Disarankan untuk tidak menggunakan tepung bulu ayam pada pakan ayam Broiler untuk peningkatan persentase (%) offal (lemak abdominal, kaki, dan kepala) ayam Broiler.
36
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Anggorodi, R. 1985. Ilmu Makanan Ternak Umum. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
Azman ME, Cerci IH, Birben N. 2005. Effects of various dietary fat sources on performance and body fatty acid composition of broiler chickens.
Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 29:811-819.
Bell, D. D and W.D. Weaver, Jr. 2002. Comercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production.5th Edition. Springer Science and Business Medial Inc, New York.
Card, L. E and Nesheim. 2002. Poultry Production. 7th Ed. Lea and Febinger, Philadelphia. New York.
Eka, Murka. 2010. Standard Performans Mingguan untuk CP707 (Broiler Modern). PT. Charoend Phokpan.
Hadiwiyoto, S. 1992. Kimia dan Teknologi Daging Unggas. Pusat Antar Universitas Pangan dan Gizi. UGM Press, Yogyakarta.
Hardjosworo, P.S. dan Rukmiasih, M.S. 2000. Meningkatkan Produksi daging Unggas. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta
Haro C V. 2005. Interaction between dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E in body lipid composition and α-tocopherol content of broiler chickens [Thesis]. [Barcelona (Spain)]: Universitat Autonoma de.
Kastasudjana.1994. Manajemen Ternak Unggas, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.
Kim, W. K and Patterson, P. H., 2000. Nutritional Value of Enzyme- or Sodium Hydroxide-Treated Feathers from Dead Hens.Poultry Science 79:528-534
Lin, X., Lee, C. G,.Casale, ES., Shih, JCH., 2002. Purification and characterization of aase from a Bacilluslicheniformisstrain. Appl Environ Microbiol58: 3271-3275
Lubis. 2004. Meningkatkan Produksi Unggas. Universitas Gajah Mada Press, Yogyakata.
37
Mahmilia, F. 2004. Tha change of Nutritional Value of The Fermented Eichrnia crassipies Mart Meal as Broiler Rations. JITV 10 (2); 90- 95.
Maulidya, Ria. 2011. Kajian Penggunaan Tepung Kulit Pisang terhadap Konsumsi dan Konversi Ransum Broiler. (Skripsi). Unkhair, Ternate.
Mulyadi. 1983. Aplikasi Enzym Fitase untuk Campuran Pakan Ternak Unggas. Dalam Seminar Nasional Sosialisasi dan Promosi Hasil Penelitian. UNS, Surakarta.
Murtidjo, B. A. 1992. Pedoman beternak ayam Broiler. Kanisius.Yogyakarta.
---. 1995. Pedoman Meramu Pakan Unggas. Penerbit Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry Ninth Revised Edition National Academy Press. Washington DC.
North, M. O. and D. D. Bell. 1990. Commercial Chicken Product Manual.
4hEd. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
Oktaviana D, Zuprizal, Suryanto E. 2010. Pengaruh penambahan ampas virgin coconut oil dalam ransum terhadap performans dan produksi karkas ayam broiler. Bul Peternak. 34:159-164
Parakkasi.A.1999. Ilmu nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak Ruminansia. UI Press Jakarta.
Pratikno H. 2011. Lemak abdominal ayam broiler (Gallus sp) karena pengaruh ekstrak kunyit (Curcuma domestica Vahl.). BIOMA. 13:1- 8.
Prihantono. 2008. Sukses Beternak Ayam Broiler. PT. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.
Rasyaf, M, 1993. Bahan Makanan Unggas di Indonesia. Penerbit Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
---, 1994. Makanan Broiler. Penerbit Kanisius, Yogyakarta ---, 1999.Beternak Ayam Pedaging.Cetakan ke-18.PT Penebar
Swadaya. Jakarta.
38
---. 2002. Manajemen Peternakan Ayam Broiler. PenebarSwadaya, Jakarta.
Soegondo S. 2006. Farmakoterapi pada pengendalian glikemia diabetes melitus tipe 2. Dalam: Aru W, Sudoyo, Setiyohadi B, Alwi I, Simadibrata MK, Setiati S, penyunting. Buku ajar ilmu penyakit dalam. Jilid III. Jakarta (Indonesia): Pusat Penerbitan Departemen Ilmu Penyakit Dalam Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia.
Sudarso, Y. dan A. Siriwa. 2007. Ransum Ayam dan Itik. Cetakan IX. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.
Suprijatna, E. U. Atmomarsono dan R. Kartasudjana. 2005. Ilmu Dasar Ternak Unggas. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.
Tillman, A. D., H. Hartadi, S. Reksohadiprodjo, S. Prawirokusumo dan S. Lehdosoekojo. 1991. Ilmu Makanan Ternak Dasar. Universitas Gadjah Mada Press, Yogyakarta.
Wahyu, J. 2004. Ilmu Nutrisi Unggas. Edisi Ke4. Universitas Gadjah Mada Press, Yogyakarta.
39
L A M
P
I
R
A
N
40
Lampiran 1. Data Primer Hasil Penelitian Berat Kepala (gram)
Putih
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 71 27 30 28
2 28 32 31 31
3 81 29 66 34
4 33 38 27 25
Biru
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 65 30 29 28
2 33 30 31 30
3 74 36 29 32
4 27 37 31 29
Merah
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 68 36 31 26
2 28 33 32 35
3 78 36 28 29
4 29 33 30 29
Rekapitulasi Berat Kepala
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 68 31 30 27
2 30 32 31 32
3 78 34 41 32
4 30 36 29 28
Jumlah 205 132 132 119
Rata-rata 51 33 33 30
41
Berat kaki (gram) Putih
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 53 54 56 42
2 42 45 50 50
3 43 49 44 46
4 55 65 46 45
Biru
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 53 50 49 43
2 47 50 46 48
3 54 50 58 41
4 40 64 52 46
Merah
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 55 54 46 45
2 45 41 37 40
3 52 61 45 47
4 45 45 49 40
Rekapitulasi Berat Kaki
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 54 53 50 43
2 45 45 44 46
3 50 53 49 45
4 47 58 49 44
Jumlah 195 209 193 178
Rata-rata 49 52 48 44
42
Berat Lemak Abdominal (gram) Putih
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 20 7 11 14
2 15 10 5 15
3 12 5 20 18
4 20 16 13 7
Biru
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 10 13 11 12
2 4 10 14 6
3 11 16 5 12
4 13 14 10 16
Merah
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 8 11 7 9
2 9 9 30 27
3 6 10 7 5
4 4 10 15 12
Rekapitulasi Berat Lemak Abdominal
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 13 10 10 12
2 9 10 16 16
3 10 10 11 12
4 12 13 13 12
Jumlah 44 44 49 51
Rata-rata 11 11 12 13
43
Berat Akhir Ayam Perlakuan (gram) Berat badan akhir (gram)
P0.1 P0.2 P0.3 P0.4
Merah 1157 1057 981 1087
Biru 1132 1135 1009 987
Putih 1089 996 980 1183
Jumlah 3378 3188 2970 3257
Rata-rata 1126 1062,67 990 1085,67
P1.1 P1.2 P1.3 P1.4
Merah 1105 1066 1153 1257
Biru 1245 997 1193 1089
Putih 1103 1050 977 983
Jumlah 3453 3113 3323 3329
Rata-rata 1151 1037,67 1107,67 1109,67
P2.1 P2.2 P2.3 P2.4
Merah 1141 824 1014 970
Biru 1106 1151 989 1082
Putih 1089 1093 1033 976
Jumlah 3336 3068 3036 3028
Rata-rata 1112 1022,67 1012 1009,33
P3.1 P3.2 P3.3 P3.4
Merah 860 883 950 957
Biru 939 973 857 871
Putih 1019 1021 1116 944
Jumlah 2818 2877 2923 2772
Rata-rata 939,333 959 974,333 924
44
Rekapitulasi Berat Akhir (gram)
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 1126 1151 1112 939
2 1063 1038 1023 959
3 990 1108 1012 974
4 1086 1110 1009 924
Jumlah 4264 4406 4156 3797
Rata-rata 1066 1102 1039 949
45
Lampiran 2. Data Penelitian Persentase (%) Berat Offal Persentase (%) Berat
Kepala
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 6.04 2.69 2.70 2.91
2 2.79 3.05 3.06 3.34
3 7.85 3.04 4.05 3.25
4 2.73 3.24 2.91 2.99
Jumlah 19.41 12.03 12.72 12.49
Rata-rata 4.85 3.01 3.18 3.12
Persentase (%) Berat Kaki
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 4.77 4.58 4.53 4.61
2 4.20 4.37 4.34 4.80
3 5.02 4.81 4.84 4.58
4 4.30 5.23 4.85 4.73
Jumlah 18.28 18.99 18.56 18.72
Rata-rata 4.57 4.75 4.64 4.68
Persentase (%) Berat Lemak Abdominal
Ulangan Perlakuan
P0 P1 P2 P3
1 1.12 0.90 0.87 1.24
2 0.88 0.93 1.60 1.67
3 0.98 0.93 1.05 1.20
4 1.14 1.20 1.25 1.26
Jumlah 4.12 3.96 4.78 5.37
Rata-rata 1.03 0.99 1.19 1.34
46
Lampiran 2. Analisis of Variance (ANOVA) Persentase (%) Kepala menggunakan SPSS Ver. 16.
Univariate Analysis of Variance
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
PERLAKUAN 1 P0 4
2 P1 4
3 P2 4
4 P3 4
Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable:PesenBrt_Kepala
PERLAKUA
N Mean Std. Deviation N
P0 4.8525 2.52679 4
P1 3.0050 .22927 4
P2 3.1800 .59850 4
P3 3.1225 .20516 4
Total 3.5400 1.40864 16
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa Dependent Variable:PesenBrt_Kepala
F df1 df2 Sig.
20.411 3 12 .000
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + PERLAKUAN
47
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable:PesenBrt_Kepala
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected
Model 9.251a 3 3.084 1.804 .200
Intercept 200.506 1 200.506 117.297 .000
PERLAKUAN 9.251 3 3.084 1.804 .200
Error 20.513 12 1.709
Total 230.269 16
Corrected Total 29.764 15
a. R Squared = ,311 (Adjusted R Squared = ,139) Post Hoc Tests
PERLAKUAN
Multiple Comparisons PesenBrt_Kepala
LSD (I) PERL AKUA N
(J) PERL AKUA N
Mean Difference (I-
J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
P0 P1 1.8475 .92450 .069 -.1668 3.8618
P2 1.6725 .92450 .096 -.3418 3.6868
P3 1.7300 .92450 .086 -.2843 3.7443
P1 P0 -1.8475 .92450 .069 -3.8618 .1668
P2 -.1750 .92450 .853 -2.1893 1.8393
P3 -.1175 .92450 .901 -2.1318 1.8968
P2 P0 -1.6725 .92450 .096 -3.6868 .3418
P1 .1750 .92450 .853 -1.8393 2.1893
P3 .0575 .92450 .951 -1.9568 2.0718
48
P3 P0 -1.7300 .92450 .086 -3.7443 .2843
P1 .1175 .92450 .901 -1.8968 2.1318
P2 -.0575 .92450 .951 -2.0718 1.9568
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 1,709.
Estimated Marginal Means
Grand Mean Dependent Variable:PesenBrt_Kepala
Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound
3.540 .327 2.828 4.252
49
Lampiran 3. Analisis of Variance (ANOVA) Persentase (%) Kaki menggunakan SPSS Ver. 16.
Univariate Analysis of Variance
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
PERLAKUAN 1 P0 4
2 P1 4
3 P2 4
4 P3 4
Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable:PesenBrt_Kaki
PERLAKUA
N Mean Std. Deviation N
P0 4.5725 .38828 4
P1 4.7475 .36845 4
P2 4.6400 .24913 4
P3 4.6800 .10296 4
Total 4.6600 .27592 16
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa Dependent Variable:PesenBrt_Kaki
F df1 df2 Sig.
3.029 3 12 .071
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + PERLAKUAN
50
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable:PesenBrt_Kaki
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected
Model .064a 3 .021 .239 .867
Intercept 347.450 1 347.450 3.869E3 .000
PERLAKUAN .064 3 .021 .239 .867
Error 1.078 12 .090
Total 348.592 16
Corrected Total 1.142 15
a. R Squared = ,056 (Adjusted R Squared = -,179) Post Hoc Tests
PERLAKUAN
Multiple Comparisons PesenBrt_Kaki
LSD (I) PERL AKUA N
(J) PERL AKUA N
Mean Difference (I-
J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
P0 P1 -.1750 .21189 .425 -.6367 .2867
P2 -.0675 .21189 .756 -.5292 .3942
P3 -.1075 .21189 .621 -.5692 .3542
P1 P0 .1750 .21189 .425 -.2867 .6367
P2 .1075 .21189 .621 -.3542 .5692
P3 .0675 .21189 .756 -.3942 .5292
P2 P0 .0675 .21189 .756 -.3942 .5292
51
P1 -.1075 .21189 .621 -.5692 .3542
P3 -.0400 .21189 .853 -.5017 .4217
P3 P0 .1075 .21189 .621 -.3542 .5692
P1 -.0675 .21189 .756 -.5292 .3942
P2 .0400 .21189 .853 -.4217 .5017
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = ,090.
Estimated Marginal Means
Grand Mean Dependent Variable:PesenBrt_Kaki
Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound
4.660 .075 4.497 4.823
52
Lampiran 4. Analisis of Variance (ANOVA) Persentase (%) Lemak Abdominal menggunakan SPSS Ver. 16.
Univariate Analysis of Variance
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
PERLAKUAN 1 P0 4
2 P1 4
3 P2 4
4 P3 4
Descriptive Statistics
Dependent Variable:PesenLmk_Abdomen PERLAKUA
N Mean Std. Deviation N
P0 1.0300 .12275 4
P1 .9900 .14071 4
P2 1.1925 .31288 4
P3 1.3425 .21975 4
Total 1.1388 .23897 16
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa Dependent Variable:PesenLmk_Abdomen
F df1 df2 Sig.
1.360 3 12 .302
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + PERLAKUAN
53
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent
Variable:PesenLmk_Abdomen Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected
Model .313a 3 .104 2.308 .128
Intercept 20.748 1 20.748 458.393 .000
PERLAKUAN .313 3 .104 2.308 .128
Error .543 12 .045
Total 21.605 16
Corrected Total .857 15
a. R Squared = ,366 (Adjusted R Squared = ,207)
Post Hoc Tests PERLAKUAN
Multiple Comparisons PesenLmk_Abdomen
LSD (I) PERL AKUA N
(J) PERL AKUA N
Mean Difference (I-
J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
P0 P1 .0400 .15044 .795 -.2878 .3678
P2 -.1625 .15044 .301 -.4903 .1653
P3 -.3125 .15044 .060 -.6403 .0153
P1 P0 -.0400 .15044 .795 -.3678 .2878
P2 -.2025 .15044 .203 -.5303 .1253
54
P3 -.3525* .15044 .037 -.6803 -.0247
P2 P0 .1625 .15044 .301 -.1653 .4903
P1 .2025 .15044 .203 -.1253 .5303
P3 -.1500 .15044 .338 -.4778 .1778
P3 P0 .3125 .15044 .060 -.0153 .6403
P1 .3525* .15044 .037 .0247 .6803
P2 .1500 .15044 .338 -.1778 .4778
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = ,045.
*. The mean difference is significant at the ,05 level.
Estimated Marginal Means
Grand Mean Dependent Variable:PesenLmk_Abdomen
Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound
1.139 .053 1.023 1.255
55
Lampiran 5. Dokumentasi Penelitian
Proses pebuatan tepung buku dengan fermentasi