160
LOG 1ST
TULOG.
MUl:nLOG
NOBARM
MIRTE
FIJNDAMENTALS OF ITEM ｉｕｾＮＧＩｲｏｎｓｅ＠ TUEORY SmtiH'
Educational Testing Service Rosedale Road
Princeton. NJ 01l'i41 U.S.A.
Scienlific Sor,ware, Inc.
I 36Q Neil1:el ROlld Mnoresville, IN 461511 U.S.A.
Dr. Colin Fraser
Cenlre ror Behavioral Studies University or New England Armidale. N.S.W.
AUSTRALIA 2351 Dr. Mark Rechse
American College Testing Program P.O. Bolt 1611
Iowa City. IA S2243 U.S.A.
, <
...
,\References
American Educalional ｒ･ｾ･｡ｲ｣ｨ＠ A!'ISocialion, American Psycholngical Associalion, &:
N.uional Council on Measurement in Educali()n ＨＱＹＸｾＩＮ＠ Sltmdards for t'dllmlinnal am/I'sydwlogical tuling. Washinglon, DC: American Psychological Association.
Andersen. E. B. (1972). The numerical IIOlulion of II set of conditional eSlimation equlltions. }mmliJl of tht' Royal Slati.ttiml Sodl!ly, Ser;r.l H. 34. 42-54.
Andersen, E .. R. (1973). A goodness of fil lest for Ihe Rasch modeL P.tydfllnlellika. 'ul.
123·140.
Andrich, D. (I978a). Application of a psychometric raling model 10 ordered categories which are scored wilh successive integers. Applied Psycholollicol Me{/.ru"enltnt. 2.
581-594.
Andrich. O. (1978b). A hinomiallalenl Irait model for the siudy of Likert-slyle allilUde questionnaires. British Journal
ot
Malht'l'lUltical /llId Stllli.<li('(l/ I',{y,'hlliogy. J I.84-98,
Andrich. D. (1978c). A raling formulation for ordered response c;alegories. p,(Yl'ha- mt'frika. 41, 561-573.
Andrich. D. (1982). An extension of the Rasch model for ralings providing both location and dispersion parameters. P.fychomt'lrika. 47. 105·11 J.
Angoff, W. H. (1911). SCllles, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational meaSUfl!menl (2nd ed.) (pp. 508-600). Washington. DC: American Council on Educalion.
Ansley. T. N.. & Forsyth. R. A. (1985). An examination of the characleristics of uni- dimensional IRT parameler estimates derived from two-dimensional data. I\ptJlit!d PsycholoRical Mt'a.mrt'rnt'nt. 9(1), 37-48.
Assessment Systems Corporation. (1988). USt'r's manual for Iht' MicroCI\T 1t'.{finR sys- Urn. (Version 3). 51. Paul. MN: Author.
Baker. F. R. (\964). An interseclion of test score inlerpretalion and ilem analysis. Journal of Educational Mf!asurt'mt'nl. 1.23-28.
Baker. F. B. (1965), Origins of the item parameters XjO and ｾ＠ as a modern ilem analysis technique. Journal of Educational Ml!aSuumt'nl. 2. 167-180.
Baker, F. B. (1985). Thf! hosies of itt'm rf.'.rpon.u 111l!l1ry. Portsmouth. NH: Heine-mann.
Baker. F. B. (1987). Methodology review: hem parameler estimation underthe one-,Iwo-, and Ihree-parameter logistic models. I\pplied Psydwl"lIical Mta.mrt'mt!tII. II.
111-142.
161
162 FUNDAMENTALS OF ITEM RESPONSE TIIEORY Bejar. I. I. (1980). A procedure for investigllting the unidimensionali!y of achievement
ｉｉＧｾｉｾ＠ bRsed on ilem parameter ･ｾｬｩｬｬｬｩｬｴ･ｳＬ＠ .Imunlll of {'.'d,It'IIliollal M"II,UfI'I·m"I1I. 17.
2113-296,
Airnbnum. A. (19611), Some latent trllit n10deh lind their use in inferring 1111 examinee '5
ability. In F. M. Lord and M. I{, Novick. ｓｬｬｬｬｩＮｾｬｫｬｬｬｬＢｦＧＨＩｲｩｬＧＮｦ＠ of melllalirsl .H'(/I'I',<
(chaplers 17-20), Reading. MA; ａ､､ｩｷｮＮｗ･ｾｬ･ｹＮ＠
Bock, R. D. (1972), Estimating item parameters and latent ability when ｲ･ｾｰｯｮｳ･ｳ＠ are scored in two or more nominal categories. P.fychomnrilw. 37.29·51. , , Bock, R. Do, & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item
parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychomttrilt.tl, 46. 443-459.
Bock, R. D., Gibbons, R., & Muraki, E, (19811). Full information item factor analysis.
Applit'd Psycllo/(>!lical Ml'a.<lIrtmtnt. 12(3).261-280.
Bock, R. D., & Lieberman, M. (1970). Filling a response curve model for dichotomously scored ｩｴ･ｭｾＮ＠ P.fychomttrika. 35, 179-1911.
Bock. R. D., & MisJevy. R. J. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcOln- puter environment. App/itd P.fychological Mta.turtmtnt, 6(4), 431-444.
Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen. J. B. (19P-9). The four generations of compu- terized educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational mta.fUrtmtnt (3rd ed.) (pp. 367·407). New York: Macmillan.
Carlson. J. E. (1987). Mullidimtn.fional iltm rtSpOn,ft tlltory tstimation: A COfl/pUltl' program (Research Repol1 ONR87-2). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing, Cook, L. L., & Eignor. D. R. (1983). Practical considerations regarding the use or item
response theory to equate tests. In R. K. Hambleton (Ed.), Applications af iftm rt.fpOnst ｴｨｾｯｲｹ＠ (pp. 175-195). Vancouver, BC: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.
Cook. L. L.. & Eignor, D. R. (1989). Using item response theory in test score equating.
Intunalional Journal of Edllwtional Rf'uard/, 13(2), 161·173.
Cook, L. L., Eignor, D. R .• & Taft. H. L. (1988). A comparative study of the effects of recency of instruction on the stability of IRT and conventional item parameter estimates. Journal of Educational Mtasu/,tmtnt. 25( I), 31-45.
de Gruijter, D. N. M. (1986). Small N dou not ｡ｬｷ｡ｹｾ＠ justify the Rasch model. Apptitd Psychological Mta.turtmtlll, 10, 187·194.
de Gruijler. D. N. M., & Hambleton, R. K. (19113). Using item response models in crilerion-referenced lest item selection. In R. K. Hamhleton (Ed.), Applications of ilf'm I'f'.fpon.ft thtol'Y (pp. 142-154). Vancouver, Be: EducationRI Research Institute of British Columbia.
Divgi, D. R. (1986). Does the ｒ｡Ｎｾ｣ｨ＠ model really work for multiple choice items? Not if you look closely. Jo",.",,! of Educational Mt'osul't'mt'ni. 23. 283-2911.
Drasgow. F .• Levine, M.
v..
& McLaughlin. M. E. (19117). Detecting inapproprillte test scores with optimal and practical appropriateness indices. Applied ｐＬｦＮｶ､ｬｏｬＬＬｾ［ｻＧＨＯＱ＠Mta.turl'ml'nt, 11(1),59-79.
Drasgow, E, & Lissak, R. I. (19113). Modified parallel analysis; A procedure for examining the latent dimensionality of dichotomously scored item responses. JouI'nal IIf Applied P,'y(·holo1(Y. 611. 363-373.
Drasgow, E. & Parsons. C. K. (19113). Application of unidimensional item response theory models to multidimensional data. Applied ｐＮｲＬｬｉＨＧｨｯｬｯｾｩＨＧＨｊＱ＠ MeOml'l'mnli. 7, IR9-199.
Embretson, S. E. (1984). A general laten! trait model for response processes. I'sydw·
mel/ilea. 49. 175-186.
Rrjrll'/w('s 16]
Fraser, C. & McDonald. R. I'. (1988), NOHARM: Least squares ilem faclor analysis, M"I/;I'(l/';tlft' B,'IIm';oral Rt'.tl'aFl'h. :B. 267 ·26'),
OIas. C. (1990). RUM: RtHI" inl'ompll'u llt'.";1(1I ll/ltlly,fi,\, Alllhelll, The Nelhe!ltlnds:
National ｉｮｾｴｩｴｵｬ･＠ for Elducational MellNurelllenl.
(loftlsteill. II" & Wood. R, (1989). Five decadC!'s of hem reslJ,mse modelling. Bfitl.th hmrnal of Mat/It'matka/ and SfaliJI;('al P,fyd",/oIlY. 42, 1]9-167.
Green. B. E. Bock. R. D .... umphreys. L. G .. Linn. R. L.. & Recklls<". M. D. (1984), Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Jtmma/ of E:duca- fional Mrasurl'mml. 2/(4), 347·360.
Green. 0, R .• Yen. W. M., & Burket, G. R. (1989). ｅｸｰ･ｲｩ･ｮ｣･ｾ＠ in Ihe application of item respoose theory in test construction. Applit'd Mfa.tUrfmeni in Edu/'afi(ln. 2(4).
297-312.
Gullihen, II. (1950). Tht'ory of meniallt'.tIS. New York: John Wiley,
GustafslIon, J. E. (1980a). A solution of the conditional eslimalion problem for long teslS in lhe Rasch model for dichotomous items. Edllcational anll P.fycholoRical Mea- SIIreml'tlt. 40. 377-385.
Guslafsson. 1. E. (l9110h). Teslina and obtaining fit of dala 10 Ihe Rasch model. Briti.th ) ournal of Mathematical and Statistical P,fycholoRY. 33, 205-233.
Haebara, T. (1980). Equaling loailltic ability scales by weighted least squares method.
)al'ont'u P.Tycho/agicol Rtsearch. 22.144-149.
Hambleton. R. K. (Ed.). (1983). Application,f of iUIfI rnponu theory. Vancouver, BC:
Educational Re!learch Institute of British Columbia.
Hamblelon, R. K. (1989), Principles and selected applications of item response theory. In R. L. Linn (Ed.). Educationa/mt'asurt'lfIt'nl Ord ed.) (pp. 147-200). New York:
Macmillan.
Hambleton. R. K., & Cook. L. L. (1983). Robustness of item response ｭｯ､･ｬｾ＠ lind effects of leM length lind sample size on the precision of abilhy eslimates. In D. Weiu (Ed.), Nt'w horizon.' in testing (pp. 31-49). New York: Academic Press.
Hambleton. R. K., & de Gmijter, D. N. M. (1983). Application of item response models to criterion-referenced test item selection. )(1l1rnal IIf Educational Ml'osuft'mt'nt.
20.355·367.
Hambleton, R. K .• ｊｏｬＱ･ｾＬ＠ R. W., &: Rogers. II. 1. (1990. August). Inflllmee of ittm paramt'ft'r t'.ttimation t'rmr., in ft',U deve/opmt'nt, Paper presented at the meeting of American ｐｾｹ｣ｨｯｬｯｧｩ｣ｦｴｬ＠ ASlIOCilltion, Boston.
lIambleton. R. K., &: Rogers, H. J. (19119). Detecting potentially hiRsed test items:
Comparison of IRT area and Mantel·lJaenszel methods. AI'plitd Ml'a,fllrt'mt'nl in EduC'Olion. 2(4). 313-334.
lIambleton, R. K .• & Rogers. H. J. (in press). Assessment of IRT model fit. Applit'd P.tYI·holog;"a/ Mt'Dsurt'nlt'nf.
Ilalnblelon. R. K., & Rovinelli. R. J. (1973). A Fortran IV program for generaling examinee response data rrom logistic lest models, Behavioral Sci"nct'. 17, 73·74.
Ilaml1lelon. R. K .• & Rovinelli. R. J. (1986). Assessing the dimensionality of a set oflesl items. Applied ｐＮｾｹ｣ｨＨＯｬｯｬｬｩ｣｡ｬ＠ Mta.tureml!tlt. 10, 287·J02.
f1amblelOn. R. K .• & Swaminathan. H. (1985). I",m rt'spon.lf. theor .... : Prin";pl"s and ''{If/liclilions. 80Slon: Kluwer.
Ifftmhlel<ln, R. K,. & Trauh. R, E. (1973). ａｮ｡ｬｹｳｩｾ＠ nf empirical dala using two logistic llltenttrait models. Ihiti.fh hlllmol of MIIf/temtlflt·"/lIIu/ Stati.!til'al ｦＧＮ｜ＩＧｉＧＯｉｏｉＨｉＮｾＮｶＮ＠ 26.
273-281
164 FUNDAMENTALS OF ITEM RESI'ONSE TIIEORY lI"mblelOn. R. K .. &. van tier Linden. W. J. (19112). Advances in item ｴ･ｓｦｬｯｮｾ･＠ theory lind applications: An introduction. A,'plie,/ Psychlliogimi Mm.mr"mnlt, 0, 37.\-3711.
lIambleton. R. K .• Zaal. J. N .• &. Pielers. J. M. P. (1991). Computeril.ed adaptive testing:
Theory. applications. and standards. In R. K. Hambleton &. J. N. Znal Ｈｅ､ＮｾＮＩＮ＠
Advanas in edt/catlonal and psy .. hological testing: 1'I,('(}ry and applicatiml.t (PI'.
341-366). Boslon: Kluwer.
lIarris. D. (1989). Comparison of 1-. 2-, and 3-parameter IRT models. Educational Measurement: ｉｳｳｵｾｳ＠ and Practice. 8, 35-41. ' ,
lIallie. J. A. (1985). Methodological review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items. Applied Psychological Mea.mrl'ment. 9. 139-164,
Holland. P. W .• &. Thayer. D. T. (1988). Differential item performance and the Mantel- Haenszel procedure, In H. Wainer &. H. I. Braun (Eds.). T(',vt validity (pp, 129-145), Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis.
PsycfromnriKa, 30, 119-185.
Kendall, M. G .• &. Stuart. A. (1961). The advanct'd theory ofstati.vtic.v (Vol. I). New York:
Hafner.
Kingsbury, G. G .. &. Zara, A. R. (1989). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applil'd Mea.mrt'mt'nt in Education, 2(4). ＳｾＹＭＳＷＵＮ＠
Kingston. N. M., &. Dorans. N. J. (1984). Item location effects and their implications for IRT equating and adaptive testing. Applied P.fychologiml Mt'asuremt'nt, 8. 141- 154.
Kingston. N. M .• &. Dorans. N. J. (19115). The analysis of item-Ability regressions: An exploratory IRT model fit tool. Apl,/i,.d Psyclrolo(liral Mell.wft'ItIt'"t, 9, 281-2118.
Kingston. N. M .• &. Stocking. M. (1986. August). ｐＮｾｹＨＧｨｯｭｬＧｴｲｩＨＧ＠ i.l.fllt:s;n IRT·ooud tnt con.flr/wtian. Paper presented at the meeting of American Psychological Associa- tion. Washington. DC.
Klein, L W .• &. Jarjoura. D. (1985). The importance of content representation for common-item equating with non-random groups. Journal of Educational Mt'asure- /
ment, 22(3), 197-206.
Kolen. M, J. (19811). Traditional equaling methodology. Edrlt'otiorlal Mt'a.vuremt'FIt: 1s.IIIt'S and Pro('/ice, 7(4),29-36,
Linn. R. L (1990). Has item response theory increased the validity of achievement test scores? Applit'd Mea.ml'emt'nt in Edllwtion, 3(2). 115-141.
Linn. R. L.. &. Hambleton. R. K. (1990). Cu.flilmizu/ ｴｎｴＮｾ＠ and (,I/.fIomiuti rwrnl.f
(CRESST Technical Report). Los Angeles: UCLA. School of Education.
Linn, R. L.. &. Harnisch. D. L. (1981). Interactions between item content and group membership on achievelJlent test items. Journal of Educational Mea.fUremt'n1. 18.
109-118.
Linn. R. L.. Levine, M. V .• Hastings. C. N .• &. Wardrop, J. L. (1981). Item bias in a test of reading comprehension. Applit'd P.tycholo(lica/ Mt'a.furt'mt'lII. 5. 159-1 n.
Lord. F. M. (1952). A theory of test SCOrt!.f (Psychometric Monograph No.1). IOWA City.
IA: Psychometric Society.
Lord. F. M. (1974). Estimation of latent ability and item parameten when there are omilled responses. ｐＮｾｹ｣ｨｯｭ･ｴｲｩｫ｡Ｎ＠ 39, 247-264.
Lord. F. M. (1977). Practical applications of item characteristic I:urve theory. JOllrnal of EdllcationaIMt'asllremenl,14,117-138.
165 Lord. F M. (l9RO). Applications of item re.fpmHI' theory /tI1'/'(It·t;'ol tf'Stillll problm,.f.
ｉｉｩｴｬｾ､｡ｬｲＮ＠ NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lord, F M. (19114). Standard errors of measurement at differt"nl ability ｬ･ｶ･ｬｾＮ＠ Journal"f Fducolim,ol Ml'o.fUrl'ml'lIt, 21, 2]9·243.
Lord, F M., & Nov ick, M. R. ( 1968). St(lti.uit'Olll,etlnes 11/ mellwlll!'.,1 H me.'. Reading, MA: Addison·Wesley.
Ludlnw, L. II. (198.5). A slrlltegy for the graphical representation of Rasch model residuals. Edu('OliOllol and P.rycholollical Mro.IIII'l'nlent, 45, 85 I -8W.
Ludlow, L. H. (1986). Graphical analysis of item response theory residuals. Applied P.fycholollkal Ml'a.furl'mt!nt. /0,217-229.
Maslers. G. N. (19R2). A Rasch model for parlial credit scoring. P.t}chonletrika, 47.
149-174.
Masters, O. N .• & Wrighl, B. D. (1984). The essential process in II family of measurement models. P.fJ'l'homl'lri/ca, 49. S29-.544.
McDonald, R. P. (1967). NOli-linear factor anaIY.fi.f (Psychometric Monograph No. IS).
Iowa City: IA: ｐｾｹ｣ｨｯｭ･ｴｲｩ｣＠ Society.
McDonald, R. P. (1981). The dimensionality of leslS lind ilems. British Journal of Malht!matical and Sfatistieal P.fycholoIlY. 34. I ()()·I 17.
McDonald. R. P. (1989). Fuilire directions for item response theory.llllernational }(mrnal of E""('(1tiollol Re.ft!arch. IJ(2), 20.'1·220.
McLaughlin, M. B .. & Drasgow. F. (1987). Lord's chi-square test of item ｢ｩ｡ｾ＠ with estimated and with known peraon parameters, Af)I'lied Psychological Mt!asurt!ment.
11,161·173,
Medin Interactive Technologies, (1986). Micro.fl·ale. Black Rock, CT: Author.
MeJlenbergh, G. (19119). Item billS lind item ｲ･ｳＨｬｏｮｾ･＠ theory. International Journal of Educatioflal Rt!.ftOI'Ch. 0(2). 127- 143.
Millman, J .. <1 Arter, J. A. (1984). Issues in item banking. Journal of Educational Mea.fu/'emt'flt, 21. 315·330.
ｍｩｾｬ･ｶｹＬ＠ R. J. (1986). Bayes modal eslimalion in item response models. P.f.'vchometriJ:a.
51.177·19S.
Mislevy, R. J., &, Bock, R. D. (1984). BILOG: Ma,rimltn' likelihood item anaIY.fi.f and tnt ,f('oring with logi.ftie modtl." Mooresville. IN: Scientific Software.
Owen, R. J. (1975). A Bayesian !lequenlial procedure for quantal res(lOnse in the context of adaptive menial testinl. Journal of tht American Statistical Association. 70, 351·356.
Phillips, S. E., & ｍ･ｨｲ･ｬｬｾＮ＠ W. A, (1987). Curricular differences and ullidimen5ionaJity of achievernenl test d8ta: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Educational Measur<'·
menl.24.1·16.
Rajl!, N. S. (1988). The IIrea between two item characteristic curves. P.tychometri!.:a. 53, 495-502.
Raju. N. S. (1990). Determining Ihe significance of estimaled signed and unsigned areas between two item response functions. ａｦＧｰｬｩｾ､＠ P.t),c/wlollical Mea.Hlreml'nt. 14(2), 197·207.
Rasch, O. (1960). Probabilistic modt!l.f far some intel/illl'nl'{, ami attoi"melll t{'.Us.
Cupenhagen: Danish Institute for Educationol Resear!:h.
Reckase, M. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models Applied to multi-faclor tl"st5: Results and implications. Jm/mal of Edllm/imllil Slatistin, 4. 207·2.m.
166 FUNDAMENTALS OF ITEM RESPONSE TIIEORY
ｒ･ｾｨ･ｴ｡ｲＮ＠ R. (1990). Compult'r ｡Ｈｬ｡ｰｬ［ｖｾ＠ lotinfr ｄＨＧＬＬｾＯＨｽｰｭ＠ .. nl and opplictllion (Lahora·
tory of ｐｾｹ｣｢ｏｬｮ･ｴｲｪ｣＠ and Evaluative Research Report No. 2(4). Amherst: IIniver- sity of Musachusells. School of Education.
Rogers, II. J., &. Hambleton. R. K. (1989). Evaluation of COlllpul('!r simulated haseline statislics for uSe in item bias studies. Educalional and Psycholol(it'al ｍｾｯＮｔｵｲＨＧｭｭｴＮ＠
49. 355·369.
Rogers. H. J., &. Hallie. J. A. (1987). A Monte Carlo investigation of several person and item fit statistics for item response models. ｉｉｰｰｬｩｾ､＠ ｐｳｹ｣ｨｯｬｯｬＨｩ｣｡ｬＬｍＮｾ｡ｳｵｲＨＧｭＨＧｮｴＮ＠
11.47-57.
Rudner, L. M .• Getson, P. R .• &. Knight, O. L. (1980). Biased item detection techniques.
JourNlI of Educot;ONlI Statistics. 5.213-233.
Safrit. M. J., COllta, M. G .• &. Cohen, A. S. (1989). Item respollllC theory and the mea&urement of motor behavior. ｒｾｳｾ｡ｮＺｨ＠ ｑｬｬ｡ｲｬｾｲｬｹ＠ for ｅＺｵｲ､ｳｾ＠ and Sporl. MJ.
325-335.
Samejima, F, (1969). Estimation of latent ability ｵｾ［ｮｧ＠ a ","sf'Onu pallern of I(radt'd ｾ･ｯｲｾｾ＠
(Psychometric Monograph No. 17). Iowa City.IA: Psychometric Society.
Samejima, F. (1972). II gt!nerol model for fru rt!.fpon.ft! dOlO (Psychometric Monograph No. 18). Iowa City. IA: Psychometric Society.
Samejima. F. (1973). Homogeneous case or the continuous response model. PsyrflO-
ｭｾｴｲｩａＺ｡Ｎ＠ 38. 203·219.
Samejima. P. (1974). Normal ogive model on the continuous response level in the multidimensional latent space. ｐｳｹ｣ｨｯｭｾｴｲ［ａＺ｡Ｎ＠ 39. I I 1-121.
Samejima. F. (1977). A use of the information function in tailored te5ting. IIpp/it'd Psyeholol(ical Uemurement. I. 233-247.
Shepard, L. A .• Camilli, 0., &: Averill. M. (198 I). Comparison of procedures for detecting test·item bi ... with both internal and eJlternal abili ty criteria. Journal ()f Educalional Slal;.II;e.T. 6. 317·375.
Shepard. L. A., Camilli. G .• &: Williams, D. M. (1984). Accounting ror statistical ani facts in item bias research. Journal of Educalional Slali.YI;es. 9. 93-128.
Shepard. L. A .• Camilli, G., &. Williams. D. M. (1985). Validity or approximation
ｴ･｣ｨｮｩｱｵ･ｾ＠ for detecting item bias. Journal of EduHllional ｕｴＧ｡ｳｵｲｾｭｴＧｮｴＮ＠ 11(2).
77-105.
Spray, J. (1990). One-parameter ilem respon!le theory models for psychomotor tests involving repealed. independent attempts. Reuarc:l, Quartuly for E,url'iu and Sporl.6/(2), 162·168.
Stocking, M. L. (1990). Specifying optimum ell.8minees for item parameter estimation in item response theory. Psych,mrttriA:a. 55(). 461·475.
Stocking. M. L .• &. Lord. F. M. (1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory. IIpplil!d Psyt'holol(ical Ul!asllrt!mt'flt. 7.201 -210.
Subkoviak, M. 1., Mack. J. S .• Ironson. G. H .• &. Craig. R. D. (1984). Bmpirical compar- ison of selected item bias detection procedures with bias manipulation. Journal of EducalionoI Ueo.fu","me,,/. 1 I( 1).49-.58.
Swaminathan. II. (1983). Parameter estimation in Item ·respunse model •. In R. K. flam- bleton (Bd.). IIpplicalions of item ｲｾｾｦＧｏｬｬｓ･＠ Iheory (PI" 24·44). Vancouver. DC:
Educational Research Institute of Brilish Columbia.
Swaminathan. II.. &: Gifford, J. A. (1982). Baye5ian estimation in the Rasch model.
Journal of Educalional Slatislics. 7. 175-191.
167 Swaminathan. 11.. & Gifford. 1. A. (198]). Estimation of parameters in the three·
parameter latent trait llIodel. In I). Weiss (Ed.). ｎｾｷ＠ hmizmu in ,,,stinK (pp. 13· 30).
New York: Academic Press.
Swaminalhan, B.o & Gifford. J. A. (I98S). RayesiUIl eSlillllllion in the two'parameler logistic model. PJychomt'lrika. 50. 349·364.
SW8min8than. If .. & GiUord, J. A. (1986). Bayesian estimatiun in the three-parameter logistic model. Psyr/wmt'lrika, 51. 589-60 I.
Swaminathan. II., & Rogers. B. J. (1990). Detecting differenlial ilem funclioning using logistic regression ｰｲｯ｣･､ｵｲ･ｾＮ＠ Jmmw/ 01 Edu('otiona/ Mea.uII-emf'IfI, 27(4), 361·
370.
Talsuoka. K. K. (l9l!7). Validation of cognitive sensitivity for item response curves.
Journal 01 Edllrat;onal M('alfurt'mmt. 24. 233·245.
Thissen. D. M. (1986). MULTlLOG: IUm onaly.,i.l al/(I .<lorinR will,multiplt' ('alt'lCory rt'.'ponS{' mot/d, (Version 5). Mooresville. IN: Scientific Software.
Thissen. D. M.o & Steinbers. L. (1986). A taxonomy of item response models. I'.,y.
t'iwmt'lrika, 51, '567·'577.
Traut., R. E .. & Lam. R. (19l!5). Latent structure and item sampling models for ｴ･ｾｬｩｮｧＬ＠
Anllulli R(,l'il'''' "f Psy(·holoICY • . M, 19-48.
Traub, R. E .. & Wolfe. R. G. (1981). Lalenl hailtherrries nnd the assessmenl of educa·
lionAI achievement. In D. C. Oerliner (Ed.), Rt'I'if'''' 01 rf'Jt'OIch in ('dUration (pp.
377·43'5). Washington. DC: American Educational Research Association.
Tucker. L. R .• ｈｵｭｰｨｲ･ｹｾＮ＠ L. 0" &; Roznowski, M. A. (!9116). Compul'lIlivt! a('t'lIro(',Y of fivt! india.f of dimt!lfsianalily of binary ilt'm.L Champaign·Urbana: University or
Illinois, Depanment or Psychology.
(frry. V. W. (1914). Approximations to hem pal'alllders of mental lest ｭｯ､･ｬｾ＠ and their uses. f:durationul and PsycholflRical Mt!o.wr<'mt!lft, 34. 253·269.
lJrry, V. W. (1918). ANCILLES: lUm I,oramnu t!slimalion pl"OR/'wn ... ith normal ORil,t!
and IORi.flii' thru·para.mt'ur modt!1 option.,. Washington, DC: U.S. Civil Service Commission. Development Cenler.
Vale, C. D. (19l!6). Linking item parameters onto n COIUlllon scale. Applit'd P"Y('ho/ORical Mrasllrf'mt'nl. 10(4). 333-344.
van der Linden. W. J .• & Ooekkooi-Timminga, E. (1989). A llIaximum model rOT lest design wilh practical constrain ... Psyt·homnri/«(,. 54(2). 237·247.
Wainer, B. et al. (Eds.). (1990). Compulniud ada/uive tt!.H;IIR: A ,nimt'/. Hillsdale, Nl:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wainer, II.. & ｔｨｩｾｾ･ｮＮ＠ D. (1987), ｅｾｴｩｭ｡ｴｩｮｧ＠ abililY with Ihe wrong model. JOllrnal of Edll('(llionol Sta'i."in, /2, 339-368.
Weiss. D. 1. (19l!2). Improving measuremenll.juality and erticiency wilh adaptive lesting.
API!Iit'tl P"yt'ho/t!Rim/ Mea.fllrt'm('n/, 6, 473-492.
Weiss, D. J. (Ed.). (1983). Nt"' horiton.f in It'stinK. New York: Academic Pre5s.
Weiss. D. J. (1985). Adaptive testing by computer. JOl/Illal of COlfJllllinR and Cliniml P.fy,·hn!t'RY, .U, 774· 7l!9.
Weiu, D. J .• .\ ｋｩｮｧｾ｢｜ｬｲｹＮ＠ G. O. (1984). Applicalion tlf cmnpuleril.ed adaplive ｉＨＧｾｴｬｮＬ＠ 10
educational problems. Journal of Edu('ationo/ Mt!u.fIlrt!m<'lft, 2/, 361·37.5.
Wingersky. M. S. (1983). LOOIST: A program for compllling mlJx;mum likelihood procedures for logistic test ｭｯ､･ｬｾＮ＠ In R. K. lIal1lblelOn (Ed.), App/it"alions of ;um rnpon.ft! Iheory (pp. 45·56). Vancouver. BC: Educalional Research Institule of British Columbia.
i
\ I
1
168 FUNDAMENTALS OF ITEM RESPONSE THEORY Wingersky, M. S., Barton, M. A., & lord. F. M. (19112). I.OGIST uur's Kuit/e I'rincelOn,
NJ: Educational Tesling Service.
Woodcock. R. W. (1978). Developm"nl and stl1ndardiZfllion of Ihe WoodcocK-Johnson P.rycho-Educational Battt!fy. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources Corporation.
Wright, B. D. (1968). Sample-free test calibration and penon measurement. PmcudinR.r of Iht! 1967 Invitational Conft!ft!nu on Tt!5tinK Prohlems. Princeton, NJ: Educa- tional Testing Service.
Wright. 9. D. (1977). Solving measurement problems with the
ｒｾｳｾｨ＠
model. Journal of Educational Measurt!menl, 14,97-116.Wright. 9. D., Mead. R. J .• &. Bell. S. R. (1979). BICAL: Calibraling ill'm.r wilh Ihe Rasch modd (Statistical Laboratory Research Memorandum No. 239). Chicago: Univer- sity of Chicago, School of Education.
Wright. B. D .• Schulz, M., &. Linacre, J. M. (1989). BIGSC ALE: Rasch analysis compultr program. Chicago: MESA Press.
Wright, B. D., &. Stone, M. H. (1979). Besl 11'51 dt!.tign. Chicago: MESA Press.
Yen, W. M. (1980). The extent. causes, and importance of context effects on item
ｰ｡ｲ｡ｭ･ｴ･ｲｾ＠ for two latent trllit modeh. Joltrntll of Educalional Mea.tllreml'nt. 17,
297-311.
Yen, W. M. (1981). Using simulation results In choose a latent trait model. AI'I!lied Psychological Mt!'osureml'nl, 5, 245·2ti2.
Yen. M. W. (1983). Use of the three-parameter logistic model in the development of a standardized achievement test. In R. K. Hamhleton (Ed.), Ap"lif'otiot/,f of ilem rnponse theory (pp. 123-141). Vancouver, BC: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.
Yen, W. M" Burket, G. R., & Sykes. R. C. (in press). Nun-unique stllutions to the likelihood equation fur the three-purillneter lugistic lIlodel. l'.nc!wmr/riAtI.