EDITORIAL
Broadening in fl uence on the food supply and environmental sustainability
Dietitians have long recognised the potential of food reformulation to improve the health of the general popula- tion, even without changes in consumer behaviour.1 How- ever, increasingly, we are realising that food choices cannot be judged solely in terms of nutritional outcomes; environ- mental impacts must also be considered. This year, the American Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior has released a position paper declaring that‘environmental sus- tainability should be inherent in dietary guidance, whether working with individuals, or groups about dietary choices, or in setting national dietary guidance’.2At the same time, a Lancet Commission has just produced a landmark report that integrates, with the quantification of universal healthy diets, global targets for sustainable food systems.3 We are now at a global climate tipping point and being challenged to consider the very basis of how to develop advice about healthy eating.
The Food and Agriculture Organization defines sustain- able diets as those that are protective and respectful of bio- diversity and ecosystems, nutritionally adequate, safe, healthy, culturally acceptable and economically affordable while optimising natural and human resources.4 Sustain- ability can also been seen as a key component in any assess- ment of food security.5 Calls for dietary guidelines to include sustainability began more than 35 ago,6and a num- ber of international dietary guidelines panels have consid- ered the sustainability of the food system when producing recommendations.7Nonetheless, there is a wide disparity in the carbon emissions intensity of the healthy diets rec- ommended in different countries, ranging from 687 kg CO2 equivalents per capita per year in India to 1579 kg in the United States of America.8
Today, global climate change is recognised as an urgent problem, with other pressing environmental issues, includ- ing loss of biodiversity, land degradation, fresh water short- ages and water pollution.9 The latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change special report assessed energy, land and ecosystems, infrastructure and industry to see how they would need to be transformed to limit global warming to 1.5C. It concluded that among the actions needed is changing food systems and promoting diet changes away from land-intensive animal products.10
Global agriculture and food production release more than 25% of all greenhouse gases (GHG).11Emissions vary widely between foods; ruminant meats such as beef and lamb can have emissions per gram of protein 250 times that of legumes, while eggs, seafood, poultry and pork have much lower emissions than ruminant meat. How a given food is produced also affects emissions. When sustainably
grazed on lands unsuitable for cropping, dairy and red meat production can increase food security, dietary quality and provide environmental benefits via nutrient cycling.12 Nonetheless, while producers have some limited ability to reduce the environmental impacts of food production, die- tary change will remain the most effective mechanism to deliver environmental benefits.13 Using global life cycle analysis of emission data, it has been calculated that a move to a Mediterranean, pescatarian or vegetarian diet could reduce GHG emissions from food production by 30–55%.11
The literature on sustainable diets has grown substan- tially in the last decade.14–16 A recent study examined 66 different dietary studies that enabled comparison of their nutritional quality and carbon footprints.17 The authors found that the Mediterranean diet and the Atlantic dietary pattern (common in northern Portugal and Galicia), as well as those in India and Peru, had much lower carbon foot- print scores than the diets of northern or western Europe and concluded that a shift to a diet rich in vegetables and lower in animal protein would be healthier and more envi- ronmentally friendly. Other studies have also concluded that reductions in meat consumption would lead to reduc- tions in GHG emissions as those of meat and dairy con- sumers are about twice those of vegans.18–21
This issue ofNutrition & Dieteticsincludes a collection of articles that relate to nutritional improvements in the food supply, including recipe modifications to reduce sodium content,22implementation of healthy food policies in health services,23 the development of national meal guidelines for Meals on Wheels programs24and the impact of health star labelling on the reformulation of packaged foods.25As more and more people consume food prepared by others, such approaches will continue to be important for the work of dietitians. Nonetheless, dietitians will also need to consider how to embed environmental concerns in national dietary policies in the future.
In the current Australian dietary guidelines, published in 2013, the topic of environmental sustainability is only briefly mentioned in afive-page appendix, and its key mes- sages focus on issues of food waste, healthy food choices and buying locally grown food rather than any recommen- dations to change food patterns substantially.26There have been attempts to describe what a healthy and sustainable diet could look like in Australia,27but in general, the topic does not get the attention it deserves at the level of govern- ment policy-making28 and intersectoral action has been hampered by disparate definitions, a perceived lack of
© 2019 Dietitians Association of Australia 247
AA AADDDietitians Associationofof Australia
Nutrition & Dietetics2019;76: 247–249 DOI: 10.1111/1747-0080.12554
robust evidence and divergent views about the role of gov- ernment in environmental policy and food regulation.29
It seems clear that moving to a diet based on more whole and plant-based foods is going to be one of the most important dietary strategies at a global level both for the planet and for human health. However, the dietary choices that an individual makes are influenced by culture, price, availability, taste and convenience, as well as nutritional knowledge. If we are going to encourage the move to a food system that is more environmentally sustainable, nutrition- ists and dietitians will need to educate consumers on how to do this30 and help develop food policy, dietary guide- lines and labelling regulations that articulate the changes needed. There is already a high level of community concern in Australia about the environmental impact of the food supply.31We may discover that many individualsfind con- cerns about environmental impact more motivating than concerns about health when considering whether to make a dietary change.
Funding source
The author received no funding to write this editorial.
Con fl ict of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Authorship
PW is the sole author of this manuscript.
Peter Williams, BSc(Hons), DipNutrDiet, MHP, PhD, FDAA Honorary Professorial Fellow, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong
References
1 Leroy P, Réquillart V, Soler L-G, Enderli G. An assessment of the potential health impacts of food reformulation.Eur J Clin Nutr2016;70: 694–9.
2 Rose D, Heller MC, Roberto CA. Position of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior: the importance of including environmental sustainability in dietary guidance. J Nutr Educ Behav2019;51: 3–15.e1.
3 Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.Lancet2019;393: 447–92.
4 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
International Scientific Symposium on Biodiversity and Sustain- able Diets United Against Hunger. Rome: FAO, 2010.
(Available from: http://www.fao.org/ag/humannutrition/
28507-0e8d8dc364ee46865d5841c48976e9980.pdf, accessed 29 January 2019).
5 Berry EM, Dernini S, Burlingame B, Meybeck A, Conforti P.
Food security and sustainability: can one exist without the other?Public Health Nutr2015;18: 2293–302.
6 Gussow JD, Clancy KL. Dietary guidelines for sustainability.
J Nutr Educ1986;18: 1–5.
7 Gonzalvez Fischer C, Garnett T.Plates, Pyramids and Planets.
Developments in National Healthy and Sustainable Dietary Guide- lines: A State of Play Assessment. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN and the Food Climate Research Net- work, 2016.
8 Ritchie H, Reay DS, Higgins P. The impact of global dietary guidelines on climate change. Glob Environ Chang 2018;
49: 46–55.
9 Cribb J. The Coming Famine. The Gobal Food Crisis and What We Can Do About It. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing, 2010.
10 Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H et al. Global warming of 1.5C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strength- ening the global response to the threat of climate change, sus- tainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva:
World Meterological Organization, 2018.
11 Tilman D, Clark M. Global diets link environmental sustain- ability and human health.Nature2014;515: 518–22.
12 Eisler MC, Lee MRF, Tarlton JFet al. Agriculture: steps to sus- tainable livestock.Nature2014;507: 32–4.
13 Poore J, Nemecek T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers.Science2018;360: 987–92.
14 Nelson ME, Hamm MW, Hu FB, Abrams SA, Griffin TS. Align- ment of healthy dietary patterns and environmental sustainabil- ity: a systematic review.Adv Nutr2016;7: 1005–25.
15 Hallström E, Carlsson-Kanyama A, Börjesson P. Environmental impact of dietary change: a systematic review. J Clean Prod 2015;91: 1–11.
16 Aleksandrowicz L, Green R, Joy EJM, Smith P, Haines A. The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: a systematic review. PLoS One 2016;11: e0165797.
17 Gonzalez-Garcia S, Esteve-Llorens X, Moreira M, Feijoo G. Car- bon footprint and nutritional quality of different human dietary choices.Sci Total Environ2018;644: 77–94.
18 Scarborough P, Appleby PN, Mizdrak A et al. Dietary green- house gas emissions of meat-eaters,fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK.Clim Change2014;125: 179–92.
19 Springmann M, Wiebe K, Masson-D’Croz D, Sulser TB, Rayner M, Scarborough P. Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environ- mental impacts: a global modelling analysis with country-level detail.Lancet Planet Health2018;2: e451–61.
20 Perignon M, Vieux F, Soler LG, Masset G, Darmon N. Improv- ing food sustainability through evolution of food choices:
review of epidemiological studies on the environmental impact of diets.Nutr Rev2017;75: 2–17.
21 van de Kamp ME, van Dooren C, Hollander Aet al. Healthy diets with reduced environmental impact? – The greenhouse gas emissions of various diets adhering to the Dutch food based dietary guidelines.Food Res Int2018;104: 14–24.
22 Reynoso-Marreros IA, Piñarreta-Cornejo PK, Mayta-Tristán P, Bernabé-Ortiz A. Effect of a salt-reduction strategy on blood pressure and acceptability among customers of a food conces- sionaire in Lima, Peru.Nutr Diet2019;76: 250–6.
23 Boelsen-Robinson T, Blake MR, Backholer K, Hettiarachchi J, Palermo C, Peeters A. Implementing healthy food policies in health services: a qualitative study.Nutr Diet2019;76: 336–43.
24 Clancy A, Walton K, Charlton Ket al. Service providers’ and health professionals’views and suggestions for the Australian National Meal Guidelines for the Commonwealth Home Sup- port Program.Nutr Diet2019;76: 290–5.
Editorial
248 © 2019 Dietitians Association of Australia
25 Morrison H, Meloncelli N, Pelly FE. Nutritional quality and reformulation of a selection of children’s packaged foods avail- able in Australian supermarkets: has the Health Star Rating had an impact?Nutr Diet2019;76: 296–304.
26 National Health and Medical Research Council.Food, Nutrition and Environmental Sustainability. Eat for Health Australian Die- tary Guidelines. Canberra: NHMRC, 2013; 130–4.
27 Friel S, Barosh LJ, Lawrence M. Towards healthy and sustain- able food consumption: an Australian case study. Pub Health Nutr2013;17: 1156–66.
28 Trevena H, Kaldor JC, Downs SM. ’Sustainability does not quite get the attention it deserves’: synergies and tensions in the sustainability frames of Australian food policy actors.Pub Health Nutr2014;18: 2323–32.
29 James SW, Friel S, Lawrence MA, Hoek AC, Pearson D. Inter- sectoral action to support healthy and environmentally sustain- able food behaviours: a study of sectoral knowledge, gover- nance and implementation opportunities.Sustain Sci2018;13:
465–77.
30 Meyer N, Reguant-Closa A. "Eat as if you could save the planet and win!" Sustainability integration into nutrition for exercise and sport.Nutrients2017;9: E412.
31 Harray A, Meng X, Kerr D, Pollard CM. Healthy and sustain- able diets: community concerns about the effect of food envi- ronments and support for government regulating sustainable food supplies in Western Australia. Appetite 2018; 125: 225–32.
Editorial
© 2019 Dietitians Association of Australia 249