CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION
B. The Implementation of Narrative Short Video as Media to Increase Students Understanding in Studying English Reading
2) Second Meeting in cycle 1
It was held on February 27th 2023 at 07.30 a.m – 09.30 a.m, in the tenth grade of SMK As-Syafi’i Rambipuji Jember academic year 2022/2023. The lesson started at 07.30 a.m, the researcher as the teacher came into the class.
Before explaining the activities, the teacher started the class by greeting to the students. The researcher as the teacher told the reason about what the purpose about the researcher and what was going to do. The purpose of the researcher was to build good relationship with the students in order to could did the research running well. Before doing the studying the researcher as the teacher checked the students attendant list by called all of the students one by one.
At 07.40 the teacher used the short video media to increase students understanding. The tittle of short video was “Four Brothers”. The story of short video told the adventure of four brothers in the forest to look for the new life skill.
The students looked happily and understanding to the story. The students also looked curiosity to the ending of the story. After watching the short video, the
teacher made interimplementing with the students. The interimplementing such as question and answer section, the teacher asked the student about the story spontaneous to the student and the student answer the question spontaneous.
At 08.10 the teacher commanded the students to looked for a short narrative story in the internet or in the google. The students commanded to wrote the story and tried to understood what the story’s mean or knew what point of the short narrative story.
At 08.35 the teacher shared the LKPD for the exercising in the school.
This section to measured the degree of students understanding. The students also used the dictionary to supported their exercised. After the student did the LKPD the students submitted the LKPD to the teacher.
At 09.25 the teacher asked the students how the material today happy or not. Most students said that the material is good and understandinged. The researcher is happy to heared that. Before the teacher closed the class the teacher gave the motivation. After the researcher as the teacher gave the motivation. The teacher closed the class by saying hamdallah and leave taking. The researcher as the teacher did not forget to said “have a nice day” to the students.
c. Observing in Cycle 1
In observing, the researcher as the teacher observed the situation of the class while the teaching the teaching learning process, students’ participations in the class and students understanding during learning process in reading. The data were described as follows:
Table 4.1 Observation Checklist
No Students Activities Grade Score
1 2 3 4 5 1 Students paid attention to the researcher as the
teacher when they taught by using short video narrative
3
2 Students understandinged in short video narrative as teaching media
3
3 Students answer teachers question about narrative correctly?
3
4 Students asked questions to clarify understanding
4
5 Students enthusiasm the task 3
Total 16
Note:
1= Very bad (no attention and no respond) 2= Bad (only few attentions or respond)
3= Fair/enough (some of students / half of students gave attentions or respond)
4= Good (more than half of students gave attention or resond) 5= Very good (almost all of students gave attention and respond)
The score of the observation as follows:
P = x 100%
= = 64%
According to the observation that used observation checklist above, it was described that the students were paid attention to the teacher as the teacher.
Around half of them were done the task nicely. Some them still had not attention and they still had a talk with each other while the researcher as the teacher was giving explanation.
Some students were understandinged when the researcher showed the short video narrative story for them because they felt fun when studying English with new media such as narrative short video.
When the researcher as the teacher showed the narrative short video to the students, then the researcher asked about story of the video almost all students known or understood the story.
d. Reflecting in Cycle 1
In this phase, the researcher as the teacher and the collaborator as vice headmaster of curriculum that understand about English Teching evaluate and reflected the implementing in cycle one. Based on the observation note that had been taken by vice headmaster as the observer, the researcher was given many suggestions by the observer bellows: the researcher had to made the class was conducive because there were some students did conversation with other that of course made the student couldn’t received the material well or could disturbed the other student. The observer also gave suggestion that the researcher as the teacher could more interactive to looked for student and giving more conversation such as call students one by one and give smile or important one was giving student enjoy and felt cared by the teacher.
After giving the treatment in cycle one, the researcher did the post-test one. It was held on March 6th 2023 at 07.30 a.m-09.00 a.m in Ten grade of As- Syafi’i Vocational School Rambipuji Jember. The test was done in order to know the understanding of students in reading narrative story. The post-test was consisted of twenty multiple choices that about narrative material.
The data of students result of post-test could be seen as follows:
Table 4.2
The Students Result of Post-Test 1
No Name Result Of
Students Post-Test
Criterion of Success
Fail/Past
1 Acha Fitria Ningsih 70 70 Past
2 Achmad Riyan Hadinata 55 70 Fail
3 Achmad Firmansyah 65 70 Fail
4 Ahmad Aril Lukmanto 75 70 Past
5 Ahmad Jefri Husaen 55 70 Fail
6 Akhmad Ainul Yaqin 40 70 Fail
7 Bagus Maulana 75 70 Past
8 Bagus Pratama 60 70 Fail
9
Cahya Maulana Adi Putra
65 70 Fail
10 Diah Nur Laili 70 70 Past
11 Dian Tika Puspitasari 70 70 Past
12 Diki Suria Saputra 65 70 Fail
13 Fajar Sidiq 55 70 Fail
14 Fauzia Yunika 75 70 Past
15 Feni Febriana Putri 90 70 Past
16 Herman Riyansyah 65 70 Fail
17 Lufna Irvania 75 70 Past
18 Lusiana Safarah 80 70 Past
19 Mahfudi 80 70 Past
20 Muhammad Ainur Rofik 75 70 Past
21
Muhammad Eksal Virdiano M
55 70 Fail
22 Muhammad Rizal 65 70 Fail
23 Rehan Oktafiano 55 70 Fail
24 Riang Rindi Amelia 70 70 Past
25 Samsul Arifin 55 70 Fail
26 Siti Anggun Putmawati 75 70 Past
27 Siti Husnul Hotimah 85 70 Past
28 Tika Ayu asari 70 70 Past
29 Wisnu Eka Nur Cahyo 70 70 Past
30 Tryo Syawal 55 70 Fail
Total 2015
Mean 67,16
Percentage 53,3%
In the post-test one, the total of students’ result was 2015 and the total of students who did the post test was 0, so mean of the students’ result was:
X = X =
= 67,16
After knowing the students’ mean score or result, the researcher as the teacher tried to know the students’ percentage at post-test one that was:
P = X 100%
P = X 100%
P = 53,3%
The Result of the post-test 1 of cycle 1 showed that the average score was only 67,16, it concludes that the students were still had low average score in the test about narrative reading text. Only 16 of 30 students who passed the target score or reached the minimum score in curriculum of school, that was 70 and the percentage of students who passed Minimum Score (KKM) just only 53,3% under 70% of criterion of success.
From the result of the observation and the score of the post-test, it was concluded that students had not achieved the criterion of success yet. From the first cycle, it could be seen the student still had difficulties or problem to mastering the narrative story or text. It seemed that they needed more explanation deeply about the material and they needed more attention.
In the other hand, the observed suggested to the researcher as the teacher to give more motivation to the students to study more and active more in this material. It concluded that, the researcher as the teacher and the collaborator still needed cycle 2 to make students’ reading ability better than before.