EVALUATION FORM
Widyakala Journal “Pembangunan Jaya University"
Paper Title:
A. The Object of Evaluation:
Evaluation content Yes No
1. Does the paper content to have originality?
2. Does the title representing the paper content?
3. Does the abstract representing the paper content?
4. Does the keyword indicate the scope of research?
5. Are the problem statement and the formulation of the research objectives clear 6. Is the research methods clearly described?
7. Are the problem statement and the formulation of the research objectives clear?
8. Are the table and figure helping in explanation?
9. Are the results of the discussion and/or analysis conducted relevant to the results of the study?
10. Is the bibliography used relevant and referenced in the paper?
Presentation Evaluation Very Good Good Average Poor 11. Originality/Novelty
12. Language
13. Accuracy of writing 14. Systematic of writing
15. Rate the clarity of the writing style B. Reviewer Decision:
16. Be accepted
17. Accepted with minor revision 18. Accepted with major revision 19. Rejected
Reviewer communication Yes No
20. Is your name as a reviewer, can be informed to the author?
C. Reviewer comment to the paper (Use additional sheet if required).
Reviewer Name:
Date:
