interest and motivate. After the video end the researcher told the student to do the act with their group by their own scrip. The researcher gave the time to the student act by their own creation while the researcher gives attention to them.
Before closing the class, firstly the researcher asked the students difficulties during the teaching process. If it might there some question concerning with the material, the researcher explained and given the answer, some advices was given to students to motivate them to always practice their English. The researcher called the students name to ensure that they attend the class and say thank to the students‟
attention and closing the class by say salam.
3.5.3 Post-test
The researcher gave a post-test to measure the students about the speaking skill after joining treatment. The test was same as the pre-test.
ACCURACY FLUENCY COMPREHENSIBILITY 6 Pronunciation is only
very slightly influenced by the mother tongue. Two or three minor grammatical and lexical errors.
6 Speaks without too great and effort with a fairly wide range of expression. Searches
for words
occasionally but only one or two unnatural pauses.
6 Easy for the listener to understand the speakers‟ intention and general meaning.
Very few interruption or clarification required.
5 Pronunciation is slightly in influenced by the mother tongue.
A few minor
grammatical errors but most utterances are correct.
5 Ha to make an effort at times to search for words. Nevertheless, smooth delivery on the whole and only a few unnatural pauses.
5 The speakers‟
intention and general meaning and fairly
clear. A few
interruptions by the
listener for
clarifications are necessary.
4 Pronunciation is still moderately
4 Although he/she has to make an effort and
4 Most of what the speaker says is easy to
influenced by the mother-tongue but no serious phonological errors. A few grammatical and lexical errors but only one or two major errors causing confusion.
search for words, three are not too many unnatural pauses.
Fairly smooth
delivery mostly.
Occasionally
fragmentary but succeeds in conveying the general meaning.
Fair range of expression.
follow. His/her to help him/her to convey the meaning or to seek clarification.
3 Pronunciation is influenced by the mother-tongue but only a few serious phonological errors.
Several grammatical and lexical errors, some of which cause confusion.
3 Has to make an effort for much of the time.
Often has to search for the desired meaning. Rather halting delivery and fragmentary. Range of expression often limited.
3 The listener can understand a lot of what is said. But he/she must constantly seek clarification.
Cannot understand many of the speaker‟s more complex or longer sentences.
2 Pronunciation
seriously influenced by the mother-tongue with errors causing a
breakdown in
communication.
Many basic and grammatical errors.
2 Long pauses while he/she searches for the desired meaning.
Frequently
fragmentary and halting delivery.
Almost give up making the effort at times. Limited of expression.
2 Only small bits (usually short sentences and phrases) can be understood and then with considerable effort by someone who is used to listening to the speaker.
1 Serious pronunciation errors as well as
many basic
grammatical and lexical errors. Ne evidence of having.
1 Full of long unnatural pauses. Very halting and fragmentary delivery. At times gives up making the effort. Very limited.
1 Hardly anything of what is said can be understood. Even when the listener makes a great effort of interrups.24
24 Heaton, Writing English Language Test, (New York:United State of America: Longman inc, 2001),P.100.
3.6.2 Scoring and Classifying the students‟ score
Scoring the students‟ speaking skill in pre-test and post-test used this formula:
Score =
The score of the test result would be classifying in to the following criteria:
SCORE CLASSIFICATION
80-100 Very Good
66-79 Good
56-65 Fair
40-55 Poor
<39 Very Poor25
3.6.3 Calculating the mean score and standard deviation
3.6.3.1 To calculating the mean score, the researcher applied the formula as follow:
Where : ẍ : the mean or arithmetic average of the score
∑x : The um of all the score
25 Suharsimi Arikunto, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Edisi Revisi; (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.2009),p.245
ẍ =
N : The total number of the subjects26
3.6.3.2 To calculate the standard deviation the researcher applied the formula:
SD = √ Where SS = ∑ - Where :
SD = Standard mean deviation SS = Standard score
N = The total number of students I = Constant number
∑x = The um of the score
(∑ = The sum square of the sum of square27 3.6.4 The Test of Significant
To finding the significant difference between the mean score of pre-test and post-test, it was needed to calculate the t-test value using the following formula:
t - √
Where:
T = test of significance
= the mean score of difference
26 Gay, L. R, Educational Research Competencies For Analysis and Application, ( Ed),United State, Earsonmerril Prenfile Hall, p. 298
27 Ibid
∑D = the sum total of total score of difference
∑D2 = the square of the sum score of difference N = the total number of the sample
DF = N-1
t = test of significant28
28 Gay, L. R, Educational Research Competencies For Analysis and Application, ( Ed),United State, Earsonmerril Prenfile Hall, p. 331
39
This chapter consisted of two sections; they are findings of the research and discussions of the findings. The writers analyzed the data that is obtained through the result of pre-test and the result of post-test.
4.1 Research Findings