I. In the New Testament.
1. Family Relations, etc.:
To the Synoptists alone are we indebted for any account of this James. He was the son of Zebedee and the brother of John (<400421>Matthew 4:21;
<410119>Mark 1:19; <420510>Luke 5:10). As the Synoptists generally place the name
of James before that of John, and allude to the latter as “the brother of James,” it is inferred that James was the elder of the two brothers. His mother’s name was probably Salome, the sister of the mother of Jesus (compare <402756>
Matthew 27:56; <411540>
Mark 15:40; <431925>
John 19:25), but this is disputed by some (compare BRETHREN OF THE LORD). James was a fisherman by trade, and worked along with his father and brother
(<400421>Matthew 4:21). According to Lk, these were partners with Simon
(5:10), and this is also implied in Mark (1:19). As they owned several boats
and employed hired servants (<420511>Luke 5:11; <410120>Mark 1:20), the establishment they possessed must have been considerable.
2. First Call:
The call to James to follow Christ (<400418>Matthew 4:18-22; <410116>Mark 1:16-20;
<420501>
Luke 5:1-11) was given by Jesus as He was walking by the sea of Galilee (<400418>Matthew 4:18). There He saw “James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother, in the boat with Zebedee their father, mending their nets;
and he called them. And they straightway left the boat and their father, and followed him” (<400421>Matthew 4:21,22). The account of Luke varies in part from those of Matthew and Mark, and contains the additional detail of the miraculous draught of fishes, at which James and John also were amazed.
This version of Luke is regarded by some as an amalgamation of the earlier accounts with <432101>John 21:1-8.
3. Probation and Ordination:
As the above incident took place after the imprisonment of John the Baptist, when Jesus had departed into Galilee (<400412>Matthew 4:12; <410114>Mark 1:14), and as there is no mention of James among those who received the preliminary call recorded by John (compare <430135>John 1:35-51; 3:24, and compare ANDREW), it is probable that while Peter and Andrew made the pilgrimage to Bethany, James and the other partners remained in Galilee to carry on the business of their trade. Yet, on the return of Peter and
Andrew, the inquiries of James must have been eager concerning what they had seen and heard. His mind and imagination became filled with their glowing accounts of the newly found “Lamb of God” (<430136>John 1:36) and of the preaching of John the Baptist, until he inwardly dedicated his life to Jesus and only awaited an opportunity to declare his allegiance openly. By this is the apparently abrupt nature of the call, as recorded by the
Synoptists, to be explained. After a period of companionship and
probationership with his Master, when he is mentioned as being present at the healing of Simon’s wife’s mother at Capernaum (<410129>Mark 1:29-31), he was ordained one of the Twelve Apostles (<401002>
Matthew 10:2; <410317>
Mark 3:17; <420614>Luke 6:14; <440113>Acts 1:13).
4. Apostleship:
From this time onward he occupied a prominent place among the apostles, and, along with Peter and John, became the special confidant of Jesus.
These three alone of the apostles were present at the raising of Jairus’
daughter (<410537>Mark 5:37; <420851>Luke 8:51), at the Transfiguration (Mr 17:1-
8; <410902>Mark 9:2-8; <420928>Luke 9:28-36), and at the Agony in the Garden of
Gethsemane (<402636>
Matthew 26:36-46; <411432>
Mark 14:32-42). Shortly after the Transfiguration, when Jesus, having “stedfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem” (<420951>Luke 9:51), was passing through Samaria, the ire of James and John was kindled by the ill reception accorded to Him by the populace
(<420953>Luke 9:53). They therefore asked of Jesus, “Lord, wilt thou that we
bid fire to come down from heaven, and consume them?” (<420954>Luke 9:54).
“But he turned, and rebuked them” (<420955>Luke 9:55). It was probably this hotheaded impetuosity and fanaticism that won for them the surname
“Boanerges, which is, Sons of thunder,” bestowed on them when they were ordained to the Twelve (<410317>
Mark 3:17). Yet upon this last occasion, there was some excuse for their action. The impression left by the
Transfiguration was still deep upon them, and they felt strongly that their Lord, whom they had lately beheld “in his glory” with “countenance
altered” and “glistering raiment,” should be subjected to such indignities by the Samaritans. Upon the occasion of Jesus’ last journey to Jerusalem
(<411032>Mark 10:32), the two brothers gave expression to this presumptuous
impetuosity in a more selfish manner (<411035>Mark 10:35-45). Presuming on their intimacy with Jesus, they made the request of him, “Grant unto us that we may sit, one on thy right hand, and one on thy left hand, in thy glory” (<411037>Mark 10:37). In the account of Matthew (20:20-28), the words are put in the mouth of their mother. The request drew forth the rebuke of Jesus (<411038>
Mark 10:38), and moved the ten with indignation (<411040>
Mark 10:40); but by the words of their Lord peace was again restored (<411042>Mark 10:42-45). After the arrival of Jesus in Jerusalem, when He “sat on the mount of Olives over against the temple,” James was one of the four who put the question to Him concerning the last things (<411303>
Mark 13:3,1). He was also present when the risen Jesus appeared for the 3rd time to the disciples and the miraculous draught of fishes was made at the sea of Tiberias (<432101>John 21:1-14).
5. Death:
James was the first martyr among the apostles, being slain by King Herod Agrippa I about 44 AD, shortly before Herod’s own death. The vehemence and fanaticism which were characteristic of James had made him to be feared and hated among the Jewish enemies of the Christians, and therefore when “Herod the king put forth his hands to afflict certain of the church ....
he killed James the brother of John with the sword” (<441201>Acts 12:1,2). Thus did James fulfill the prophecy of our Lord that he too should drink of the cup of his Master (<411039>Mark 10:39).
II. In Apocryphal Literature.
According to the “Genealogies of the Twelve Apostles” (compare Budge, Contendings of the Apostles, II, 49), “Zebedee was of the house of Levi, and his wife of the house of Judah. Now, because the father of James loved him greatly he counted him among the family of his father Levi, and
similarly because the mother of John loved him greatly, she counted him among the family of her father Judah. And they were surnamed `Children of Thunder,’ for they were of both the priestly house and of the royal house.” The Acts of John, a heretical work of the 2nd century, referred to by Clement of Alexandria in his Hypotyposis and also by Eusebius
(Historia Ecclesiastica, III, 25), gives an account of the call of James and his presence at the Transfiguration, similar in part to that of the Gospels, but giving fantastic details concerning the supernatural nature of Christ’s body, and how its appearances brought confusion to James and other disciples (compare Itennecke, Handbuch zu den neutestamentlichen Apokryphen, 423-59). The Acts of James in India (compare Budge, II, 295-303) tells of the missionary journey of James and Peter to India, of the appearance of Christ to them in the form of a beautiful young man, of their healing a blind man, and of their imprisonment, miraculous release, and their conversion of the people. According to the Martyrdom of James (Budge, II, 304-8), James preached to the 12 tribes scattered abroad, and persuaded them to give their first-fruits to the church instead of to Herod.
The accounts of his trial and death are similar to that in <441201>
Acts 12:1-2.
(1) James is the patron saint of Spain. The legend of his preaching there, of his death in Judea, of the transportation of his body under the guidance of angels to Iria and of the part that his miraculous appearances played in the history of Spain, is given in Mrs. Jameson’s Sacred and Legendary Art, I, 230-41.
(2) James the son of Alpheus ([oJ tou~ jAlfai>ou, ho tou Alphaiou]; for etymology, etc., of James, see above): One of the Twelve Apostles
(<401003>Matthew 10:3; <410318>Mark 3:18; <420615>Luke 6:15; <440113>Acts 1:13). By
Matthew and Mark he is coupled with Thaddaeus, and by Luke and Acts with Simon Zelotes. As Matthew or Levi is also called the son of Alpheus
(compare <400909>Matthew 9:9; <410214>Mark 2:14), it is possible that he and James were brothers. According to the Genealogies of the Apostles (compare Budge, Contendings of the Apostles, II, 50), James was of the house of Gad. The Martyrdom of James, the son of Alpheus (compare Budge, ib, 264-66) records that James was stoned by the Jews for preaching Christ, and was “buried by the Sanctuary In Jerusalem.”
This James is generally identified with James the Little or the Less, the brother of Joses and son of Mary (<402756>Matthew 27:56; <411540>Mark 15:40). In
<431925>
John 19:25 this Mary is called the wife of Cleophas (the King James Version) or Clopas (Revised Version), who is thus in turn identified with Alpheus. There is evidence in apocryphal literature of a Simon, a son of Clopas, who was also one of the disciples (compare NATHANAEL). If this be the same as Simon Zelotes, it would explain why he and James (i.e. as being brothers) were coupled together in the apostolic lists of Luke and Acts. Some have applied the phrase “his mother’s sister” in <431925>John 19:25 to Mary the wife of Clopas, instead of to a separate person, and have thus attempted to identify James the son of Alpheus with James the brother of our Lord. For a further discussion of the problem, see BRETHREN OF THE LORD.
(3) James, “the Lord’s brother” ([oJ ajdelfo<v tou~ Kuri>ou, ho adelphos tou Kuriou):