• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

15.2% Matches 0% Quotes 9.2% Exclusions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "15.2% Matches 0% Quotes 9.2% Exclusions"

Copied!
14
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

File name: 6. JURNAL_13385-Hamyana_JPPT

Page count: 10 Word count: 1152

Сharacter count: 7939

File size: 20.16 MB File ID: 84762198

15.2% Matches

Highest match: 6.08% with Library source (File ID: 31057769)

...

Page 12

...

Page 13

0% Quotes

9.2% Exclusions

Some exclusions were automatic (exclusion filters: matched word count less than 8 words and 0%)

...

Page 14

...

Page 14

10.2% Internet sources 130 7.03% Library sources 19

Exclusion of quotes is off Exclusion of references is off

9.2% Internet exclusions 1

0.95% Library exclusions 13

(2)

Rice Farming Income and Financial Feasibility Analysis:

Case of Rice Farmers in Salamrejo Village, Karangan District, Trenggalek Regency, East Java

Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang

Jl. Dr. Cipto No. 144 A, Bedali-Lawang, Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65200 E-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Rice is one of the leading commodities in Salamrejo Village, Karangan District, Trenggalek Regency, East Java. However, one of the main problems faced is that the income of rice farmers is not optimal in meeting household needs. Therefore, research is needed to analyze the problems as mentioned above. This study aims to: 1) Knowing the average income of rice farming per hectare in Salamrejo Village, 2) Knowing the simultaneous and partial effects of land, cost, quantity, price and experience factors on rice farming income in

Salamrejo Village. The research method uses a survey type by using a questionnaire as a data collection tool. The research sample was determined using the simple random sampling type of probability sampling method. Data analysis used farming analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that: 1) The average income of rice farming per hectare in Salamrejo Village is Rp 15,562,431 in one growing season, 2) Individually, land has no effect, cost has a negative and significant

effect, quantity has a positive and significant effect, price has a positive and significant effect, and experience has no effect, price has an effect positive and significant, and experience has no effect on rice farming income in Salamrejo village, 3) Taken together on cost, quantity, price and experience have a positive and significant effect on rice farming income in Salamrejo village.

Keywords: Rice, farming, income, financial feasibility

Padi adalah salah satu komoditas unggulan di Desa Salamrejo, Kecamatan Karangan, Kabupaten Trenggalek, Jawa Timur. Salah satu masalah yang dihadapi petani di daerah ini adalah pendapatan dari usahatani padi belum mencukupi kebutuhan rumah tangga.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: 1) pendapatan rata-rata usahatani padi di Desa Salamrejo, dan 2) pengaruh simultan dan parsial faktor luas lahan, biaya, kuantitas, harga gabah, dan pen galam a n pet an i dalam b eru sa ha tan i pa di. Pe nelit ian menggunakan metode survei dengan membagikan angket untuk pengumpulan data. Sampel penelitian menggunakan metode probability sampling dengan simple random sampling. Analisis

data menggunakan analisis usahatani dan regresi linier berganda.

Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan: 1) Pendapatan rata- rata usahatani padi di Desa Salamrejo adalah Rp 15.562.431/ha/

musim tanam; 2) Secara individual, luas lahan tidak berpengaruh, biaya produksi berpengaruh negatif dan nyata, jumlah produksi berpengaruh positif dan nyata, harga gabah berpengaruh positif dan nyata, harga gabah berpengaruh positif dan nyata, pengalaman berusahatani tidak berpengaruh terhadap pendapatan usahatani padi; dan 3) Secara bersama-sama biaya produksi, jumlah produksi, harga gabah, dan pengalaman berusahatani berpengaruh positif dan nyata terhadap pendapatan usahatani padi.

Kata Kunci: Padi, usahatani, pendapatan, kelayakan finansial

Matches Quotes References T Ignored text AReplacement Comments

Sources on this page: 2-5, 7-9, 12, 15-17, 20, 22, 24-25

(3)

proportional random sampling

.

Net Present Value Internal Rate of Return Payback Period Profitability Index Net Benefit Cost Ratio

total cost

TC = FC x VC Total cost Fix cost Variable cost

total cost

total revenue

Matches Quotes References T Ignored text AReplacement Comments

Sources on this page: 6, 18, 23

(4)

TR = Q x P Total revenue Quantity Price

TR – TC (dibayarkan + diperhitungkan) Profit

Total Revenue Total Cost

TI = TR - TC (dibayarkan) TI = Total Income (pendapatan) TR = Total Revenue (total penerimaan) TC = Total Cost ( total biaya)

Net Present Value Net present value

social opportunity cost of capital discount factor

benefit cost

break event point

2. Internal rate of return Internal rate of return

net present value net present value discount rate

discount rate

Matches Quotes References T Ignored text AReplacement Comments

Sources on this page: 2-3, 6, 10-11, 13, 21

(5)

break event point

3. Profitability Index Net Benefit Cost Ratio Profitability Index Net Benefit Cost Ratio

present value present value

benefit cost ratio

break event point

4. Payback Period Payback period

et al

hand sprayer

power tracer,

Tabel 1. Rata-rata biaya usahatani padi di Desa Salamrejo pada MT 2020

Komponen biaya Total luas Total biaya Rata-rata

lahan (Rp) biaya

(ha) (Rp/ha)

Sewa lahan 29,5343 210.973.350 7.143.333 Biaya penyusutan alat 29,5343 27.441.831 929.151

Biaya benih 29,5343 6.202.203 210.000

Biaya pupuk 29,5343 36.964.242 1.251.570

Biaya pestisida 29,5343 21.155.397 716.299 Biaya lain-lain 29,5343 12.743.720 716.299 Biaya irigasi 29,5343 35.700.000 1.208.764 Biaya perontokan 29,5343 7.720.000 261.391 Biaya pengangkutan 29,5343 18.200.000 616.233 Biaya tenaga kerja 29,5343 422.720.000 14.312.850

Total 799.820.742 27.081.080

Matches Quotes References T Ignored text AReplacement Comments

Sources on this page: 2, 14

(6)

tracer

power tracer

combine harvester

implisit et al

et al.

System of Rice Intensification

power tracer power

Tabel 2. Perbandingan penerimaan dan pendapatan usahatani jagung antara pola kemitraan dan nonkemitraan dalam satu musim tanam (per ha) di Kecamatan Sumberpucung Malang, Maret-Mei 2020.

Komponen biaya Total luas Total Rata-

lahan biaya rata

(ha) (Rp) (Rp/ha)

Biaya yang dibayarkan - Sewa lahan milik

orang lain 20,3955 150.040.716 7.356.560

- Biaya benih 29,5343 6.202.203 210.000

- Biaya pupuk 29,5343 36.964.242 1.251.570

- Biaya pestisida 29,5343 21.155.397 716.299 - Biaya lain-lain 29,5343 12.743.720 431.489 - Biaya irigasi 29,5343 35.700.000 1.208.764 - Biaya perontokan 29,5343 7.720.000 261.391 - Biaya pengangkutan 29,5343 18.200.000 616.233 - Biaya tenaga kerja luar

keluarga 29,5343 248.810.000 8.424.442

Total 537.536.278 20.476.748

Biaya yang diperhitung kan - Biaya sewa lahan

milik sendiri 9,139 60.932.633 6.667.465 - Biaya penyusutan alat 29,5343 27.441.831 929.151 - Biaya tenaga kerja

dalam keluarga 29,5343 173.910.00 5.888.4080

Total 262.284.464 13.485.024

Matches Quotes References T Ignored text AReplacement Comments

Sources on this page: 2

(7)

eksplisit

et al

et al.

input output

NPV

Tabel 3. Hasil analisis finansial usahatani padi/ha di Desa Salamrejo pada MT 2020

Analisis Jumlah Ketentuan Keterangan

kelayakan

NPV (15%) Rp 10.861.668 NPV > 1 = Layak

NPV < 1 = Tdk layak Layak IRR 16,97% IRR > i = Layak

IRR < i = Tidak layak

i = 15% Layak

PP 9,87 PP > t usaha = Layak

PP < t usaha = Layak Layak

NBCR 2,24 NBCR > 0 = Layak

NBCR < 0 = Layak Layak

Matches Quotes References T Ignored text AReplacement Comments

Page 6 of 13

(8)

NPV

Internal Rate of Return

Payback Period

. payback period

net benefit benefit

Y = (-13.861.901) + (-1,010) X2 + 4.903X3 + 2.860X4 + (-9.660) X5

et al.

et al

et al

Tabel 4. Hasil analisis regresi linier berganda pendapatan petani padi di Desa Salamrejo Kecamatan Karangan, Kabupaten Trenggalek, Jawa Timur, MT 2020

Variabel Koefisien Standar t-hitung Signifikansi error

Konstanta -13861901.555 2514016.397 -5.514 0,000

Biaya Produksi -1.010 .051 -19.887 0,000

Jumlah Produksi 4903.471 143.478 34.176 0,000

Harga Jual 2859.851 480.254 5.955 0,000

Pengalaman -9660.349 12683.930 1.762 0,449

R2 = 0,974, t-tabel = 1,67, f-hitung = 721.263, f-tabel = 2,33 (sig. 0,000), α = 0,05

Matches Quotes References T Ignored text AReplacement Comments

Sources on this page: 2

(9)

et al

Matches Quotes References T Ignored text AReplacement Comments

Page 8 of 13

(10)

Matches Quotes References T Ignored text AReplacement Comments

Page 9 of 13

(11)

Matches

Matches Quotes References T Ignored text AReplacement Comments

Page 10 of 13

(12)

Internet sources 130

3 http://jurnalmahasiswa.umsu.ac.id/index.php/jimtani/article/download/233/205 2.08%

4 http://eprints.umpo.ac.id/7777/2/HALAMAN%20DEPAN.pdf 1.82%

5 https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/journal/view/6468?page=211 1.74%

6 https://www.coursehero.com/file/p1nonkn/Question27-02pts 1.74%

7 https://www.jurnal.uts.ac.id/index.php/jmb/citationstylelanguage/download/ris?publicationId=206&submissionId=281 1.48%

8 https://jacobbradjohnson.com/factors-affecting-supply-chain-management-in-the-retail-business-industry-in-kenya 1.48%

9 https://garuda.ristekbrin.go.id/journal/view/6468?issue=Vol+9%2C+No+1+%282014%29%3A+APRIL 1.39%

10 https://truckeetahoeairport.com/board_meetings/163/view_file?file=tab+10d+-+appendix+d.1+-+trk+executive+hangar+study… 1.39%

11 https://www.neliti.com/publications/78495/evaluasi-usaha-penggilingan-padi-sumber-hidup-di-desa-marindi-kecamatan-harua… 1.13%

12 https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/journal/view/9940?issue=Vol+1+No+2+%282012%29%3A+Economic+Education+Analysis+Jou… 1.13%

13 http://ejournal.upnjatim.ac.id/index.php/sear/article/view/1712 1.04%

14 https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/59563-ID-analisa-kelayakan-teknis-pasar-dan-finan.pdf 1.04%

16 http://lib.unnes.ac.id/16033 0.87%

17 http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/9338/2/13410113.pdf 0.87%

18 https://brainmass.com/file/247479/25MultipleChoice.docx 0.87%

20 https://gssrjournal.com/fulltext/discovering-the-impact-of-national-language-use-in-l2-learning-on-the-proficiency-of-learners 0.78%

21 http://lrd.yahooapis.com/_ylc=X3oDMTVnOXFvMXVuBF9TAzIwMjMxNTI3MDIEYXBwaWQDTHJlazRUTFYzNEdRVjYwVDFRYVlHeC5x…0.78%

22 http://repository.ubb.ac.id/3163 0.69%

23 http://lrd.yahooapis.com/_ylc=X3oDMTVnNmJicGk1BF9TAzIwMjMxNTI3MDIEYXBwaWQDTHJlazRUTFYzNEdRVjYwVDFRYVlHeC5x… 0.69%

24 https://Scholar.ufs.ac.za/bitstream/handle/11660/11195/MaraisaneML.pdf 0.69%

18 Sources

5 Sources

14 Sources

9 Sources

2 Sources

11 Sources

6 Sources

4 Sources

25 Sources

4 Sources

3 Sources

6 Sources

7 Sources

5 Sources

2 Sources

4 Sources

Page 11 of 13

(13)

Exclusions

Library sources 19

2 ANGGUN RISTIKA IRJAYANTI_0712162111 File ID: 31057769 Institution: Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang 6.08%

15 SALSABILA IMTAZA File ID: 81780926 Institution: Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang 0.95%

17 Sources

2 Sources

Page 12 of 13

(14)

Internet exclusions 1

http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/jpptp/article/download/11927/9693 9.2%

Library exclusions 13

02_AHMAD GHUFRON_AGRINAK 2A_04.09.20.631_ARTKEL ILMIAH STUDI PUSTAKA File ID: 59004348 Institution: Politeknik Pe… 0.87%

Deni Indra File ID: 81780927 Institution: Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang 0.69%

11 Sources

2 Sources

Page 13 of 13

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Internal Rate Return (IRR), Net Benefit Cost Ratio (Net B/C Ratio), Payback Periode dan analisis sensitivitas. Analisis aspek non finansial yang dilakukan terhadap

Citra Perdana Kendedes dengan menggunakan metode Average Rate of Return (ARR), Payback period (PP), Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit Cost Ratio ( B/C Ratio ),

Citra Perdana Kendedes dengan menggunakan metode Average Rate of Return (ARR), Payback period (PP), Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit Cost Ratio (B/C Ratio),

Belayan Internasional Coal di Muara Badak meliputi empat unsur net present value (NPV), internal rate return, benefit cost ratio dan payback period, usaha ini berada

526.828.701 NPV positif Benefit cost ratio Net B/C = 1 Net B/C > 1 Net B/C < 1 1,249 Proyek untung Internal rate return NPV = NPV NPV‟ = NPV 33,40 % Proyek untung Payback period <

The model specification for the net farm income is as follows: NFI = GFI – TVC – TFC --- 1 Where NFI = Net Farm Income GFI = Gross Farm Income TVC = Total Variable Cost TFC = Total

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION Conclusion Break even point BEP, cost benefit ratio B/C Ratio, net present value NPV, payback period PP, and internal rate of return IRR analysis for

Dari hasil perhitungan dengan metode Net Present Value NPV, Benefit Cost Ratio BCR, Internal Rate of Return IRR dan Payback Period PBP, investasi pada pembangunan Villa Maharaja