CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD
B. Suggestion
Based on the conclution above, the research wants draw some suggestion as follows:
1. For teacher
a. The English teachers are suggested that they apply Educational Debating Method teaching and learning especially in teaching speaking.
b. The English teaching are suggested that they be more creative and enrich their materials. They can use Educational Debating Method stimuate the students’ attention and motivate them in leaning English.
c. In teaching English speaking, teacher should be use certain technique or strategies, because speaking is not easy thing in teaching Engish.
d. The teacher have to choose an appropriate technique or strategy in teaching English. So that, the students’ can be enthusiasm and interested in learning teaching process.
2. For students
The students are suggested that they practice their speaking ability continually in role play to have good command and more ability in speaking accuracy and fluency. The suggestion, which mentions English speaking class always fun and easy to conduct and never harder like their imagination so many times before.
3. For next researchers
The researcher in the future are suggested that they develop these research findings to investigate the speaking issues in any level of students, especially in senior high school level. Moreover, the use of experimental research as research design can be first research implication to secure the issues or problems in improving students’ ability to speak.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Andini, Niar. 2014. The Effectiveness of using Presentation, Practce, Production (PPP) Technique to Improve the Students’ Speaking Skill. Thesis:
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
Ardawati. 2009. The Application of Conversation Lingual Method in Improving Listening Skill of the First Year Student at SMK Muhammadiyah I Bontoala. Thesis: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
Barkley, Elizabert E, Et al. (2005). Collaborative Learning Techniques.
Translated by Narulita Yusron. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Calcagnini, Sara. 2007. Debating as an Educational Method tto Science and Citizenship. Journal of Science Communication. (http://jcom.sissa.it).
Darby, Michele. 2007. Debate: A Teaching-Learning Strategy for Deveeloping Competence in Communication and Critical Thinking. Jornal of Dental Hygiene vol.81, No.4, October 2007.
Depdikbud. 1985. Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Proses Belajar Mengajar dan Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Sistem Penilaian. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Fatmawati. 2014. Improving the Students’ Speaking Skill through Self Determination Approach. Thesis: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
Gay, L.R., and Airisian, Peter. (2000). Educational Research. Columbus:
Prentice-Hall.
Gay, L., R. 1981. Educational Research, Competencies for Analysis and Application. Chicago: Charles E. Merril publishing Company.
Halvorsen, Andy. 2005. Incorporating critical thinking skills development into ESL/EFL course. (http://iteslj.org).
Hamed G. 2012. Audio Lingual Learning. Asian Journal Press.
Harmer, Jeremy. 1991. The Practice of English Language Teaching. New York Group UK United.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The practice of English language teaching (third edition).
England: Longman.
Hornby. 2000. Definition of Speaking Skill. New York: Publisher.
Iqbal, Muh. 2009. The Effectiveness of Speaking Factor in the Students fFuency and Accuracy (a true experimental at the third grade of SMU 6 Muhammadiyah Makassar). Thesis: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar
Joyce A. Shaw. 2012. Using Small Group Debates to Actively Engage Students in an Introductory Microbiology Course. Journal of Microbiology &
Biology Education. (http://dx.doi.org).
Kennedy, Ruth. 2007. In-Class Debates: Fertile Ground for Active Learning and the Cultivation of Critical Thinking and Oral Communication Skills.
Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania. (http://www.isetl.org).
Khoironiyah. 2011. The Implementation of Debate in Teaching Speaking at Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 2 Rembang in the academic year 2011/ 2012. Online Thesis. FKIP Unirow Tuban.
Klippel, Friederike. 1987. Keep Talking- Communicative Fluency Activities for Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lilly, Emily L. 2012. Assigned Positions for In-Class Debates Influence Student Opinions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Vol. 24 No. 1, 1-5.
Mbato. 2006. Action Research and the Professional Development of Graduate Teaching Assistants. The Modern Language Journal, vol. 90, no.1, and pp.33-47.
Muhadharah, Umarah. 2014. The Implementation of Educational Debating Method to Foster Students’ Speaking Ability at The Eleventh Grade Of SMAN 1 Sumber. Unpublish.
Nurdin, Mohamad dkk. Belajar dengan Pendekatan PAILKEM. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Nurjannah. 2012. Improving Students’ Speaking Skill through the Use of Audiolingual Method. Thesis: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
Omelicheva, Mariya Y. 2006. Global Politics on Trial: Using Educational Debate for Teaching Controversies of World Affairs. International Studies Perspectives. 7, 172-186: Purdue University. http://jdh.adha.org
Rinamandasari. 2014. The effectiveness of Retelling Short Stories in Improving Students’ Speaking Ability. Thesis: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
River. 1968. How to Improve your Pronunciation. Retrieved from:
(http://www.howtodothings.com).
Steward, T and Pleisch, G. 1998 Developing Academic Language Skill And Fluency Through Debate. http://www.language.hyper.chubu.ac.
Tarigan, H.G. (1990). Berbicara sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa.
Bandung: Angkasa.
Tenri Ampa, Andi. . English Pronunciation. Unpublish: Makassar Muhammadiyah University.
Vargo, Steven P. 2012. Teaching By Debate. (http://www.usma.edu)
Wahyuni. 2013. Improving The Students’ Fluency In Speaking Through Mixing Conversation-Bilingual Learning Approach. Thesis: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
Widdowson. 1984. Definition of Speaking. Hiroshima University.
P P N E D I E C
S
ix
APPENDIX A : Pre-test and Post-Test... 51 APPENDIX B : Lesson Plan... 52 APPENDIX C : Teaching Material... 64 APPENDIX D : Data Analysis ... 68 APPENDIX E :The Students’Speaking Ability in Accuracy and Fluency... 72 APPENDIX F : Total Score of Pre-Test and Post-Test ... 74 APPENDIX G :Total Score of the Students’ in Speaking Ability... 77 APPENDIX H : The Mean Score... 78 APPENDIX I : ThePercentage of the Students’ Improvement of Speaking
Accuracy and Fluency ... 80 APPENDIX J : The Significant Difference ... 81 APPENDIX K : Distribution of t-table ... 82 DOCUMENTATION... 83 CURRICULUM VITAE………...………....84
Appendix A
a. Pre-test
The students spoke and delivering their argument about the topic from the teacher, the topic is “The Effect of Internet Toward the Young Generation”.
b. Post-test
The students spoke and gave an argument about the topics from the teacher’s given, the theme is “The Effect of Mobile Phone Toward the Young Generation”.
Nama Sekolah : SMA NEGERI 1 BONTONOMPO Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : XI IPA 2/1 Pertemuan ke : 1 (pertama) Alokasi Waktu : 2 x 45 menit Aspek Skill : Speaking