CHAPTER IV CHAPTER IV
B. Suggestions
Based on the conclusion above, the reseacher addresses the following suggesstion and recommendation.
1. It is suggested to the English teacher to apply the cloze procedural technique as one of alternative in teaching method and learning process.
2. The teachers should be creative in teaching English especially reading because to master English, it needs more method or method in improving it.
3. The students also should not to forget to memorize many English daily expressions in order to make them speak easily in their activities.
4. It is suggested to the English teachers to use Cloze Procedural technique in presenting the reading comprehension materials, because it is effective to improve the students‟ achievements.
5. For next researcher, they use Cloze Procedural technique in doing researchers,because it can give enough opportunity to the students‟ to practice their reading comprehension and it is enjoyable way for learning.
6. The result of this research can also be used as an additional reference or further research with different discussion for the next researchers.
7. The writer hopes the researches use cloze procedural technique to improving students‟ reading comprehension.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ampa, A. Tenri. 2010. English for Specific Purposes.Makassar.
Anita, 2006. Improving the Students Reading Comprehension through Sustained Silent reading Method. Makassar: Thesis. FKIP Unismuh.
Anggraeni, DF. 2010. Multiple-Choice and Cloze Tests for Measuring the Reading Comprehension Ability among the first Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Gombong. Makalah TAS. Yogyakarta: Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FBS UNY.
Anggraeni, Purwita. 2007. Audio Lingual Teaching as an Alternative Method in Teaching Speaking an A Action Research Given to the First Year Students of SMP Negeri 2 Pemalang in the Academic Year 2006/2007. Thesis: of UNNES.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Procedure Penelitian (Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Edisi Revisi IV). Jakarta. PT Rineka Cipta.
Bachman, Lyle F. 1985. Performance on cloze tests with fixed-ratio and rational deletions. TESOL, (Online), Vol. XIII, No. 2,
(http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 23, 2012 Ba‟dulu, A. Muis. 2009. Introduction to Linguitics. Makassar.
Basri D.M. 2007. Fundamental of Research Methodology. Makassar.
Bloomer, R. The Effect of Non-overt reinforced Cloze Procedure upon Reading Comprehension. In G. Schick and M. May (Eds) new Frontiers in Colledge-Adult Reading. Milwaukee, WI: National Reading Conference.
(Online), Vol. XIII, No. 2
(http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 23, 2012 Bormuth, J. 1966. On the theory of achievement test items. Chicago:University of
Chicago, press. (Online), Vol. XIII, No. 2
(http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 23, 2012 Bortnick, Robert and G.S. Lopardo. 1973. An instructional Aplication of the Cloze
Procedure. TESL Canada Journal.
B. Risnawati. 2011. The Application of Journal Entry Technique in Developing Students’ Reading Comprehension at the first Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Tanete Riaja. Makassar: Thesis. FKIP Unismuh.
Derewianka, Beverly.1990. Exploring How Texts Work. London: Primary English Teaching Association.
Dirham. 2011. Improving the Students’ Reading Comprehension through Discovery Learning Method at SMAN 18 Makassar. Makassar: Thesis.
FKIP Unismuh.
Elliot, John. 1991. Action Research for Educational Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Fitriani. 2008. Improving the Students’ Reading Comprehension by Using Anecdotes at the Second year Students of SMP Negeri 1 Bulukumba Kec.
Herlang. Thesis. Makassar: Muhammadiyah University.
Fromkin, Victoria & Rodman, Robert. 1983. An Introduction to Language. New York: CBS College Publishing.
Gay, L.R. 1981. Educational Research Competences for Analysis and Application. Charles E. Meril Publishing Company A Bell and Howell Company.
Goodman. 1988. Ten Steps to Building College Reading Skills. Townsend:
Townsend Press.
Grellet, Francoise. 1981. Developing Reading Skills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Harris and Sipay. 1980. How to Increase Reading Ability. A guide to Developmental and Remedial Methods, Seventh Edition Revised and Enlarged. New York: Longman Publisher Inc.
Hariana. 1998. Factor Affecting the Reading English Newspaper. Thesis. FBS UNM
Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. How to Teach English. Longman.
Hasna .1999. Improving Reading Comprehension of the Students of the Second Years Students Of SLTP 1 Takalalla Wajo Through Communicative Task.
Thesis, FBS UNM
Hikmawati. 2008. Improving Students’ Reading Ability through English Magazines Using Three-Phase-Techniques. Thesis. FKIP Unismuh
Hoffman, J. V. 1980. Studying contextual build-up during reading through cumulative cloze. Journal of Reading Behavior.
Smith, J. Richard. 1978. Teaching Children to read.Second Edition. London:
Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
Suhendar, M.E &PienSupinah. 1992. MKDU Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Pimir Jaya.
Islamiah. 2009. Incresing the students’ reading comprehension through Duided Reciprocal Peer Questioning Technuque. Makassar: Thesis. FKIP Unismuh.
Jongsma, E. 1980. Cloze Instruction Research: A second Look. Newark, DE:
International Reading Association.
Kennedy, D., and Weener, P. Visual and Auditory training with the cloze procedure to improve reading and listening comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 8,523-541. (Online), Vol. XIII, No. 2
(http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 23, 2012 Kustaryo, S. 1988. Reading Method for Colleague Students. Jakarta: Proyek
Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan, Direktorat Lutfiah, 2008. Improving Reading Comprehension by Using Authentic Material.
Makassar: Thesis. FKIP Unismuh.
Marino, Jacqueline. 1981. cloze passages: guidelines for selection.TESL Canada Journal. (online), Vol. 6, No. 1,
(http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 23, 2012 Meyer, B. 1975. Organization of Prose and its Effect on Recall. Amsterdam:
North Holland Publishing Company. (Online), Vol. XIII, No. 2 (http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 23, 2012 Mikulecky, B. S. and L. Jeffries. 1986. Reading Power. Boston: Addison Wesley
Publishing Company.
Nunan, David. 1989. Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Nuttal, N. 1988. Teaching Reading Skill in Foreign Language. Oxford:
Heinemann International Publishing Company.
Olson, J.P & M.H Diller.1982. Learning to Teach Reading in ElementarySchool.
London: Macmilan Publishing Company.
Rankin, E.F. 1977. Sequence strategies for teaching reading comprehension with the cloze procedure. In P. David Pearson and Jane Hansen (eds.) Reading:Theory, Research and Practice, 26th Yearbook ofthe National
Reading Conference. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association. (online), Vol. 6, No. 1,
(http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 25, 2012 Rankin, E. F. An Evaluation of the Cloze Procedure as a Technique for
Measuring Reading Comprehension. Unpublished doctoral desertation, Uneversity of Michigan. (online), Vol. 6, No. 1,
(http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 23, 2012 Regina. G. Chatel. 2001. Diagnostic and Instructional Uses of the Cloze
Procedure. Available: at http://www.ucs.mun.colossman/3040noe9.html.
Rivers, W. 1971. Linguistic and Psychological Factors in Speech Perception and Their Implications for Teaching Materials: In Language in Education.
Theory and Practice 20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11-2.
Rudianto. 2011. Improving the Students’ Reading Comprehension through K-W-L Technique. Makassar: Thesis. FKIP Unismuh.
Rye, James. 1982. Cloze Procedure and the Teaching of Reading. London:
Heinemann. 7
Rye, James. 1982. Cloze Procedure and the Teaching of Reading. London:
Heinemann. 45.
Rye, James. 1982. Cloze Procedure and the Teaching of Reading. London:
Heinemann. (online), Vol. 6, No. 1,
Saiful. at all. 2019. The effects of the PORPE method on students reading comprehension.(http://www.academypublication.com/ojs/index.php/jltr/
article/download/jltr1003569582/1907) Accessed on May 2019
Salmiati, 2007. Teaching Reading Comprehension to the Second Year Students of
SMA Negeri 4 Parepare by Using English Magazine Articles.
(http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 23, 2012 Schneyer, J. 1962. Use of Cloze Procedure for Improving Comprehension. The
Reading Teacher, 30, 174-179.
Taylor, W. 1950. Cloze Procedure: A New Tool for Measuring Readability.
Journalism Quarterly. (Online), Vol. XI, No. 2
(http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 23, 2012
Taylor, W. 1953. Cloze Procedure: A New Tool for Measuring Readability.
Journalism Quarterly. (Online), Vol. XI, No. 2
(http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 23, 2012 Taylor, Wilson. 1953. Alexander and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad
day. New York: Macmillan. (Online), Vol. XI, No. 2
(http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 23, 2012 Thomas. 1978. Instructional Applications of the cloze technique. New York:
Macmillan.
Tusino. 2004. The relationship between Understanding of Contextual Word Meaning and Reading Comprehension Ability among Second-Grade Students of SMU N Bantul. Makalah TAS. Yogyakarta: Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris , FBS UNY.
Weaver, Wendell W. 1965. Theoretical aspect of the cloze procedure. In E.L.
Thurston and L.E. Hafner (eds). The Philosophical and Sosiological Bases of Reading, 19th Yearbook of the National Reading Comference.Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association. (Online), Vol. XI, No. 2 (http://jlr.sagepub.com/content/11/12/129) Accessed on July 23, 2012.
LEMBAR OBSERVASI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA
NO ASPEK YANG DIAMATI SKOR
I Pra pembelajaran
1 Siswa menempati tempat duduk nya masing-masing 2 Kesiapan menerima pelajaran
II Kegiatan Awal Pembelajaran
1 Mampu menjelaskan kembali isi materi terdahulu
2 Mendengarkan secara seksama ketika dijelaskan tujuan pembelajaran yang hendak dicapai
III Kegiatan Awal Pembelajaran A Penjelasan Materi Pembelajaran
1 Memperhatikan dengan serius ketika dijelaskan materi pelajaran 2 Aktif bertanya saat proses penjelasan materi
3 Adanya interaksi positif diantara siswa 4
Siswa
memiliki pemahaman yang sama tentang materi pelajaran yang dijelaskan
B Pendekatan Strategi Pembelajaran
1 Siswa terlibat aktif dalam kegiatan pembelajaran
2 Siswa memberikan pendapatnya ketika diberi kesempatan 3 Aktif mencatat berbagai penjelasan yang di berikan 4 Siswa termotivasi dalam mengikuti proses pembelajaran
5 Siswa dalam mengikuti proses pembelajaran dengan santai dan tidak penuh tekanan
6 Siswa merasa senang ketika berbagai strategi pembelajaran dilakukan dalam pembelajaran
C Pemanfaatan Media Pembelajaran/Sumber Pembelajaran 1 Adanya interaksi positif saat media pembelajaran disajikan 2 Ketertarikan siswa terhadap materi yang disajikan meningkat saat
media pembelajaran disajikan
3 Siswa semakin jelas dan konkrit saat penjelasan materi yang disajikan dengan media pembelajaran
D Penilaian proses dan hasil belajar
Nama sekolah : SMA Muhammadiyah Sungguminasa Kelas : XI Ipa
Mata pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Waktu : -
Tanggal : - Cycle / Pertemuan : I/ 1-4
(Agustina, 2012) Keterangan :
1. Skor 1 jika pernyataan tersebut dilakukan oleh kurang dari 10% seluruh siswa
2. Skor 2 jika pernyataan tersebut dilakukan oleh tidak kurang dari 11% dan tidak lebih dari 40% seluruh siswa
3. Skor 3 jika pernyataan tersebut dilakukan oleh tidak kurang dari 41% dan tidak lebih dari 70% seluruh siswa
4. Skor 4 jika pernyataan tersebut dilakukan oleh tidak kurang dari 10% dan tidak lebih dari 100% seluruh siswa
Peneliti,
NAJMA LEMBAR OBSERVASI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA
1 Siswa merasa terbimbing
2 Mampu menjawab pertanyaan-pertanyaan guru dengan benar E Penggunaan bahasa
1 Penjelasan dapat dengan mudah dimengerti oleh siswa
2 Siswa tidak menemui kesulitan dalam pemahaman ketika dijelaskan materi pelajaran
F Penutup
1 Siswa secara aktif memberi rangkuman
2 Siswa membuat rangkuman hasil pembelajaran secara runtuh Total PPP
Nama sekolah : SMA Muhammadiyah Sungguminasa Kelas : XI Ipa
Mata pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Waktu : -
Tanggal : - Cycle/ Pertemuan : II/ 1-4
NO ASPEK YANG DIAMATI SKOR I Pra pembelajaran
1 Siswa menempati tempat duduk nya masing-masing 2 Kesiapan menerima pelajaran
II Kegiatan Awal Pembelajaran
1 Mampu menjelaskan kembali isi materi terdahulu
2 Mendengarkan secara seksama ketika dijelaskan tujuan pembelajaran yang hendak dicapai
III Kegiatan Awal Pembelajaran A Penjelasan Materi Pembelajaran
1 Memperhatikan dengan serius ketika dijelaskan materi pelajaran 2 Aktif bertanya saat proses penjelasan materi
3 Adanya interaksi positif diantara siswa
4 Siswa memiliki pemahaman yang sama tentang materi pelajaran yang dijelaskan
B Pendekatan Strategi/Pembelajaran
1 Siswa terlibat aktif dalam kegiatan pembelajaran
2 Siswa memberikan pendapatnya ketika diberi kesempatan 3 Aktif mencatat berbagai penjelasan yang di berikan 4 Siswa termotivasi dalam mengikuti proses pembelajaran
5 Siswa dalam mengikuti proses pembelajaran dengan santai dan tidak penuh tekanan
6 Siswa merasa senang ketika berbagai strategi pembelajaran dilakukan dalam pembelajaran
C Pemanfaatan Media Pembelajaran/Sumber Pembelajaran 1 Adanya interaksi positif saat media pembelajaran disajikan
2 Ketertarikan siswa terhadap materi yang disajikan meningkat saat media pembelajaran disajikan
3 Siswa semakin jelas dan konkrit saat penjelasan materi yang disajikan dengan media pembelajaran
D Penilaian proses dan hasil belajar 1 Siswa merasa terbimbing
2 Mampu menjawab pertanyaan-pertanyaan guru dengan benar E Penggunaan bahasa
(Agustina, 2012) Keterangan :
1. Skor 1 jika pernyataan tersebut dilakukan oleh kurang dari 10% seluruh siswa
2. Skor 2 jika pernyataan tersebut dilakukan oleh tidak kurang dari 11% dan tidak lebih dari 40% seluruh siswa
3. Skor 3 jika pernyataan tersebut dilakukan oleh tidak kurang dari 41% dan tidak lebih dari 70% seluruh siswa
4. Skor 4 jika pernyataan tersebut dilakukan oleh tidak kurang dari 10% dan tidak lebih dari 100% seluruh siswa
Peneliti,
NAJMA 1 Penjelasan dapat dengan mudah dimengerti oleh siswa
2 Siswa tidak menemui kesulitan dalam pemahaman ketika dijelaskan materi pelajaran
F Penutup
1 Siswa secara aktif memberi rangkuman
2 Siswa membuat rangkuman hasil pembelajaran secara runtuh Total PPP
APPENDIX B