• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

A Clinical Model for the Early Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis in the Emergency Department

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "A Clinical Model for the Early Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis in the Emergency Department "

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

A Clinical Model for the Early Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis in the Emergency Department

SUPPLEMENTAL DIGITAL CONTENT

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1. Distribution of Acute Pancreatitis and 54 Candidate Predictors in Derivation and Validation Sets

Candidate Predictor* Derivation Set (n = 212)

Validation Set (n = 107)

P

Acute pancreatitis 122 (57) 60 (56) 0.81

Demographic factors

Age, y 49 (35–65) 51 (40–60) 0.57

Sex, male 96 (45) 42 (39) 0.34

Race 0.39

White 121 (57) 57 (53) -

Black 42 (20) 26 (24) -

Hispanic 35 (17) 13 (12) -

Other 14 (7) 11 (10) -

Medical comorbidities/history

Charlson Cormorbidity Index 1 (0–3) 1 (0–3) 0.09

Prior AP 59 (28) 31 (29) 0.90

No. of prior AP episodes 0 (0–1) 0 (0–1) 0.91

Chronic pancreatitis 18 (8) 11 (10) 0.68

Pancreatic tumor 8 (4) 5 (5) 0.77

Autoimmune pancreatitis 2 (1) 0 (0) 0.55

Hereditary AP 1 (0) 1 (1) 1.00

Cholelithiasis 37 (17) 22 (21) 0.54

Biliary colic 6 (3) 3 (3) 1.00

Cholecystitis 10 (5) 7 (7) 0.59

Cholangitis 3 (1) 1 (1) 1.00

Choledocholithiasis 7 (3) 2 (2) 0.72

Cholecystectomy 44 (21) 17 (16) 0.37

Hypertriglyceridemia 5 (2) 5 (5) 0.31

Hypercalcemia 1 (0) 0 (0) 1.00

Abdominal surgery in prior 2 months 22 (10) 15 (14) 0.36

ERCP in prior 1 week 7 (3) 1 (1) 0.28

Medication change in prior 2 weeks 29 (14) 6 (6) 0.04§

Family history of AP 0 (0) 3 (3) 0.04§

Lifestyle factors

Smoking (ever) 85 (40) 35 (37) 0.22

Smoking (current) 47 (22) 18 (17) 0.30

Alcohol use (current) 74 (35) 34 (32) 0.62

Symptoms and signs

Time from onset to presentation, days 2 (0–4) 2 (0–5) 0.65

Pain severity at presentation, out of 10 0.14

Mild (0–3) 56 (26) 18 (17) -

Moderate (4–6) 30 (14) 15 (14) -

(2)

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 1. Distribution of Acute Pancreatitis and 54 Candidate Predictors in Derivation and Validation Sets

Candidate Predictor* Derivation Set (n = 212)

Validation Set (n = 107)

P

Upper abdominal 89 (42) 40 (37) 0.47

Radiating to back 77 (36) 30 (28) 0.17

Progressively worsening severity 35 (17) 22 (21) 0.44

Constant in presence 50 (24) 25 (24) 1.00

Similar previous symptoms 71 (33) 34 (32) 0.80

Surgical/rigid abdomen 1 (0) 0 (0) 1.00

Interferes with sleep 26 (12) 8 (7) 0.25

Interferes with eating 53 (25) 33 (31) 0.29

Other symptoms/signs

Nausea 136 (64) 76 (71) 0.26

Vomiting 103 (46) 61 (57) 0.19

Diarrhea/loose stools 48 (23) 27 (25) 0.68

SIRS at presentation 55 (26) 29 (27) 0.89

Laboratory studies

Lipase, U/L 0.90

≥3 – <10x ULN (180–599) 114 (54) 56 (52) -

≥10 – <20x ULN (600–1199) 39 (18) 22 (21) -

≥20 ULN (≥1200) 59 (28) 29 (27) -

Alanine aminotransferase >50 U/L 62 (29) 28 (26) 0.60

Aspartate aminotransferase >50 U/L 64 (30) 32 (30) 1.00

Alkaline phosphatase >130 U/L 66 (31) 24 (22) 0.11

Total bilirubin, mg/dL 0.71

Normal (0–1) 160 (75) 80 (75) -

Moderately elevated (1.8–4) 38 (18) 22 (21) -

Severely elevated (>4) 14 (7) 5 (5) -

White blood cell <4 or >12 x103 cells/mm3 64 (30) 32 (30) 1.00

Hematocrit, % 0.50

Low (<36) 76 (36) 34 (32) -

Normal (36–48) 132 (62) 69 (64) -

Elevated (>48) 4 (2) 4 (4) -

Blood urea nitrogen >23 mg/dL 45 (21) 20 (19) 0.66

Creatinine >1.2 mg/dL 49 (23) 24 (22) 1.00

Albumin <3.5 g/dL 38 (18) 12 (11) 0.14

Lactate >2.2 mmol/L 18 (8) 19 (18) 0.02§

Values are n (%) for categorical variables and median (IQR) for continuous variables.

*Missing dichotomous “symptoms and signs” assumed as absent. Missing “pain severity at presentation” and laboratory variables imputed with statistical mode of individuals with and without AP. Missing “time from onset to presentation” variables imputed with statistical mean.

Excluded from univariable analysis due to prevalence <5% in both AP and non-AP cohorts.

See Supplementary Table 3.

§P < 0.05 between derivation and validation sets.

Initial laboratory values used. Cut-offs based on institutional standards.

AP indicates acute pancreatitis; ED, emergency department; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; IQR, interquartile range; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome; ULN, upper limit of normal.

(3)

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 2. Derivation of the Point-Based Scoring Model Candidate Variable Category Reference

Value βi βi (Wij – WiREF) Pointsij = βi (Wij - WiREF)/B

No. of prior AP episodes 1.1595

0 0 = W4REF 0 0

1 1 1.1595 1

2 2 2.3190 2

3 3 3.4786 3

≥4* 4 4.6391 4

History of cholelithiasis 1.9207

No 0 = W3REF 0 0

Yes 1 1.9207 2

Abdominal surgery in prior 2 months

-1.8196

No 0 = W5REF 0 0

Yes 1 -1.8196 -2

Epigastric pain 2.6323

No 0 = W1REF 0 0

Yes 1 2.6323 2

Progressively worsening pain severity

1.5368

No 0 = W2REF 0 0

Yes 1 1.5368 1

Time from onset to presentation, d

-0.1217

<1 0 = W6REF 0 0

≥1 – <3 2 -0.2434 0

≥3 – <5 4 -0.4868 0

≥5 – <7 6 -0.7302 -1

≥7 10 -1.2170 -1

Pain severity at

presentation (moderate)

2.3082

No 0 = W7REF 0 0

Yes 1 2.3082 2

Pain severity at presentation (severe)

3.5863

No 0 = W8REF 0 0

Yes 1 3.5863 3

Serum lipase (≥10x – <20x ULN)§

0.6615

No 0 = W9REF 0 0

Yes 1 0.6615 1

Serum lipase (≥20x ULN)§

1.8191

No 0 = W10REF 0 0

Yes 1 1.8191 2

*Range 0–6 episodes; to determine reference value for last category, the median value was used.

Range 0–48 days; to determine reference value for last category, the median value was used.

Using pain severity (mild) as reference.

§Using serum lipase (≥3x – <10x ULN) as reference.

AP indicates acute pancreatitis; βi, regression-coefficient for predictor (i); B, points constant which reflects regression units associated with each prior episode of AP (1.1595); ULN, upper limit of normal; Wij, reference

(4)

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 3. Estimate of AP Risk Using Point-Based Scoring Model*

Point Total Estimate of AP Risk Point Total Estimate of AP Risk

-4 0.0001 7 0.9744

-3 0.0004 8 0.9918

-2 0.0011 9 0.9974

-1 0.0036 10 0.9992

0 0.0112 11 0.9997

1 0.0350 12 0.9999

2 0.1035 13 0.9999

3 0.2691 14 0.9999

4 0.5400 15 0.9999

5 0.7892 16 0.9999

6 0.9227 17 0.9999

*𝑃(risk of AP) = 𝑒(𝑋𝛽) 𝑒(𝑋𝛽) + 1 , where 𝑋𝛽 ≈ 1.1595 × point total − 4.4774.

(5)

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 4: Abdominal Surgeries in Derivation and Validation Sets

Surgery* Derivation Set (n = 22) Validation Set (n = 15)

Bowel resection/bypass 5 (23) 4 (27)

Cholecystectomy 5 (23) 1 (7)

Gastric sleeve 4 (18) 2 (13)

Gastrostomy/enterostomy tube 2 (9) 1 (7)

Endoscopic necrosectomy/cyst drainage 2 (9) 2 (13)

Lysis of adhesions 2 (9) 0

Whipple 0 2 (13)

Other 2 (9) 3 (20)

Values are expressed as n (%).

* Within prior 2 months via open, laparoscopic, or endoscopic approach.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

But since my project cannot guarantee the minimum income yet, so, I would rather wait and see how it grows first before moving to the full-time entrepreneurship”, Interviewee7

Duties of .President and Vice Presidents until November 15~ 1931 Discussed importance oi£ sending state exhibits to Kansas City.. It was agreed that Vice Presidents and President