CHAPTER III CHAPTER III
B. Suggestions
In relation to the English subject discussed in this research regarding the students’ speaking ability especially smoothness and pronounciation, the researcher deals with some suggestions as follows.
1. For the Researcher
The researcher should implement Time Token Method in speaking class in order to help the students in improving their speaking ability. The teachers of speaking class must give the students an interesting topic in speaking activity learning hence they would be more interesting in speaking regarding in describing something in English. The teachers should consider various topic of describing text in speaking class that implemented with Time Token method because each student has a different level of understanding and learning style.
2. For the Students’ at the XIIPA2 grade of SMAN 5 Soppeng
48
For the students should be more fluent to speak and improve their English in all aspect in order to the students’ more easy to learning speaking English.
3. For the English teacher at SMAN 5 Soppeng
Based on the data analysis, proved that Time Token technique makes the students speaking ability better than before. To increase students ability in speaking, the researcher suggests the teacher to apply Time Token technique in teaching speaking.
4. For the researcher
The data might become reference to other researchers or they can complete this research in next time to progress education better wherefore there is no practice without theory and vice versa.
49
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ahyarudin Ahmad, 2007. Comparative Study Of The Students’ Speaking Development Between Those Who Are Taught Through The Time Token Method And Those Taught Through Audio Lingual Method (unpublished S1 Script). University of Lampung, Lampung.
Anna Kurniawati, 2013. Improving The Self-Confidence In Speaking Practice By Using Role-Play Technique For The Eight Grade Students Of Smp Muhammadyah 3 Yogyakarta (Published S1 Script). Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (BNSP). 2006. Standar Kompetensi dan Kompetensi Dasar SMA/MA. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Arango, Hernando Prada.2015.Students’ Self Confidence as A Way to Affect English Oral Production In Tenth Grade Students At Ricaurte School.
Thesis
Arends, Richard I. 2008. Lerning to Teach . Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Asmadi .2016. The Influence of Psychological Factors Towards The Students’
Speaking Ability. Thesis
Asmayanti, S., & Amalia, R. (2014). Improving Students' Speaking Ability By Using Whole Brain Teaching (Wbt) Method at The First Year Students' of SMP Negeri 1 Baraka. Exposure, 3(1), 72-96.
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (BNSP). 2006. Standar Kompetensi dan Kompetensi Dasar SMA/MA. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Barber, H. 2003. Psychology: Motivation, Anxiety, Confidence, Goal Setting.
United States.
Basuki, Y. 2018. The Use of Drilling Method in Teaching Phonetic Transcription and Word Stress of Pronunciation Class. Karya Ilmiah Dosen, 1(1).
Blaz, D. 2000. A Collection of Performance Task and Rubrics: Foreign Language. Published by Eye on Education, Inc.
http://googlebooks.co.id retrieved on March 3rd, 2009.
Brown, G & Yule, G. 1983. Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
50
Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by principle. An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Second Edition. New York: Pearson Education.
Burden, P. R. & David M. B. 1999. Methods for Effective Teaching. Second Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Desfitranita & Senjahari, B. 2019. Assessing Students Speaking Skills at 2nd Semester Students of English Study Program IAIN Curup. ENGLISH FRANCA : Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 3(1), 41-70.
Fauziyah, N., & Fitria, N. 2021. Teacher�s Strategies to Overcome Students�
Difficulties When Implementing Time Token Arends Method in Learning Speaking English. Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30659/jamr.2.1.1-11
Fauzan, Muh.Saefullah Al. 2019. Improving Student’s Speaking Ability through Mobile Social Networking (Pre-Experiment Researh At the Tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 8 Makassar). Skripsi Tesis. Makassar: Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.
Fauziati, Endang. 2014. Methods of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL). Surakarta: Era PustakaUtama.
Fentari, R., & Darmawan, S. L. 2016. THE INFLUENCE OF USING TIME TOKEN METHOD TOWARD SPEAKING ABILITY AT THE STUDENTS’
OF SMP N 1 BATANGHARI ACADEMICYEAR 2014/2015. PREMISE JOURNAL:ISSN Online: 2442-482x, ISSN Printed: 2089-3345, 5(1).
https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v5i1.420
Nur Afni, Syam, U. K., & Andi Baso, F. (2021). THE USE OF CRITICAL LITERACY APPROACH TO INTENSIFY THE STUDENTS’ CRITICAL READING ABILITY AT THE SMPN 2 SUNGGUMINASA. English Language Teaching Methodology, 1(3), 151–156. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/eltm/article/view/43
Gower, R., Phillips, D.,& Walters, S. 1995. Teaching Practice Handbook (New Edition). Oxford: Mac Millan Heinemann
Hamka, Fitriani. (2018). The Students’ Speaking Performance in Using TimeToken Arends (Tta) Technique (A Descriptive Research at The Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Muhammadiyah Camba Maros). Skripsi Tess. Makassar: Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.
51
Hanum, L. 2017. Improving English Speaking Skill through Introductory English Videos. Skripsi Tesis. Banda Aceh: UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh.
Harmer, Jeremy. 1998. How to Teach English. Addison welsey Longman, Inc.
Heaton, J.B. Speaking English Language Test. Newyork: Longman. 1989
Istarani. 2011. 58 Innovative Instructional Model As Teachers’ References in Deciding Learning Instruction. Medan: Penerbit Media Persada
Ladousse, Gillian Porter. 1987. Role Play. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leo, Sutanto. 2001. English for Professional Accommodation Services. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Lim, S. L. 2017. Fluency and Accuracy in Spoken English-Implications for Classroom Practice in A Bilingual Context. The English Teacher, 9.
Littlewood, W.T. 1981. Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Luoma, Sari. 2004. Assessing Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. 1989. Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom.Camridge :Camridge University Press
Nunan, D. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. Cambridge: McGraw Hill.
O’Malley, M.J. 1996. Authentic Assessment for Language Learners: Practical Approaches for teachers. USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Owens, Timothy J. 1994. "Two Dimensions of Self-Esteem: Reciprocal Effects of Positive Self-Worth and Self-Deprecation on Adolescent Problems."
American Sociological Review. 59:391-407.
Owens, Timothy J. 2001. Extending Self-Esteem Theory and Research.
Cambridge: University Press.
Prawerti, Ringgi Candraning.. 2012. The Effectiveness of Using Strip Stories Technique in Teaching Speaking Toward Students’ Speaking Achievement of the Eleventh Grade Studensts of Excellent Science Class in MAN Tulungagung 1. Skripsi Tesis. Tulungagung: STAIN Tulungagung.
Rivers, W. M. 1987. Interactive Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52
Rosenberg, Morris. 1965. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. (Chapter 2 discusses construct validity.)
Rosenberg, Morris. 1986. Conceiving the Self. Krieger: Malabar, FL Silber, E.
and Tippett, Jean 1965. "Self-esteem: Clinical assessment and measurement validation." Psychological Reports, 16, 1017-1071.
(Discusses multitrait-multimethod investigation using RSE).
Rossiter, Marian J. 2009. Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review 65(3): 395–412.
Susatyo, B. 2021. Time Token Technique to Improve Students’ Learning Activity and Communicative Competence. PROMINENT JOURNAL, Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2021
Suryosubroto, 2004, Menejemen Pendidikan di Sekolah, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Slavin, Robert E. 1990. Cooperative Learning theory, research, and practice.
Englewood Cliffs, Nj. Prentice Hall.
Thornbury, S. 2005. How to Teach Speaking. London: Pearson EducationBlascovich, Jim and Joseph Tomaka. 1993. "Measures of Self- Esteem." Pp. 115-160 in J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver, and L.S. Wrightsman (eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. Third Edition. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.
Thresia, F. 2016. Improving Speaking Ability and Self Confidence through Task- Based Language Teaching at the First Semester of Accountancy.University Muhammadiyah of Metro.
Wells, L. Edward and Gerald Marwell. 1976. Self-Esteem: Its Conceptualization and Measurement. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Wylie, Ruth C. 1974. The Self-Concept (especially pp. 180-189.) Revised Edition.
Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press
53
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
C
E
S
54 Appendix A
Oral Test
Composition Test A. Pre-Test
Speak in front of class about favorite person in 1 minutes!
B. Post-Test
Speak in front of class about favorite thing in 1 minutes!
ACTIVITY : Speaking Test ( group discussion ) INSTRUCTION : Do as what the instruction say!
TIME : 30-60 Second each students
MATERIALS : Pre-Test about favorite person in 1 minutes!. Post-Test about favourite thing.
Step Of Time Token Arends
Istarani in muhammad kristiawan (2011:194) says several steps of Time Token activity:
1. Prepare the Time Token coupon to be spread to the students’.
2. Arrange the students’ seating into a discussion form.
3. Every students’ is given a coupon to talk around 30 seconds.
4. If the student have finished their speak, it must be given to the teacher.
One coupon once speaking chance.
5. The students’ who have run out their coupon, have no chance to speak anymore. The chance is only for those who still hand their coupon.
55 Process:
The English teacher of the school apply Time Token Arends technique as teaching technique learning activity:
1. The teacher conveys a learning technique that will be used of Time Token type cooperative learning where each student is given two coupons, and when the student submits, answers, and responds to the questions the student must put the coupon in the middle of the group.
2. The last is the teacher divides the students into groups which consist of four students and select one of them to become the captain of the group.
3. The teacher asked each captain to come forward and took an envelope in which had a number on it. And the teacher gave some coupon for each students. After the teacher called the entire captain of the group to took the envelope, the teacher then gave the students time to discuss the topic for twenty minutes. After the students finished discuss about the topic, the teacher choose the first group presentation about the topic and so on all of the group finished presentation.
4. After the students finished to speak, students gave the teacher coupon they have .
5. The students not have coupon, they can’t speak again. Just for the students have coupon can speak. One by one the students speak and the teacher help the researcher for analyzed students self confidence used assessment self confidence.
56 Appendix B
TEACHINGS’ SCHEDULE
No Day, Date Time Allocated Activity
1 Friday, 29 October 2021 2x40 Minutes Pre-test
2
Friday, 05 November 2021
2x40 Minutes
Treatment
3
Friday, 12 November 2021
2x40 Minutes
Treatment
4
Friday, 19 November 2021
2x40 Minutes
Treatment
5
Friday, 26 November 2021
2x40 Minutes
Post-test
57 Appendix C
Students’ Scores
DATA OF PRE-TEST
No Code Score
Smoothness Pronunciation
1 S-01 50 50
2 S-02 55 40
3 S-03 40 35
4 S-04 60 55
5 S-05 30 55
6 S-06 30 60
7 S-07 50 40
8 S-08 50 40
9 S-09 50 65
10 S-10 40 60
11 S-11 50 55
12 S-12 40 50
13 S-13 30 40
14 S-14 30 45
15 S-15 55 60
16 S-16 40 40
17 S-17 40 50
18 S-18 30 40
58
DATA OF POST-TEST
No Code Score
Smoothness Pronunciation
1 S-01 80 70.00
2 S-02 85 70
3 S-03 75 65
4 S-04 100 70
5 S-05 70 70
6 S-06 70 85
7 S-07 75 80
8 S-08 75 75
9 S-09 75 90
10 S-10 80 75
11 S-11 85 80
12 S-12 75 70
13 S-13 70 70
14 S-14 70 70
15 S-15 100 90
16 S-16 75 65
17 S-17 75 65
18 S-18 75 65
59 Appendix D
Result of SPSS Smoothness Pre-Test
Statistics PreTest
N Valid 18
Missing 0
Mean 42.7778
Std. Deviation 10.03263 Variance 100.654
Range 30.00
Minimum 30.00
Maximum 60.00
PreTest Frequency Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid 30.00 5 27.8 27.8 27.8
40.00 5 27.8 27.8 55.6
50.00 5 27.8 27.8 83.3
55.00 2 11.1 11.1 94.4
60.00 1 5.6 5.6 100.0
Total 18 100.0 100.0
Post-Test
Statistics PostTest
N Valid 18
Missing 0
Mean 78.3333
Std. Deviation 9.07485 Variance 82.353
Range 30.00
Minimum 70.00
Maximum 100.00
60 PostTest Frequency Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid 70.00 4 22.2 22.2 22.2
75.00 8 44.4 44.4 66.7
80.00 2 11.1 11.1 77.8
85.00 2 11.1 11.1 88.9
100.00 2 11.1 11.1 100.0
Total 18 100.0 100.0
T-Test and T-Table
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean N
Std.
Deviation
Std. Error Mean Pair 1 PreTest 42.7778 18 10.03263 2.36471
PostTest 78.3333 18 9.07485 2.13896
Paired Samples Correlations N
Correlatio
n Sig.
Pair 1 PreTest &
PostTest
18 .781 .000
Paired Samples Test Paired Differences
t df Sig.
(2- taile
d) Mean
Std.
Deviati on
Std.
Error Mean
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference Lower Upper Pair
1
PreTe st - PostT est
- 35.555 56
6.3913 7
1.506 46
- 38.7339 1
- 32.377 20
- 23.60 2
17 .000
61 Fluency
Pre Test
Statistics PretestPronunciation
N Valid 18
Missing 0
Mean 48.8889
Std. Deviation 9.16444
Variance 83.987
Minimum 35.00
Maximum 65.00
PretestPronunciation
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid 35.00 1 5.6 5.6 5.6
40.00 6 33.3 33.3 38.9
45.00 1 5.6 5.6 44.4
50.00 3 16.7 16.7 61.1
55.00 3 16.7 16.7 77.8
60.00 3 16.7 16.7 94.4
65.00 1 5.6 5.6 100.0
Total 18 100.0 100.0
Post-test
Statistics PostestPronunciation
N Valid 18
Missing 0
Mean 73.6111
Std. Deviation 8.18994
Variance 67.075
Minimum 65.00
Maximum 90.00
62 PostestPronunciation
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid 65.00 4 22.2 22.2 22.2
70.00 7 38.9 38.9 61.1
75.00 2 11.1 11.1 72.2
80.00 2 11.1 11.1 83.3
85.00 1 5.6 5.6 88.9
90.00 2 11.1 11.1 100.0
Total 18 100.0 100.0