to
go
to Trujillo.According
to Bernal Diaz, they got as far as the gold-working regionon
theGuayape
River,when
they learned of Cortez' departure. Receiving ordersfrom
Saavedra to return, they did so,and, Bernal Diazremembers,
they threw stones at the country as they left.They met Marin
at the pueblo of Acaltecaand
then proceeded to another pueblo called Maniani,where
they encountered six of Alvarado's soldiers. Intwo
days'marching
they reachedAlvarado
"near thetown
called Chuluteca Malcala." Thiswas
probablythe site of Tegucigalpaon
the Choluteca River.From
here thecombined
parties proceededtoward Guatemala
after a difficult crossing of theLempa
River,which was
then in flood.Years
later, Bernal Diaz (1916, vol. 5, pp. 328, 329) thus recalled the country ofNaco and
of theUlua
River, as itwas when
he firstsaw
itand
as it soonbecame
and what I state I know, for when I came with Cortes on the expedition to
Honduras I was present in Trujillo, which was called by the Indian name of Guaimura, and I was at Nacoand the Rio de Pichin, and that of Balama, and that of Ulua, and in nearly all of the pueblos of that neighborhood, andit was
thickly peopled and at peace (andthe people were living) intheir houses with theirwivesandchildren; butassoonasthosebadgovernorscametheydestroyed them to such an extent, that in the year fifteen hundred and fifty one, when I passed throughthere on
my
returnfrom Castile, two Caciqueswho
had knownme
in theold days, toldme
with tears in theireyes ofall their misfortunesand thetreatment (they had received),and I was shockedto see the countryin such a condition.The
details of this tragicand complex
period inHonduran
history cannot be considered here.The
withdrawal of Cortezthrew
thenew
colony into turmoiland
the starving colonistsengaged
in everyform
of intrigue.Coming from
Guatemala,Pedro
deAlvarado
took over the governorshipand
set about pacifying the country.He
built thetown
ofSan Juan
at Puerto Caballosand founded San
Pedro.For
the Indians thiswas an
evenmore
tragic period.According
toBan-
croft (vol. 7, pp. 233-234) Indian slaveswere
kidnappedand
sold inHonduras by
the shipload. In thevicinityof Trujillowhere
therehad
been villages offrom 600
to 3,000 houses, therewere
notmore
than 180 Indiansleft in 1547.Those
not enslaved orkilledhad
fledto the mountains.At
Naco,where
therehad
originally been a population ofabout 10,000, therewere,in 1536, only 45 remaining.At La Haga,
a coastaltown some
9 leaguesfrom
Trujillo, therehad
been about900
houses, but of the entire population, only the daughter of the Cacique remained.The
crueltytoward
the nativeswas
even greater than in Guatemala. In 1539,when Alvarado
returnedfrom
SpainNO. I
HONDURAS
STROJSTG, KIDDER,AND PAUL
25and
transported the materials for building a fleet across the isthmus, the entire remaining Indian population fled.These
evilswere
pre- sented in full detailby
Bartolome deLas
Casas,and
thenew
laws resultingfrom
hisfamous
publicationat least gave nominal protection totheoppressed natives.In
answer
to a petitionfrom
Trujillo, theEmperor
appointed Francisco de Montejo, the former governor of Yucatan, as ruler ofHonduras. Only
ahandfulof starvingSpanish colonists remained.Montejo subdued
but did not enslave the Indians of the mountains near Trujillo.Many
Indians returned voluntarily to theirhomes
in this region.Montejo
thenvisited thetown
of Gracias a Dios. Here,owing
to themurder
of a Spaniard, he arrestedand
punished theLenca
Indian ring leaders in the presence of the Caciques of the district of Cerquin previously referred to. This aroused the opposi- tion of thefamous Lenca
leader Lempira, "Lord
of the Mountains."Lempira had
previously withstoodAlvarado and
driven off Spanish attacks under Chavez,and
henow
opposed Montejo,The
great Indian leader had secured alliesfrom
various interior tribesincluding several thathad
formerlybeenhostiletotheLenca,and was
estimated tohavea force ofsome
30,000warriors.According
toLehmann
(1920, vol. 2, p. 637), hehad
united themen
ofmore
than 200towns and commanded
over 2,000 "men and
gentlemen of distinction.""Lempira, the last of the chiefs of Corquin,
made
his final stand against the Spaniardson
the mountains of Piriera,which
overlooks the valley of the riverLempa,
in thename
ofwhich
beautiful stream hisown
iscommemorated."
(Squier, 1858, p. 329.)Here
for 6months
hewas
besiegedby
Caceres, a lieutenant of Montejo, but so greatlywere
the Spaniards harassedby
the Indians that theywere on
the point of failure. Siegeand
assault having failed, Caceres resorted to treachery.Under
a flag of truceLempira came
to the walls of his stronghold to parley with his enemiesand was
shotby
a hiddenmarksman. The Lenca and
their allies fled,and
the great conspiracy soon fell to pieces.Mrs. Popenoe, quoting
from
a letterfrom Montejo
to theKing
of Spain,June
i, 1539, gives the following account of the latter part ofthiscampaign
againsttheLenca
:"Disturbing news reached Gracias, where Montejo was sojourning with 11 Spanish soldiers. The Indians were preparing stubbornly to resist him. In Yamala, a nearby village, they were building
many
houses on a great, very"D. H. Popenoe, 1936, pp. 559-560. For the original, see Coleccionde Docu- mentosIneditos, 1864,vol.2,pp. 212-266.
strong rock which they have, andproviding them withprovisions. The Spanish chieftain sent a Negro spy,
who
knew the languageof the Indians, to enter the stronghold and bring back a report. The frightened Negro found there four houses built very large, and four more largerones full of corn, andhe set fire to the houses and to the corn.Word
came of a great disaster in the valley of Comayagua. The Indians had risen. One Spaniard had beenkilled and several others wounded. Four horses had been lost. Unable longer to withstand the siege, the Spaniards had fled at night to a neighboring province where the inhabitantswerefriendly.Montejo realized that thetime had comefor desperate action. Supplies were brought together, and soldiers werecalled in fromregions where the dangerof rebellion was not imminent. Others
who
had been wounded but now had recovered sufficiently to join the colors, augmented the small band which was placedunder theleadership of Alonzode Caceres, recentlyreturned fromthefinalcampaignagainst Lempira.
When
they arrived at Comayagua they found that the Indians, doubtless apprisedof theirapproach, withallavailable supplies wouldfortifythemselveson big rocks. Cattle which they could not take with them had been killed and eaten, so that the valleywasnow
inastateof starvation.Montejo advanced into one part of the valley, Caceres into another, attacking and capturing a mountain fortress "which was the strongest in that region."
The last named leader then proceeded to a village, by name Guaxerequi, where six Christians had recently been killed. There he found another fortress. At
this point he was rejoined by Montejo,
who
describes the place in his letter.He
says: "and (has) seen (or visited) a great rock, which was the strongest thing that has been seen, which, if they had time to cut a ridge of mountain, which they were cutting, would be impossible to capture, for they had on itwater and woodand cultivated fields and
many
provisions; they had 220 large houses,andcertaintemples andplaces ofworship."It took the combined forces of Montejo and Caceres four months to conquer the valley ofComayagua,afterwhichthey carried thecampaignintoOlancho.
Such stories as the above throw much light on the importance of fortified
mountain tops at the time of the Conquest. Although it has been impossibleto place Tenanipua (thefamous archeological sitenear Comayagua, first described by Squier, 1858 and 1869, seemap, fig. i), among the strongholds described in the early accounts at
my
disposal, it seems probable that itmay
have been one of those captured during thecampaign carried out in the Comayagua regionby Francisco de Montejo and his lieutenant, Alonzo de Caceres. Itmay
have been theformidable Guaxerequi describedin Montejo's letter.In the light of the partially cut "cuchillo" or narrow^ neck con- necting
Tenampua
withthemain promontory
to thenortheast (D.H.
Popenoe, 1936, pp. 562, 563
and map),
Iam
inclined to believe that this identification ofGuaxerequi and Tenampua
is indeed very probable.It is certain that a complete
combing
of the sources,combined
with first-hand examination of the available archives inHonduras and
neighboring countries,would
yield a considerablemass
of informa- tionon
theLenca and
their neighbors, but this is not possible atNO. I
HONDURAS
STRONG, KIDDER,AND PAUL
2,"]present. All thathasbeen attempted hereistosuggest the