CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
B. Suggestion
Based on the result and conclusion of the research, it is known that students’ perception of using E-Dictionary is at very positive category. The researcher provides several recommendations as follows:
1. It is recommended for students to use E-Dictionary wisely, which is more concerned with grammar, vocabulary and so on.
2. To the teacher, the researcher suggests to allow the use of E- Dictionary but still in the right direction.
65
3. Finally, the results of this study are expected to be a reference for future studies.
Akramah, et al. (2020). Online Dictionary and Manual Dictionary: Which One Is Used More?. Banda Aceh: ELASTE, 2746-3805.
Alex, S. (2003). Psikologi umum. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Amirian, S., & Heshmatifar, Z. (2013). The impact of using electronic dictionary on vocabulary learning and retention of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 2(1), 1-10.
Angell, J. (2015). An Introductory Study of the Structure and Function of Human Conscious. New York: Henry holt and Company
Arikunto, Suharsimin. (2007). Manajemen Pendidikan. Jakarta:PT Rineka Cipta.
Ary, Donald. (2014). Introduction to Research in Education. Wadsworth Cengage Aust, R., Kelley, M. J., & Roby, W. (1993). The use of hyper-reference and conventional dictionaries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(4), 63-74.
Azwar, Saifuddin. (2016). Dasar-dasar Psikometria. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar BBC News Indonesia. 2020. Virus Corona: Sekolah, Universitas Meniadakan
Kelas. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-51769074
Benson, L. et al. (2002). Usability and instructional design heuristics for e- learning evaluation (pp. 1615-1621). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Bergenholtz, H. (2012). What is a dictionary?. Lexikos, 22, 20-30.
Chon, & Yuah. (2016). The Electronic Dictionary for Writing: A Solution or A Problem? International Journal of Lexicography, 23-54.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education.
In Research Methods in Education.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th edition, Boston:Pearson.
Dabbagh, N., Ritland, B.B. (2005). Online Learning: Concept, Strategies, and Application. New Jersey: Pearson Merril Printice Hall.
Dashtestani, R. (2013). EFL Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on the use of Electronic Dictionaries for Learning English. Retrieved from http://callej.org/journal/14-2/Dashtestani_2013.pdf.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G.E., & Airasian, P.W.(2012). Educational Research:competencies for analysis. New Jearsey: Pearson
Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Autonomous language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 4-11. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2011/emerging.pdf.
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., &
Freynik, S. (2012). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, DOI:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315.
Goodwin, J. and Wu, D. (2016) What Is The Relationship between Audit Partner Busyness and Audit Quality? Contemporary Accounting Research, 33, 341-377.
Goyal S, (2012). E-Learning: Future of Education, Journal of Education and Learning. Vol.6 (2) pp. 239-242.
Hamdi, C. (2015). The Effects of Electronic Dictionary Use on Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Retention of EFL Students. Arab World English Journal, 180-191.
Hamouda, A. (2013). A Study of Dictionary Use by Saudi EFL Students at Qassim University. Study in English Language Teaching, 227-257.
Hartmann, R.R.K. (2002). Thematic Network Project in the Area of Languages.
Subproject 9: Dictionaries. Exeter.
Hayati, M., & Fattahzadeh, A. (2006). The effect of monolingual and bilingual dictionaries on vocabulary recall and retention of EFL learners. The Reading Matrix, 6(2)
Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning: Concepts and practice. Sage.
Indrakusuma, A. H., & Putri, A. R. (2016). E-learning: Teori dan Desain. Medan:
Tulung Agung.
Iska, Z. N. (2006). Psikologi pengantar pemahaman diri dan lingkungan. Jakarta:
Kizi Brother’s.
Jiang, S. 2012. The advanced and disadvantage of using electronic dictionaries.
Retrieved from http://w52lfl2.blogspot.co.id/2012/10/ the-advantage-and- disadvantge-of-using.html
file:///C:/Users/ASUS/Downloads/46-132-1-PB.pdf
Khan, B. H. (Ed.). (2005). Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation. IGI Global.
Koentjaraningrat. (2010:42).Pengantar Ilmu Antar Pologi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Koyama, T., & Takeuchi, O. (2004). Comparing electronic and printed
dictionaries: How the difference affected EFL learning. JACET bulletin, 38, 33-46.
Kusmana. (2011). E-Learning Dalam Pembelajaran. Lentera Pendidikan.
http://digilib.its.ac.id/public/ITS-Undergraduate-30248-51080100016- Bibliography.pdf
Kusmayadi, Y. (2014). The Use of Google Translate as a Learning Media for Improving Students’ Translation Skill, Bandung: University of Education Laufer, B., & Hill, M. (2000). What lexical information do L2 learners select in a
CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention? Language Learning & Technology, 3(2), 58-76. Retrieved April 29 2022, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num2/laufer-hill/index
Learning Asgari, A., & Mustapha, G.B. (2011). The type of vocabulary learning strategies used by ESL students in university putra malaysia. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 84-90.
Li, H. (2014). Comparison of Google Translation with Human Translation. Paper presented at the Twenty-Seventh International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, University of Memphis.
Liu, X. (2015). Multimodal definition: the multiplication of meaning in electronic dictionaries. Lexikos, 25, 210-232.
Marjun, Agustinus. (2021). An Analysis Students’ Perception on the Use of Paper and Electronic Dictionary. Sintang: Edumedia.
Martyn, et al. (2010). Metaanalysis provides evidence-based effect sizes for a cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire, the FACT-G. J Clin Epidemiol 63:270-281
Michael. (1999). A Critique of Leyton's Theory of Perception and Cognition.
Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 43, 314345
Murnani, Z. T., & Salehi, H. (2015). Effect of electronic dictionary as an ICT tool.
English Collocation Learning of EFL Learners, 3(5), 366–373.
Mustafa, et al. (2011). Using Internet for Learning Vocabulary among Second Language Learners in a Suburban School. Malaysia: Elsevier Ltd.
Nation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching Vocabulary: Strategies and Techniques. Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.
Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Nation, ISP. (2000). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Nesi, H. (1999). A user's guide to electronic dictionaries for language learners. International journal of lexicography, 12(1), 55-66.
Ng, C. W. (2016). Impact of the Monolingual and Bilingual Dictionaries on the Lexical Errors Commited by EFL Learners in Hong Kong: a Semantic Analysis. ASIALEX, 143-173. doi:10.1007/s40607-016-0024-0
Nugraha, G., Ratnawati, R., & Surachmat, A. M. (2019). Exploring Low and High Students’ Perception on Engaging E-Dictionary in Mastering Vocabulary:
Cross-Sectional Survey. Indonesian EFL Journal, 5(1), 37-44.
Ovidiu, M., & Adriana, V. (2009). Electronic Dictionary and ESP Students.
Retrieved from http. eccsf. ulbsibiu.
ro./RePEc/journl/5324vintean&matiu. pdf.
Pranoto, et al. (2009). Sains dan Teknologi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Qiong, O. U. (2017). A brief introduction to perception. Studies in literature and language, 15(4), 18-28.
Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. (2005). Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Richardson, J. C. (2001). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Albany: State University of New York.
Robbins, P, S., & Judge, A, T. (2013). Organizational behavior (15th ed.).
London: Pearson Education.
Sevik, M. 2014. University prep-school EFL learners’ dictionary ownership and preferences. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 226-232.
Shoebottom, P. (2011). Learners: How to Use Dictionary Effectively. Retrieved
from A Guide to Learning English:
http://esl.fis.edu/learners/advice/dic.htm.
Silberztein, M. (2016). Electronic Dictionaries. Formalizing Natural Languages, 83-109.
Sinaga, (2018). Students’ Perception on the Role of English Day Program in Speaking Skill Development. Jakarta: JET.
Stirling, J. (2005). The portable electronic dictionary: Faithful friend or faceless foe? Modern English Teacher, 14(3), 64-72.
Sudijono, A. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susilana, R., & Riyana, C. (2007). Media pembelajaran: hakikat, pengembangan, pemanfaatan, dan penilaian. Bandung: CV. Wacana Prima.
Swan, et al. (2000). Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact, and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23 (4), 389-413.
Syafii, M. (2019). From Paragraphs to a Researcher Report: A Writing of English for Academic Purpose. Pekanbaru: Publishing and Consulting Company.
Toha, M. (2003). Prilaku organisasi konsep dasar dan aplikasinya. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Triyono, Bruri dan Pipit Utami. 2017. Pembelajaran E-learning Pendidikan Vokasi. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Truong, D. (2012, Sep 11). Online vs. print dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.visualgui .com/2012/09/11/online-vs-print-dictionary/
Tulgar. (2017). ictionary Use of Undergraduate Students in Foreign Language Departments in Turkey at Present. Turkey: Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(12B): 51-57.
Usman, Husaini, & Akbar, P. S. (2008). Pengantar Statistika. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara
Wahono, R.S. (2008). Meluruskan salah kaprah tentang e-learning. Retrieved from http://romisatriawahono.net/2008/01/23/meluruskan-salah-kaprah- tentang-e-learning.
Walgito, B. (2004). Pengantar psikologi umum. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Wang, Y. (2007). On the cognitive processes of human perception with emotions, motivations, and attitudes. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), 1(4), 1-13.
Wati. (2020). Students’ Perceptions on the Use of Electronic Dictionaries in Efl Context: Lesson Learned From Indonesian Vocational High School. West Java: Gema Wiralodra.
Wulandari. (2017). Optimalisasi E-Learning Dengan Menggunakan Metode Flipped Classroom. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan. 978-602-50088-0-1.
Yagi, S. (2004). Denshijisho shouhin no gijyutsu kaihatsu suii to saishin jyoho [A shift in the development and the latest information concerning electronic dictionaries]. In JACET Kansai Chapter Conference, Kobe, Japan.
Yong, et al. (2007). Bilingual Lexicography From a communicative Perspective.
Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
Zarei, A. A., & Gujjar, A. A. (2012). The Contribution of Electronic and Paper Dictionaries to Iranian EFL Learner's Vocabulary Learning. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 2(4).
Zgusta, L. (1971). Manual of Lexicography. The Hague: Mouton.
Zheng, H., & Wang, X. (2016). The use of electronic dictionaries in EFL classroom. Studies in English Language Teaching, 144-456.
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Lesson Plan
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN WORK FROM HOME
Sekolah : SMA N 1 Tandun
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris Kelas/Semester/Tahun : X/Genap/20192020 Materi Pokok : Narrative Text
Alokasi Waktu : 4 Pertemuan x 2 jam pelajaran @45 menit A. Kompetensi Dasar dan Indikator Pencapaian Indikator
Kompetensi Dasar Indikator Pencapaian 3.10 Membedakan fungsi
sosial, struktur teks, dan unsur kebahasaan beberapa teks naratif lisan dan tulis dengan memberi dan meminta informasi terkait legenda rakyat, sederhana, sesuai dengan konteks penggunaannya
Mengidentifikasi kalimat-kalimat yang memuat bagian-bagian legenda yang ditanyakan
Mengidentifikasi persamaan dan perbedaan fungsi sosial, struktur teks dan unsur kebahasaan teks naratif
Memahami struktur teks naratif dalam memberi dan meminta informasi terkait legenda rakyat
Memahami unsur kebahasaan dari teks naratif dalam memberi dan meminta informasi terkait legenda rakyat
B. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Setelah mempelajari Narrative Text, peserta didik dapat Membedakan fungsi sosial, struktur teks, dan unsur kebahasaan beberapa teks naratif lisan dan tulis dengan memberi dan meminta informasi terkait legenda rakyat, sederhana, sesuai dengan konteks penggunaannya.
C. Kegiatan Pembelajaran PERTEMUAN KE-1
KEGIATAN PENDAHULUAN
a. Melakukan pembukaan dengan salam pembuka dan berdoa untuk memulai pembelajaran
b. Memeriksa kehadiran peserta didik sebagai sikap disiplin c. Memberikan gambaran tentang manfaat mempelajari
pelajaran yang akan dipelajari dalam kehidupan sehari- hari.
d. Memberitahukan materi pelajaran yang akan dibahas pada pertemuan saat itu.
KEGIATAN INTI
b. Peserta didik diberikan kesempatan untuk membaca dan memahami teks Narrative (materi yang terdapat dalam buku elektronik bahasa inggris kelas X).
c. Peserta didik diberikan kesempatan untuk bertanya tentang materi.
d. Peserta didik diminta untuk mendiskusikan materi pembelajaran dalam group whatsap terkait dengan fugsi social dan makna dalam teks.
e. Peserta didik diminta mengirim hasil diskusi melalui whatsap.
f. Peserta didik menganalisis dan menyimpulkan masukan,tanggapan dan koreksi dari guru terkait.
KEGIATAN PENUTUP
a. Membuat resume dengan bimbingan guru tentang poin-poin penting yang muncul dalam kegiatan pembelajaran.
b. Mengagendakan materi yang akan dipelajari pada pertemuan berikutnya.
c. Guru menutup pembelajaran dengan memberi salam.
D. Penilaian
1. Sikap : Memperhatikan keaktifan peserta didik saat pembelajaran digroup Whatsapp
2. Pengetahuan: Tes tertulis
Tandun, 14 Maret 2020 Mengetahui
Kepala Sekolah Guru Mata Pelajaran
Nurhidayati, S.Pd Wisyawali, S.Pd
Appendix 2 Instrument
Thesis Research Questionnaire with the title:
“Students’ Perception of Using E-Dictionary in E-Learning English During Pandemic”
Name:
Class:
General Instruction:
a. Read carefully all the statements below.
b. Put a tick (√) in the available answer column with alternative answers, namely:
1) SA : Strongly Agree 2) A : Agree
3) U : Uncertain 4) D : Disagree
5) SD : Strongly Disagree c. Answer the statement honestly.
d. The answers in this questionnaire will not affect the results/values of learning English.
No Statements Strongly
agree Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly disagree
1 E-Dictionary helps me to understand the importance of learning English
2 E-Dictionary are easy to be carried
3 Internet access in my neighborhood makes it easier for me to use E-Dictionary
4 E-Dictionary design is more practical, modern and attractive than other dictionaries
5 E-Dictionary makes me enjoy studying English
my English level
7 E-Dictionary helps me enhance the efficiency of my English study
8 It is easy for me to use E- Dictionary
9 The features in E-Dictionary convince me to always use it 10 Detailed definitions are provided
in E-dictionary
11 E-dictionary gives me enough information
12 Using E-Dictionary will encourage me to use a different learning style and search strategy
13 The use of E-Dictionary improves my English learning 14 Many of my friends use E-
Dictionary
15 I need an E-dictionary to interpret words and sentences wherever and whenever I need 16 My English teacher recommends
me to use the E-dictionary instead of other dictionaries 17 I feel motivated when learning
English with E-dictionary 18 I feel the E-dictionary is very
important in learning English 19 Because access in E-Dictionary
is free so my friends and I feel it's affordable
20 I feel enthusiastic about learning English by using E-Dictionary
Appendix 3
Score of students Questionnaire (Try-Out)
NO Respondent X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17 X18 X19 X20
1 Student 1 5 5 4 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 4
2 Student 2 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 3 4 4 5 4
3 Student 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 Student 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
5 Student 5 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
6 Student 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4
7 Student 7 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 4
8 Student 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
9 Student 9 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4
10 Student 10 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 4
11 Student 11 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 4 4
12 Student 12 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
13 Student 13 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
14 Student 14 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 5 2 3 4 4 4
15 Student 15 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
16 Student 16 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
17 Student 17 5 5 3 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 3 5 2 5 5 5 5
18 Student 18 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 2 2 4 4 4
19 Student 19 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 2 4 5 5 4
20 Student 20 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 1 5
21 Student 21 4 5 4 4 2 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 2 5 2 3 4 4 3
22 Student 22 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 3 4 5 4 4
23 Student 23 4 4 2 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 2 3 4 3 3
24 Student 24 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
25 Student 25 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5
26 Student 26 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 3 5 4
27 Student 27 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 2 5 3 4 5
28 Student 28 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
29 Student 29 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 3 4 5 5 3
30 Student 30 4 4 2 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 2 3 2 4 4
31 Student 31 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 3 5 3 4 5 4 5
32 Student 32 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 2 4 3 3 4
33 Student 33 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 4 4
34 Student 34 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Score of Students Questionnaire
No Respondent X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17 X18 X19 X20 Total
1 Student 1 4 4 4 5 4 3 2 2 4 4 3 2 4 2 4 3 4 2 4 4 68
2 Student 2 5 5 1 5 3 4 4 2 5 5 4 4 4 3 5 3 3 5 5 5 80
3 Student 3 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 80
4 Student 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 80
5 Student 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 74
6 Student 6 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 94
7 Student 7 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 80
18 Student 8 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 82
9 Student 9 5 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 83
10 Student 10 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 98
11 Student 11 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 77
12 Student 12 5 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 4 4 4 76
13 Student 13 4 5 5 5 3 3 4 5 3 5 5 4 4 3 5 3 3 4 4 4 81
14 Student 14 4 4 5 5 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 4 3 4 4 78
15 Student 15 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 3 3 73
16 Student 16 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 82
17 Student 17 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 4 3 5 5 5 5 3 3 88
18 Student 18 5 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 5 1 4 3 4 4 72
19 Student 19 5 4 3 4 5 4 3 4 5 4 3 4 5 4 3 1 4 5 3 3 76
20 Student 20 2 5 4 4 4 1 4 5 3 2 4 4 2 4 2 1 2 3 3 3 62
21 Student 21 5 4 2 1 4 3 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 4 2 3 2 4 4 1 61
22 Student 22 4 3 3 5 1 4 5 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 74
23 Student 23 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 79
24 Student 24 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 3 4 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 3 4 79
25 Student 25 4 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 3 85
26 Student 26 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 2 5 4 4 4 87
27 Student 27 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 2 4 4 3 3 84
28 Student 28 5 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 5 91
29 Student 29 4 3 5 2 5 1 3 5 4 2 5 4 3 4 2 1 5 4 4 4 70
30 Student 30 2 5 3 5 1 4 4 3 5 1 4 4 5 4 3 3 4 2 5 2 69
31 Student 31 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 91
32 Student 32 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 91
33 Student 33 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 94
34 Student 34 5 4 2 5 4 2 4 4 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 1 3 3 2 4 68
Appendix 4 Thesis Supervision activity report
Attachment of Proposal Examination
Students’ Thesis Guidance Activities Letter
Appendix 5 Recommendation Letter
Pre-Research Letter
Research Letter
Recommendation of Rokan Hulu Regent
Completion Letter to the research