CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD
E. Techniques of Data Analysis
This research used descriptive quantitative research. The data analyzed by closed ended questionnaire for quantitative data and open ended questionnaire for qualitative data. The closed ended questionnaire data calculated using percentage and the open ended questionnaire data investigated the applications they use to learn English Speaking.
For quantitative data designed using likert scale proposed by Cresswell.
The steps of quantitative data were as followed:
1. Scoring
Scoring is giving score on respondents to obtain quantitative data in this research. The study used a modify Likert Scale, in a Likert Scale modification. The answer was given by students. Here is the table below which consisted of different score and was used to give the score for each item in the questionnaire.
Strongly Aggree 5
Agree 4
Undecided 3
Disagree 2
Strongly Disagree
1
Table 3.2 (Cresswell, 2012)
The data in this application aimed to determine the benefits of the applications used for learning English speaking and the tool of data analysis
19
used to determine the benefits of applications for students speaking was Mean.
Mean is used to determine or calculate the average value using arithmetic calculations. The calculation of the mean is determined by enumerating the values of each respondent’s answer value SA = 5, A = 4, UN
= 3 D = 2 SD = 1. If the majority of respondents strongly agree (SA), then the amount Mean will be close to 5 and vice versa. If the majority of respondents Strongly disagree (SD), then the magnitude of the mean will be close to 1 on the scale (1-5) based on the maximum value and the minimum value can be known how the perception of respondents.
Having determined the value for each item, the researcher then analyzed the item and used the formula below in order to find the value of Mean from each item. Thus, It can be formulated through:
F x 100
N x the highest score Information
F : the number of answers N : the number of students 2. Classification Score
Analyzing the data from the questionnaire used Likert Scale to see the benefits of the applications used by millennial students for their speaking.
20
Thus, the Likert Scale was used for classification score of the result of the data
Score Classification
85%– 100% Strongly Agree
69%– 84% Agree
52% – 68% Not Sure
36%– 50% Disagree
20%– 35% Strongly Disagree
Table 3.3 (adapted from Cresswell, 2008)
Having analyzed the classification score above, the researcher used formula to analyze all of the data which resulted in finding the category of classification score. It can be formulated through :
F x 100%
N (Number of Items x the highest score) Information
F : the number of answers
N : the number of students
After the researcher finishes calculating the percentage distribution and finds the data. The researcher made a description from the accumulation of all items based on the data. This description portrays the benefits of applications used to learn English speaking for the millennial.. This will be
21
effective because it can give easy comprehension to the readers, students, teacher and future researcher when seeing the benefits of applications being used.
22 CHAPTER IV
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter is about the result of the study presented. The chapter is divided into two main sections. Finding shows the result description from the data that had been collected through questionnaires described in table form. Then, discussion contains explanation of findings which reflect to the result of the data.
A. Findings
The data as mentioned from the previous chapter used 2 questionnaires.
The first is open ended questionnaire and the second is closed ended questionnaire. The open ended questionnaire more focuses to investigate applications that students have in their gadget to learn English speaking.
Application used by students in their gadget dealing with the first research question, it found that from 28 students of H class of public administration there are 7 applications used by students to learn English Speaking as follows:
1. Google Translate 2. Youtube
3. Kamusku 4. Whatsapp 5. Instagram 6. U-Dictionary 7. Facebook
23
Table 4.1 The Benefits of Using Applications
No. Statements Percentage
1. Facilitating to make simple and complex sentences.
83%
2. Facilitating to recognize my own mistakes. 79%
3. Facilitating to create sentences contextually. 86%
4. Having clear pictures and audio. 76%
5. Facilitating to find new words 92%
6. Facilitating to arrange understandable sentences 85%
7. The application is less fun to use for learning. 45%
8. Facilitating to increase grammatical understanding
86%
9. Facilitating to increase speaking fluency 83%
10. The application is not enough to make me understand learning English
45%
11. Facilitating to trains in interact with the real speaking situation
76%
12. The application served understandable material 78%
13. Facilitating to improve speaking ability 84%
Σ 77%
Adapted from Susanti, 2017.
Based on the table above it showed that the benefits of students in learning English speaking gained 77%. That means it create a positive impact and they agree that applications gave many benefits in terms of learn English Speaking
24
such as; they can make simple and complex sentences, find new words, increase their grammatical understanding, entertaining to use for learning, increase speaking fluency and make them easier to interact with the real speaking situation.
Those were a step that the students’ face while learning English in order to understand how to speak well.
B. Discussion
The findings showed that there are seven applications that the students used to learn English speaking, those are Google Translate and Youtube, Kamusku, Whatsapp, Instagram, U-Dictionary and Facebook. By use those applications give a big impact toward the students in term of their speaking.
Williams 2016 said that you can use the michrophone of google translate to test your pronunciation of basic sentences. It is same kind with google translate, kamusku and U-Dictionary that the students used to learn English speaking in this research, they can use it to correct their own mistakes on pronunciation.
Gunada 2017 said that the students lack of vocabulary, pronunciation and grammar and also feel bored to learn in conventional teaching.tackling those problem Youtube Video is a promising solution to improve students’ English speaking skill. Youtube in this case linked with the applications used by the students to learn English speaking with the benefits for the pronunciation and grammar.
Muhammad 2018 found that Whatsapp application can improved speaking of the students. It is linked with whatsapp application that used by the students in this research.
25
Wulandari 2019 said that Instagram Vlog enhancing fluency, acquiring vocabulary items and boosting confidence and motivation to speak. It is also linked with Instagram application in this research that the application bring benefit for the fluency and train them to speak for the real situation.
Alegre 2017 stated that learning through a facebook can develop oral skills. It is linked with the research of mine by used facebook application, it enhance students speaking (oral skill).
26 CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
This chapter consists of two sections, the first section deals with the conclusion of findings of the research and the other one deal with the suggestion.
A. Conclusion
Based on the result of the research, the researcher concluded that there are some applications used by the class H of Public Administration students. They are google translate, youtube, kamusku, whatssapp, instagram, u-dictionary, and facebook. The applications help them to have a better speaking, they can make complex sentences which suitable with the conversation, they could be more flounce to speak English and understanding more to the words from people they talk to. It shows that the applications bring many benefits to their knowledge and speaking ability. The researcher believes that with all the benefits they got will bring them to a good future.
B. Suggestion
Using applications in gadget bring benefits for students in learning English speaking. Therefore, the teacher should encourage students in public administration to learn from applications in their gadget because from the applications they can learn more effective and it is more entertaining to enhance their English skill. Having the applications in their gadget as a learning tool to improve the students’ English skill ensures that they will be prepared to communicate in English which commonly used in this globalization era. It is
27
needed to be connected with International relationship. Eventually, they can deal with the demand of the globalization era.
Furthermore, it recommended to education institutions to provide such as WIFI for the students especially nowadays the digital technologies form an inextricable part of their daily life. Students will be easier on doing task or things they want with the control of the institutions.
28
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Agusmita. 2019. “Cara Menulis Daftar Pustaka Dari Internet”.
https://caramenulisbuku.com/cara-menulis-daftar-pustaka-dari-
internet/cara-menulis-daftar-pustaka-internet.htm. Accessed July 10, 2019.
Alegre, Porto, 2017. English language learning through a Facebook group:
activities for developing oral skills, (online), http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/belt/article/view/28205, accessed February 1 2019)
Attewell, Jill, 2005. Mobile Technologies and Learning. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
Burns, A., & Joyce, H. 1997. Focus on Speaking. Sydney: National Center for English Language Teaching and Research.
Burn and Rechards. 2009. Interpersonal Relationships Mediate the Association between Social Skills and Psychological Well-Being. Personality and Individual Differences.Journal of Applied Psychology. (online). Vol 12.(https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/60183-EN-improving- students-speaking-fluency-thro.pdf). Accessed on June 18th 2018.
Carstens, A., & Beck, J. 2005. Get Ready for the Gamer Generation. TechTrends, 49(3), 22-25.
Djiwandono, Patrisius Istiarto. 2017. The Learning Styles of Millennial Generation in University: A Study in Indonesian Contex. International Journal of Education, UPI Press
Elias, T. 2011. Universal Instructional Design Principles for Mobile Learning.
International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12/(2).
143-156. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ920738.pdf.
Frances, Pedro. 2006. The New Millenium Learners: Challenging our Views on ICT and Learning. OECD:CERI
Gibson, O. 2005. Young Blog Their Way to a Publishing Revolution. The Guardian, p. 15.
Grunwald, P. 2004. Children, Families, and the Internet. Bethesda: Grunwald Associates
Gunawa , I. 2017. Using YouTube Video; An IT-based Media to Improve Students'
Speaking Skill, (Online)
(https://www.researchgate.net/profile/I_Wayan_Gunada accessed February 2020)
29
Goyo, Gabriel. 2019. Learn to Speak English Correctly With These 6 Innovative Apps. https://www.fluentu.com/blog/english/english-speaking-app/
Accesed June 29 2019
Heeks, R. 2008. Meet Marty Cooper–The Inventor of the Mobile Phone. BBC, 41(6), 26-33.
Howe, N. & Strauss, W. 2000 “Millennials Rising”, Vintage Books, New York.
Jondeya, Rania. 2011. The Effectivenes of Using Information Gap on Developing Speaking Skills for Eight Graders in Gaza Governorate Schools. A thesis:
Al Azhar University-Gaza.
Ju, Weijie, 2013. Learning English Speaking through Mobile-Based RolePlays:
The Exploration of a Mobile English Language Learning App called Engage. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1064976, accessed July 27 2019
Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. 2005. Teen Content Creators and Consumers.
Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Man Sze-Paul Man. 2007. Developing Students’ Listening and Speaking Skills Through ELT Podcasts. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Malissa and Monaco, 2007. The Millennial Student: A New Generation of Learners. Provo: National Athletic Trainers’ Association.
Malasari, Susanti. 2017. Android Application to Improve Senior High School Students’ Speaking Skill.Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
Muhammad, Aras. 2018. The Effect of Using Whatsapp Messenger on Students’
SpeakingAchievement at the Secon Grade students of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri(MAN)1Kendari.(Online)https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/76aa/221 db13f37a9b89d2c69a4d2790eb62b924e.pdf. Accessed February 2019) Moduli, Jyoti. 2014. Addiction to Technological Gadgets and Its Impact on
Health and Lifestyle: A Study on College Students. India:National Institute of Technology, Rourkela.
Moorman, Gary, et all, 2009. Teaching and Reaching the Millennial Generation Through Media Literacy. Boone, North Carolina: Appalachian State University.
Moreno and Vermeulen, 2014. Using VISP (VIdeos for SPeaking), a mobile app based on audio description, to promote English language learning among Spanish students: a case study. Spain: Ghent University.
Nicholas, Arlene, 2008. Preferred Learning Methods of the Millennial Generation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41951985.Accesed July 2019.
30
Nigel, King, at all, 2018.2nd Edition Interviews in Qualitative Research.
UK:University of Huddersfield.
Nunan, D. (Ed). 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.). 2005. Educating the Net Generation.
Washington, DC: Educause.
Pedro, Frences, 2006. The New Millennium Learners: Challenging our Views on
ICT and Learning.
https://scholar.google.co.id/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=THE+N EW+MILLENNIUM+LEARNERS%3A+Challenging+our+Views+on+I CT+and+Learning&btnG=, accessed June 26 2019
Prensky, M. 2006. Listen to the natives. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 8–13.
Ru-Chu Shih, 2010. Blended Learning Using Video Based Blogs: Public speaking for English as a second language student. Taiwan: National Pingtung University of Science and Technology
Saylor, M. 2012. The mobile wave: how mobile intelligence will change everything. Vanguard
Shukor A Nurbiha. 2015. Digitally Speaking: Multitasking and the Future of Digital Language for Academic Communication. Malaysia: University Teknologi Malaysia.
Sukardjo. 2006. Kumpulan Materi Evaluasi Pelajaran.Yogyakarta: Program Studi Pembelajaran, Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Stockwell, G. and Hubbard, P. 2013. Some emerging principles for mobile assisted language learning. Monterey, CA: The International Research Foundation for English Language Education. Retrieved from http://www.tirfonline.org/english-in-tthe-workforce/mobile-assisted- language-learning. On November 20th, 2014.
Sucitra. 2018. The Effectiveness of Debate Method in Achieving Students’
Speaking Skill (Oral Communication) of The Twelfth Grade at SMA Negeri 2 Pinrang (A Pre-Experimental Research). Makassar: Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.
Sugiyono, 2016. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Veen, W. 2003. A New Force for Change: Homo Zappiens. The Learning Citizen(7), 5-7.
31
Warren, Jami Leigh. 2011. The Relationship Between Service Learning and Public Speaking Selfefficacy: Toward Engaging Today’s Undergraduates. America: University of Kentucky UKnowledge.
Woyke, E. 2012. A Look At OLPC's XO 3.0 Tablet's Solar and Kinetic Chargers.
Forbes.
Wulandari Mega. 2019. Improving EFL Learners Proficiency Through Instagram Vlog. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
A P P E N D I C E
S
Statements
Student 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
A 4 4 4 3 5 3 4 4 4 2 4 4 4
B 4 3 3 2 5 4 4 4 4 2 3 4 3
C 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 2 4 4 4
D 5 5 5 5 5 4 1 5 5 1 5 5 5
E 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 5 2 5 5 5
F 4 4 4 2 4 4 2 4 4 3 4 4 4
G 4 4 4 3 5 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3
H 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 2 5 5 5
I 4 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 3 2 4 4
J 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 2 4 4 4
K 4 3 5 3 5 5 2 4 4 2 4 4 5
L 5 2 3 5 5 5 3 4 4 2 4 4 3
M 4 4 5 2 5 4 2 5 4 2 3 4 3
N 4 2 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 2 4 2 4
O 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 5 2 5 5 5
P 5 5 5 1 5 5 1 5 5 4 5 5 5
Q 4 4 3 4 5 4 2 5 3 3 4 2 4
R 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4
S 4 3 5 5 5 4 3 3 2 3 1 1 4
T 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
U 5 5 5 4 5 5 1 5 5 1 5 5 5
V 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 5 1 5 5 5
W 3 4 5 5 5 4 2 5 5 2 3 3 4
X 4 3 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 1 4 3 4
Y 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 5 5
Z 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4
A 2 5 4 4 5 5 2 4 5 2 4 4 5
B 3 3 4 4 4 4 2 4 3 2 4 3 4
Amount 116 111 121 107 129 119 64 120 116 63 107 109 118 1400
1. To find the classification of score in order to determine the student agreement result that gadget applications bring benefits for learning English speaking. It can be formulated through :
F x 100%
N (Number of Items x the highest score)
3695 x 100%
45 (20 x 5)
1400 x 100%
1820
= 77 (Agree)
a. Statement 1
116 x 100% = 83% (Agree) 28 x 5
b. Statement 2
111 x 100%= 79% (Agree) 28 x 5
c. Statement 3
121 x 100% = 86% (Strongly Agree) 28 x 5
d. Statement 4
107 x 100% = 76% (Agree) 28 x 5
e. Statement 5
129 x 100% = 92% (Strongly Agree) 28 x 5
f. Statement 6
119 x 100% = 85% (Strongly Agree) 28 x 5
g. Statement 7
64 x 100% = 45% (Disagree) 28 x 5
h. Statement 8
120 x 100% = 86% (Strongly Agree) 28 x 5
i. Statement 9
116 x 100% = 83% (Agree)
28 x 5
j. Statement 10
63 x 100% = 45% (Disagree) 28 x 5
k. Statement 11
107 x 100% = 76% (Agree) 28 x 5
l. Statement 12
109 x 100% = 78% (Agree) 28 x 5
m. Statement 13
118 x 100% = 84% (Agree) 28 x 5
Filling out the questionnaires.