1 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
A B C A
Aastrup, S. (2013). Dynamisk kartleggingsprøve i matematikk for elever fra 5-10 trinn og elever i videregående skole. Statped Midt.
Abbasi, A. & Fatemi, M.A. (2015). On the effect of dynamic assessment on Iranian pre- intermediate EFL learner acquisition of English tenses. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 8(4), 222-236.
Abbott, S. P., Reed. E., Abbott, R.D., & Berninger, V.W. (1997). Year-long balanced
reading/writing tutorial: A design experiment used for dynamic assessment. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 249-263/
Abdolrezapour, P. J. (2016). Improving L2 reading comprehension through emotionalized dynamic assessment procedures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1-24.
doi:10.1007/s10936-016-9464-9
Abdolrezapour, P., Tavakoli, M., & Ketabi, S. (2013). Enhancing learners’ emotions in an L2 context through emotionalized dynamic assessment. Studies in Second Language, 3(2), 213- 243.
Ableeva, R.(2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Ableeva, R. (2008). The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 listening comprehension, in J. P.
Lantolf and M. E. Poehner (eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages, London, Equinox.
Ableeva, R.(2007). Assessing listening for development. In R. Alanen & S. Poyhonen (Eds.), Language in Action. Vygotsky and Leontievian legacy today. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp.
352-379.
2 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Ableeva, R. & Lantolf, J. (2011). Mediated dialogue and the microgenesis of second language listening comprehension. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 133-149.
Adrianopoulos, L.P. (2001). The perceived utility of traditional and dynamic psychoeducational assessment recommendations by teachers of the deaf. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, Aug., 62(2-A), 455.
Adokh, H. & Rafiee, M. (2016). Investigating the insiders’ perspectives about dynamic
assessment process and practicality. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 6(2), 41-47.
Agaton P. Pattalitan Jr.. The Implications of Learning Theories to Assessment and Instructional Scaffolding Techniques. American Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 4, No. 9, 2016, pp 695-700. http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/4/9/9
Aghaebrahimian, A., Rahimirad, M., Ahmadi, A., & Alamdari, J. K. (2014). Dynamic Assessment of Writing Skill in advanced EFL Iranian learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 60-67.
Agheshteh, A. (2015). Dynamic Assessment for better placement: Implications of Vygotsky’s ZAD and ZPD. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(5).
Ahangari, S. & Alizadeh, K. (2015). The reasoning towards using dynamic assessment in EFL (English as a Foreign Language) educational system in Iran. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 5(2), 534-540.
Ahmadi, A., & Besharati, F. (2017). Web-based Versus Face-to-Face Interactionist Dynamic Assessment in Essay Writing Classrooms – A Comparative Study. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1- 29.
Ahmadpour, L. & Asadoliahfam, H. (2018). The effects of dynamic assessment and gender on EFL learners’ oral narrative task performance. International Journal of Language Testing and Assessment, 1(1), 1-8).
Ai, H. (2017). Providing graduated corrective feedback in an intelligent computer-assisted language learning environment. ReCALL. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401700012X Published online: 24 May 2017
Aiken, R., Bessagnet, M-N, & Israel, J. (2005). Interaction and collaboration using an intelligent collaborative learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 10(1-2), 67-82.
Ajideh, P., Farrokhi, F. & Nourdad, N. (2012). Dynamic assessment of EFL reading: Revealing hidden aspects at different proficiency levels. World Journal of Education. 2 (4), 102.
3 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Ajideh, P. & Nourdad, N. (2012). The immediate and delayed effect of dynamic assessment on EFL reading ability. English Language Teaching. 5 (12). Correspondence: Nava Nourdad (PhD), English Department, Persian Literature and Foreign Languages Faculty, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. Tel: 98-91-4412-1534. E-mail: nourdad@tabrizu.ac.ir
Ajideh, P. &Nourdad, N. (2012). The effect of dynamic assessment on EFL reading comprehension in different proficiency levels. Language Testing in Asia, 2(4), 101- 121.
Akbari, R., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2011). EFL teachers’ recruitment and dynamic assessment in private language institutes of Iran. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 8, 30–51.
Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Schatschneider, C., &
Wagner, R. K. (2014). To wait in Tier 1 or intervene immediately: A randomized experiment examining first-grade Response to Intervention in reading. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 11.
Alavi, M., Kalvanpanah, S. & Shabani, K. (2012). Group dynamic assessment: An Inventory of meditational strategies for teaching listening. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 3(4), 27-58.
Alavi, S.M. & Taghizadeh, M. (2014). Dynamic assessment of writing: The impact of implicit/explicit mediations on L2 learners’ internalization of writing skills and strategies.
Educational Assessment, 19(1), 1-16.
Albuquerque, C.P., Santos, P.,& Nascimento, S. (2007). WISC-III: Avaliaçao dinamica em sujeitos com défices cognitivos. [WISC-III: Dynamic assessment in subjects with cognitive deficits]. Psicologia Educaçao Cultura,11(1),113-128.
Alderson, J. C., Brunfaut, T., & Harding, L. (2017). Bridging assessment and learning: a view from second and foreign language assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice.
Alemi, M. (2015). The impact of Dynamic Assessment on Irnaian EFL students’ writing self- assessment. TELL, 9(1), 145-169.
Al-Hroub, A. (2009). Évaluation dynamique appliquée aux préscolaires présentant des
difficultés d'apprentissage (Dynamic Assessment Applied to Preschool Children with Learning Difficulties). La Nouvelle revue de l'adaptation et de la scolarisation, 46, 61-76.
Al-Hroub, A. (2010). Developing assessment profiles for mathematically gifted children with learning difficulties at three schools in Cambridgeshire, England. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(1), 7-44.
Al-Hroub, A. (2010). Developing assessment profiles for mathematically gifted children with learning difficulties at three schools in Cambridgeshire, England. Journal for the Education of
4 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0 the Gifted. 34(1), 7–44.
Al-Hroub, A. (2014). Identification of Dual-exceptional Learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 63-73.
Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J.P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and sceond language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-483.
Aljunied, M. & Frederickson, N. (2011). Does central coherence relate to the cognitive performance of children with autism in dynamic assessments? Autism, 17(2), 172-183.
Aljunied, M. & Frederickson, N. (2013). Does central coherence relate to the cognitive performance of children with autism in dynamic assessments? Autism, 17(2), 172-183.
Aljunied, M., & Frederickson, N. L. (2014). Assessing cognitive abilities in children with autism:
practitioner evaluation of treatment validity. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities.
Allal, L. & Ducrey, G.P. (2000). Assessment of-or-in the zone of proximal development.
Learning & Instruction, 10(2), 137-152.
Allsopp, D.H., Kyger, M.M., Lovin, L-A, Gerretson, H., Carson, K.L., & Ray, S. (2008).
Mathematics dynamic assessment: Informal assessment that responds to the needs of struggling learners in mathematics. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(3), 6-16.
Al-Mahrooqi, R., Coombe, C., Al-Maamari, F., & Thakur, V. (Eds.). (2017). Revisiting EFL Assessment: Critical Perspectives. Springer.
Al-Natour, M. Alkhamra, H, & Al-Smadi, Y. (2008). Current practices and obstacles.
International Journal of Special Education, 23(2), 68-74.
Alony, S. & Kozulin, A. (2007). Dynamic assessment of receptive language in children with Down Syndrome. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 1-9, 323-331.
Ambinder, A.M. (1993). The differential effects of the Learning Potential Assessment Device (LPAD) on intellective factors in older adults with memory complaints. Dissertationi Abstracts International, 53(12-B), 6529.
Ambrose, L. & Machek, G.R. (2015) (Identifying Creatively Gifted Students: Necessity of a Multi-Method Approach. Contemporary School Psychology, 19(3), 122-127.
Amerian, M. & Mehri, E. (2015). Transcendence of cognitive development: The incorporation of task-based instruction into the transfer tasks of dynamic assessment. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6 (6), 1311-1319
5 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Amerian, S.M., Bonjakhi, M., & Nafchi, A.M. (2016). The effect of the Online Dynamic Assessment of University Students’ Writing Electronic Portfolios on micro-componential writing ability. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 6(3).
Amiri, F. & Sageri, L. (2016). Dynamic assessment: The effect of Mediated Learning Experience on Iranian EFL learners’ writing skills. International Academic Journal of Humanities, 3 ( 2), 1- 9.
Andisheh S. ( 2012). Dynamic Assessment: A call for change in assessment. The Asian EFL Journal, 59.
Andrews, J.J., Saklofske, D.H. Y Janzen, H.L. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of psychoeducational assessment: Ability, achievement and behavior in children. San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
Andrianopoulos, L.P. (2001). The perceived utility of traditional and dynamic psychoeducational assessment recommendations by teachers of the deaf.
Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University (New York).
Antón, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 576-598.
Aramburu-Zabala, L. & Casals, M. (2003). Prediction of training performance for diesel mechanics. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 233-246.
Aramburu-Zabala Higuera, L.C.R.M.(2004). Validation of a trainability test for young apprentices. European Psychologist, 9(1), 56-63.
Aravena, S. (2017). Letter-speech sound learning in children with dyslexia: From behavioral research to clinical practice. University of Amsterdam, thesis.
Aravena, S., Tijms, J., Snellings, P., & Van der Molen, M. (2016). Predicting responsiveness to intervention in dyslexia using dynamic assessment. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 209-215. (2016).
Arias, G., & Friberg, J. (2017). Bilingual Language Assessment: Contemporary Versus Recommended Practice in American Schools. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 48(1), 1-15.
Arbitman-Smith, R., Haywood, H. C., & Bransford, J. D. (1984). Assessing cognitive change. In P. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. McCauley (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 433-471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Archibald, L.M.D. (2018). The reciprocal influences of working memory and linguistic knowledge on language performance: Considerations for the assessment of children with
6 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
developmental language disorder. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 424- 433.
Aryadoust, V., & Riazi, M. (2017). Future directions for assessing for learning in second
language writing research: epilogue to the special issue. Educational Psychology, 37(1), 82-89.
Asad, A.N., Hand, L., Fairgray, L. & Purdy, S.C. (2013). The use of dynamic assessment to evaluate narrative language learning in children with hearing loss: Three case studies. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 29(3), 319- 342
Asad, A. N., Purdy, S. C., & Hand, L. (2016). Dynamic Assessment of Narrative Abilities of Children with Hearing Loss: Case Study of a Child with Moderate to Severe Hearing Loss.
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1 (9), 68-8 DOI 10.1044/persp1.SIG9.68 Assif, T. & Tzuriel, D. (2014). Cognitive modifiability and ego identity among adolescents.
Psychology & Psychotherapy, 4(4), 147-156.
Atencio, D.J. (2004). The emerging volitional self: A dynamic assessment of the mediating role of social and private dialogue in the development of self-direction and task motivation.
Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 64 (9-A), 3186.
Austin, L. (2012). Dynamic Assessment: Whys and hows. Perspectives on School-Based Issues.
Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 5(4), 56-68.
Austin, T. (2017). What’s at Stake in a High-Stakes Math Test? Analysis of Multimodal
Challenges for Emergent English Bilingual Learners. In Culturally Responsive Pedagogy (pp.
185-206). Springer International Publishing.
Azarian, F., Nourdad, N., & Nouri, N. (2016). The effect of dynamic assessment on elementary EFL learners’ overall language attaninment. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(1), 203.
Azarizad, R. (2013). Speaking dynamic assessment. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Azarizad, R. & Barzegar, R. (2012). Dynamic assessment of speaking performance of EFL intermediate learners TEFL. Academic Publishing (Iran).
B
BACK TO TOPBachman, L.F. & Cohen, A.D. (1998). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Badhoda, I. & Shabani, K. (2016). Response latency as a tool to study L2 learners’ ZPD, ZAD, and ongoing information processing. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(2).
Baek, S-G & Kyoung, J.K. (2003). The effect of dynamic assessment based instruction on children's learning. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(2), 189-198.
Baez, R.A. (1987). The effectiveness of a learning potential assessment procedure with Puerto Rican children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(2-A), 337.
Bagherpour, N., Rashtchi, M., & Birjandi, P. (2017). The impact of mediational artifact types on EFL learners’ writing complexity: Collaboration vs. asynchronous artifacts. Journal of
Language and Translation, 7(4), 53-67.
Bailey, A. L. (2017). Theoretical and developmental issues to consider in the assessment of young learners’ English language proficiency. English language proficiency assessments for young learners, 25.
Bain, B.A. (1994). A framework for dynamic assessment in phonology: Stimulability revisited.
Clinical Communication Disorders, 4(1), 12-22.
Bain, B.A. & Olswang, L.B. (1995). Examining readiness for learning two-word utterances by children with specific expressive language impairment: Dynamic assessment validation.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 81-92.
Bakhoda, I., & Shabani, K. (2017). Enhancing L2 learners’ ZPD modification through
computerized-group dynamic assessment of reading comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-14.
Balac, T. & Gaines, D.M. (no date). Dynamic Multiple Assessment: An instructional method that captures the symbiosis of assessment and instruction. Online download from
Citeseer.ist.psu.edu/295525.html
Baltes, M., Kuhl, K.P., Sowarka, D., & Gutzman, H. (1995). Potential of cognitive plasticity as a diagnostic instrument: A cross-validation and extension. Psychology and Aging, 10(2), 167-172.
Baltes, M. & Raykov, T. (1996). Prospective validity of cognitive plasticity in the diagnosis of mental status; A structural equation model. Neuropsychology, 10, 549-556.
Banks, S.R. & Neisworth, J.T. (1995). Dynamic assessment in early intervention: Implications for serving American Indian/Alaska native families. Journal of American Indian Education, 34(2), 27-43. Online:http://jaie.asu.edu/V34S2dyn.html
Bardsley, J.R. (1980). An exploration of learning potential assessment with learning disabled
8 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40(12-A, Pt 1), 6226.
Bar-Ilan, R.T., Golstand, S., Parush, S., & Katz, N. (2007). The Dynamic Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment for Children (DOTCA-Ch): A new instrument for assessment learning potential. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, January.
Barjesteh, H. & Niknezhad, F. (2013). A paradigm shift toward a new philosophy of assessment:
Dynamic assessment from a critical perspective. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences ISSN: 2231-6345. An Online journal available at http://www.cibtech.org/jls.htm, Vol. 3 (3) July-September, 526-535.
Barker, R.M., Bridges, M.S. & Saunders, K.J. (2014). Validity of a non-speech Dynamic Assessment of Phonemic Awareness via the Alphabetic Principle. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(1), 71-82.
Bar-Korzen, S. (2003). The Berry-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI)-A comparison between standard-static assessment and dynamic assessment (mediated learning experience), between two goups: Low grade achievers and appropriate-high grade achievers (Unpublished master’s thesis) Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Barn, J. (2014). Review of Improving Learning through Dynamic Assessment: A practical classroom resource. Educational Psychology in Practice, 30(2), 204.
Barr, P.M. & Samuels, M.T. (1988). Dynamic assessment of cognitive and affective factors contributing to learning difficulties in adults: A case study approach. Professional Psychology:
Research & Practice, 19(1), 6-13.
Barrera, M. (2006). Roles of definitional and assessment models in the identification of new or second language learners of English for special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 142-156.
Barrera, M. (2003). Curriculum-based dynamic assessment for new- or second-language learners with learning disabilities in secondary education settings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29 (1), 69-84.
Bartal-Bahat, E. (2001). The Test of Visual Motor Skills (TVMS)-A comparison between standard-static assessment and dynamic assessment (mediated learning experience) (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tel Avis University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Bastiaanse, R., Edwards, S., & Rispens, J. (2002). The verb and sentence test (VAST). Thurston, Suffolk: Thames Valley Test Company.
Beasley, F. & Shayer, M. (1990). Learning potential assessment through Feuerstein's LPAD: Can quantitative results be achieved? International Journal of Dynamic Assessment & Instruction, 1(2), 37-48.
9 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Beaven, A. & Borghetti, C. (2016) Interculturality in study abroad, Language and Intercultural Communication, 16:3, 313-317, DOI: 10.1080/14708477.2016.1173893 To link to this article:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2016.1173893
Bechard, S., Sheinker, J., Abell, R., Barton, K., Burling, K., Camacho, C., Camero, R., Haertel, G., Hansen, E., Johnstone, C., Kingston, N., Murray, E., Parker, C.E., Redfield, D., & Tucker, B.
(2010). Measuring cognition of students with disabilities using technology-enabled assessments: Recommendations for national research agenda. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 10 (4).
Beck, S.W. (2018). Learning to teach writing through dialogic assessment. English Education, 50 (4).
Beckmann, J.F. (2001). Zur Validierung des Konstruckts des intelleckuellen
Veranderungspotentials (Validating the construct of potential for intellectual change).
Gottingen:Hogrefe.
Beckmann, J.F. (2006). Superiority: Always and everywhere? On some misconceptions in the validation of dynamic testing. Educational & Child Psychology, 23(3), 35-49.
Beckmann, J.F. (2014). The umbrella that is too wide and yet too small: Why dynamic Testing has still not delivered on the promise that was never made. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 13(3), 308-323.
Beckmann, J.F. & Herzberg, P.Y. (Eds.). (2001). Dynamik im Testen. Perspektiven auf die Zone der nachsten Entwicklung in der Psychodiagnostik. Festscrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Jurgen Guthke (Dynamic in testing. Perspectives of the zone of proximal development in
psychodiagnostics). Commemorative volume (J. Guthke: 60th birthday). Landau: VEP.
Beckmann, N. and Beckmann, J.F. and Elliott, J.G. (2009). Self-confidence and performance goal orientation interactively predict performance in a reasoning test with accuracy feedback.
Learning and individual differences, 19 (2), 277-282.
Bednar, M.R. (1990). Dynamic Assessment Procedure: A validation. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference 40th Annual Meeting, Miami, FL, November 29.
ED329921
Bedwell, Scott E. Beyond static representations: Development of a multi-channel, dynamic assessment of emotion perception. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, Vol 72(6-B), 2011, 3768.
Behrooznia, S. (2014). Dynamic Assessment revisited: pedagogical considerations in L2 context.
International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 237-249.
10 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Behshad, A., Amirian, S.M.R., Davoudi, M. & Ghaniabadi, S. (2017). The differing role of L2 WTC in Iranian EFL learners’ performance on a computerized dynamic test of writing. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7 (1), 17-34.
Behzad Nazari, B. (2012). Teach-to-test instruction of dynamic assessment: A critical overview.
Bellaterra Journal of Teaching and Learning Language and Literature, 5(4), 56-68.
Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Olsen, M. W., & Leary, H. (2015). A Pilot Meta-Analysis of
Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education. Educational Technology & Society, 18 (1), 183–
197.
Belland, B.R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N.J. & Lefler, M. (2016). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, (October 10),107-126.
Bellissimo, Alexandra, "Dynamic Assessment of Early French Immersion Literacy Learning Competencies" (2017). Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 1943.
http://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1943.
Bello, A.R. (2007). Utilidad de la Escala ACFS para Poblacion Preescolar con Sindrome de Down. Unpublished dissertation, University of Grenada, Spain.
Benjamin, L. & Lomofsky, L. (2002). Effects of the observation of dynamic and static
assessment on teachers' perceptions of the learning potential of less academic learners. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 2(2), 102-123 (online:
http://www.iace.coged.org/journal)
Ben-Yishay, Y., Diller, L., Gerstman, L., & Gordon, W. (1970). Relationship between initial competence and ability to profit from cues in brain-damaged individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 75, 248-259.
Bergamin, P. B., Werlen, E., & Bochud, Y. E. (2017). Scaffolding collaborative learning in pairs within a technology-enhanced learning environment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(1), 40.
Berger, J-L. (2004). Assessment of learning potential: Construction and first evaluation of the psychometric characteristics of an analogical reasoning test. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology [online], 4, 144-145. www.iacep.coged.org
Bergman, M.M. (1980). The ability to learn in mentally retarded persons: An exploration of learning potential and intellectual potential. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(5-B), 1902- 1903.
Berninger, V.W. & Abbott, R.D. (1994). Redefining learning disabilities: Moving beyond aptitutde-achievement discrepancies to failure to respond to validated treatment protocols. In
11 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
G.R. Lyon (Ed.). Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues.
Baltimore: P.H. Brookes.
Bethge, H., Carlson, J.S., & Wiedl, K.H. (1982). The effects of dynamic assessment procedures on Raven Matrices performance, visual search behavior, test anxiety, and test orientation.
Intelligence, 6(1), 89-97.
Bicen, P. & Laverie, D.A. (2009). Group-based assessment as a dynamic approach to marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 31 (2), 96-108.
Bianca, L. (2015). Validity of a Spanish nonspeech dynamic assessment of
phonologicalawareness in children from Spanish-speaking backgrounds. Unpublished master’s thesis University of Florida. Proquest Dissertations and Theses-Gradworks, 1596495.
Bider, C. & Linder. A.-L. (2005). Contribution a la validité d'un test d 'un apprentissage, le HART (Hessels Analogical Reasoning Test), a l'aide de criteres dynamiques [Contribution to the validation of a learning test, the HART (Hessels Analogical Reasoning Test) by means of
dynamic criterion tests]. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Geneva.
Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., & King, M. (2017). Dynamic assessment for 3- and 4-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication: Evaluating expressive syntax.
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (June). DOI: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L- 15-0269
Birjandi, P., Daftarifard, P. (2011). Potential predictability of ZPD of children’s cognitive development. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artifical Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2 (2).
Birjandi, P., Daftarifard, P., & Lange, R. (2011). The effects of dynamic assessment on Rasch item and person hierarchies in second language testing. International Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 5(1), 125-140.
Link : http://www.ijls.net/volumes/volume5issue1/daftari1.pdf
Birjandi, P. & Ebadi, S. (2012). Microgenesis in dynamic assessment of L2 learners’socio- cognitive development via web 2.0. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 34-39.
Birnbaum, R and Deutsch, R (1996) The use of Dynamic Assessment and its Relationship to the Code of Practice. Educational and Child Psychology, Vol 13, 3, 14-24.
Bider, C. & Linder, A.-L. (2005). Contribution a la validité d'un test d'apprentissage, le HART [Hessels Analogical Reasoning Test]. a l'aide de criteres dynamiques [Contribution to the validation of a learning test, the HART, by means of dynamic criterion tests]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Geneva.
Birney, D. (2004). Mediating the impact of mediated learning [book review]. Contemporary
12 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0 Psychology: 48 (5), 677-679.
Black, P. & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21 (1), 5-31.
Blachowicz, C.L.Z.(1999). Vocabulary in dynamic reading assessment: Two case studies.
Reading Psychology, 20(3), 213-236.
Blayney, Paul, Slava Kalyuga and John Sweller Using Cognitive Load Theory to Tailor
Instruction to Levels of Accounting Students' Expertise Journal of Educational Technology &
Society Vol. 18, No. 4 (October 2015), pp. 199-210
Bleichrodt, N., & Resing, W.C.M. (1994). Measuring intelligence and learning potential in iodine-deficient and noniodine-deficient populations. In J.B. Stanbury (Ed.), The damaged brain of iodine deficiency. Cognitive, behavioral, neuromotor, educative aspects. New York:
Cogni-zant communication corporation. (p. 37-42).
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2017). Focusing on “the Future Child”. Theories of Early Childhood Education: Developmental, Behaviorist, and Critical, 58.
Boers, E. (2015). Beyond the eyes: The development of a dynamic assessment procedure to measure the communication potential of people with congenital deafblindness. Unpublished doctoral theses: University of Groningen (NL).
Boers, E., Janssen, M.J., Minnaert, A.E.M.G., & Ruijssenaars, W.A.J.J.M. (2013). The application of dynamic assessment in people communicating at a prelinguistic level: A descriptive review of the literature. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 60(2) 119-145.
Boersa, E., Janssen, M & Minnaeart, A. (2013). The application of dynamic assessment in people communicating at a prelinguistic level: A descriptive review of the literature. International Journal of Disability Development and Education, 60(2),119-145.
Boeyens, J. (1989). Learning potential: A theoretical perspective. Pretoris, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.
Bohács, K. (2010). A dinamikus értékelés. A dinamikus értékelés definíciója és története.
Magyar Pedagógia, 110(4), 311-328
Bolig, E. & Day, J.D. (1993). Dynamic assessment and giftedness: The promise of assessing training responsiveness. Roeper Review, 16(2), 110-113.
Boll, H.S. (1987). Maintenance and generalization during static and dynamic assessment in learning disabled, educable mentally retarded, and non-disabled children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47 (11-A), 4070.
13 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Bonert, M. & Wilbert, J. (2016). Dynamisches Testen als neue perspective in der
sonderpadagogischen diagnosotik - Theorie, evidenzen, impulse für forschung und praxis.
Zeitschrift für Heilpedagogik, 67(4), 156-167.
Bonete, S., Vives, M. C., Fernández-Parra, A., Calero, M. D., & García-Martín, M. B. (2010).
Potencial de aprendizaje y habilidades sociales en escolares con el trastorno de Asperger. / Learning potential and social skills in children with Asperger disorder. Behavioral
Psychology/Psicología Conductual: Revista Internacional Clínica y de la Salud, 18(3), 473- 490.
Boosman, H., Bovend”Eerdt, T.J.H., Visser-Meily, J.M.A., Nijboer, T.C.W., & van Heugten, C.M.
(2014). Dynamic testing of learning potential in adults with cognitive impairments: A systematic review of methodology and predictive value. Journal of Neuropsychology, 20(4),
Boosman, H., Visser-Meily, J., Ownsworth, T., Winkens, I., & Van Heugten, C. M. (2014).
Validity of the Dynamic Wisconsin Card Sorting Test for Assessing Learning Potential in Brain Injury Rehabilitation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(10), 1034- 1044.
Borghetti, C. (2014). Comsiderations on dynamic assessment of intercultural competence, diversity, plurilinguaisma dnt heir imparct on language testing and assessment. TEASIG conference Proceedings, Siena, 17-20.
Borkowski, J.G., Carothers, S.S., Howard, K., Schatz, J., & Farris, J.R. (2007). Intellectual assessment and intellectual disability. In J.W. Jacobson, J.A. Mulick., & J. Rojahn (Eds).
Handbook of intellectual and developmental disabilities. Issues in clinical child psychology (pp.
261-277). New York: Springer.
Borland, J.H. & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(4), 164-171.
Börnert, M. & Wilbert, J. (2016). Dynamisches Testen als neue Perspektive in der
sonderpädagogischen Diagnostik - Theorie, Evidenzen, Impulse für Forschung und Praxis.
Zeitschrift für Heilpadagogik, 67, 156-167.
Bornert-Ringleb, M. & Wilbert, J. (2019). Beitrag eines dynamischen gegenuber einem statischen Test kognitiver Fahigkeiten zur Vorhersage der Schulleistung. Empirische Sonderpadagogik, 3, 175-190.
Bosma, T. (2011). Dynamic testing in practice: Shall I give you a hint? Doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden. The Netherlands: Iskamp Drukkers B.V., Enchede
Bosma, T.& Resing, W.C.M. (2006). Dynamic assessment and a reversal task: A contribution to needs-based assessment. Educational & Child Psychology, 23(3), 81-98.
14 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Bosma, T. & Resing, W.C.M. (2008). Bridging the gap between diagnostic assessment and classroom practice. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology [online], & (2), 174-198.
Bosma, T. & Resing, W.C.M. (2010). Teacher’s appraisal of dynamic assessment outcomes:
Recommendations for weak mathematics-performers. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9(2),91-115.
Bosma, T., Stevenson, C. E., & Resing, W. C. (2017). Differences in need for instruction: dynamic testing in children with arithmetic difficulties. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(6), 132-145.
Bosson, M.S. (2003). Le potentiel d'apprentissage en raisonnement analogique: Construction d'un instrument d'évaluation en groups basé sur une échelle de Rash [Learning potential in analogical reasoning: Construction of a Rasch-scaled instrument for groupwise assessment].
Unpublished master's thesis. University of Geneva.
Bøttcher, L. & Dammeyer, J. (2016). Learning and teaching when the child has special
educational needs. Development and Learning of Young Children with Disabilities, volume 13, International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, 131-153.
Botting, N., Dipper, L., & Hilari, K. (2017). The effect of social media promotion on academic article uptake. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 795- 800.
Bountrogianni, M. (1990). Dynamic assessment: Implications for classroom consultation, peer tutoring and parent education. In E. Cole & J.A. Siegel (Eds.). Effective consultation in school psychology (pp. 129-140). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
Braun, C., Rennie, B.J., & Gordon, C.J. (1987). An examination of contexts for reading assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 89(5), 283-289.
Brandao, S., Cadime, I., Ribeiro, I., & Viana, F.L. (2014). Evaluating listening comprehension in children using a dynamic assessment approach: An exploratory study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(6), 746-753.
Brice, A. & Perkins, C. (1997). What is required for transition from the ESL classroom to the general education classroom? A case study of two classrooms. Journal of Children's
Communication Development, 19 (1), 13-22.
Bridges, Mindy Sittner; Catts, Hugh W. The use of a dynamic screening of phonological awareness to predict risk for reading disabilities in kindergarten children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol 44(4), Jul-Aug 2011, 330-338.
Bridges, M. S. & Catts, H. W. (2011). The use of a dynamic screening of phonological awareness to predict risk for reading disabilities in kindergarten children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(4), 330-338.
15 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Brondi Smith, K. (1993). An investigation of the application of Feuerstein's Learning Potential Assessment Device with school-identified adolescents with learning disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(2-A), 460.
Brooks, R. (2014). Professional Practice Report 1: A critical examination of the use of the Dynamic Assessment of Learning Potential in Educational Psychology Practice. Unpublished doctoral thesis: University of Birmingham, Department of Applied Educational and Child Psychology.
Brown, A.L., Campione, J.C., Webber, L.S., & McGilly, K. (1992). Interactive learning
environment: A new look at assessment and instruction. In B. Gifford & M.C. O'Connor (Eds.).
Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction. Evaluation in education and human services (pp. 121-211). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Brown, A.L. & Ferrara, R.A. (1985). Diagnosing zone sof proximal development. In J. Wertsch (Ed.). Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 272-305). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, A. L. & Ferrara, R.A. (1999). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In P. Lloyd &
Fernyhough, C. (Eds.). Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments: The zone of proximal development, Vol. III (pp. 225-256). Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
Brown, A.L. & French, L.A. (1979). The zone of potential development: Implications for intelligence testing in the year 2000. Intelligence, 3, 255-273.
Brown, C.T. (2016). Equipping minds for Christian education: Learning from neuroscience for Christian educators. Christian Education Journal. 13 (1),147-168.
Brozo, W.G. (1990). Learning how at-risk readers learn best: A case for interactive assessment.
Journal of Reading, 33(7), 522-527.
Bruce, S.M., Luckner, J.L. & Ferrell, K.A. (2017). Assessment of students with sensory disabilities: Evidence-based practices. Assessment for Effective Intervention. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508417708311
Büchel, F. (2006). Analogical reasoning in students with moderate intellectual disability:
Reasoning capacity limitations or memory overload? Educational & Child Psychology, 23(3), 61- 80.
Büchel, F.P. & Paour, J.L. (1990). Introduction: Contributions a l'étude de potentials d'apprentissage et de dévelopment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 5(2).
Büchel, F.P. & Scharnhorst, U. (1993). The Learning Potential Assessment Device (LPAD):
Discussion of theoretical and methodological problems. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, et al.
(Eds.). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodoligical and practical issues (pp. 83- 111). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
16 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Büchel, F.P., & Schlatter, C. (1995a). Organisation de Points. Version standardisée. Document non publié. Université de Genève, Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Eduaction.
Büchel, F.P., & Schlatter, C. (1995b). Figure complexe. Version standardisée. Document non publié. Université de Genève, Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Eduaction.
Büchel, F.P., & Schlatter, C. (1996). Set Variation I. Version standardisée. Document non publié.
Université de Genève, Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Eduaction.
Büchel, F.P., & Schlatter, C. (2001). Apprentissages cognitifs. In J.A. Rondal & A. Comblain (Dir.), Manuel de psychologie des handicaps: sémiologie et principes de remédiation (ch. 2, pp.
49-80). Sprimont: Mardaga.
Büchel, F.P., & Hessels-Schlatter, C. (in preparation). The Analogical Reasoning Learning Test.
Manual. Berne: Hogrefe.
Büchel, F.P., Schlatter, C., & Scharnhorst, U. (1997). Training and assessment of analogical reasoning in students with severe learning difficulties. Educational and Child Psychology, 14(4), 83-94.
Budoff, M. (1967). Learning potential among institutionalized young adult retardates. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72(3), 404-411.
Budoff. M. (1968). Learning potential as a supplementary testing procedure. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.). Learning Disorders, Vol. 3. Seattle, WA: Special Child.
Budoff, M. (1987a). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactive approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 173-195. New York:
Guilford.
Budoff, M. (1987b). The validity of learning potential assessment. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp.52-81). New York:
Guilford.
Budoff, M. & Corman, L. (1976). Effectiveness of a learning potential procedure in improving problem-solving skills of retarded and nonretarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81, 260-264.
Budoff, M., & Friedman, M (1964). "Learning potential" as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. Journal for Consulting Psychology, 28, 434-439.
Budoff, M. & Hamilton, J.L. (1976). Optimizing test performance of moderately and severely mentally retarded adolescents and adults. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81, 49-57.
Budoff, M., Meskin, J., & Harrison, R.H. (1971). Educational test of the learning-potential
17 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
hypothesis. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 76, 159-169.
Bunderson, C.V. (2004). Technoogy and theory as drivers for deeper-than-predicted changes.
Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2(1), 37-40.
Burden, B. (2002). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. Dynamic assessment of young children [book reviews].
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 607-608.
Burger-Veitmeijer, E.J. Minnaert, A.E.M.G., & Van den Bosch, E.J. (2015). Intellectually gifted students with possible characteristics of ASD: A multiple case study of psycho-educational assessment practices. European Journal of Special Needs Education.
Burns, M.S. (1984). Comparison of "graduated prompt" and "mediational" dynamic assessment and static assessment with young children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45(3-A), 818.
[also, ED313112]
Burns, S. (1991). Comparision of two types of dynamic assessment with young children. The International Journal of Dynamic Assessment and Instruction, 2, 29-42.
Burns, M.S.(1996). Dynamic assessment: Easier said than done. In J.G. Luther, E. Cole, et al.
(Eds). Dynamic assessment for instruction: From theory to application (pp. 182-188). North York, ON: Captus.
Burns, M.S., Delclos, V.R., Vye, N.J., & Sloan, K. (1992). Changes in cognitive strategies in dynamic assessment. International Journal of Dynamic Assessment & Instruction, 2(2), 45-54.
Burns, M.S., Delclos, V.R., Vye, N.J., & Sloan, K. (1996). Changes in cognitive strategies in dynamic assessment. In M. Luther, E. Cole, & P. Gamlin (Eds.). Dynamic assessment for instruction: From theory to application. Toronto: Captus University Publications.
Burns, M.S., Haywood, H.C. & Delclos, V.R. (l987). Young children's problem-solving strategies:
an observational study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 8, ll3-121.
Burns, M.S., Vye, N.J., Bransford, J.D., Delclos, V., & Ogan, T. (1987). Static and dynamic measures of learning in young handicapped children. Diagnostique, 12, 59-73.
Burton, V. .J. & Watkins, R.V. (2007). Measuring word learning: Dynamic versus static
assessment of kindergarten vocabulary. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40(5), 335-356.
Byers, R.W. (2002). Using Feuerstein's methodology to dynamically assess visuospatial cognitive ability in individuals with early-stage Alzheimer's disease and other cognitive
dysfunctions. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, Aug., 63 (2-B), 75
18 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Bury, J., & Masuzawa, Y. (2018). Non-hierarchical learning: Sharing knowledge, power and outcomes. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 8(1).
Butler, Y.G. (2017). Challenges and future directions for young learners’ English language assessments and validity research. In M.K. Wolf & Y.G. Butler (Eds.). English language proficiency assessments for young learners (pp. 193-213). Taylor & Francis.
Bylund, J. (2012). Dynamic assessment: An introductory resource guide for school psychologists. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Shirley Mount Hufstedler School of Education, Educational Psychology, Alliant International University, San Diego Campus.
Bylund, J. (2013). Dynamic assessment: An introductory resource guide for school
psychologists. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 73(8-A(E)). No Pagination Specified.
C
BACK TO TOPCacchione, A. (2015). Creative use of Twitter for dynamic assessment in language learning classroom, at the university. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, 24, 145-161.
Cacchione, A. (2018). Twitter in the language learning classroom at the university: An
experimentation for dynamic and authentic assessment. In A.D. Bravo, A.M. Alves, C. Martins, E.M. Silva, & I. Chumbo (Eds.). Culturas,identidades e litero-linguas estrangeiras atas do I coloquio international de linguas estrangeiras. Servicos de Imagem do Instituto Politecnico de Graganca, 115-135. Portugal.
Caffrey, E. (2008). A comparison of dynamic assessment and progress monitoring in the prediction of reading achievement for students in kindergarten and first grade. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(12-A), 5045.
Caffrey, E., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2008). The predictive validity of dynamic assessment: A review. Journal of Special Education, January.
Calero, M.D. (1987). Un nuevo instrumento de Evaluación del Potencial de Aprendizaje (EPA).
Evaluación Psicológica/Psychological Assessment, 3 (1) 137-141.
Calero, M.D. (1989). Análisis Bibliométrico de las Técnicas de Potencial de Aprendizaje.
Estudios de Psicología,38, 81-88.
19 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Calero, M.D. (1990) La Evaluación del Potencial de Aprendizaje: Estado Actual. Revista de Educación, (293) 399- 415.
Calero, M.D. (1995). Modificacion De La Inteligencia/ Intelligence Modification Sistemas De Evaluacion E Intervencion (Psicologia). Piramide Ediciones Sa
Calero, M. D. (Ed.). (1995). Modificación de la Inteligencia: Sistemas de evaluación y entrenamiento. Madrid, Pirámide. ISBN: 84- 368-0899-1
Calero, M.D. (2002). La Mediación: acercamiento al niño con síndrome de Down en la escuela.
En M.A. Robles, L. Almazán y J.A. Torres (ED.): Síndrome Down y educación: una mirada hacia el futuro. Asociación Síndrome Down, Jaén, PP. 197-208. ISBN: 84-95233-33-9
Calero, M.D. (2004). La validez de las técnicas de evaluación del potencial de aprendizaje.
Psicothema, 16 (2) 217-221.
Calero, M.D. & Belchi, J. (1989). La generalización del entrenamiento en las Técnicas de Potencial de Aprendizaje. Estudios de Psicología, 38, 69-79.
Calero, M.D., Belen, G-M. M., & Robles, M.A. (2011). Learning potential in high IQ children:
The contribution of dynamic assessment to the identification of gifted children. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 176-181.
Calero, M.D, Fernández-Parra, A., López-Rubio, S. & Carles, R., Mata, S., Vives, M.d. C.,
Navarro, E., & Márquez, J. (2012). Variables involved in personal, social and school adjustment in a sample of preschool-aged children from different cultural backgrounds Eur J Psychol Educ.
Calero, M. D., García-Martin, M. B., & Robles, M.A. (2011). Learning potential in high IQ children: The contribution of dynamic assessment to the identification of gifted children.
Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 176-18
Calero,M.D., Gómez-Pérez. M. M., & Sierra. S. M. (2017). Learning potential and executive functions in children in social exclusion: Using a mediational training programme. Educational
& Child Psychology, 24(1).
Calero, M.D. & Lozano, M.A. (1994). La Evaluación del potencial de aprendizaje en ancianos.
Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 47, 89-100.
Calero, M.D. & Marquez, J. (1996). El Juego del Dibujo y la Palabra. Test de Potencial de Aprendizaje para la Lectura. Granada, Magic Color. ISBN 84-922013-1-2
Calero, M.D. & Marquez, J.(1998). Psychometric Properties of a Learning Potential Test for Reading: The Picture Word Game. European J. of Psychological Assessment, 14 (2) 124-133.
20 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Calero, M.D., Mata, S., Rosario, C., Vives, C., Lopez-Rubio, S. Fernandez-Parra, A., Navarro, E.(2013). Learning potential and adaptation the educational context: The usefulness of the ACFS for assessing immigrant preschool children. Psychology in the Schools, 50(7), 705-721.
Calero, M.D., Mata, S., Carles, R., Vives, C., Lopez-Rubio, S., Fernandez-Parra, A., & Navarro E.
(2013). Learning potential assessment and adaptation to the educational context: The usefulness of the ACFS for assessing immigrant preschool children. Psychology in the Schools.
Calero, M.D. & Navarro, E. (2000). Relationship between plasticity, mild cognitive impairment and cognitive decline. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 653-660.
Calero, M.D. & Navarro, E. (2003). El test de aprendizaje de posiciones: un instrumento de medida de la plasticidad del anciano deterioro cognitivo leve. Revista de Neurología, 36 (7) 619- 624.
Calero, M.D. & Navarro, E. (2004). Relation between plasticity, mild cognitive impairment and cognitive decline. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 623-660
Calero, M.D., Mata, S., Bonete, S., Molinero, C. & Gomez-Pérez, M.M. (2015). Relations between learning potential, cognitive and interpersonal skills in Asperger children. Learning and Individual Differences, 41.
Calero, M.D., Navarro, E., Arnedo, M.L., Garcia-Berben, T.M. & Robles, P. Estimación del potencial de rehabilitación en ancianos con y sin deterioro cognitivo asociado a demencias.
Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 2000, 35 (S2), 44-50.
Calero, M. Dolores; Belen, García-Martin M.; Robles, M. Auxiliadora. Learning potential in high IQ children: The contribution of dynamic assessment to the identification of gifted
children.Learning and Individual Differences, Vol 21(2), Apr 2011, 176-181.
Camilleri, B. (2005). Review of Dynamic Assessment and Intervention: Improving children's narrative abilities. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 40(2), 240- 24.
Camilleri, B. & Botting, N. (2013). Beyond static assessment of children's receptive vocabulary:
The dynamic assessment of word learning (DAWL). International Journal of Language &
Communication Disorders, 48(5), 565-581.
Camilleri, B., Hasson, N. & Dodd, B.(2014). Dynamic assessment of bilingual children’s language at the point of referral. Educational & Child Psychology Vol. 31 No. 2, 56-70.
Camilleri, B., Hassson, N. & Dodd, B. (2014). Dynamic assessment of bilingual children’s language at the point of referral. Educational and Child Psychology, 31(2), 57-72.
21 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Camilleri, B. & Law, J. (2007). Assessing children referred to speech and language therapy:
Static and dynamic assessment of receptive vocabulary. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 9 (4), 312-322.
Camilleri, B. & Law, J. (2013). Dynamic assessment of word learning skills of pre-school children with primary language impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, October.
Camilleri, B. & Law, J. (2014). Dynamic assessment of word learning skills of pre-school children with primary language impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(5), 507-515.
Campbell, W., Kennedy, J., Pollock, N. & Missiuna. C. (2016) Screening children through Response to Intervention and Dynamic Performance Analysis: The example of partnering for change. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 1-6.
Campione, J.C. (1989). Assisted assessment: A taxonomy of approaches and an outline of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(3), 151-165.
Campione, J.C. & Brown, A.L. (1984). Learning ability and transfer propensity as sources of individual differences in intelligence. In P.H. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. McCauley (Eds.).
Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 265-293). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawarence Erlbaum.
Campione, J.C.& Brown, A.L. (1985). Dynamic assessment: One approach and some initial data.
Technical Report No. 361. Cambridge, MA: Illinois University, Urbana. Center for the Study of Reading. ED269735
Campione, J.C. & Brown, A.L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82-115). New York: Guilford.
Campione, J.C. & Brown, A.L. (1990). Guided learning and transfer: Implications for
approaches to assessment. In N. Frederiksen, R.Glaser et al. (Eds.). Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition (pp. 141-172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Campione, J.C., Brown, A.L., & Bryant, N.R. (1985). Individual differences in learning and memory. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.). Human abilities: An information-processing approach (pp.
103-126). New York: W.H. Freeman.
Campione, J.C., Brown, A.L. Ferrara, R.A., & Bryant, N.R. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Implications for individual differences in learning. New Directions for Child Development, 23, 77-91.
22 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Candeias, A.A., Silva, J., Saragoça, M.J. & Rebocho, M. (2011). Dynamic assessment of students with difficulties in learning and development based on portfolios. In J. Lebeer, A. Candeias, & L.
Gracio (Eds.). With a different glance: Dynamic assessment of functioning of children oriented at development and inclusive learning (pp.227- 235). Antwerp, Belgium: Garant-Uitgevers.
Canty, A. L., Neumann, D. L., Fleming, J., & Shum, D. H. (2017). Evaluation of a newly developed measure of theory of mind: The virtual assessment of mentalising ability.
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 27(5), 834-870.
Cao, T.H., Jung, J.Y. & Lee, J. (2017). Assessment in gifted education: A review of the literature from 2005 to 2016. Journal of Advanced Academics. 10.1177/1932202X17714572
Carbarcas, Lizeth Katherine Vergara; Dilson Javier Castellon Barrios; López Caraballo, José Luis; Vásquez Rossi, Carlos Alberto; Becker Arroyo, Eric Arturo.Zona
Próxima; (2019).Evaluación Dinámica para la Enseñanza de Lenguas Barranquilla Iss. 30, Carbello, G. (2012). Gula para la evaluacion del TEL: Algunas consideraciones/Assessment guide for specific language impairment: Some considerations. Revista de Logopedia. Foniatria y Audiologia, 32(2), 87-93.
Carlson, J.S. (1983a). Dynamic assessment in relation to learning characteristics and teaching strategies for children with learning disability. Final report. ED305813
Carlson, J.S. (1983b). Applications of dynamic assessment to cognitive and perceptual functioning of three ethnic groups. Final report. ED233040
Carlson, J.S. (Ed.) (1992). Theoretical issues: Intelligence, cognition, and assessment.
Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Carlson, J.S. (Ed.). (1995). Advances in cognitive and educational practice. European contributions to dynamic assessment (Volume 3). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Carlson, J.S. & Dillon, R. (1978). Measuring intellectual capabilities of hearing-impaired children: Effects of testing-the-limits procedures. The Volta Review, 80, 216-224.
Carlson, J.S. & Wiedl, K.H. (1978). Use of testing-the limits procedures in the assessment of intellectual capabilities in children with learning difficulties. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 82, 559-564.
Carlson, J.S. & Wiedl, K.H. (1979). Toward a differential testing approach: Testing-the limits employing the Raven Matrices. Intelligence, 3, 323-344.
Carlson, J.S. & Wiedl, K.H. (1980a). Applications of a dynamic testing approach in intelligence assessment: Empirical results and theoretical formulations. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 1, 303-318.
23 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Carlson, J.S. & Wiedl, K.H. (1980b). Dynamic assessment: An approach toward reducing test bias. ED191884
Carlson, J.S. & Wiedl, K.H. (1992a). Principles of dynamic assessment: The application of a specific model. Learning & Individual Differences, 4(2), 153-166.
Carlson, J. & Wiedl, K. (1992b). The dynamic assessment of intelligence. In H.C. Haywood & D.
Tzuriel (Eds.). Interactive assessment (pp. 167-186). New York: Springer.
Carlson, J.S. & Wiedl, K.H. (2001). The validity of dynamic assessment. In C.S. Lidz & J.G.
Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 681-712).
Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Carlson, J.S. & Wiedl, K.H. (2013). Cognitive education: Constructivist perspectives on schooling, assessment, and clinical applications. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(1), 6-25.
Carney, J.J. Cioffi, G. (1990). Extending traditional diagnosis: The dynamic assessment of reading abilities. Reading Psychology, 11(3), 177-192.
Carney, J.J. & Cioffi, G. (1992). The dynamic assessment of reading abilities. International Journal of Disability, Development & Education, 39(2), 107-114.
Carson, K.L., Gerretson, H., Kyger, M.M., Lovin, L, Ray, S., & Allsopp, D.H. (2008).
Mathematics dynamic assessment: Informal assessment that responds to the needs of struggling learners in mathematics. Teaching Exceptional Children, January 1.
Carrasco, J. (2007). Especialista relaciona Avaliação Dinâmica à deficiência cognitive. Instituto de Psicologia- AGÊNCIA UFRJ DE NOTÍCIAS – CCS agn2pv@reitoria.ufrj.br
Cauley, D.R. (2007). Risk assessment of civilly committed sexually violent predators: Static versus dynamic orientations. The Forensic Examiner, 16(1), 18-24.
Chaffey, G.W. (2009). Gifted but underachieving: Australian indigenous children. In T. Balchin, B. Hymer, & D.J. Matthews (Eds.). The Routledge International Companion to Gifted Education (pp. 106-114). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Chaing, E.P. & Vazquez, J.J. (2017). The power of a simple verbal explanation: Evaluating the efficacy of narrated feedback. International Review of Economics Education 25, 25-34.
Chan, W.Y., Ashman, A.F. & van Kraayenoord, C.E. (2000). Science and biological classification:
Linking dynamic assessment to classroom curriculum. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.).
Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp.607-639). Amsterdam:
JAI/Elsevier Science.
Chartier, D. & Loarer, E. (1994). Evaluation dynamique de l'intelligence non-verbale par la
24 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
procédure aide au cours du test: Application a une population non-francophone et a des adultes de bas niveau de qualification. In M. Huteau (Ed.), Les techniques psychologiques d'évaluation des personnes. Issy-les-Moulineaux: EAP.
Chen, D. (2015). Dynamic assessment based on cognitive diagnose –Taking children’s reasoning ability for example [sic]. Psychological Science, 5, 1248-1255.
Chen, De-zhi; Dai, Hai-qi; Zhou, Jun, Compiling and validating of structurally-equivalent Standard Figure Reasoning Test. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol 19(3), Jun 2011, 319-322, 412.
Cho, E. (2015). Construct and incremental validity of dynamic assessment of decoding within and across domains. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 76(4-A(E).
Cho, E. & Compton, D.L. (2015). Construct and incremental validity of dynamic assessment of decoding within and across domains. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 183-196.
Cho, E., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Bouton, B. (2012; 2014). Examining the predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of decoding to forecast response to Tier 2 intervention. Online: Journal of Learning Disabilities, December 04, 2012. Print version:
Journal of Learning Disabilities, September/October2014, 47(5), 409-423
Cho, E. & Compton, D. L. (2014). Construct and incremental validity of dynamic assessment of decoding within and across domains. Learning and Individual Differences, Nov. 8.
Cho, E, Compton, D.L., Gilbert, J.K., Steacy, L.M., Collins, A. A., & Lindstrom (2015).
Development of first-graders’ word reading skills: For whom can dynamic assessment tell us more? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 0022219415599343, first published on August 28, 2015.
Chaing, E.P. & Vazquez, J.J. (2017). The power of a simple verbal explanation: Evaluating the efficacy of narrated feedback. International Review of Economics Education 25, 25-34.
Chia-Hua H. (2008). The effects of strategy instruction and scaffolding mediation in dynamic assessment for facilitation first graders' learning potential on mathematical problem solving.
Bulletin of Education Psychology, 39 (4), 513-
Christensen, L. & Mendoza, J.L (1986). A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the BC index. Behavior Therapy, 17, 305-308.
Chubarov, E., Sommerfeld, E., Hermesh, H., Shoval, G., Weiser, M., & Zalsman, G. 2015).
Dynamic occupation assessment of executive function in adolescents with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: An initial report. European Psychiatry, 30(8), 894-899.
25 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Chuchutova, L, K. (2008). Dynamicke. L hodnocen. L a jeho využitiÅL v diagnostice školni. L zralosti a připravenosti. E-psychologie [online]. 2(1), 1−11 [cit. vložit datum citovaÅLniÅL].
Dostupný z WWW: http://e-psycholog.eu/pdf/chuchutova.pdf>. ISSN 1802-8853.
Cicerone, K.D. & Tupper, D.E. (1986). Cognitive assessment in the neuropsychological
rehabilitation of head-injured adults. In B.P. Uzzeli & Y. Gross (Eds.). Clinical neuropsychology of intervention (pp. 59-83). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
Cioffi, G. & Carney, J.J. (1983). Dynamic assessment of reading disabilities. Reading Teacher, 36(8), 764-768.
Cioffi, G. & Carney, J.J. (1997). Dynamic assessment of composing abilities in children with learning disabilities. Educational Assessment, 4(3), 175-202.
Clarà, M. (2017). How Instruction Influences Conceptual Development: Vygotsky's Theory Revisited. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 50-62.
Clayson, P.E., Kern, R.S., Nuechterlein, K.H., Knowlton, B.J., Bearden, C.E., Cannon, T.D., Fiske, A. P., Ghemezi, L., Hayata, J.N., Hellemann, G.S., Horan, W.P., Kee, K., Lee, J., Subotnik, K.L., Sugar, C.A., Ventura, J., Yee, C.M., & Green, M.F. (2018). Social vs. non-social measures of learning potential for predicting community functioning across phase of illness in
schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, August 16, 2018, in press.
Clements, D.H. & Nastasi, B.K. (1990) Dynamic approach to measurement of children's metacomponential functioning. Intelligence, 14(11), 109-125.
Cliff, A. & Montero, E. (2015). The balance between excellence and equity in admissions tests:
Contributions of experiences in South Africa and Costa Rica. Iberoamerican Journal of Educational Evaluation, 3(2), 7-28.
Cline, T., Laughlan, F. & Resing, W. (2014). Guest editorial: Bilingualism and language diversity. Educational and Child Psychology, 31(2), 5-7.
Coelho, C., Ylvisaker, M. & Turkstra, L.S. (2005). Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26(4). 223-241.
Coker, C.C. (1990). Dynamic assessment, learning curve analysis and the training quotient.
Vocational Evaluation & Work Adjustment Bulletin, 23(4), 139-147.
Cole, E. (1996). Multicultural psychological assessment: New challenges, improved methods. In M.G. Luther, E. Cole et al. (Eds.). Dynamic assessment for instruction: From theory to
application (pp. 88-95). North York, ON: Captus.
26 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Cole, Michael J., et al. (2011). Dynamic assessment of information acquisition effort during interactive search." Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 48 (1), 1-10.
Coleman, M. R. & Shah-Coltrane, S. (2011). Remembering the importance of potential: Tiers 1 and 2. In M.R. Coleman, S.K. & Johnsen (Eds), RTI for gifted students: A CEC-TAG educational resource. CEC-TAG educational resource series (pp. 43-61). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Coleman, Mary Ruth; Shah-Coltrane, Sneha. Remembering the importance of potential: Tiers 1 and 2. Coleman, Mary Ruth (Ed); Johnsen, Susan K. (Ed), (2011). RtI for gifted students: A CEC-TAG educational resource. CEC-TAG educational resource series., (pp. 43-61). Waco, TX, US: Prufrock Press, xiii, 141 pp.
Compton, D.L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Bouton, B., Gilbert, J.K., Barquero, L.A., Cho, E., &
Crouch, R.C. (2010). Selecting at-risk first grade readers for early intervention: Eliminating false positives and exploring the promise of a two-stage gated screening process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 327-340.
Conrad, S., Clarke-Midura, J., & Klopfer, E. (2013). A framework for structuring learning assessment in an educational massively multiplayer online educational game: Experiment- centered design. EDUCATIONXPRESS, July 1, 2013; educationpress.org.
Conroy, P., Sage, K., & Lambon R. (2009). A comparison of word versus sentence cues as therapy for verb naming in aphasia. Aphasiology,23(4),462-482.
Coolong-Chaffin, M. & McComas, J.J. (2016) Introduction to problem analysis to identify Tier 3 interventions: Brief experimental analysis of academic problems. In Jimmerson. S.R., Burns, M.K. & VanDerHeyden, A.M. (Eds.). Handbook of response to intervention (pp. 361-373).
NY:Springer Science+Business Media.
Cormier, P., Carlson, J.S. & Das, J.P. (1990). Planning ability and cognitive performance: The compensatory effects of a dynamic assessment approach. Learning & Individual Differences, 2(4), 437-449.
Corman,L. & Budoff, M. (1973). A comparison of group and individual training procedures on the Raven Learning Potential Meaure. RIEPrint #56. Cambridge, MA: Research Institute for Educational Problems.
Cornish, D. (20162. Applying a validity as argument approach to dynamic assessment of second language classrooms: A literature review. Unpublished masters thesis, York University.
Cotrus, A. & Camelia, S. (2014). A study on dynamic assessment techniques as a method of obtaining a high level of learning potential untapped by conventional assessment. Procedia-
27 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(21), 2616-2619.
Coventry, William L.; Byrne, Brian; Olson, Richard K.; Corley, Robin; Samuelsson, Stefan.
Dynamic and static assessment of phonological awareness in preschool: A behavior-genetic study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol 44(4), Jul-Aug 2011, 322-329.
Coventry, W. L., Brian, B., Olson, R. K., Corley, R., & Samuelsson, S. (2011). Dynamic and static assessment of phonological awareness in preschool: A behavior-genetic study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(4), 322-329.
Coxhead, P. & Gupta, R.M. (1988). Construction of a test batter to measure learning potential.
In R.M. Gupta & P. Coxhead (Eds.), Cultural diversity and learning efficiency: Recent developments in assessment (pp. 118-140). New York: St. Martin's Press.
Craig, D.V. (2001). Alternative, dynamic approaches for second language learners. ED453691 Crest, C., Ferrari, R., Fogarty, J. L., Sennott, S. C., & Hix-Small, H. (2017). MODELER AAC Intervention During Shared Reading and Play in Early Childhood. (missing info).
Crick, R.D. (2007). Learning how to learn: The dynamic assessment of learning power.
Curriculum Journal, 18(2), 135-153.
Crisp, L. & Greenberg, K.(2006). Review of The Dynamic Assessment of Cognitive Modifiability.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2494), 404-407.
Crosson, A C.; McKeown, M G. (2016). Middle school learners' use of Latin roots to infer the meaning of unfamiliar words. Cognition and Instruction, 34(2),148-171.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1145121
Cunha, A. C. Barros da (2004, December). Dynamic and static cognitive assessment of children with visual impaired (low vision) and their relations with mother’s behaviors and mediation.
Doctored Thesis. Post-graduation Program in Psychology. Center of Human and Natural Science. Federal University of Espírito Santo, 429 p.
Cunha, A. C. B. & Enumo, S. R. F. Canal, C. P. P. (2006). Relações entre avaliações cognitivas, assistida e tradicional, de crianças com deficiência visual e padrões maternos de mediação durante jogos de dominós. (Relations between dynamic and static cognitive assessment of visual impairment children and mediation mother pattern in domino game situation). In: Agnaldo GARCIA. (Org.). Relacionamento interpessoal: Estudos e pesquisas. (Interpersonal
relationships: studies and researches). 1ed. ed. Vitória, ES, 2006, v. 1, p. 39-54.
Cunha, A. C. B. & Enumo, S. R. F. Canal, C. P. P. (2007). “Concepções de mães sobre
desenvolvimento infantil e desempenho cognitivo do filho com deficiência visual em situação de avaliação cognitiva assistida e tradicional” (Mother conceptions about child development and cognitive performance of visually impairment children in dynamic and static assessment).
Revista da FAEEBA, v. 27.
28 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Cunha, A. C. B. & Enumo, S. R. F. Canal, C. P. P. (2004). Será que o meu filho tem potencial de aprendizagem: Breve análise da relação entre avaliação cognitiva dinâmica da criança com deficiência visual e interação mãe-criança (Does my son have learning potential: brief analyse of relation between cognitive dynamic assessment of visual impairment child and mother-child interaction). Integrar, Lisboa, Portugal, v. 21-22, p. 47-52.
Cutumisu, M., Chin, D.B., & Schwartz, D.L. (2019). A digital game-based assessment of middle- school and college students’ choices to seek critical feedback and to revise. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12796.
BACK TO TOP
