). Retrieved from

http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/students/index.php/akt/article/view/630

Suryani. (2011). Analisis pengaruh financing to deposit ratio (FDR) terhadap profitabilitas perbankan syariah di Indonesia, 19(1), 47–74.

Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah. (2008). Undang- Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 1998. (1998). UNDANG- UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 10 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG

PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1992 TENTANG PERBANKAN.

Wibowo, E. S., & Syaichu, M. (2013). Analisis pengaruh suku bunga, inflasi, car, bopo, npf terhadap profitabilitas bank syariah, 2(2), 1–10.

Widarjono, A. (2009). Ekonometrika Pengantar dan Aplikasinya. EKONISIA.

Winarno, W. W. (2011). Analisis Ekonometrika dan Statistika dengan Eviews (Ketiga).

Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Zulfiah, F., & Susilowibowo, J. (2014). Pengaruh Inflasi, BI Rate, Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Non Performing Finance (NPF), Biaya Operasional dan Pendapatan Operasional (BOPO) Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank Umum Syariah Periode 2008- 2012, 2(3), 759–770.

Lampiran Rasio ROA UJI CHOW

UJI HOUSMEN

UJI NORMALITAS

UJI MULTIKOL

Redundant Fixed Effects Tes ts Equation: Untitled

Tes t cros s -s ection fixed effects

Effects Tes t Statis tic d.f. Prob.

Cros s -s ection F 2.209920 (7,148) 0.0365

Cros s -s ection Chi-s quare 15.906205 7 0.0260 Cros s -s ection fixed effects tes t equation:

Dependent Variable: ROA Method: Panel Leas t Squares Date: 08/17/18 Tim e: 09:00 Sam ple: 2013Q1 2017Q4 Periods included: 20 Cros s -s ections included: 8

Total panel (balanced) obs ervations : 160

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statis tic Prob.

CAR 0.053323 0.078385 0.680276 0.4973

DPK -4.78E-10 4.61E-10 -1.038320 0.3007

FDR -0.056480 0.040466 -1.395716 0.1648

BOPO -0.147344 0.034246 -4.302487 0.0000

C 0.205552 0.045371 4.530498 0.0000

R-s quared 0.133292 Mean dependent var 0.013798 Adjus ted R-s quared 0.110925 S.D. dependent var 0.108769 S.E. of regres s ion 0.102559 Akaike info criterion -1.685999 Sum s quared res id 1.630355 Schwarz criterion -1.589900 Log likelihood 139.8799 Hannan-Quinn criter. -1.646977 F-s tatis tic 5.959403 Durbin-Wats on s tat 1.238085 Prob(F-s tatis tic) 0.000174

Correlated Random Effects - Haus m an Tes t Equation: Untitled

Tes t cros s -s ection random effects

Tes t Sum m ary Chi-Sq. Statis tic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob.

Cros s -s ection random 14.769611 4 0.0052

** WARNING: es tim ated cros s -s ection random effects variance is zero.

Cros s -s ection random effects tes t com paris ons :

Variable Fixed Random Var(Diff.) Prob.

CAR 0.187246 0.053323 0.030028 0.4396

DPK -0.000000 -0.000000 0.000000 0.9037

FDR -0.045931 -0.056480 0.000863 0.7196

BOPO -0.161839 -0.147344 0.000771 0.6016

Cros s -s ection random effects tes t equation:

Dependent Variable: ROA Method: Panel Leas t Squares Date: 08/17/18 Tim e: 09:04 Sam ple: 2013Q1 2017Q4 Periods included: 20 Cros s -s ections included: 8

Total panel (balanced) obs ervations : 160

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statis tic Prob.

C 0.173254 0.101159 1.712681 0.0889

CAR 0.187246 0.189352 0.988880 0.3243

DPK -2.02E-10 2.33E-09 -0.086823 0.9309

FDR -0.045931 0.049153 -0.934451 0.3516

BOPO -0.161839 0.043390 -3.729887 0.0003

Effects Specification Cros s -s ection fixed (dum m y variables )

R-s quared 0.215310 Mean dependent var 0.013798 Adjus ted R-s quared 0.156989 S.D. dependent var 0.108769 S.E. of regres s ion 0.099867 Akaike info criterion -1.697913 Sum s quared res id 1.476071 Schwarz criterion -1.467275 Log likelihood 147.8330 Hannan-Quinn criter. -1.604259 F-s tatis tic 3.691780 Durbin-Wats on s tat 1.367652 Prob(F-s tatis tic) 0.000118

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

-0.006 -0.004 -0.002 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008

Series: Standardized Residuals Sample 2013Q1 2017Q4 Observations 122 Mean -1.99e-19 Median -0.000140 Maximum 0.007906 Minimum -0.005949 Std. Dev. 0.002577 Skewness 0.330894 Kurtosis 3.094941 Jarque-Bera 2.272140 Probability 0.321078

CAR DPK FDR BOPO

CAR 1.000000 -0.346774 0.635779 -0.186217 DPK -0.346774 1.000000 -0.375200 -0.031794 FDR 0.635779 -0.375200 1.000000 -0.117129 BOPO -0.186217 -0.031794 -0.117129 1.000000

UJI HETERO PARK inres2=log(resid^2)

UJI AUTOKOL

DU 1,7727 – 2,2273

Dependent Variable: INRES2 Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 08/18/18 Time: 01:15 Sample: 2013Q1 2017Q4 Periods included: 20 Cross-sections included: 8

Total panel (unbalanced) observations: 122

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

CAR -4.392139 4.988969 -0.880370 0.3806

DPK -4.89E-08 6.01E-08 -0.813181 0.4179

FDR 2.706226 2.203235 1.228297 0.2220

BOPO -0.745497 1.671743 -0.445940 0.6565

C -25.05235 3.380768 -7.410255 0.0000

Effects Specification Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

R-squared 0.399106 Mean dependent var -24.83772 Adjusted R-squared 0.339016 S.D. dependent var 2.580912 S.E. of regression 2.098306 Akaike info criterion 4.413318 Sum squared resid 484.3175 Schwarz criterion 4.689123 Log likelihood -257.2124 Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.525342 F-statistic 6.641858 Durbin-Watson stat 1.819587 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Dependent Variable: ROA

Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH) Date: 08/18/18 Time: 01:21

Sample: 1 122

Included observations: 122

Convergence achieved after 26 iterations

Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

CAR 0.036205 0.002890 12.52586 0.0000

DPK -1.53E-10 3.40E-11 -4.487208 0.0000

FDR -0.015807 0.001161 -13.61206 0.0000

BOPO -0.128363 0.001815 -70.72318 0.0000

C 0.137363 0.002859 48.04806 0.0000

AR(1) 0.574562 0.097592 5.887418 0.0000

AR(2) 0.333967 0.096126 3.474256 0.0007

SIGMASQ 6.68E-06 7.12E-07 9.369820 0.0000

R-squared 0.976537 Mean dependent var 0.006742 Adjusted R-squared 0.975096 S.D. dependent var 0.016937 S.E. of regression 0.002673 Akaike info criterion -8.934916 Sum squared resid 0.000814 Schwarz criterion -8.751045 Log likelihood 553.0299 Hannan-Quinn criter. -8.860233 F-statistic 677.8109 Durbin-Watson stat 1.998339 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Inverted AR Roots .93 -.36

Uji t-f koefisien determinasi

Statistic deskriptif Dependent Variable: ROA Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 08/18/18 Time: 01:22 Sample: 2013Q1 2017Q4 Periods included: 20 Cross-sections included: 8

Total panel (unbalanced) observations: 122

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

CAR 0.021564 0.006427 3.354963 0.0011

DPK -6.91E-11 7.75E-11 -0.892401 0.3741

FDR -0.014085 0.002838 -4.962076 0.0000

BOPO -0.128410 0.002154 -59.62172 0.0000

C 0.136924 0.004356 31.43692 0.0000

Effects Specification Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

R-squared 0.976841 Mean dependent var 0.006742

Adjusted R-squared 0.974525 S.D. dependent var 0.016937 S.E. of regression 0.002703 Akaike info criterion -8.895515 Sum squared resid 0.000804 Schwarz criterion -8.619710 Log likelihood 554.6264 Hannan-Quinn criter. -8.783492 F-statistic 421.8024 Durbin-Watson stat 0.920169 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

ROA CAR DPK FDR BOPO

Mean 0.006742 0.211352 14591951 0.944326 0.937860 Median 0.007350 0.168400 5185122. 0.920200 0.929950 Maximum 0.056100 0.700700 77903143 1.824200 1.822800 Minimum -0.110200 0.107400 10195.00 0.718700 0.535300 Std. Dev. 0.016937 0.114452 20654704 0.169812 0.129705 Skewness -3.513950 2.263924 1.780837 3.188145 3.645267 Kurtosis 26.68672 8.327654 4.717453 14.99407 26.38013 Jarque-Bera 3103.132 248.5003 79.47873 937.9507 3048.893 Probability 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

Sum 0.822500 25.78490 1.78E+09 115.2078 114.4189

Sum Sq. Dev. 0.034711 1.585015 5.16E+16 3.489177 2.035614

Observations 122 122 122 122 122

Lampiran Rasio ROE UJI CHOW

UJI HOUSMAN

UJI NORMALITAS

UJI MULTIKOLARITAS

Redundant Fixed Effects Tests Equation: Untitled

Test cross-section fixed effects

Effects Test Statistic d.f. Prob.

Cross-section F 1.972866 (7,148) 0.0624

Cross-section Chi-square 14.273749 7 0.0465

Cross-section fixed effects test equation:

Dependent Variable: ROE Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 08/14/18 Time: 01:29 Sample: 2013Q1 2017Q4 Periods included: 20 Cross-sections included: 8

Total panel (balanced) observations: 160

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

CAR -0.054120 0.551278 -0.098171 0.9219

DPK -1.34E-09 3.23E-09 -0.415286 0.6785

FDR -0.139920 0.284311 -0.492136 0.6233

BOPO -0.709418 0.239648 -2.960253 0.0036

C 0.971522 0.317968 3.055411 0.0026

R-squared 0.060658 Mean dependent var 0.118863 Adjusted R-squared 0.036416 S.D. dependent var 0.731780 S.E. of regression 0.718332 Akaike info criterion 2.206982 Sum squared resid 79.98018 Schwarz criterion 2.303081 Log likelihood -171.5586 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.246005 F-statistic 2.502263 Durbin-Watson stat 1.357724 Prob(F-statistic) 0.044648

Correlated Random Effects - Haus m an Tes t Equation: Untitled

Tes t cros s -s ection random effects

Tes t Sum m ary Chi-Sq. Statis tic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob.

Cros s -s ection random 13.245630 4 0.0101

** WARNING: es tim ated cros s -s ection random effects variance is zero.

Cros s -s ection random effects tes t com paris ons :

Variable Fixed Random Var(Diff.) Prob.

CAR 0.005620 -0.054120 1.484542 0.9609

DPK -0.000000 -0.000000 0.000000 0.5871

FDR -0.153631 -0.139920 0.043967 0.9479

BOPO -0.905886 -0.709418 0.038284 0.3153

Cros s -s ection random effects tes t equation:

Dependent Variable: ROE Method: Panel Leas t Squares Date: 08/14/18 Tim e: 01:27 Sam ple: 2013Q1 2017Q4 Periods included: 20 Cros s -s ections included: 8

Total panel (balanced) obs ervations : 160

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statis tic Prob.

C 1.267838 0.712864 1.778513 0.0774

CAR 0.005620 1.332539 0.004217 0.9966

DPK -1.01E-08 1.64E-08 -0.614563 0.5398

FDR -0.153631 0.348421 -0.440934 0.6599

BOPO -0.905886 0.305447 -2.965766 0.0035

Effects Specification Cros s -s ection fixed (dum m y variables )

R-s quared 0.140828 Mean dependent var 0.118863 Adjus ted R-s quared 0.076971 S.D. dependent var 0.731780 S.E. of regres s ion 0.703054 Akaike info criterion 2.205271 Sum s quared res id 73.15408 Schwarz criterion 2.435909 Log likelihood -164.4217 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.298925 F-s tatis tic 2.205352 Durbin-Wats on s tat 1.491680 Prob(F-s tatis tic) 0.016922

0 4 8 12 16 20 24

-0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04

Series: Standardized Residuals Sample 2013Q1 2017Q4 Observations 122 Mean 4.55e-19 Median -0.000548 Maximum 0.047867 Minimum -0.061806 Std. Dev. 0.018730 Skewness -0.064044 Kurtosis 3.681370 Jarque-Bera 2.443417 Probability 0.294726

CAR DPK FDR BOPO

CAR 1.000000 -0.379326 0.720854 -0.041377

DPK -0.379326 1.000000 -0.338104 -0.003808

FDR 0.720854 -0.338104 1.000000 0.038742

BOPO -0.041377 -0.003808 0.038742 1.000000

UJI HETERO BRUZ

UJI AUTOKOL (COCHRANE ORCUTT)

UJI T , F DAN KOEFISIEN DETERMINASI

Heteroskedasticity Test: Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey Null hypothesis: Homoskedasticity

F-statistic 2.080348 Prob. F(4,117) 0.0877

Obs*R-squared 8.100850 Prob. Chi-Square(4) 0.0880 Scaled explained SS 12.48708 Prob. Chi-Square(4) 0.0141 Test Equation:

Dependent Variable: RESID^2 Method: Least Squares Date: 08/17/18 Time: 07:48 Sample: 1 122

Included observations: 122

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 0.000839 0.000573 1.465310 0.1455

CAR -0.001743 0.000974 -1.789572 0.0761

DPK -1.26E-11 5.03E-12 -2.512259 0.0134

FDR 0.000477 0.000460 1.038705 0.3011

BOPO -0.000207 0.000481 -0.429574 0.6683

R-squared 0.066400 Mean dependent var 0.000546 Adjusted R-squared 0.034482 S.D. dependent var 0.001004 S.E. of regression 0.000987 Akaike info criterion -10.96413 Sum squared resid 0.000114 Schwarz criterion -10.84921 Log likelihood 673.8119 Hannan-Quinn criter. -10.91745 F-statistic 2.080348 Durbin-Watson stat 1.607265 Prob(F-statistic) 0.087743

Date: 08/17/18 Time: 07:49 Sample: 1 122

Included observations: 122

Convergence achieved after 33 iterations

Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

CAR -0.023563 0.022949 -1.026786 0.3067

DPK -1.30E-10 1.64E-10 -0.793130 0.4293

FDR -0.036718 0.010395 -3.532470 0.0006

BOPO -0.372685 0.008716 -42.75680 0.0000

C 0.430780 0.015937 27.02993 0.0000

AR(1) 0.447907 0.077615 5.770891 0.0000

AR(2) 0.289939 0.088787 3.265551 0.0014

SIGMASQ 0.000361 3.86E-05 9.370100 0.0000

R-squared 0.930052 Mean dependent var 0.035543 Adjusted R-squared 0.925757 S.D. dependent var 0.072160 S.E. of regression 0.019662 Akaike info criterion -4.951363 Sum squared resid 0.044070 Schwarz criterion -4.767493 Log likelihood 310.0331 Hannan-Quinn criter. -4.876681 F-statistic 216.5410 Durbin-Watson stat 2.007351 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Inverted AR Roots .81 -.36

STATISTIK DESKRIPTIF

DU 1,7727 – 2,2273 Dependent Variable: ROE Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 08/17/18 Time: 07:43 Sample: 2013Q1 2017Q4 Periods included: 20 Cross-sections included: 8

Total panel (unbalanced) observations: 122

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

CAR -0.022039 0.045395 -0.485503 0.6283 DPK -4.67E-11 6.84E-10 -0.068270 0.9457 FDR -0.058282 0.012457 -4.678503 0.0000 BOPO -0.359954 0.013450 -26.76242 0.0000

C 0.437599 0.026950 16.23766 0.0000

Effects Specification Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

R-squared 0.932626 Mean dependent var 0.035543 Adjusted R-squared 0.925889 S.D. dependent var 0.072160 S.E. of regression 0.019644 Akaike info criterion -4.928877 Sum squared resid 0.042449 Schwarz criterion -4.653071 Log likelihood 312.6615 Hannan-Quinn criter. -4.816853 F-statistic 138.4251 Durbin-Watson stat 1.299747 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Date: 08/17/18 Time: 07:32 Sample: 1 122

ROE CAR DPK FDR BOPO

Mean 0.035543 0.243384 12183717 1.003589 0.937984 Median 0.043150 0.198650 4387556. 0.928250 0.926700 Maximum 0.131600 0.700700 77903143 2.570800 1.926000 Minimum -0.320400 0.107400 241217.0 0.718700 0.535300 Std. Dev. 0.072160 0.136572 19376030 0.284391 0.187644 Skewness -2.953989 1.684930 2.199385 2.987365 2.759324 Kurtosis 13.22261 5.312632 6.514925 13.36146 14.58315 Jarque-Bera 708.6470 84.91313 161.1613 727.2081 836.8427 Probability 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Sum 4.336300 29.69280 1.49E+09 122.4379 114.4341 Sum Sq. Dev. 0.630048 2.256882 4.54E+16 9.786286 4.260459

Observations 122 122 122 122 122

LAMPIRAN RASIO NIM UJI CHOW

UJI HOUSMEN

UJI NORMALITAS

UJI MULTIKOL

Redundant Fixed Effects Tests Equation: Untitled

Test cross-section fixed effects

Effects Test Statistic d.f. Prob.

Cross-section F 1.985780 (7,148) 0.0607

Cross-section Chi-square 14.363110 7 0.0451

Cross-section fixed effects test equation:

Dependent Variable: NIM Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 08/17/18 Time: 07:55 Sample: 2013Q1 2017Q4 Periods included: 20 Cross-sections included: 8

Total panel (balanced) observations: 160

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

CAR 0.090500 0.335398 0.269830 0.7876

DPK -1.52E-09 1.96E-09 -0.774168 0.4400

FDR -0.105514 0.172975 -0.609998 0.5428

BOPO -0.112130 0.145802 -0.769055 0.4430

C 0.310455 0.193452 1.604819 0.1106

R-squared 0.010197 Mean dependent var 0.099378 Adjusted R-squared -0.015346 S.D. dependent var 0.433718 S.E. of regression 0.437033 Akaike info criterion 1.213137 Sum squared resid 29.60473 Schwarz criterion 1.309236 Log likelihood -92.05098 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.252160 F-statistic 0.399204 Durbin-Watson stat 1.320295 Prob(F-statistic) 0.808998

Correlated Random Effects - Haus m an Tes t Equation: Untitled

Tes t cros s -s ection random effects

Tes t Sum m ary Chi-Sq. Statis tic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob.

Cros s -s ection random 13.040543 4 0.0111

** WARNING: es tim ated cros s -s ection random effects variance is zero.

Cros s -s ection random effects tes t com paris ons :

Variable Fixed Random Var(Diff.) Prob.

CAR 0.382136 0.090500 0.549198 0.6939

DPK 0.000000 -0.000000 0.000000 0.8659

FDR -0.064017 -0.105514 0.016265 0.7449

BOPO -0.207748 -0.112130 0.014163 0.4217

Cros s -s ection random effects tes t equation:

Dependent Variable: NIM Method: Panel Leas t Squares Date: 08/17/18 Tim e: 07:57 Sam ple: 2013Q1 2017Q4 Periods included: 20 Cros s -s ections included: 8

Total panel (balanced) obs ervations : 160

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statis tic Prob.

C 0.270140 0.433586 0.623036 0.5342

CAR 0.382136 0.810490 0.471488 0.6380

DPK 1.32E-10 9.97E-09 0.013289 0.9894

FDR -0.064017 0.211920 -0.302081 0.7630

BOPO -0.207748 0.185782 -1.118232 0.2653

Effects Specification Cros s -s ection fixed (dum m y variables )

R-s quared 0.095180 Mean dependent var 0.099378 Adjus ted R-s quared 0.027929 S.D. dependent var 0.433718 S.E. of regres s ion 0.427618 Akaike info criterion 1.210868 Sum s quared res id 27.06292 Schwarz criterion 1.441506 Log likelihood -84.86943 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.304522 F-s tatis tic 1.415306 Durbin-Wats on s tat 1.446865 Prob(F-s tatis tic) 0.171513

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

-0.02 -0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02

Series: Standardized Residuals Sample 2013Q1 2017Q4 Observations 122 Mean -3.41e-19 Median -0.000488 Maximum 0.024327 Minimum -0.022721 Std. Dev. 0.009782 Skewness 0.091106 Kurtosis 2.767078 Jarque-Bera 0.444557 Probability 0.800692

CAR DPK FDR BOPO

CAR 1.000000 -0.369575 0.719380 -0.063894 DPK -0.369575 1.000000 -0.333528 -0.011153 FDR 0.719380 -0.333528 1.000000 0.017167 BOPO -0.063894 -0.011153 0.017167 1.000000

UJI HETERO

UJI AUTOKOL

Heteroskedasticity Test: Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey Null hypothesis: Homoskedasticity

F-statistic 1.821140 Prob. F(4,117) 0.1293 Obs*R-squared 7.150658 Prob. Chi-Square(4) 0.1281 Scaled explained SS 9.014669 Prob. Chi-Square(4) 0.0607 Test Equation:

Dependent Variable: RESID^2 Method: Least Squares Date: 08/17/18 Time: 08:49 Sample: 1 122

Included observations: 122

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 0.000612 0.000249 2.452201 0.0157

CAR -2.91E-06 0.000436 -0.006671 0.9947

DPK -5.60E-12 2.23E-12 -2.510599 0.0134

FDR -0.000245 0.000205 -1.194957 0.2345

BOPO -3.20E-05 0.000202 -0.158967 0.8740 R-squared 0.058612 Mean dependent var 0.000267 Adjusted R-squared 0.026428 S.D. dependent var 0.000444 S.E. of regression 0.000438 Akaike info criterion -12.58895 Sum squared resid 2.24E-05 Schwarz criterion -12.47403 Log likelihood 772.9258 Hannan-Quinn criter. -12.54227 F-statistic 1.821140 Durbin-Watson stat 0.513347 Prob(F-statistic) 0.129346

Date: 08/17/18 Time: 08:51 Sample: 1 122

Included observations: 122

Convergence achieved after 26 iterations

Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

CAR 0.048818 0.012523 3.898183 0.0002

DPK 3.61E-11 6.91E-11 0.522906 0.6020

FDR -0.005604 0.003137 -1.786045 0.0767 BOPO -0.017907 0.003761 -4.761216 0.0000

C 0.061374 0.010987 5.586161 0.0000

AR(1) 0.889575 0.043662 20.37397 0.0000 SIGMASQ 7.44E-05 7.24E-06 10.27407 0.0000 R-squared 0.796351 Mean dependent var 0.048882 Adjusted R-squared 0.785726 S.D. dependent var 0.019187 S.E. of regression 0.008882 Akaike info criterion -6.541145 Sum squared resid 0.009072 Schwarz criterion -6.380258 Log likelihood 406.0098 Hannan-Quinn criter. -6.475798 F-statistic 74.94943 Durbin-Watson stat 2.071085 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Inverted AR Roots .89

UJI T, F DAN KOEFISIEN DETERMINASI

STATISTIK DESKRIPTIF Dependent Variable: NIM Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 08/17/18 Time: 08:55 Sample: 2013Q1 2017Q4 Periods included: 20 Cross-sections included: 8

Total panel (unbalanced) observations: 122

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

CAR 0.070569 0.023341 3.023373 0.0031

DPK 1.41E-10 3.55E-10 0.397732 0.6916

FDR 0.004402 0.006530 0.674089 0.5017

BOPO -0.005479 0.006466 -0.847370 0.3986

C 0.031019 0.013543 2.290393 0.0239

Effects Specification Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

R-squared 0.740094 Mean dependent var 0.048882 Adjusted R-squared 0.714104 S.D. dependent var 0.019187 S.E. of regression 0.010259 Akaike info criterion -6.228102 Sum squared resid 0.011578 Schwarz criterion -5.952297 Log likelihood 391.9142 Hannan-Quinn criter. -6.116079 F-statistic 28.47550 Durbin-Watson stat 0.718145 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

NIM CAR DPK FDR BOPO

Mean 0.048882 0.239266 12272819 0.999022 0.940502 Median 0.048750 0.197600 4642245. 0.926200 0.926700 Maximum 0.093400 0.700700 77903143 2.570800 1.926000 Minimum 0.007100 0.107400 241217.0 0.718700 0.535300 Std. Dev. 0.019187 0.135097 19338663 0.281701 0.198828 Skewness -0.131678 1.786980 2.200775 3.091510 2.843940 Kurtosis 2.398690 5.699745 6.523078 14.03116 13.97435 Jarque-Bera 2.190558 101.9809 161.5774 812.9075 776.6744 Probability 0.334446 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Sum 5.963650 29.19050 1.50E+09 121.8807 114.7413 Sum Sq. Dev. 0.044546 2.208406 4.53E+16 9.601992 4.783457

Observations 122 122 122 122 122

Dokumen terkait