CHAPTER IV CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
B. Suggestions
Based on the research findings in this study, the researcher presents several suggestions for the English learners, English lecturers, and future researchers.
1. Pre-service Teacher
Pre-service Teacher should continue to learn more about TPACK in order to improve the quality of the educational process. This is obviously, in compliance with the requirements of the government's regulations of teacher competency. Teachers must not only improve students' cognitive capacity, but they also must also inculcate decent technological understanding, which is known as Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK).
2. English Lecturer
English lecturers should be aware of TPACK in order to provide by developing various trainings and practices in the class. Thus, it is essential to make better understanding about Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in the class especially for Pre-service Teacher.
3. Future Researchers
The researcher suggests that for future researchers, who would like to investigate into teachers' technology pedagogical content knowledge should look into technological knowledge in particular, which is not included in this study.
REFERENCES
Arnold Kukari “Definition of Pre-Service Teacher’s Pre-conceptions of Teaching and Learning. Journal of Culture and Education Number’’ 43, 2004. p. 1 Asnawi Moslem, Yusrina, Qismullah, Rena, Juliana, “Perceptions and Barriers To
ICT Use Among English Teachers in Indonesia”. Teaching English with Technology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2017, p. 3-23.
Bachtiar S. Bahri, “Meyakinkan Validitas Data Melalui Tringaluasi Pada Penelitian Kualitatif”, Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, Vol.10, No. 1, April 2010, p. 55-57.
Bernard, .Research Methods in Antrhopology: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. 3rd edition. (California: AltaMira Press,Walnut Creek, 2002).
Dev Raj Paneru. Information Communication Technologies in Teaching English as a Foreign Language: Analyzing EFL Teachers’ TPACK in Czech Elementary Schools. C.E.P.S Journal, vol. 8, 2018, p. 3.
Dina Al-Jamal, “UNRWA EFL In-Service Teachers’ Perception of The Application of TPACK in Teaching Listening and Speaking”. IUG Journal of Educational Psychological Science, vol. 27, no. 2, 2018, p.
56-72
Don E. Hamachek, Psychology in Teaching, Learning And Growth. 5th edition.
(Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1995), p. 199.
Donald Ary, Lucy C. Jacobs, and Asghar Razavieh, Introduction to Research in Education, 8th edition, (Wadsworth: Cengage Learning, 2010), p. 56 I.W.A. W Prasetya, I.N.A.J. Putra, I.G. Budasi. Teachers’ Perceptions in Using
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teaching English at Senior High Schools in Buleleng Sub District. LEJU, vol. 2, No.1, February 2019
Joyce Hwe Ling Koh, Ching Sing Chai, Chin-Chung Tsai, “Examining practicing teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: a structural equation modeling approach”.
Instructional Science, vol. 41, no. 4, 2013, p. 793-809.
Jun-Jie Tseng, “Investigating EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge: Students’ perceptions”. EUROCALL (Research- publishing.net, presented on Aug 2014)
Kazu, I. Y., Erten, P, “Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Self-Efficacies”. Journal of Education and Training Studies, vol. 2, no.
2, 2014, p. 126-144.
Laikatun, N.A, Nur Arifah, D, “Investigating EFL teachers’ perceptions on their TPACK development: how EFL teachers view seven domains on TPACK framework”. Leksika. Vol. 13, August 2019, p. 95-101.
Lee S. Shulman, “Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching”.
Teaching and learning in the secondary school, 1994, p. 125-133.
Lexy J. Moleong, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, (Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda karya, 2013), p. 330.
Lynn Sheridan, “Exploring Pre-Service Teacher's Perceptions of Teacher Qualities in Secondary Education: A Mixed-Method Study.”, (Thesis, University of Canberra, 2011)
Maha Yahya Barzaq, “Student-Teacher's Training Programmes Evaluation in English Language Teaching Colleges of Education in Gaza Strip Universities.”, (Thesis, The Islamic University of Gaza Deanery of Curricula and Teaching Methods Department, 2007)
1Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldana, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Methods Sourcebook, 3rd edition, (Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications), 2014.p. 31-35
Matthew J Kohler, Punyashloke Mishra. “What happens when teachers design educational technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge”. Journal of Educational Computing Research,vol.
32, no. 2, 2005, p. 131-152.
Matthew J. Kohler & Punya Mishra, “What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)?”, Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, vol. 9, no. 1, 2009, p. 60-70
Monica Jacobs, Ntombizolile Cynthia Gloria Vakalisa and Nqabomzi, Teaching- Learning Dynamics: A Participative Approach for OBE. 3rd edition.
(Sandown: Heinemann, 2004) p. 231.
Muhammad Imam Farisi, “Developing the 21st-century Social Studies Skills through Technology Integration”, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 17, no. 1, 2016, p. 16-30
Muliadi Bakri, “Analysis on Computer Assisted Language Learning (Call) Class in Developing Students’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge” (Thesis, State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2018)
Paul Muchinsky, Schreuder and Kriek, Personnel Psychology. 3rd edition. (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 217.
Philip Kotler. Analysis, Planning, implementation, and Control 9th Edition. (New Yersey: Prentice Hall International, Int, 2000).
Rocci Luppicini, “A Systems Definition of Educational Technology in Society”.
Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 8, 2005, p. 3.
Safitri NSAA : “Teacher Views and Understanding of TPACK during Microteaching Performance,( Skrips, Faculty of psychology and Sociocultural sciences / English language education Islamic university of indonesia, Jakarta, 2018),p 10.
Serkan ÜLGÜ, Mustafa ER, “Pre-Service Language Teacher Education in Turkey”, Scientific Research and Education in the Air Force-AFASES 2016, p. 681.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D., (Bandung: Alfa beta, 2011), p. 18.
Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik, (Jakarta:
Rineka Cipta, 2006), p. 139.
Syarifudin, Communication Strategies in Talking Turns Speaking of English as a Foreign Language Use, 2nd Edition, Mataram: CV Sanabil. 2020, ).
p.20-23.
Tengku Maya Sylvianti, “Looking into EFL students’ perceptions in listening by using English movie videos on YouTube”. Studies in English Language and Education, vol. 1, no. 1, 2014, p. 45-63.
Wilson M, “Using TPACK to promote effective language teaching in an ESL/EFL classroom”. (Schoolarworks.uni.edu, August 2013), p. 150
Appendix 1
Questionnaire Information:
a. This questionnaire aims to gather information about pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) b. Filling the questionnaire will not affect students’ academic scores.
c. Please respond to the questionnaire by giving a score of around 1-5 for each item.
Note:
Score 1 = strongly disagree Score 2 = disagree
Score 3 = neutral Score 4 = agree
Score 5 = strongly agree
No Dimension Statement Answer
1 2 3 4 5
1 Technological Knowledge
I have the technical skills to use the internet and computers
effectively
I learn technology easily I know how to solve my own
technical problems when using
technology
I keep up with popular new
technologies
2 Pedagogical Knowledge
I am able to stretch my students’
thinking by creating challenging
tasks for them
I am able to guide my students
to adopt appropriate learning
strategies
I am able to help my students to
monitor their own learning I am able to help my students to
reflect on their learning
strategies
I am able to plan group activities
for my students
I am able to guide my students to discuss effectively during
group work
3 Content
Knowledge
I have sufficient knowledge of
science
I can think about the content of science like a subject matter
expert
I am able to develop a deeper understanding of the content of
science
4
Technological Pedagogical
Knowledge
I am able to use technology to introduce my students to real-
world scenarios
I am able to facilitate my students to use technology to find more information on their
own
I am able to facilitate my students to use technology to plan and monitor their own
learning
I am able to facilitate my
students to collaborate with each
other using technology
5
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Without using technology, I can address the common
misconceptions my students
have about science
Without using technology, I can help my students to understand the content knowledge of
science in various ways 6
Technological Content Knowledge
I can use the software that is created specifically for science
(e.g., data loggers for science) I know about the technologies
that I have to use for research of the content of science
I can use appropriate
technologies (e.g., multimedia resources, simulation) to
represent the content of science
7
Technological Pedagogical and Content
I can teach lessons that
appropriately combine science, technologies, and teaching
approaches
I can select technologies to use in my classroom that enhance what I teach, how I teach, and
what students learn
I can use strategies that combine science, technologies, and teaching approaches that I learned about in my coursework
in my classroom
I can provide leadership in helping others to coordinate the use of science, technologies, and teaching approaches in my
school and/or district
Appendix 2 Interview
Information:
a. This interview aims to gather further information about pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). b. Answering the interview will not affect students’ academic scores Questions:
1. What are your problems in integration technology?
2. What are advantages of technology integration?
3. What do you think about Students centered learning through the integration of technology
4. Do you have knowledge of new technology and its classroom integration 5. Are you apply peer collaboration by helping or informing each other about
the use technology in the classroom
APPENDIX III
The Frequency of Students Answers in Questionnaire
No Question Answer
SDA DA N A SA
1 I have the technical skills to use the internet and
computers effectively 1 2 7 21 9
2 I learn technology easily 4 6 8 16 6
3 I know how to solve my own technical
problems when using technology 2 5 9 20 4
4 I keep up with popular new technologies 4 3 3 22 8 5 I am able to stretch my students’ thinking by
creating challenging tasks for them 2 4 7 20 7
6 I am able to guide my students to adopt
appropriate learning strategies 3 5 8 21 3
7 I am able to help my students to monitor their
own learning 1 4 5 25 5
8 I am able to help my students to reflect on their
learning strategies 4 3 7 23 3
9 I am able to plan group activities for my
students 4 2 4 24 6
10 I am able to guide my students to discuss
effectively during group work 3 5 5 22 5
11 I have sufficient knowledge of science 4 4 4 19 9 12 I can think about the content of science like a
subject matter expert 3 5 3 18 11
13 I am able to develop a deeper understanding of
the content of science 2 4 4 20 10
14 I am able to use technology to introduce my
students to real-world scenarios 3 2 7 23 5
15
I am able to facilitate my students to use technology to find more information on their own
2 3 5 22 8
16
I am able to facilitate my students to use technology to plan and monitor their own learning
2 3 6 24 5
17 I am able to facilitate my students to collaborate
with each other using technology 2 3 8 23 4
18
Without using technology, I can address the common misconceptions my students have about science
3 2 10 18 7
19
Without using technology, I can help my
students to understand the content knowledge of science in various ways
2 3 10 20 5
20 I can use the software that is created specifically
for science (e.g., data loggers for science) 3 5 9 18 5 21 I know about the technologies that I have to use
for research of the content of science 2 6 4 22 6 22
I can use appropriate technologies (e.g., multimedia resources, simulation) to represent the content of science
4 4 7 21 4
23 I can teach lessons that appropriately combine
science, technologies, and teaching approaches 3 2 5 23 7 24
I can select technologies to use in my classroom that enhance what I teach, how I teach, and what students learn
3 4 4 22 7
25
I can use strategies that combine science, technologies, and teaching approaches that I learned about in my coursework in my classroom
2 5 6 20 7
26
I can provide leadership in helping others to coordinate the use of science, technologies, and teaching approaches in my school and/or district
2 6 7 21 4
APPENDIX IV
The Conversion of Students Score in Questionnaire
No Questions SDA DA N A SA Total Score Pecentage
1 Q1 1 4 21 84 45 155 78%
2 Q2 4 12 24 64 30 134 67%
3 Q3 2 10 27 80 20 139 70%
4 Q4 4 6 9 88 40 147 74%
5 Q5 2 8 21 80 35 146 73%
6 Q6 3 10 24 84 15 136 68%
7 Q7 1 8 15 100 25 149 75%
8 Q8 4 6 21 92 15 138 69%
9 Q9 4 4 12 96 30 146 73%
10 Q10 3 10 15 88 25 141 71%
11 Q11 4 8 12 76 45 145 73%
12 Q12 3 10 9 72 55 149 75%
13 Q13 2 8 12 80 50 152 76%
14 Q14 3 4 21 92 25 145 73%
15 Q15 2 6 15 88 40 151 76%
16 Q16 2 6 18 96 25 147 74%
17 Q17 2 6 24 92 20 144 72%
18 Q18 3 4 30 72 35 144 72%
19 Q19 2 6 30 80 25 143 72%
20 Q20 3 10 27 72 25 137 69%
21 Q21 2 12 12 88 30 144 72%
22 Q22 4 8 21 84 20 137 69%
23 Q23 3 4 15 92 35 149 75%
24 Q24 3 8 12 88 35 146 73%
25 Q25 2 10 18 80 35 145 73%
26 Q26 2 12 21 84 20 139 70%