• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

The following content was supplied by the authors as supporting material and has not been copy-edited or verified by JBJS.

N/A
N/A
Nguyễn Gia Hào

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "The following content was supplied by the authors as supporting material and has not been copy-edited or verified by JBJS. "

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

The following content was supplied by the authors as supporting material and has not been copy-edited or verified by JBJS.

Table S-1: Histology Scoring Method

Histologic

Feature Definition Score

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Ca p sul e

Cellularity

# per 40x objective lens from 10 spots

in region of interest <30 31-60 61-90 91-120 121-150 151-180 181-210 211-240 241-270 271-300 >300

Fibroblast

# per 40x objective lens from 10 spots

in region of interest <30 31-60 61-90 91-120 121-150 151-180 181-210 211-240 241-270 271-300 >300

Adhesions

% of capsule adhered to surrounding humerus and radial (anterior) or ulnar (posterior) bone surfaces

<10 <15 <20 <25 <30 <40 <50 <60 <70 <80 >80

Fibrosis

% of capsule containing dense,

unorganized connective tissue <10 <15 <20 <25 <30 <40 <50 <60 <70 <80 >80

Synovium

# of synovial cell layers from joint

space surface 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >10

Thickness

measured in 3 locations (um), averaged and normalized to historical control data by subtracting 200 um

0-150 151-250 251-350 351-450 451-550 551-650 651-750 751-850 851-950 951-1050 >1050

***Taken from the Mankin scoring system and modified as follows

Ca rtil a g e

Structure

See detailed definitions →

0 1a 1b 1c 2a 2b 3a 3b 4 5 6

Normal <30% 31-61% >60% <50% >50% <50% >50% Clefts to radial

zone

Clefts to calcified zone

Complete disorganization Surface irregularities

Pannus and surface irregularities

Clefts to transitional

zone

Cellularity

See detailed definitions →

0 1a 1b 1c 1d 2a 2b 2c 3a 3b 3c

Normal <25% 25-50% 51-75% >75% <30% 31-61% >60% <25% 25-50% >50%

Diffuse hypercellularity Cloning Hypocellularity

Matrix staining

% of metachromatic staining that

resembles normal cartilage >80 <80 <70 <60 <50 <40 <30 <25 <20 <15 <10

Tidemark Integrity

% not crossed by blood vessels at the radial zone and calcified cartilage interface

>80 <80 <70 <60 <50 <40 <30 <25 <20 <15 <10

(2)

Table S-2: Capsule Histology Scores

C e l l u l a r i t y

F i b r o b l a s t s

Adhesio ns

Fibro

sis Synovium Thickness

A nte ri or Cap su le

Control 3 . 3

± 0 . 6

2 . 1

± 0 . 8

0.9 ± 0.8 0.2 ±

0.4 0.0 ± 0.0 1.7 ± 0.6

IM3 4 . 0

± 0 . 0

2 . 4

± 0 . 5

1.7 ± 0.6 1.3 ±

1.2 0.1 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 1.0

IM7 5 . 9

± 1 . 2

4 . 3

± 1 . 2

5.3 ± 2.9 6.0 ±

2.6 0.1 ± 0.2 4.9 ± 1.5

IM14 5 . 4

4 . 6

7.3 ± 2.5 8.2 ±

2.0 0.1 ± 0.2 4.3 ± 1.9

(3)

± 0 . 7

± 0 . 5

IM21 6 . 1

± 0 . 6

4 . 3

± 0 . 9

8.0 ± 0.0

8.7 ± 1.5

0.4 ± 0.8

4.1 ± 0.2

Post eri o r Cap su le

Control 3 . 3

± 0 . 6

1 . 3

± 0 . 6

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

0.1 ± 0.2

1.0 ± 0.0

IM3 4 . 3

± 0 . 6

2 . 0

± 0 . 0

0.7 ± 0.6 0.0 ±

0.0 0.4 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.2

IM7 5 . 4

± 1 . 4

3 . 1

± 1 . 4

1.3 ± 1.2 0.7 ±

0.2 0.6 ± 0.5 1.6 ± 1.0

IM14 5 . 9

± 1 . 5

3 . 3

± 0 . 6

4.6 ± 1.5 4.9 ±

2.0 1.2 ± 0.7 1.7 ± 1.2

(4)

IM21 8 . 2

± 1 . 0

4 . 9

± 1 . 1

4.3 ± 0.6

8.7 ± 0.6

2.0 ± 0.7

2.7 ± 0.6

Note: mean ± standard deviation

Table S-3: Cartilage Histology Scores

Structure Cellularity Matrix

Staining Tidemark

R adius

Control 0.3 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0 2.8 ± 0.3 0.0 ± 0.0

IM3 1.6 ± 1.0 0.0 ± 0.0 2.4 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0

IM7 1.2 ± 0.4 0.1 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0

IM14 1.1 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 1.7 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0

IM21 2.5 ± 1.3 0.3 ± 0.6 1.8 ± 0.3 0.0 ± 0.0

(5)

A nte ri or H um er us

Control 0.08 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.9 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0

IM3 4.4 ± 4.5 0.0 ± 0.0 2.8 ± 1.7 0.0 ± 0.0

IM7 5.1 ± 3.7 0.4 ± 0.8 3.1 ± 2.5 0.0 ± 0.0

IM14 6.2 ± 3.1 0.0 ± 0.0 2.8 ± 1.3 0.0 ± 0.0

IM21 5.7 ± 3.7 0.3 ± 0.6 4.2 ± 3.3 0.0 ± 0.0

Post eri o r H um er us

Control 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0

IM3 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0

IM7 1.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.3 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0

IM14 0.3 ± 0.3 0.0 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0

IM21 0.2 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0

U lna

Control 1.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 2.3 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0

IM3 1.3 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 2.7 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0

IM7 1.7 ± 0.3 0.2 ± 0.4 2.7 ± 0.3 0.0 ± 0.0

IM14 1.0 ± 0.0 0.4 ± 0.5 2.9 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0

IM21 3.0 ± 1.7 0.9 ± 0.6 4.6 ± 2.1 0.1 ± 0.1

Note: mean ± standard deviation

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Kemudian pada indikator partisipasi dalam evaluasi penerima program juga masuk dalam kategori sedang karena mereka menilai ADEMOS telah memberikan wadah kepada mereka untuk memberikan