FINAL PROJECT
ANALYSING THE RIVER POLLUTION IN KEJAWAN PUTIH TAMBAK USING ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Course:
Community Development (Q) Lecture Supervisor:
Vely Kukinul Siswanto, ST, MT, M.Sc Prepared by:
1. Arif Musyaffat (5015221028)
2. Bimo Suryo Hartono (5015221051) 3. Ariesta Bramantyo Syatya P. (5015221112) 4. Andi Araminta Wardiyah (5015231001) 5. Vanya Dyandra Putrie (5015231011) 6. Fathima Alya Putri (5015231083)
URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF CIVIL PLANNING AND GEO ENGINEERING
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI SEPULUH NOPEMBER 2024
TABLE OF CONTENT
TABLE OF CONTENT 2
LIST OF FIGURE 5
LIST OF TABLE 5
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 6
1.1 Background 6
1.2 Goals and Objectives 6
1.3 Research Scope 7
1.3.1 Study area 7
1.3.2 Study Scope 8
1.4 Stakeholders 8
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW 9
2.1 Collaborative Planning Cases Regarding Environmental Issues 9
2.2 River Pollution 9
2.3 Waste Management 10
2.4 Synthesis 10
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY 11
3.1 Data Collection Method 11
3.1.1 Primary Data Collection 11
3.1.2 Secondary Data Collection 12
3.2 Data Processing Method 13
3.2.1 Stakeholder Analysis 13
3.2.2 Participatory Mapping 13
3.2.3 Root Cause Analysis Using Fishbone Method 14
3.2.4 SWOT Analysis 14
CHAPTER IV PROCESS AND PROBLEM DISCUSSION 15
4.1 Description of The Location 15
4.2 Description of The Problem 15
4.3 Documentation of the Ongoing Process 15
4.3.1 Interview with the residents and business owner in Kejawan Putih Tambak 15 4.3.2 Business Owner Building in Kejawan Putih Tambak 16 4.3.3 Current condition of the river pollution in Kejawan Putih Tambak 16
4.3.4 Participatory Mapping Implementation 17
CHAPTER V ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION 18
5.1 Stakeholder Mapping 18
5.2 Participatory Mapping 19
5.3 Root Cause Analysis 20
5.4 SWOT Analysis 22
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION 24
REFERENCE 25
ATTACHMENTS 26
LIST OF FIGURE
Figure 1. Research Delineation Map 8
Figure 2. Purposive Sampling Illustration 12
Figure 3. Power/ interest matrix by Gardner et al. (1986) 14
Figure 4. Participatory Mapping Illustration 15
Figure 5. Fishbone Diagram Example 15
Figure 6. SWOT Diagram Example 15
Figure 7. Stakeholder Mapping 19
Figure 8. Neighbourhood Associate 01/01 Participatory Mapping 20 Figure 9. Neighbourhood Associate 03/01 Participatory Mapping 20
Figure 10. Participatory Mapping Combination Result 21
Figure 11. Root Cause Analysis using Fishbone Diagram 22
LIST OF TABLE
Table 1. River Pollution Variables and Indicators 10
Table 2. Respondent Criteria 13
Table 3. Strategy SWOT Analysis 24
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background
As an archipelagic country, Indonesia is placed at the fourth most populous country in the world with a population estimated at approximately 275.8 million as of 2022 (“Introduction”, 2023). As a result of economic and population growth, the country faces two fundamental environmental problems: 1) difficulty managing waste collection and 2) rapid waste accumulation (Marchal et al., 2019). The volume of waste in a Regency/City from time to time continues to increase along with population growth, including in the city of Surabaya.
Surabaya is the largest population city in East Java. This will affect the level of waste in Surabaya, which will trigger garbage-related problems. Surabaya provides several places and vehicles for garbage collection and final processing in any residential area.
The decline in environmental quality and sanitation is a complex problem in Indonesia, including the city of Surabaya. All sub-districts in the city of Surabaya have implemented the Sanitasi Total Berbasis Masyarakat (STBM) program (STBM Indonesia, 2017). However, 12.4% of the population still practices open defecation, throws waste into the river and uses river water for household purposes. Not all people are aware of open defecation (STBM Indonesia, 2017). Kejawan Putih Tambak Village recorded 1,118 houses that drain household liquid waste (detergent waste and water used for bathing or washing clothes) through sewers and piping directly to the river. Unsafe disposal of household liquid waste can cause health problems (Wardana, 2005). A lack of public awareness of how to dispose of waste in the right place will result in a lack of community involvement in environmental protection. Lack of community participation in communal activities to clean up the environment has resulted in existing waste needing to be properly managed.
Solid waste management (SWM) is vital to pursue because almost all economic sectors produce solid waste (SW). Factors that cause environmental concern are based on human reasoning and behavior. Citizens’ active participation is crucial to identifying issues in waste management. Efforts to preserve the environment must begin at the individual level by starting small transformations. Changes can then become habits in the family or community, resulting in significant shifts in the way people think about household waste management to mitigate waste at the source through citizen participation (Ruliana et al., 2019). This study aims to explore community participation in waste management practices in Surabaya, with a particular focus on Kejawan Putih Tambak district as a case study. A set of recommendations will be made to support sustainable waste management techniques that can be expanded throughout Surabaya by comprehending the obstacles to public participation and offering ways to enhance community involvement.
1.2 Goals and Objectives
From the background above, it can then be identified the goals and objectives of this study. Which are:
1. Identifying the root cause of the river pollution problems in Kejawan Putih Tambak with community participation
2. Formulating the strategies to address the existing river pollution problems in Kejawan Putih Tambak
1.3 Research Scope 1.3.1 Study area
The study area lies in Kejawan Putih Tambak, Mulyorejo, Surabaya, with a total delineation area of 48.35 hectares. The main focus of the research is the river in the delineated area, which was only focused on the 5.54 hectares inside the delineation area. The area are directly bordered by:
➢ East side = Pakuwon City
➢ West side = Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember and Kertajaya
➢ South side = Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember and Keputih
➢ North side = Mulyosari
Figure 1. Research Delineation Map Source: Author Research
1.3.2 Study Scope
The scope of this study covers the river pollution problems in the perspective of the community involved in the delineated area, such as the residents and business owners.
Although the river itself covers a large area of Surabaya as it connects with other waterways, the study focuses on the river area near the waste filter dam. With that, the main information that was taken from the communities is the waste management and types that might contribute to the river pollution problems.
1.4 Stakeholders
In order to conduct this research, several stakeholders must be approached to provide insights and express their concerns regarding the problems with river pollutants. The stakeholders involved are:
1. Kejawan Putih Tambak Neighbourhood Association 2. Kejawan Putih Tambak Residents
3. Kejawan Putih Tambak Business Owner
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Collaborative Planning Cases Regarding Environmental Issues
The paper by Novaria Maulina and Atika, published in the MetaCommunication:
Journal of Communication Studies, investigates the “Maharagu Sungai” program initiated by the Banjarmasin City Government to revitalize local rivers. The city is grappling with pollution and degradation of its rivers, which have become shallow and narrow due to the habits of the residents who often dispose of household waste and garbage into the rivers. The program seeks to enhance community awareness and participation in maintaining river cleanliness.
The researchers conducted data collection through a combination of interviews, field observations and documentation. Informants included members of the Banjarmasin City Environmental Department, river stakeholders, and local residents living along the riverbanks. The result showed that the program effectively mobilized community members to participate in river cleaning activities, fostering a collective sense of responsibility and increasing awareness of the negative impact of the solution.
2.2 River Pollution
River pollution refers to the contamination of river water by harmful substances, resulting from both human activities and natural processes. This pollution alters the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the water, making it unsafe for drinking, recreation, agriculture and aquatic life, and can lead to severe ecological imbalances and health risks for humans and wildlife. Physical, chemical, and biological variables in the followings are used to asses river pollution:
Table 1. River Pollution Variables and Indicators
Variables Indicators
Physical
1. Temperature 2. Turbidity 3. Color
4. Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
Chemical
1. pH Levels
2. Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 3. Nutrient Levels
4. Presence of Heavy Metals
5. Concentration of Organic Pollutants
Biological
1. Presence of Pathogens
2. Diversity and Abundance of Aquatic Organism
3. Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD)
Industrial discharges are a significant contributor as factories often release untreated or inadequately treated wastewater containing toxic chemicals and heavy metals directly into rivers. Agricultural runoff also plays a crucial role, with fertilizers and pesticides washing into waterways during rainfall can lead to nutrient pollution and eutrophication. Urban runoff exacerbates the issue, as stormwater collects pollutants like oil, grease, and heavy metals from impervious surfaces and transports them into rivers. Deforestation and soil erosion increase sedimentation in rivers, further degrading water quality. The introduction of invasive species disrupts local ecosystems, contributing to biological pollution, while climate change alters precipitation patterns and river flow, potentially worsening pollution levels. Mining activities can introduce heavy metals and sediments and spills from transportation and shipping can release oil and other hazardous materials into the river.
2.3 Waste Management
Waste management refers to the collection, transportation, processing, recycling and disposal of waste materials in a systematic and efficient manner, aimed at reducing the impact of waste on human health and the environment (Tchobanoglous et al., 1993). Several factors affecting these systems include technical issues such as a lack of technical skills among personnel, inadequate infrastructure and insufficient challenges. Social factors are also important as the low social status of waste workers leads to low motivation and a lack of prioritization of waste management by politicians resulting in limited trained personnel.
Additionally, an adequate legal framework is essential for developing integrated waste management systems, while the absence of satisfactory policies and weak regulations can hinder progress.
Effective waste management is essential for minimizing environmental impact and promoting sustainable practices. Having comprehensive waste management involves controlling the generation, storage, collection, transfer, transport, processing and disposal of solid wastes to ensure public health and environmental principles are upheld. Moreover, optimizing material flows by limiting raw material consumption and increasing the recovery and reuse rates of waste materials is also crucial.
2.4 Synthesis
The literature review has identified variables that have affected river pollution.
Degradations of local rivers were caused due to waste runoff, littering, and household &
industrial discharges which altered the physical, chemical, and biological factors of the river water. Meanwhile, waste management mostly comes from human power and its technical capability, inadequate infrastructure, social factors of human powers and effectiveness of the waste management system.
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY 3.1 Data Collection Method
3.1.1 Primary Data Collection
Primary data collection is a method to achieve primary data, generally from a direct source without intermediaries. Several primary collection methods will be used in this research, such as:
a. Observation
The observation carried out is to observe directly (field survey) the object of research regarding the problem and existing conditions of waste pollution in the area of the river of Kejawan Putih Tambak. The result of the observation can be included to generate the interview question list so the interview results can be more precise.
b. Interview
Interview activities are carried out by providing a list of questions directly to respondents to gain more detailed information about the problem in the area. The question list generated refers to the result of article reading and observation. The information obtained is the cause of the Kejawan Putih Tambak waste problem. The stakeholders for the interviews will consist of 3 representatives: residents, shop owners, and local authorities (RT/RW). To make the data obtained more reliable, there will be several respondents for each of the stakeholders.
i. Respondent Sampling
The sampling method used for this research is purposive sampling of non-probability sampling, which involves non-random selection based on convenience or other criteria. Purposive sampling itself involves the researcher using their expertise to select a sample that is most useful to the purposes of the research.
Figure 2. Purposive Sampling Illustration Source: scribbr.com
ii. Respondent Criteria
Table 2. Respondent Criteria
Stakeholders Criteria
Resident 1. Local resident who have
been living for over 10 years
2. Located approximately 45 meters from the river
Business Owner 1. Local business owner
who have run their business for minimum of 5 years
2. Located approximately 30 meters from the river 3. Produces waste that falls
into the categories of organic, inorganic/or material
Neighborhood Association 1. Responsible for the management of residential areas near rivers
2. Have contacted government agencies related to river pollution 3. Have received
complaints from local residents about river pollution
3.1.2 Secondary Data Collection
Secondary data collection is primary data that has been further processed and collected by another party, in the form of paragraphs, tables, diagrams, maps, or any other data presentation approaches. In this research, the secondary data method used is:
a. Literature Review
The literature review was carried out by understanding and reviewing previous research documents and news articles related to the research discussion. It is carried out by reading, filtering information, understanding policy directions, and synthesizing information that is considered important by adjusting the data needs in the research. The goal was to gain an understanding of the issue of waste in the study area and use it as input for the interview question list.
3.2 Data Processing Method 3.2.1 Stakeholder Analysis
Stakeholders is Individuals/groups with a substantive interest in an issue including those who have a role and influence in making decisions or making them.
Stakeholder analysis itself is a method to understand the relationship between stakeholders, their power, and their interest in the problem/program activity.
Stakeholders analysis will place stakeholders in a divided quadrant of power and interest called the power/interest matrix by Gardner et al. (1986). The first quadrant (A) is called minimal effort which has low interest and power, who should we keep updated about the project but with minimal effort. The second quadrant (B) is called Keep Informed which has high interest and low power, who should we invite and maintain close relationships with. The third quadrant ( C ) is called Keep Satisfied which has low interest and high power, who should we actively consult. The fourth and last quadrant (D) is Key players with high interest and high powers, Who are the people that we should actively engage with.
Figure 3. Power/ interest matrix by Gardner et al. (1986) Source: Lecturer’s slides
3.2.2 Participatory Mapping
Participatory Mapping is a mapping method that places the community as the actor in mapping their territory, as well as being the determinant of their own regional development planning. It is in the one form of participatory planning that emphasizes a bottom-up approach and implementation of the Arnstein ladder of participation that indicates people power and planning from and for the people.
Participatory mapping has the characteristics of involving all community members, the mapping topic and objectives are determined by the community, the community determines the process, mapping will benefit the community, the information comes from community knowledge, and the community determines the use of the map produced.
Figure 4. Participatory Mapping Illustration Source: Lecturer’s slides
3.2.3 Root Cause Analysis Using Fishbone Method
Fishbone analysis, also known as an Ishikawa diagram or cause-and-effect diagram, is a tool used to identify and organize the potential causes of a problem. The diagram is shaped like a fish skeleton, with the main problem at the head of the fish and the causes branching out to the left. The data of the problem and information from the interview will be imputed in the fishbone diagram and analyzed so the problem root can be found so the strategy recommendation made can be more effective and holistic.
Figure 5. Fishbone Diagram Example Source: Lecturer’s slides
3.2.4 SWOT Analysis
SWOT analysis is a strategic planning tool that helps organizations identify and evaluate the internal and external factors affecting their success. The acronym SWOT stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. Strengths refer to the internal attributes and resources that support a successful outcome, while Weaknesses are internal factors that may hinder performance. Opportunities are external factors that the organization can capitalize on to achieve its goals, and Threats are external challenges that could jeopardize success. By assessing these four aspects, researchers can gain a clearer understanding of the current condition to develop precise strategy.
Figure 6. SWOT Diagram Example Source: Research Gate
CHAPTER IV
PROCESS AND PROBLEM DISCUSSION 4.1 Description of The Location
Kejawan Putih Tambak River is located in the eastern part of Surabaya. The rivers are in direct contact with the roads. Due to its proximity to ITS and Pakuwon, the area experiences heavy traffic, with many vehicles passing through on a daily basis. The river plays an important role in the region's water management systems and serves as a drainage channel for both residential and commercial areas. A mix of residential buildings and small businesses characterizes the neighborhood.
4.2 Description of The Problem
Business owners who live and sell in the area complain that the river is full of pungent odors, especially during the dry season or when the water is dry. The odor is very annoying and even affects customers who come to their shops, with some having to wear masks while shopping. In addition to the odor, the river is also filled with water hyacinth and foam, further degrading the aesthetics and comfort of the environment. Most of the residents mentioned that the river used to be clear and used for bathing or washing but is now polluted by domestic waste such as nappies and the habit of littering by residents. Cleaning efforts, such as community or government-initiated community service, have often been carried out, but the results have not been significant. Waste collected from residents' activities is usually transported to the Tempat Pembuangan Sampah (TPS), but household liquid waste management still needs to be better organized.
4.3 Documentation of the Ongoing Process
4.3.1 Interview with the residents and business owner in Kejawan Putih Tambak
4.3.2 Business Owner Building in Kejawan Putih Tambak
4.3.3 Current condition of the river pollution in Kejawan Putih Tambak
4.3.4 Participatory Mapping Implementation
CHAPTER V
ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION 5.1 Stakeholder Mapping
After identifying the stakeholders which are the Kejawan Putih Tambak residents and the Kejawan Putih Tambak Business Owner, the stakeholders were then analyzed based on the influence that they have and their interest regarding the issue. The total number of stakeholders included in the study is 3 stakeholders with the detail of; five residents, five business owners, and 2 neighborhood associates. All of the stakeholders have lived most of their life in the Kejawan Putih Tambak, their living needs lie in the conditions of the area which increases their interest in the issues. Even so, as most of the regulation and policy came top down instead of bottom up they do not have high influence or power that can affect the issue directly. From that, the stakeholders are then categorized in the quadrant where they should be involved or engaged as needed in future strategy making.
Figure 7. Stakeholder Mapping Source: Authors Research
5.2 Participatory Mapping
The participatory mapping was done only through the neighbourhood associate stakeholders as they hold the most information and knowledge regarding the river pollution in the area. The first mapping was done through the 01/01 neighborhood association in which it was then concluded that there are 4 main causes for the river pollution issues which are;
greywater effluent influx, waste piles up and clogs the river, residents littering, foam coming out of the pump building. While the second mapping was done through the 03/01 neighbourhood association where there are 4 causes for the river pollution that was identified which are; greywater coming from the resident’s toilet pipes, the growth of water hyacinth, foam in the east side of the river, and residents littering. The mapping also includes the symbologies of a few infrastructures that may influence the waste and river management such as the sewer system and temporary waste disposal.
The results of the two participatory mapping were then combined together which create eight symbologies that should be identified in the area as a whole. The said symbologies indicate; the sewer system, temporary waste disposal area, resident’s toilets, greywater waste flow, foam, water hyacinth, area clog by waste, and area where residents are littering.
Figure 8. Neighbourhood Associate 01/01 Participatory Mapping
Figure 9. Neighbourhood Associate 03/01 Participatory Mapping
Figure 10. Participatory Mapping Combination Result Source: Authors Research
5.3 Root Cause Analysis
Based on the interview results, it can be concluded that 4 aspects contribute to the Kejawan River problem including bad odour, chemical induced, murky water or in other word non-transparent water, and lastly the unpleasant sight of the river. These 4 aspects are then translated into the fishbone shape, creating 4 different parts that delve deeper into each aspect of the problem's cause with results as follows:
1. Bad Odour
a. The Kejawan Putih Tambak River emits an unpleasant odor that disturbs the people in the surrounding area of the river. This is due to the river being filled with waste, which creates an unpleasant smell. This factor was then worsened by Surabaya’s heat and wind which distributed the smell to the settlements.
b. There is piled up solid waste near the river area which also contributes to the unpleasant odor. Most of the residents acknowledge that over the years, the population in Kejawan Putih Tambak experienced an increase which caused the increasing production of waste in the area as well.
2. Chemical Induced
a. The river in Kejawan Putih Tambak is contaminated with household liquid waste which can vary to either detergent, shower residue, etc. This started in 1995 as there was a development of sewer system in Kejawan Putih Tambak that connects the resident’s toilet pipes to the river itself
b. The river itself is well known to produce some sort of foam at a certain time in the day which some residents assume as toxic foam while the others testified that the foam is harmless. The foam itself was produced by the flood control buildings near the river as it mismanaged and sometimes malfunctioned.
3. Murky Water
a. The murky water of the river can be seen from the colour itself which is presented with the green colour. This comes from the decomposition of organic waste that was thrown/flown to the river. Without daily river cleaning and waste filtering, the water would only worsen in colour
b. There are also clogged areas in the river which cause the non-flowing or low flow of river streams. Without a nicely flowing river, it would be really hard for the river to continuously clean itself or throw the unwanted waste
c. The murky water also came from the inconsistent river maintenance in which the residents testify that a few of the staff does not prioritize the maintenance of the river as they are required to work on their other job which can be seen as a lack of human resource on dealing with the maintenance job.
4. Unpleasant Sight
a. There are a few floating solid waste in the river which comes from several residents who throw their solid waste directly into the river. This problem was then identified to be the direct result of the trash bin collection reducing by the year as there is a lack in human resource to manage this activity.
b. It can be seen in certain seasons of the month that a few water hyacinths would grow uncontrollably in the river area. As the river itself was contaminated with a few chemical or liquid waste from the resident house, the water of the river then turned into water with a higher nutrient level making it more suitable for water hyacinth to grow.
Figure 11. Root Cause Analysis using Fishbone Diagram Source: Authors Research
5.4 SWOT Analysis
From the root cause analysis, the true cause of the problems are identified. The causes can be concluded as follows:
1. The changes in government period and leadership with different set of priority 2. Lack of direction on proper disposal of liquid waste.
3. Lack of human power and resources for river cleaners and controllers.
4. The malfunction of the water pumping house.
5. Natural conditions (heat and rain) that worsen the waste odor.
Based on this result, several strategies and recommendations can be proposed to handle the waste problem in Kejawan Putih Tambak. The strategy recommendations are:
1. Develop long-term planning and policy framework for river and waste management.
The formulation of a comprehensive plan regarding the river and waste management, with a long-term period, in order to facilitate the transfer of this plan to the next government leadership. The regulation of waste management also has to be stricter as it also has to include severe fines for the violators. Regulations about greywater management also have to be implemented. Because the provision of wastewater management might be difficult if it burdens the people, the government also needs to assist the wastewater management provision with incentives through the updated regulations.
2. Create a wastewater filtration system in the sewer.
As there isn’t any direction for the residents to dispose of their liquid waste properly, there should at least be a liquid filtration system in the newly installed sewer. Liquid filtration is a process that removes particles and other media of a certain size and larger from liquids. Removing these particles and debris from a wastewater system allows the water to be reused within that system.
3. Increase Human Power and resources.
The people demand the existence of river cleaners who regularly clean the river. This has also proven to improve river conditions as it controls the amount of water hyacinth and river cleanliness. Because of that, the addition of manpower is needed. The human resources of the pumping houses also need to be increased as the pumping activity produces water with a lot of toxic foams that contaminate the neighborhood. There is a possibility of mismanagement here that creates this condition.
4. Monitoring and evaluating the water pumping house
Other than mismanagement, there is also the possibility of malfunction. The process of water pumping might need to be corrected so the water pumping house produces a lot of toxic foams. Because of that, Monitoring and evaluating the work of the water pumping house is needed so the process of water pumping will not produce foam again in the future.
5. Mitigate natural conditions
Some mitigation actions can be taken to reduce the odor condition. These mitigations can be chemical engineering to change the river odor. Some difficult actions, like climate engineering, can also be implemented if they are urgent and really need to be done at that time.
Table 3. Strategy SWOT Analysis
Strategy SWOT Analysis
Strength Weakness Opportunity Threat
Develop long-term planning and policy framework for river and waste
management
Provides detailed, structured, and sustainable
planning, ensuring all aspects of river and waste
management are covered.
The creation of the comprehensive plan could be time-consuming and can not be directly implemented.
Involving the community in formulating the long-term plan which increases the community’s participation and awareness.
The new
government period and leadership rejecting the plan and not continuing the monitoring and evaluating.
Create a wastewater filtration system in the sewer.
Provides a
systematic solution for proper liquid waste disposal and enables water reuse within the system
Installation and maintenance require significant investment and technical expertise
Enhances wastewater filtration efficiency, ensuring cleaner disposal and enabling
sustainable water reuse within the system
Potential technical challenges during installation and maintenance, alongside possible public resistance due to unfamiliarity with the system
Increase Human Power and resources.
Proven success in improving river cleanliness through regular
maintenance
Insufficient manpower at pumping house
Adding manpower ensures better waste
management
Mismanagement worsens conditions
Monitoring and evaluating the water pumping house
Prevents
mismanagement and toxic foam productions
Requires continuous resources
Embedding programs into regulations ensures focus
Leadership changes may still affect consistency
Mitigate natural conditions
Chemical engineering methods can effectively and quickly neutralize odor-causing agents
High costs make implementation and maintenance financially challenging
Public health improvements create support for sustainable environmental
Potential
environmental risks from chemical interventions may harm ecosystems
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION
This study identifies several important factors contributing to the waste management challenges in Kejawan Putih Tambak, as revealed by the root cause analysis. The main obstacles identified are a need for proper planning and regulation regarding waste management, an insufficient workforce, and limited river cleaning and maintenance resources. Additionally, issues such as malfunctioning water pumping systems, shifting governmental priorities due to leadership changes, and the impacts of natural conditions like heat and rain further complicate this situation.
A series of strategic recommendations have been proposed to tackle these challenges effectively. Key steps include creating a comprehensive plan regarding river and waste management, enforcing stricter regulatory measures, and bolstering the workforce and resources allocated to river maintenance and pumping station operations. Regular monitoring and evaluation of the water pumping infrastructure are also essential to ensure its proper functioning. Furthermore, stabilizing policy priorities will help maintain a consistent approach to waste management across different government administrations.
By implementing these targeted strategies, we can significantly enhance waste management in Kejawan Putih Tambak, ultimately elevating environmental quality and the overall well-being of the community. Through a collaborative effort, we have the potential to create a cleaner, healthier environment that fosters better living conditions for all residents.
REFERENCE
Brotosusilo, A., Nabila, S.H., Negoro, H.A. and Utari, D., 2020. The level of individual participation of community in implementing effective solid waste management policies.
Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 6(3), pp.341–354.
https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2020.03.05
Guerrero, L.A., Maas, G. and Hogland, W., 2013. Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Management, 33(1), pp.220–232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008
Hassan Al-Taai, S.H., 2021. Water pollution: Its causes and effects. IOP Conference Series:
Earth and Environmental Science, 790(1), p.012026.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/790/1/012026
Maulina, N. and Rusli, A., 2021. Komunikasi lingkungan melalui Maharagu Sungai dalam meningkatkan partisipasi masyarakat pada program revitalisasi sungai Kota Banjarmasin.
Metacommunication: Journal of Communication Studies, 6(1), p.67.
https://doi.org/10.20527/mc.v6i1.10127
Pleşea, D. and Vişan, S., 2010. Good practices regarding solid waste management recycling.
Amfiteatru Economic, XII(27), pp.228–241. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46524041
Prayitno, J. and Widati, S., 2018. Kajian strategi promosi kesehatan sanitasi total berbasis masyarakat (STBM) di Kelurahan Kejawan Putih Tambak Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan, 10(3), pp.267–275.
.
ATTACHMENTS
6.1 Transcript of direct interview with Pak Jamil (Neighbourhood Head RT 01 RW 01)
Name : Pak Jamil
Day & Date (Interview Upload) : Sunday, 01 December 2024
Location : Kejawan Putih Tambak
Bimo: Permisi bapak selamat sore perkenalkan kami mahasiswa dari ITS sedang melakukan tugas penelitian mengenai kondisi sampah/polusi di sungai kejawan ini. Boleh meminta waktunya untuk melakukan wawancara dan melakukan pemetaan masalah sampah di sini tidak ya pak?
Pak Jamil: Dulu jaman Bu Risma bersih, sekarang dipegang Pak Eri tidak ada pekerjaan pembersihan di Sungai. Terus mau gimana, pertanyannya apa?
Tyo: Bapak sudah berapa lama tinggal di Kejawan Putih Tambak?
Pak Jamil: Oh asli sini dari lahir (1967)
Bimo: Berarti kondisi sekarang sama dulu beda ya pak?
Pak Jamil: Oh jauh, jaman bu risma ini bersih banyak pemberishan. Cuma sekarang ini gaada sama sekali. Bantuan pembersihan pun tidak ada.
Tyo: Sungainya sering dipake warga ga pak?
Pak Jamil: Oh gabisa racun itu. Dipake cuci kaki tangan pun gabisa. Sudah kotor dari apartemen dan perumahan jadi airnya tidak bersih.
Tyo: Kalo yang pipa di sana bagaimana?
Pak Jamil: Itukan pompa sedotbuat memeprcepat aliran sungai ke laut.
Tyo: Kalo busa sudah ada dari dulu pak?
Pak Jamil: Busa kan dari keluarnya pompa itu.
Tyo: Pompa dari tahun berapa?
Pak Jamil: Lama dari 2001.
Bimo: Berarti masalah busa ini sejak 2001 setelah pompanya ada ya pak?
Pak Jamil: Masalah busa itu karena pompa dibuka. Tapi warga sini gaada komplen karena dah biasa. Warga sekitar sadar yang penting ga banjir. Gaada banjir disini, cuma kali penuh cuma 2-3 jam gasampe keluar.
Tyo: Yang bikin kotor berarti dari sampah perumahan atau apa lagi?
Pak Jamil: Ya susah itu buang sampah sembarangan, repot. Masalah sampah ya dari warga.
Tapi akhir-akhir ini agak sulit. Sampah di depo (pengumpulan sampah) depan numpuk karena lama diambil karena armada truknya kurang. Kok bisa, heran aku. Sejak akhir-akhir bulan ini.
Bimo: Berarti tadi ada masalah sampah menumpuk. Terus ada buang sampah sembarangan Pak Jamil: Ya susah iya repot ini.
Bimo: Terus ada limbah rumah tangga, tadi ada busa berarti dari sabun
Pak Jamil: Kalo busa ya iya dari sabun. Air sabun dari karang menjangan turun ke sini semua, ya jadinya air busa.
Bimo: Terus ada lagi tidak pak?
Pak Jamil: Tidak ada
Bimo: Berarti bapak disini dari belum ada apa apa ya. Ini sungainya alami dari dulu ada pak?
Pak Jamil: Iya alami tapi kecil, ada pelebaran kali tahun 1977. Buat penampungan air dari pusat biar ga banjir di sana.
Bimo: Tahun segitu bisa dipakai airnya?
Pak Jamil: Oh sebelum dilebarkan? Ya dulu minum pake air itu. Sejak PDAM masuk ya kita gapake air sungai lagi.
6.2 Transcript of direct interview with Pak Nagor (Neighbourhood Head RT 03 RW 01)
Name : Pak Nagor
Day & Date (Interview Upload) : Monday, 09 December 2024
Location : Kejawan Putih Tambak
Pak Nagor : 80-an masih bersih, terus ada pembangunan, sungai kecil-kecil got-got, mulainya tambah perkembangan penduduknya, limbahnya jadi satu, barat Mulyorejo ke sini sampahnya.
Vanya : Pembuangan gotnya dari pemerintah?
Pak Nagor : Iya, betul, tapi ini nggak nyalahin pemerintah, penduduk berkembang, limbahnya jadi satu, dari barat Mulyorejo juga ke sini.
Vanya : Kan katanya alirannya nggak jalan ya?
Pak Nagor : Jalan, tapi nggak lancar. Itu kan muara timur langsung ke laut los, tapi sekarang belok ke kiri, kan ada pembangunan Pakuwon City, jadi terpengaruh.
Vanya : Petanya boleh digambarkan, Pak? Sungainya ini betul ya Pak? Ini Pakuwon, ini Mulyorejo kira-kira, bapaknya bilang gotnya di mana ya, Pak?
Pak Nagor : Di sini, gotnya satu aja. Kalau yang ini apa ya?
Vanya : Kalau ini rawanya ITS, Pak.
Pak Nagor : Dari Gang 1 yang ada penyebrangan sampai ke sini, terus jalan ke Dinamika ITS sampai situ.
Vanya : Ini pembuatan gotnya dimulai tahun berapa?
Pak Nagor : Kurang lebih 1995.
Vanya : Kira-kira tadi kata bapak kan alirannya dari barat?
Pak Nagor : Dari Sungai Permai masuk ke sini, dari Manyar Barat masuk ke sini, muaranya jadi satu.
Vanya : Kan betul ya pak sampah dari warga, betul ya, Pak?
Pak Nagor : Jadi pembuangan rumah, jeding, cucian, kora-kora masuk ke got kecil itu semua.
Vanya : Kalau untuk sampah kayak gini?
Pak Nagor : Itu diangkut ke TPA di Hidrodinamika sini, diambilnya tiap hari, tergantung petugasnya. Tiap RT kan ada tukang sampah, ada yang tiap hari, ada yang 2 hari sekali. Tapi permasalahannya untuk sekarang pengambilan sampah tidak banyak kayak dulu, pengambilan dari truknya tidak maksimal, jadi sampahnya tetap ngumpul di sana.
Vanya : Berarti itu permasalahan dari dulu?
Pak Nagor : Berkurangnya pelayanan diangkatnya, fasilitas dari Surabaya-nya kurang, kurang bahannya atau kurang dari pemerintah. Dulu teman-teman kaosnya sering banget untuk diganti. Gaji dipotong, jadinya tidak maksimal.
Vanya : Pas sama Bu Risma, kondisi sungainya gimana ya?
Pak Nagor : Dibersihkan dulu dikit-dikit, ada eceng gondok langsung dibersihkan. Dulu Bu Risma sering banget tengah malam bersihin, jadi diperhatikan Bu Risma. Dulu kerja bakti, sekarang kadang-kadang bareng DKTRTH turun ke lapangan sering kita kasih minum.
Vanya : Jadi eceng gondok, dari got, sampah dari daerah lain masuk, terus ada bapak pernah lihat masyarakat langsung buang sampah ke gotnya?
Pak Nagor : Oh ada, itu depan situ kali, Kali Saridamen, lihat pinggir kali sampahnya banyak, dari dalam sampai dari luar.
Vanya : Itu beda ya, Pak, pengurusannya?
Pak Nagor : Jadi satu dari barat sampai timur, gampang kan depan rumah.
Vanya : Oh iya pak tentang busa.
Pak Nagor : Busa itu sebenarnya masalah klasik. Busa itu dulu kalau mumbul dijadiin mainan anak-anak.
Vanya : Apa nggak bahaya ya, Pak?
Pak Nagor : Nggak apa-apa. Sekarang dijadiin dikit-dikit, "Wih banyak limbahnya," ya pasti lah banyak limbahnya. Dulu dipandang gimana?
Vanya : Ada yang dapat ruam nggak?
Pak Nagor : Alhamdulillah nggak ada.
Vanya : Kira-kira busanya yang bapak pernah lihat?
Pak Nagor : Muara sungai di bagian timur situ, kan ada DAM ya di situ, jadi DAM-nya ada 2, dari sini masuk ke sini.
Vanya : Kan di sini juga ada area di jembatan persaringan, apakah pernah jadi masalah, tidak terutilisasikan dengan baik?
Pak Nagor : Oh tidak ada masalah.
Vanya : Berarti itu tujuannya jadi filter buat sampah ya?
Pak Nagor : Iya, filter sampah itu supaya tidak masuk ke timur. Di sini di-filter, di sana juga ada filter.
Vanya : Kalau menurut bapak pemerintah gimana sekarang?
Pak Nagor : Kebijakan pemerintah kan beda-beda. Kalau zaman Bu Risma, dipercantik kotanya, tamannya. Kalau zaman ini beda, kali di kesehatan diperbaiki. Kan beda-beda pimpinan beda fokus.
Vanya : Tapi dengan polusi ini akan memengaruhi kesehatan di warga sekitar, karena ada yang bilang kadang-kadang suka bau.
Pak Nagor : Ya itu tergantung pimpinannya apakah memperhatikan seperti itu apa nggak.
Teman-teman sekitar sini selalu sambat. Beda pimpinan beda kebijakan, dari protesnya juga hasilnya gitu. Dari masyarakat sudah bilang, "Kok RT gitu-gini," ya mau gimana lagi, kita sudah sampaikan.
Vanya : Kan di daerah Kejawan banyak yang jualan jus buah, warung, ada bengkel, apa menurut bapak mereka berkontribusi juga untuk membuat polusi dengan adanya bisnis?
Limbahnya jadi beragam, apakah itu terangkut?
Pak Nagor : Oh kalau begitu, sampahnya pasti diangkut dan taruh ke TPA, nggak ada masalah. Permasalahannya pengangkutan tong sampah ke tong yang lebih besar kalau mereka lancar ya disini jauh lebih bersih.
6.3 Transcript of direct interview with Ibu Sunami and Ibu Farida
Name : Ibu Sunami and Ibu Farida Day & Date (Interview Upload) : Sunday, 01 December 2024
Location : Kejawan Putih Tambak
Tyo: Selamat Pagi Ibu, perkenalkan saya Tyo bersama teman saya Bimo. Kami dari ITS dan sedang ada tugas untuk mengetahui kondisi sungai kejawan
Sunami: Boleh mas
Tyo: Ibu sudah berapa lama tinggal di Kejawan Putih Tambak?
Sunami: Saya sudah 20 tahun mas Farida: Kalau Saya 35 tahun
Tyo: Menurut Ibu kondisi sungai kejawan ini seperti apa ya bu?
Sunami & Farida: Kotor mas, engga keurus. Tanaman liar dimana-mana. Sering ada busanya juga
Tyo: Perubahan apa terjadi pada sungai selama beberapa tahun terakhir? Apakah semakin bersih atau semakin kotor?
Sunami & Farida: Dulu bersih mas, dipake mandi cuci. Cuma sekarang udah kotor tidak keurus.
Tyo: Kalau sekarang berarti sudah tidak digunakan apa apa ya bu?
Sunami & Farida: Iya mas, warga juga sudah tidak tertarik karena kotor.
Tyo: Apa saja sumber utama pencemaran sungai di sini?
Sunami & Farida: Kurang terurus sih mas. Di ujung sungai juga ada pipa yang sering bikin busa. Jadi meresahkan warga
Tyo: Apakah ada waktu-waktu tertentu dimana pencemaran menjadi lebih parah?
Sunami & Farida: Kalau musim hujan mas makin parah. Suka naik juga airnya.
Tyo: Menurut Ibu, bagaimana cara pemerintah dapat membantu mengurangi pencemaran sungai?
Sunami & Farida: Seperti waktu zaman Bu Risma sih mas, ada pembersihan rutin.
6.4 Transcript of indirect interview with Ibu Yuli and Ibu Nita
Name : Ibu Yuli and Ibu Nita Day & Date (Interview Upload) : Sunday, 01 December 2024
Location : Kejawan Putih Tambak
Tyo: Permisi ibu selamat siang perkenalkan kami mahasiswa dari ITS sedang melakukan tugas penelitian mengenai kondisi sampah/polusi di sungai kejawan ini.
Bu Yuli & Bu Nita : Oh boleh mas, mau duduk atau berdiri?
Bimo: Terserah ibu enaknya gimana, sambil duduk bisa sambil berdiri juga bisa.
Bu Yuli & Bu Nita : Sambil duduk saja kalu gitu mas.
Bimo: Baik bu, Sebelumnya ibu ibu semua warga sini.
Bu Yuli&n Bu Nita : Iya benar.
Bimo: Sudah tinggal di sini sejak kapan bu?
Bu Yuli: Saya sudah dari 2005 sejak jalanan ini masih tanah belum di paving seperti sekarang.
Bu Nita: Kalau saya dari 2011.
Bimo: Apakah ada perbedaan terkait kondisi sungai dahulu dan sekarang?
Bu Yuli: Beda mas, dulu lebih bersih. Bisa buat mandi tapi sekarang udah engga lagi.
Bu Nita: Dulu juga pas jaman bu Risma sering ada upaya pembersihan dari petugas kaya nyabutin tanaman itu. Tapi sekarang udah ga ada lagi hampir satu tahun.
Bimo: Apakah pencemaran sungai memengaruhi kehidupan sehari-hari?
Bu Yuli & Bu Nita: Ya jadi gabisa dipake buat nyuci lagi mas airnya.
Bimo: Kalo sumber pencemaran sungai nya ini dari mana ya bu?
Bu Yuli & Bu Nita: Ya dari saluran mandi dan cuci warga mas di rumah, langsung dialirin ke sungai.
Bimo: Apakah ada waktu tertentu pencemaran sungainya semakin parah?
Bu Yuli: Gaada sih mas, sama aja setiap saat.
Bimo: Apakah ada upaya dan inisiatif dari masyarakat untuk menjaga kebersihan sungai.
Bu Nita: Tidak ada sih mas.
Bimo: Menurut ibu apakah ada cara dari pemerintah untuk memperbaiki kondisi di sungai ini?
Bu Nita: Apa ya mas. Ya mungkin kaya jaman bu Risma dulu lebih diseringkan lagi buat pembersihan sungainya sama petugas.
Bu Yuli: Sama harus ada penindakan tegas si mas kepada yang ngetori sungai sperti yang buag sampah.
Bimo: Baik mungkin cukup segitu saja bu. Terima kasih banyak ya atas luangan waktunya.
Apakah boleh diambil fotonya untuk dokumentasi.
Bu Yuli & Bu Nita: Oh ya boleh mas.
6.5 Transcript of indirect interview with Pak Ghoffar
Name : Pak Ghoffar
Day & Date (Interview Upload) : Sunday, 01 December 2024
Location : Kejawan Putih Tambak
Tyo: Permisi ibu selamat siang perkenalkan kami mahasiswa dari ITS sedang melakukan tugas penelitian mengenai kondisi sampah/polusi di sungai kejawan ini.
Pak Ghoffar: Boleh mas, duduk di kursi sebelah rumah itu ya mas Tyo: Bapak sudah berapa lama tinggal di Kejawan Putih Tambak?
Pak Ghoffar:: Saya dari 1995 mas.
Tyo: Menurut Bapak kondisi sungai kejawan ini seperti apa ya pak?
Pak Ghoffar: Banyak tanaman liar mas, kurang terurus juga
Tyo: Perubahan apa terjadi pada sungai selama beberapa tahun terakhir? Apakah semakin bersih atau semakin kotor?
Pak Ghoffar:Beda jauh mas. Dulu bersih tidak ada tanaman liar. Dulu dipakai mandi cuci sekarang tidak ada lagi.
Tyo: Apa saja sumber utama pencemaran sungai di sini?
Pak Ghoffar: Karena ini ujung dari sungai ini ya mas, jadi sampah yang terbawa dan dari pipa air di bagian timur mas. Pipanya kalau hujan mengeluarkan air dan jadi berbusa yang kotor. Saluran pembuangan warga juga langsung mengarah ke sungai
Tyo: Apakah ada waktu-waktu tertentu dimana pencemaran menjadi lebih parah?
Pak Ghoffar: Saat hujan mas
Tyo:Apakah ada upaya dan inisiatif dari masyarakat untuk menjaga kebersihan sungai.
Pak Ghoffar: Tidak ada mas kalau sekarang.
Tyo: Menurut bapak, bagaimana cara pemerintah dapat membantu mengurangi pencemaran sungai?
Pak Ghoffar: Bisa kaya dulu lagi mas petugas kebersihannya diperbanyak buat ngebersihin sungai terutama nyabutin tanamannya.
6.6 Transcript of indirect interview with Ibu Sumatri
Name : Ibu Sumatri
Day & Date (Interview Upload) : Sunday, 01 December 2024
Location : Kejawan Putih Tambak
.
Vanya: Kira kira sudah berapa lama ibu tinggal dan berjualan di area ini?
Sumatri: 5 tahun
Vanya: 5 tahun ya bu? Itu berjualan aja apa tinggal juga ya bu?
Sumatri: Tinggal disini juga
Vanya:Kira kira ibu pernah ke area dekat sungai ga bu?
Sumatri: Aku gak pernah
Vanya:Kalo dari tempat ibu berjualan disini, bagaimana ibu cara ibu menggambarkan kondisi sungainya?
Sumatri: Gak bisa menggambarkan soalnya saya gak pernah kesana Vanya: Tapi pernah kayak ada bau atau apa gitu bu ke sini?
Sumatri: Iya bau
Vanya: Bau ya bu, itu mempengaruhi ibu jualan disini ya bu? Gimana itu bu?
Sumatri: Iya ngaruh, baunya itu ga enak, nyengat sampe sini
Vanya: Itu baunya kira kira berapa lama bu? Apa dari pagi sampai malam?
Sumatri: Itu dari pagi ke malam pagi lagi, seharian satu malaman
Vanya: Itu kira kira ngefek ke pelanggan ibu ga? Kayak mereka gamau kesini atau gimana gitu?
Sumatri: Iya ngaruh, karena baunya itu orang kesini pake masker
Vanya: Dari 5 tahun ibu tinggal dan jualan disini ada perubahan ga bu? Kayak ga terlalu bau atau tetap?
Sumatri: Ya agak berubah sih, lumayan tapi masih ada baunya
Vanya: Kalau sungainya sendiri, ibu pernah liat dipakai oleh masyarakat ga bu? Kayak untuk main main atau apa gitu?
Sumatri: Oh gak pernah
Vanya: Mungkin saya lanjut ke pertanyaan dagangan ibunya ya bu, kira kira kalau semisalnya sampah dalam sehari, satu dagangan ibu ini kira kira berapa kilogram?
Sumatri: Paling kadang ya 10 kilogram, kalau tidak rame 3 kg tergantung ramai sepinya Vanya: Berarti itu bentuk sampahnya seperti apa bu?
Sumatri: Sampah sayur semua
Vanya: Nah itu kira kira ibu bawa sampahnya kemana?
Sumatri: Ada yang ngambil
Vanya: Ah, berarti taro di depan aja ya bu nanti diambil gitu ya bu?
Sumatri: Iya
Vanya: Untuk dibawa kemananya berarti ibu kurang tau ya?
Sumatri: Ke tempat TPS, tempat pembuangan sampah, setiap hari
Vanya: Menurut ibu ada upaya gak bu dari masyarakat sekitar kayak tetangga tetangga ibu, RT RW ibu buat kayak membersihkan sampah sampah di sekitar sungai?
Sumatri: Sebenarnya sering dibersihkan sampahnya tapi tetap ada baunya, kalinya kan ga jalan, kadang kadang pada buang sampah dibelakang disana jadi tetap bau, maaf kayak bau beol gitu, sering itu
Vanya: Oh ibu tinggalnya di belakang? Dan masih bau?
Sumatri: Iya di belakang
Vanya: Kira kira ibu pernah liat sungainya berbusa gak bu?
Sumatri: Kalo disini kan jalannya kesana jadi iya
Vanya: Kalau menurut ibu sendiri sungai yang dulu sama sekarang ada perubahannya kah bu?
Sumatri: Kalo dulu masih sering ada sampah ngapung
Vanya: Oh gitu, berarti sekarang sampah udah ga ngapung tapi masih tetap bau dan berbusa Sumatri: Iya, apalagi kalau jembatannya itu ga dibuka tutup baunya lebih parah
Vanya: Untuk busanya itu apakah sore aja? Karena kemarin kita liat busanya sore sore aja bu, kalo dari pengalaman ibu dari pagi aja, sore aja apa malem juga bu?
Sumatri: Ya kan kadang pagi sore, kalau pas mau bangun tidur, orang mau masak itu bau banget, baunya campuran pokoknya dek
Vanya: Kira kira di tempat dagangan ini ada sampah atau limbah yang cari ga bu?
Sumatri: Ga ada, sampah sayur semua
Vanya: Mungkin ada kalimat penutup ibu maunya pemerintah sekitar upaya nya seperti apa buat sungai tersebut?
Sumatri: Kerja bakti
Vanya: Berarti kerja bakti yang ngajak orang sekitar ya?
Sumatri: Iya, tapi sebenarnya orang orang udah pada kerja bakti tapi tetap aja, harusnya ada alat berat untuk mengeruk sampahnya
6.7 Transcript of indirect interview with Ibu Matiah dan Bapak Sudiarto
Name : Ibu Matiah dan Bapak Sudiarto Day & Date (Interview Upload) : Sunday, 01 December 2024
Location : Kejawan Putih Tambak
Vanya: Kira kira sudah berapa lama ibu dan bapak tinggal dan berjualan disini?
Matiah: Sudah lama mulai dari hidup sampai sekarang. Terus berjualan gini, nah disini tuh sebenernya saya asli Nganjuk, terus saya dibawa teman saya untuk mengajar agama disini di sekolahan itu, sebetulnya saya disini dari tahun 77
Vanya: Kira kira ibu kalo mau menggambarkan atau mendeskripsikan sungai disini seperti apa? Secara fisik atau estetik? Bau atau jelek atau gimana
Sudiarto: Baunya sampe sini, kalau kering ga ada air nya itu baunya bau banget, apalagi eceng gondoknya muncul dari sana sampai sini, semuanya penuh, pertumbuhan eceng gondok kan memang cepet ya
Vanya: Selain bau ada ciri khas lain ga ya? Apa dia berbusa atau gimana?
Sudiarto: Berbusa kan mungkin dari pompa yang sana dari situ biasanya, tapi kalo depan sini ga ada
Vanya: Kira kira dari kondisi dulu sampai kondisi sekarang ada perubahan ga bu? Kayak lebih baik atau gimana?
Matiah: Ada, dulu kan itu hanya jembatan gitu aja, jembatan biasa terus dibangun pernah roboh
Vanya: Oh iya? Jembatan yang mana tuh bu?
Sudiarto: Yang sebelah disini awalnya tapi sekarang sudah dipindah, setelah roboh dibangun lagi
Vanya: Untuk sungainya apa memang dari dulu sudah bau?
Matiah: Tidak, dulu itu airnya ngalir orang orang mandi
Sudiarto: Itu mba karena tempat padat, semakin lama akan semakin banyak air kotor, dulu jernih mba airnya buat mandi, iya karena dulu kan sepi masih rawa rawa, bisa dipakai untuk nyuci baju orang orang
Vanya: Sekarang tapi udah gabisa dipake untuk itu ya pak?
Sudiarto: Iya sudah ga bisa
Vanya: Berarti kira kira salah satu faktornya itu ya? Meningkatnya populasinya?
Sudiarto: Iya
Vanya: Untuk pencemaran seperti bau dan lain lain gitu pasti mengaruhi orangnya ya, nah itu kira kira itu untuk jualan ibu apakah terpengaruh?
Sudiarto: Engga sih
Vanya: Jualannya mungkin juga ga terkait ya seperti makanan gitu?
Matiah: Iya kalo makanan jualan yang di depan
Vanya: Mungkin sekarang aku mau nanya tentang dagangannya ya, sampah atau limbah dagangan ibu ini bentukannya apa?
Sudiarto: Bentukannya plastik
Vanya: Itu kira kira sehari berapa beratnya?
Matiah: Dulu itu rame, sekarang ini agak sepi, sepi banget soalnya banyak orang yang jualan, jualan yang deket deket jadi berpengaruh
Vanya: Bisa dihitung ga bu kira kira satu plastik kah?
Sudiarto: Ga sampe
Vanya: Kalo untuk sampah rumah sendiri itu kayak gimana?
Sudiarto: Kalo untuk satu hari, satu plastik Vanya: Oh iya, itu dikumpulkan di depan gitu ya?
Sudiarto: Iya itu ditaruh di depan, dikasih tong satu satu Vanya: Oke berarti itu nanti diangkut sama?
Sudiarto: Diangkut 2 hari sekali
Vanya: Kalo di rumah sendiri itu ada sampah yang dibuang yang cair ga? Maksudnya kayak minyak atau kopi atau gimana gitu di wastafel?
Sudiarto: Engga itu engga
Vanya: Menurut ibu dan bapak sendiri, masyarakat sendiri ada upaya untuk membersihkan sungai tersebut ga
Sudiarto: Upaya ada mba, tapi itu biasanya langsung dari pemerintah, biasanya sebulan sekali ada gerakan dari Pak RT sama gerakan dari mana gak tahu
Vanya: Mungkin pertanyaan terakhir untuk interviewnya, dari bapak dan ibunya sendiri mau pemerintah melakukan upaya apa untuk membersihkan sungai?
Sudiarto: Mungkin itu sudah terorganisir dan tertata tapi mungkin lebih ditingkatkan lagi ya Vanya: Kalau dari ibunya sendiri mungkin ada kebutuhan apa dari ibunya untuk pemerintah kayak harus ngapain di daerah sini gitu
Matiah: Heem, ngapain ya? Ya saya ini ya di rumah saja, ya yang ngajar jumat sama sabtu, kegiatannya jalan jalan itu aja, sudah tua.
6.8 Transcript of indirect interview with Bapak Aris
Name : Bapak Aris
Day & Date (Interview Upload) : Sunday, 01 December 2024
Location : Kejawan Putih Tambak
Vanya: Bapak kira kira sudah jualan dan tinggal di darah sini berapa lama?
Aris: Dari 2016 jualan di tempat yang sama, sekitar 5 tahunan Vanya: Bapak biasanya jualan dari jam berapa?
Aris: Jualan dari jam 6 pagi, tapi karena rame biasanya di sekitar sana nah pas udah ga rame baru pindah kesini, sampe jam 10 atau 11 lah
Vanya: Menurut bapak sendiri, kondisi sungainya gimana?
Aris: Bau sih engga, bau tapi baunya gak lama gitu
Vanya: Terus itu karena sungainya rada bau itu ngaruh ga ke pelanggan bapak? Mungkin karena bau mereka gamau kesini
Aris: Ga ngaruh si ke pelanggan
Vanya: Untuk dari dagangan bapak sendiri itu sampahnya gimana?
Aris: Sampahnya saya kumpulkan sendiri dan bawa pulang sendiri Vanya: Terus kira kira sampahnya berapa banyak?
Aris: Biasanya sih 1 kantong doang
Vanya: Itu kira kira isi sampahnya apa aja?
Aris: Ya es batu, sampah minum
Vanya: Kira kira bapak pernah liat ga ya itu sungainya biasanya dipake untuk apa? Kayak aktivitas apa gitu anak anak main atau seperti apa?
Aris: Waduh saya kurang paham kalo sungainya itu dipake untuk apa
Vanya: Oh oke pak, mungkin untuk pertanyaan terakhir, apa yang diharapkan bapak untuk pemerintah lakukan untuk sungainya?
Aris: Wah menurut saya kurang paham sih kalau tentang upaya pemerintah, menurut saya sudah baik
6.9 Transcript of indirect interview with Ibu Siti and Bapak Matinggal
Name : Bapak Aris
Day & Date (Interview Upload) : Sunday, 01 December 2024
Location : Kejawan Putih Tambak
Vanya : Selamat pagi pak, nama saya Vanya Dyandra Putrie saya dari jurusan perencanaan wilayah dan kota ITS. Dan saya Fathima Alya Putri dengan Departemen dan universitas yang sama Mungkin ibu dan bapaknya juga boleh perkenalkan diri dulu bu, nama dan umur.
Ibu Siti: Hahaha Umurnya berapa pak? 60 tahun. Saya 35 tahun.
Vanya : Mungkin saya masuk ke pertanyaan pertama dulu ya bu ya. Kira-kira ibu bapaknya tuh udah tinggal dan jualan disini berapa lama?
Ibu Siti: Lama sekali. 40 tahun segituan Vanya : Berarti ibunya dari lahir, dari sini ya?
Ibu Siti: Iya, sebelumnya lahir, ibu saya masih jualan
Vanya : Kira-kira gimana cara... Kalau ibu boleh menggambarkan kondisi sungai yang di depan, gitu. Itu gimana, ibu? Secara fisik, baukah atau apa, gitu?
Ibu Siti : Ya, bau, ya... Nyamuk banget, kan, bang.Apalagi ada telokan ini, air nggak jalan, nggak laku. Waduh, nyamuk banget banget.
Vanya : Baunya dari depan situ sampai ke sini juga?
Ibu Siti : Iya.
Vanya : Kira-kira itu nge-efek, ibu, kejualan ini? Kayak misalkan orang-orang jadi malas dikit berdiri di sini.
Ibu siti : Iya, ganggu.
Vanya : Kan ibu sama bapaknya udah di sini 40 tahunan, ya? Dari tahun-tahun dulu itu sama sekarang ada perubahan nggak dari sungainya sendiri?
Pak Matinggal : Nggak ada perubahan. Enak zaman dulu. Nggak ada apa-apa,
Vanya : Kira-kira kalau untuk baunya itu ada waktunya nggak, ibu? Kayak misalkan sore aja atau siang aja atau seharian itu memang bau?
Ibu Siti : Enggak. Pokoknya kalau ada angin gitu, dia lewat. Baunya di sini. Angin kayak ini.
Baunya di sini. Dulu air basah kan masuk ke luar. Air basah. Air laut.
Vanya : Selain mempengaruhi pelanggan, kalau untuk ibu bapak yang sendiri itu mempengaruhinya gimana lagi?
Ibu Siti : Yang rasanya itu terpengaruhkan ke baunya, tapi ya gimana lagi ya? Biarin aja.
Vanya : Buat ibu sendiri, sumbernya itu apa? Kalau secara asumsi, apakah warga-warga pada gua sampai di sana? Atau limbah-limbah enggak jelas itu di mana?
Ibu Siti : Karena kadang itu orang nyapu-nyapu gitu, mba, terus dimasukkan saja, kadang pampers juga, karena kan dimarahin samaa orang orang kalau dibuang di tong sampah malam malam
Vanya : Kira-kira pernah enggak bu, ada upaya dari masyarakat setempat kayak ayo bersihkan daerah dekat sungai itu?
Ibu Siti : Kayak kerja bakti?. Enggak pernah. Enggak mau, mba. Ya siapa juga yang mau mba, mending tidur
Vanya : Kita pernah baca gitu ya, Bu, kalau di sungai sini, waktu itu pernah ada busa-busa gitu. Ibunya sih pernah lihat, Bu?
Ibu Siti : Iya. Iya, iya.
Vanya : Itu kapan, bu ? Kayak sore-sore atau gimana?
Ibu Siti : Kayaknya di sana, di sini, enggak. Kalau malam malam, pernah sampai naik ke jembatan
Vanya : Masyarakatnya ada yang pernah kena, enggak, Bu?
Ibu Siti : Enggak, enggak alhamdulillah enggak pernah. Enggak tahu sih, cuma kalau aku kan sampai naik sih, jembatan pernah lewat. Ya, lewat aja, kan busanya itu sampai
gelembung gelembung ke atas.
Vanya : Mungkin saya lanjutkan pertanyaan tentang dagangan ya, Bu. Kira-kira untuk
dagangan Ibu ini, sampah-sampahnya, mainly apa, Bu? Apa namanya? Paling banyak itu apa, sampahnya?
Ibu Siti & Pak Matinggal : Biasanya sampah nasi. Sayur-sayur, kulitnya telur, itu yang paling banyak. Sampah sayur, sampah nasi, sampah makan
Vanya : Kalau sehari, itu kira-kira berapa kilo, bu, pak?
Pak Matinggal : Enggak tahu ya Kalau kayak gini, sepi minggu.
Vanya : Itu kira-kira dibuangnya ke mana, Bu? Ada yang ngangkut atau gimana?
Ibu Siti : Ada yang ngangkut.
Vanya : Itu diangkutnya ke mana, Bu?
Ibu Siti : Ke situ ke keputih. Dikumpulin di situ. Kalau buat buka setiap rumah, setiap gang, datang-datang sampah. Nanti diangkut, kadang ya dua hari sekali, kadang ya setiap hari, nggak pasti orangnya yang ngangkut ini.
Vanya : Kalau untuk sampah-sampah yang cairan gitu, kira-kira di sini enak nggak, Bu?
Ibu Siti : Apa maksudnya, rebusan ayam gitu? Iya, kayak minyak, gitu. Iya. Kayak minyak-minyak ya, hitam
Vanya : Kalau dari Ibu sama Bapak sendiri, kira-kira maunya pemerintah kita tuh melakukan apa untuk sungai itu, dibersihkan atau gimana?
Ibu Siti & Pak Matinggal : Bersihkan. Bersihkan, terus sama warganya itu, kalau bisa dibilangin, jangan seenaknya, biarnya nyapu-nyapu, langsung dimasukkan. Kayak pampers, malam dimasukkan ke tong sampah gitu mbak, kalau bisa dibilangin, warganya jangan sampai buang sampah di sungai
6.10 Transcript of indirect interview with Bapak Adin
Name : Bapak Adin (Natural stone seller) Day & Date (Interview Upload) : Sunday, 01 December 2024
Location : Kejawan Putih Tambak
Vanya : Nama saya Vanya Dyandra Putri, saya dari perencanaan wilayah dan kota, mungkin bapaknya juga boleh perkenalan diri dulu, Pak
Pak Adin : Nama saya Adin, kami bekerja di bidang wirausaha Nama saya Adin, kami bekerja di bidang penjualan batu alam. Batu alam itu lebih dominan untuk kemarauan kesedihan.
Vanya : Mungkin untuk pertanyaan pertama, Pak, kira-kira Bapak sudah berapa lama tinggal di sini atau jualan di sini?
Pak Adin : Kita untuk perjualan di sini, di sini saya mulai tahun 2011.
Vanya : Tinggalnya?
Pak Adin : Tinggal kadang-kadang di sini, kadang-kadang di Kota Putri, kadang-kadang di tempat tinggal kami, di Alwi, di desa.
Vanya : Kira-kira, menurut Bapak, sungai yang di depan ini, Pak, itu gimana cara Bapak mau menggambarkan kondisinya? Secara visual, kayak apakah baunya?
Pak Adin : Langsung saya jawab, tadi bau. Sungai yang di depan ini memang
kadang-kadang bau. Posisi baunya pas di saat terik-teriknya musim kemarau. Kurang lebih kisaran bau itu menyengat, sangat menyengat sekali kisaran sekitar satu bulan penuh. Tapi pas saat-saat terik-teriknya musim kemarau. Karena apa, itu salah satunya, alirannya kurang begitu mengalir lancar. Terus pas di jam itu kan, memang ada alat untuk naikin sampah ada.
Tentu juga ada truk untuk mengambil sampah-sampahnya pengguncana daerah. Cuma, di sepengatahuan saya, itu, enggak tahu jam kerjanya seperti apa, terus kondisinya seperti apa, untuk sungai ini, Intinya, sering ada sampah di situ. Apalagi, kalau setelah musim hujan, masuk ke musim kemarau, pasti ada tanaman ejeng gondok. Ejeng gondok. Ejeng gondok itu, Mbak, dari pengambilan sampah sampai ke jembatan depan. Cuma yang lebih banyak,
kisaran dari pintu air dari dalam itu, maju ke depan, sekitar 20 meter, penuh. Sama ejeng gondok. Dulu, waktu zaman bu risma sering dibabat, skrg ada yg ambil tp ga sekonsisten
Vanya : Tapi itu pengambilan dari pemerintah sendiri Bapak?
Pak Adin : iya
Vanya : Enggak dari sekitar sini?
Pak Adin : Enggak. Kalau warga, saya kurang tahu. Karena saya kurang tahu kenapa. Jarang kita ada diajak untuk membersihkan sungai. Tapi kalau kotoran yang di depan, di bawah kita, got got samping, kita sering.
Vanya : Tapi untuk yang got, Bapak sendiri pernah?
Pak Adin : Iya, kala
