1 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
R S T U V W X Y Z
R
Rabi,B., Tabatabaee, S.A., & Attarzadeh, M. (2017). The effect of dynamic versus non-dynamic assessment on the use of resultive conjunctions in cause effect paragraph pattern. Modern Journal of Language Teaching.
Rahbardar, H., Ajilian Abbasi, M., & Talaei, A. (2014). Dynamic Assessment (DA) and
Evaluation of Problem-solving Skills in Children. International Journal of Pediatrics, 2(3.3), 47- 54.
Rahimi, M., Kushki, A., & Nassaji, H. (2015). Diagnostic and developmental potentials of dynamic assessment for L2 writing. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 2(2).
Rahmani, A. (2015). Dynamic assessment: A humanistic approach of learners’ writing
proficiency from a Vygotskian perspective. Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Science Science Journal (CSJ), 36(3), Special Issue, 960-967.
Ram, G., Marinellie, S.A.,Benigno, J., & McCarthy, J. (2012). Morphological Analysis in Context vs Isolation: Use of a Dynamic Task with School Age Children. Lang Speech & Hearing Services in the School, 44, 32-47.
Ram, G., Marinellie, S. A., Benigno, J., & McCarthy, J. (2013). Morphological analysis in context versus isolation: Use of a dynamic assessment task with school-age children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44(1), 32-47.
Ramazanpour, G., Nourdad, N., & Nouri, N. (2016). Gender differences in the effect of dynamic assessment on grammatical accuracy of writings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(1), 90.
Ramey, C.T. & MacPhee, D. (2006). A new paradigm in intellectual assessment?
PsychCRITIQUES.
Rand, Y. & Kaniel, S. (1987). Group administration of the LPAD. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 196-214). New York:
Guilford.
2 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Ranjbar, S., & Rahimy, R. (2020). Validating a CIPP-based Inventory to Evaluate Undergraduate-Level Technical English Translation Courses. Translation Studies Quarterly, 18(70), 66. Retrieved from
https://www.journal.translationstudies.ir/ts/article/view/800
Raykov, T., Baltes, M.,Neher, K., & Sowarka, D. (2002). A comparative study of two psychometric approaches to detect risk status for dementia. Gerontology, 48, 185-193.
Razaghi, M., Bagheri, M.S., & Yamini, M. (2019). The impact of cognitive scaffolding
on Iranian EFL learners’ speaking skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 1308-1470.
Razavi, A. (2015). The effect of dynamic assessment on the acquisition of apology speech act.
CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Razavi, A. & Tabatabaei, O. (2014). The effect of dynamic and nondynamic assessment on acquisition of apology speech act among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies (Special Issue on Applied Sciences), 4(8), 1-20. Available
Razemba, F., L. Jacobs, et al. (2013). Convergent Validity of the Occupational Therapy Adult Perceptual Screening Test with two other cognitive- perceptual tests in South Africa.
Occupational Therapy Africa Regional Group. Harare, Zimbabwe.
Razzaq, L., Feng, M., Nuzzo-Jones, G., Hefferman, K., Koldinger, K., Junker, B., Ritter, S., Knight, A., Mercado, E., Turner, T.E., Upalekar, R., Walonoski, J.A., Macasek, M.A., Aniszczyk, C., Choksey, S., Livak, T., & Rasmussen, K. (2005). Blending assessment and instructional assisting. In C.K. Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredewig, & J.B. Bruker (Eds.)
Proceedings of the 12th Artificial Intelligence In Education [Conference], 555-562. Amsterdam:
ISO Press. http://www.assistment.org/portal/project/papers/AIED2005/
mainAIED.pdf
Rea-Dickins, Pauline; Poehner, Matthew E. Addressing issues of access and fairness in
education through Dynamic Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, Vol 18(2), May 2011, 95-97.
Rea-Dickins, P. & Poehner, M. (2011). Addressing issues of access and fairness in education through Dynamic Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18 (2), 95-99.
Rea-Dickins, P. & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Addressing issues of access and fairness in education through Dynamic Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 95- 97.
Reder, L.M. & Schunn, C.D. (1999).Bringing together the psychometric and strategy worlds:
Predicting adaptivity in a dynamic task. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.). Attention and
performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application.
Attention and performance (pp. 315-342). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rees, R.J. & Storry, C.J. (1996). Static and dynamic assessment practices after head injury.
3 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0 Brain Injury, 10(4), 247-257.
Regalla, M. & Peker H. (2017). Dynamic assessment of special needs and typical students in a prekindergarten inclusive French program: Prompting all students to learn: Examining Dynamic Assessment. Foreign Language Annals (April), DOI: 10.1111/flan.12261
Regalla, M. & Peker, H. (2017). Prompting All Students to Learn: Examining Dynamic Assessment of Special Needs and Typical Students in a Prekindergarten Inclusive French Program: Prompting All Students to Learn. Foreisn Language Annals.
Reka, J., Edit, M., Zsuzsanna, F., & Eniko, B. (2013). Does cognitive-mediational intervention enhance inclusive education? Preliminary results from the work In the Feuerstein Centre in Cluj-Napoca. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, Special Issue, 293.
Relkin, E. & Bers, M.U. (2020). Designing an assessment of computational thinking abilities for young children. In L.E. Cohen & S. Waite-Stupiansky (Eds). STEM in early childhood
education: How science, Technology, Engineering, and mathematics strengthen learning. NY:
Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Rempfer, M., Brown, C., Hamera, E. (2011). Learning potential as a predictor of skill acquisition in people with serious mental illness. Psychiatry Res.,185:293–295.
Rempfer, M., Hamera, E., Brown, C. & Bothwell, R.J.(2006). Learning proficiency on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in people with serious mental illnesses: What are the cognitive characteristics of good learners? Schizophrenia Research, 87, 316-322.
Rempfer, M.V., McDowd, J.M., Brown, C.E. (2012). Assessing learning potential in people with schizophrenia using the Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure Test. Open J Psychiatr. 2:407–413.
Resaee, A.A. Alavi, S.M. & Razzzaghifard, P. (2019) The impact of mobile-based dynamic assessment on improving EFL oral accuracy. Education and Information Technologies, 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09915-1.
Reschly, D.J. & Robinson-Zañartu, C. (2000). Aptitude tests in educational classification and placement. In G. Goldstein & M. Hersen. Handbook of psychological assessment (3rd edition) (pp. 183-201). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Resing, W.C.M., Bakker, M., Elliott, J.G. & Vogelaar, B. (2019). Dynamic testing: Can a robot as tutor be of help in assessing children’s potential for learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12358
Resing, W. C., Touw, K. W., Veerbeek, J., & Elliott, J. G. (2017). Progress in the inductive strategy-use of children from different ethnic backgrounds: a study employing dynamic testing.
Educational Psychology, 37(2), 173-191.
Resing, W.C.M. (1990). Intelligentie en leerpotentieel. Een onderzoek naar het leerpotentieel van jonge leerlingen uit het basis-en speciaal onderwijs. [Intelligence and learning potential. A study on the learning potential of young children from primary schools and special education].
4 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Academisch proefschrift. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger (pp. 1-239).
Resing, W.C.M. (1991). Leerpotentieel en de predictie van school prestaties. [Learning potential and the prediction of school success.] In B.H.A.M. van Hout-Woleters & L.F.W. de Klerk (Eds.).
Onderwijsleerprocessen. Cognitie en motivatie. Amsterdam: SCO (pp. 163-172).
Resing, W.C.M. (1993a). Measuring inductive reasoning skills: The construction of a learning potential test. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment. Theoretical, methodological and practical issues. Amsterdam/Berwyn P.A.: Swets &
Zeitlinger Inc. (p. 219-241).
Resing, W.C.M (1993b). Leerpotentieelonderzoek: een bijdrage aan de diagnostiek van jonge kinderen met leesproblemen. [Research on learning potential: A contribution to the diagnostic process for young children with reading problems]. In E.J.M. van Aarle & K. Henneman.
Dyslexie '92. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger (pp. 39-51).
Resing, W.C.M. (1993c). Leerpotentieel en intelligentie: twee zijden van een medaille? [Learning potential and intelligence: Two sides of the same coin?] In E.H. Rodigas & C.E.H.E. Veraart (Eds.). Zorgbreedte. Heerlen: OBC/CRO/PABO (pp. 30-38).
Resing, W.C.M. (1995a). Niet wat je weet, maar wat je kunt leren. [Not what you know, but what you can learn]. Psychologie, 14, juli/auagustus, 37-39.
Resing, W.C.M. (1995b). Leerpotentieelonderzoek in het special onderwijs: een aanvulling op het onderzoek met de RAKIT. {Learning potential research in special education: New data with the RAKIT]. In Nieuwe ontwikkelingen in de psychodiagnostiek (pp. 81-103). Jubileumuitgave van de Vereniging voor Psychodiagnostisch Werkenden, Oktober, 1995. Rijswijk: RS Drukkerij.
Resing, W.C.M. (1996). Untersuchung zur Lernfahigkeit bei Kindern: Die Auswirkungen eines metakognitiven induktiven Denktrainings. [Research on learning potential in children: The effect of metacognitive training in inductive thinking]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Padagogische Psychologie, 28 Heft 1, 33-53.
Resing, W.C.M. (1997a). Learning potential assessment: the alternative for measuring intelligence? Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 68 – 82.
Resing, W.C.M. (1997b). Intelligentie, leren en leerpotentieel. Meer van hetzelfde? [Intelligence, learning and learning potential. Are they all the same?] In W. Tomic & H.van der Molen (Eds.).
Intelligentie en sociale competentie. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger (pp. 301-323).
Resing, W.C.M. (1997c). Leerpotentieel onderzoek: wat is de meerwaarde? [Assessing learning potential: Does it have a surplus value?] In T. Engelen-Snaterse & R. Kohnstamm (Eds.).
Kinder- en Jeugdpsychologie. Trends. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger (pp. 283-303).
Resing, W.C.M. (1998). Intelligence and learning potential: Theoretical and research issues. In J. Kingma & W. Tomic (Eds.), Conceptual issues in research on intelligence. Vol.5 of Advances in cognition and educational practice (series editor: J.S. Carlson). Stamford, Connecticut: JAI Press. (227 - 259).
5 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Resing, W.C.M. (2000). Assessing the learning potential for inductive reasoning in young children. In C.S. Lidz & J. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and
applications, Vol. 6 (pp. 229-262). Advances in cognition and educational practice (series editor:
J.S. Carlson). Oxford: Elsevier Inc.
Resing, W.C.M. (2001). Beyond Binet: All testing should be dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7, 221-231.
Resing, W.C.M. (2006). Using children's 'ability to learn' in diagnosis and assessment.
Educational & Child Psychology, 23(3), 6-11.
Resing, W.C.M. (2013). Dynamic testing and individualized instruction: Helpful in cognitive education. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(1), 81-95.
Resing, W.C.M. (Ed.). (2015). Handboek intelligentiemeting en testgebruik. Amsterdam, Pearson.
Resing, W.C.M. (2015). Intelligentiemeting: theorie en psychologische modelvorming. In W.C.M. Resing (Ed.), Handboek intelligentietheorie en testgebruik (pp.19-40). Amsterdam, Pearson
Resing, W.C.M. (2015). Praktische aspecten van intelligentiemeting: afname, scoring en
interpretatie. In W.C.M. Resing (Ed.), Handboek intelligentietheorie en testgebruik (pp.41-62).
Amsterdam, Pearson.
Resing, W.C.M. (2015). Tot slot. In W.C.M. Resing (Ed.), Handboek intelligentietheorie en testgebruik (pp.397-401). Amsterdam, Pearson.
Resing, W.C.M., Bakker, M., Pronk, C.M.E. & Elliott, J.G. (2016). Dynamic testing and transfer:
An examination of children’s problem-solving strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 110-119.
Resing, W.C.M., Bakker, M., Pronk, C.M.E., & Elliott, J.G. (2017). Progression paths in children’s problem solving: The influence of dynamic testing, initial variability, and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 153. DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.09.004 Resing, W.C.M., deJong, F.M., Bosma, T., & Tunteler, E. (2009). Learning during dynamic testing: Variability in strategy use by indigenous and ethnic minority children. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8(1), 22-37.
Resing, W. C. M. and Elliott, J. G. (2011), Dynamic testing with tangible electronics: Measuring children's change in strategy use with a series completion task. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 81(4). 579-605. doi: 10.1348/2044-8279.002006
Resing, W.C.M., Elliott, J.G., & Grigorenko, E.L. (in press). Dynamic testing & assessment. In:
S. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, Springer Verlag.
Resing, W.C.M., & Bleichrodt, N. (2015). WNV: Non-verbale intelligentiemeting voor een brede
6 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
leeftijdsrange. In W.C.M. Resing (Ed.), Handboek intelligentietheorie en testgebruik (pp.225- 247). Amsterdam, Pearson
Resing, W.C.M., & Bleichrodt, N. (2015). RAKIT-2: Intelligentiemeting bij kinderen in de basisschoolleeftijd. In W.C.M. Resing (Ed.), Handboek intelligentietheorie en testgebruik (pp.141-167). Amsterdam, Pearson.
Resing, W.C.M. & Drenth, P.J.D. (2007). Intelligentie: Weten en meten [Intelligence: Knowing and measuring]. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds.
Resing, W.C.M. & Hessels, M.G.P. (2001). Het meten van de cognitieve mogelijkheden en het schoolgedrag van allochtone leerlingen. [Measuring the cognitive potential and the school behavior of ethnic minority children]. In N. Bleichrodt & F. Van de Vijver (Eds.). Diagnostiek voor allochtonen. Mogelikheden en beperkingen van psychologische tests. Lisse: Swets &
Zeitlinger (pp. 89-118).
Resing, W.C.M., & Hessels, M.G.P. (2000, in press). The assessment of cognitive abilities of minority children [Het testen van cognitieve vaardigheden bij allochtone kinderen]. In N.
Bleichrodt & F.J.R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Het gebruik van psychologische tests bij allochtonen:
problemen en remedies. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. Haarlem: De Vrieseborch
Resing, W., Lauchlan. F. & Elliott, J. (2017). Guest Editorial: Bridging the gap between psychological assessment and educational instruction . Educational & Child Psychology, 24(1).
Resing, W.C.M. & Roth-Van der Werf, G.J.M. (2001). Inductive reasoning: The relationship between learning potential assessment and cognitive training. In F. Oser & U. Baetz (Eds.).
Bridging the gap between learning and instruction. Abstracts of the 9th European Conferene on Learning and Instruction, Pp. 259-260. Aachen, Mainz.
Resing, W.C.M., & Roth-Van der Werf, G.J.M. (2002). Learning potential assessment and cognitive training in inductive reasoning: emergent relationship? In: G.M. Van der Aalsvoort, W.C.M. Resing & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice Volume 7. Learning Potential Assessment and Cognitive Training (p.175-208). New York:
Elsevier Science Ltd.
Resing, W.C.M., & Roth-Van der Werf, G.J.M. (2003/ in press). The emperor’s new clothes:
Testing the theory behind a cognitive training program. Educational and Child Psychology.
Resing, W.C.M., Ruijssenaars, A.J.J.M., & Bosma, T. (2002). Dynamic assessment: using measures for learning potential in the diagnostic process. In: G.M. Van der Aalsvoort, W.C.M.
Resing & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice Volume 7. Learning Potential Assessment and Cognitive Training (p.29-64. New York: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Resing, W.C.M., Stevenson, C.E., and Bosma, T. (2012). Dynamic testing: Measuring inductive reasoning in children with developmental disabilities and mild cognitive impairments. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11(2), 159-178.
7 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Resing, W.C.M., Touw, K.W.J., Veerbeek, J., & Elliott, J.G. (2016) Progress in the inductive strategy-use of children from different ethnic backgrounds: A study employing dynamic testing.
Educational Psychology (April). DOI:10.1080/01443410.2016.1164300
Resing, W. C.M., Tunteler, E., & Elliott, J.G. (2015). The effect of dynamic testing with electronic prompts and scaffolds on Children’s Inductive Reasoning: A microgenetic study. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 14(2).
Resing, W.C.M., Tunteler, E., Roig, I., Elliott, J.G., Van Herk, R., & Verhaegh, J. (in prep).
Dynamically testing inductive reasoning abilities. The use of a tangible table in a learning-while- testing situation.
Resing, W.C.M., Verhaegh, J., Hart de Ruiter, E., Tunteler, E., Fontijn, W., & Elliott, J.G. (in prep.). Dynamic testing while learning: The use of tangible tables and scaffolding techniques in education.
Resing, W.C.M. & Wijk, A.M. van (1996). Leerpotentieel: onderzoek bij allochtone leerlingen uit het basisonderwijs. [Learning potential: Research with ethnic minority children from
mainstream education]. Tijdschrift voor Orthopedagogiek, 35, 432-444.
Rey, A. (1934). D'un procédé pour évaluer l'éducabilité: Quelques applications en psychopathologie (On a procedure for evaluating educability: Some applications in psychopathology). Archives de Psychologie, 24(96), 298-337.
Rey, A. (1991). L'évaluation de l'éducabilité cognitive (le test des plateaux). Issy-les-Moulineaux:
Editions Scientifiques et Psychotechniques.
Rezaee, A.A. & Ghanbarpour, M. (2016). The measurement paradigm and role of mediators in dynamic assessment: A qualitative meta-synthesis. International Journal of Language Studies . 10 (4), 77-108.
Richards, T., Berninger, V., Nagy, W., Parsons, A., Field, K., & Richards, A. (2005). Brain activation during language task contrasts in children with and without dyslexia: Inferring mapping processes and assessing response to spelling instruction. Education and Child Psychology, 22(2), 62-80.
Riley, K., Miller, G.E. & Sorenson, C. (2016). Early childhood authentic and performance-based assessment. In A. Garro (Ed.). Early childhood assessment in school and clinical child
psychology (pp. 95-117). New York: Springer. 95-117.
Rittner, L. L. ( 2010). The children's Inferential Thinking Modifiability Test as a tool for the identification of second grade gifted Hispanic learners. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 3758.
Rittner, L. L. & Pulos, S.M. (2014). Rasch model of a dynamic assessment: An investigation of the Children’s Inferential Thinking Modifiability Test. Journal of Applied Measurement, 15(1), 40-52.
8 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Robaye, F. & Robaye, E. (1956). Détermination de la zone discriminative dans un test a item de difficulté croissante. Bulletin de Centre d'études de Recherches Psychotechinques, 2.
Robinson, C.A. (1987a). The Learning Potential Assessment Device (LPAD): Its role in the non- biased assessment of cognitive functioning. (Alternative Assessment Committee Report CASP).
CASP Today, XXXVII, 3, 10-16.
Robinson, C.A. (1987b). A rebuttal to Frisby. The LPAD back in perspective. CASP Today, XXXVII(2), 3-5.
Robinson, C.A. (1987c). The Learning Potential Assessment Device: A non-biased assessment of cognitive functioning. An occasional paper. San Diego, CA: Policy Studies in Languages and Cross Cultural Education.
Robinson, C.A. & Cook, V.J. (1990). Alternative assessment ecosystems and dynamic. NASP Communiqué, 18(5).
Robinson-Zañartu, C. (1996). Serving Native American children and families: Considering cultural variables. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 27(4), 373-384.
Robinson-Zañartu, C. (2011). Dynamic assessment: An intervention-based approach. In S.
Jackson, G. Brown, & R. Laro-Alecio (Eds.). Handbook of educational theories (pp. 787-793).
Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Robinson-Zañartu, C.A. & Aganza, J.S. (2000). Dynamic assessment and sociocultural context:
Assessing the while child. In C.S. Lidz and J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 443-487. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier.
Robinson-Zañartu, C. & Campbell, L. (2000). Developing scientific minds: The use of mediated thinking and learning to facilitate enhanced student outcomes. The California School
Psychologist, 5, 33-42.
Robinson-Zañartu, C. & Carlson, J. (2012). Dynamic assessment. In K.F. Geisinger, (Ed.).
Handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (pp. 149-167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Robinson-Zañartu, C, & Carlson, J. (2013). Dynamic assessment. In K.F. Geisinger, B.A.
Bracken, J.F. Carlson, J-I. C., Hansen, N.R. Kuncel, S.P. Reise, & M.C. Rodriguez,(Eds), (2013).
APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 3: Testing and assessment in school psychology and education. APA handbooks in psychology pp. 149-167). Washington, DC.:
American Psychological Association.
Robinson-Zañartu, C., Mendoza, N., Mesa, D.R. & Wager, J.D. (2017). Response to mediated intervention: Dynamic assessment in context. Educational and Child Psychology, 34(1), 39-54.
9 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Robinson-Zañartu, C. & Reschly, D. (1997). Evaluacion de las aptitudes (Evaluation of aptitudes) in G. Buela-Casal (Ed.). Manual de evaluacion psicologica (Handbook of psychological evaluation). Madrid , España: Siglo XXI de Expaña.
Rodger, S., Daley, E., Hughes, K.& Ziviani, J. (2005). Dynamic Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment for Children: Perceived utility in Australian occupational therapy practice.
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52(4), 337-349.
Robles, M.A. Y Calero, M.D. La Evaluación del potencial de aprendizaje para la lectura en niños con síndrome Down. Siglo Cero, 2003, 34 (2)15-25.
Robles-Bello, M.A. (2017). Validez concurrente de La Escala EHPAP adaptada a poblacion preescolar Española de inteligencia media y con necesidades educativas de apoyo especifico.
International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology INFAD Revista de Psicología, No2 - Monográfico 1, 289-300.
Robles-Bello, M. A. & Calero Garcia, M.D. (2013). Using learning potential to evaluate children with specific language impairment. The Spanish journal of psychology, 16(68), 1-11.
Robles-Bello, M.A., Sanchez-Teruel, D., & Naranjo, N.V. (2015). Evaluación del potencial de aprendizaje en niños con trastorno específico del lenguaje . Revista de Psicologia Clinica con Niños y Adolescentes, 2(1), 19-24.
Robles-Bello, M.A., Valencia-Naranjo, N., Barba-Colmenero, F., Sanchez-Teruel, D. (2017).
Evaluacion del perfil cognitive y de conducta en niños de un Centro de Atencion y Desarrollo Infantil Temprano. Revista. Argentina de Clinica Psicologica, 26, 313-323.
Robles-Bello, M.A., Valencia-Naranjo, N., & Sanchez-Teruel, D. (2018). Learning potential is useful in pre-schoolers with Fragile X and Down Syndrome. Psicologia Educativa, 24 (2), 51- 57.
Rodger, S., Daley, E., Hughes, K.& Ziviani, J. (2005). Dynamic Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment for Children: Perceived utility in Australian occupational therapy practice.
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52(4), 337-349.
Rodriguez-Arocho, W.C.(1989). La zona de desarrollo proximo y su importancia en la evaluacion de destrezas de pensamiento [The zone of proximal development and its importance in the evaluation of thinking skills]. In A. Villarini & A. Rios (Eds.), Ponencias del Primer Encuentro sobre la Investigacion y la Enseoanza Orientada al Desarrollo de Destrezas de Pensamiento (pp.
309-314). Universidad de Puerto Rico: Centro para el Fortalecimiento de la Docencia.
Roohani, A., & Rad, H.S. (2019). Effectiveness of hybrid dynamic assessment in L2 learners’
descriptive writing development. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 8(2), 67-79.
Rosario, A.C., Candeias, A.A. & Cruz. V. (2011). Dynamic assessment & intervention of learning difficulties based on the PASS Reading Enhancement Programme. In J. Lebeer, A. Candeias, &
L. Gracio (Eds.). With a different glance: Dynamic assessment of functioning of children
10 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
oriented at development and inclusive learning (pp.219- 226). Antwerp, Belgium: Garant- Uitgevers.
Roth, W.-M. (1992). Dynamic and authentic assessment: An approach for assessing cognitive change and learning in authentic settings. Science Scope, 15(6), 37-40.
Rothman, H.R.& Semmel, M.I. (1990). Dynamic assessment: A comprehensive review of literature. In R. Gaylord-Ross (Ed.). Issues and research in special education, Volume 1.
Teachers College Press Special Education Series (pp. 355-386). New York: Teachers College Press.
Roth-van der Werf, G.J.M., Resing, W.C.M., & Slenders, A.P.A.C. (2002). Task similarity and transfer of an inductive reasoning training. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 296-325.
Roybal-Benson, C.W. (2007). Becoming phonemically aware: A study on the role of assistance in language learning. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social
Sciences, 68 (3-A), 933.
Ruijssenaars, A.J.J.M., Castelijns, J.H.M., & Hamers, J.H.M. (1993). The validity of learning potential tests. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, et al. (Eds.). Learning potential assessment:
Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 69-82). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Rumley, L. (2007). Etude de la validité prédictive d'un test d'apprentissage: Le HART [Study of the predictive validity of a learning test: The HART]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Geneva.
Rutland, A. & Campbell, R. (1995). The validity of dynamic assessment methods for children with learning difficulties and nondisabled children. Journal of Cognitive Education, 5(1), 81-94.
Rutland, A.F. & Campbell, R.N. (1996). Relevance of Vygotsky's teory of the 'zone of proximal development' to the assessment of children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 40(2), 151-158.
Ryba, K. (1998). Dynamic assessment and programme planning for students with intellectual disabilities. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 27(2), 3-10.
Ryder, M.G. (1994). An analysis of the effects of motivational components on performance during a dynamic assessment procedure. Dissertation Abstracts International, 55-08, section A,2356.
S
BACK TO TOP11 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Safa, M.A. & Beheshti, S. (2018). Interactionist and interventionist group dynamic assessment (GDA) and EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(3), 37-56.
Sahbi, B.B. (2017). Validation of a Dynamic Reading Comprehension Test for EAP Learners in an EFL In Hidri & Coombe (Eds). Evaluation in Foreign Language Education in the Middle East and North Africa, Chapter 19, Springer International Publishing, pp. 315-337. DOI:
10.1007/978-3-319-43234-2_19
Saber, K. M. (2015) Dynamic assessment: From theory to practice. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Sadeghi, K. & Khanahmadi, F. (2011). Dynamic assessment of EFL grammar: The role of
mediated learning experience in L2 learning. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(2), 931.
Sadeghi, K. & Khonbi, Z. A. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(2), 129-133.
Sadek, N. (2011). Dynamic assessment and second language writing: Toward a hybrid dynamic assessment model in assessing English Language Learners (ELL). LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Sadighi, F., Jamasbi, F., & Ramezani, S. (2018). The impact of using dynamic assessment on Iranian’s writing literacy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(9).
Saedi, M., Ahangari, S., & Asl, N.S. (2020). The effect of group-type and mediation-type in Group-dynamic assessment on the improvement of Iranian EFL learners’ listening
comprehension. Journal of Language Horizons.
Saenz, T. I. & Huer, M.B. (2003). Testing strategies involving leasst biased language assessmentn of bilingual children. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 24(4), 184-193.
Safa, M. A., & Jafari, F. (2017). The Washback Effect of Dynamic Assessment on Grammar Learning of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 55-68.
Sahragard, R. & Heidari,K.(2014).How much mediation in dynamic assessment for gifted students? Up to critical thinking please! Gifted Education International.
Sainsbury, E.J. & Walker, R.A. (2008). Assessment as a vehicle for learning: Extending collaboration into testing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 103-117.
Sahragard, R. & Heidari, K. ( 2017). How much mediation in dynamic assessment for gifted students? Up to critical thinking please! Gifted Education International.
Saldaña, D. (2004). Dynamic Master Mind: Interactive use of a game for testing metacognition.
School Psychology International, 25(4), 422-438.
12 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Salihu L., Aro, M., & Räsänen. P. (2017). Dynamic potential of feedback in self-regulated learning and motivation of children with mathematical learning difficulties. Hrvatska reija za rehabilitacjska istrazivanja, 53 (2), 111-129.
Samuels, M.T. (2000). Assessment of post-secondary students with learning difficulties: Using dynamic assessment in a problem-solving process. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 521-542). Amsterdam:JAI/Elsevier Science.
Samuels, M. (2005). Guest editorial: Assessment of postsecondary students: Why we should be using dynamic assessment. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology [online], 5, 1, 17-24.
www.iacep.coged.org
Samuels, M., Lamb, C., & Oberholtzer, L. (1992). Dynamic assessment of adults with learning difficulties. In H.C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 275-299. New York: Springer-Verlag.
San Miguel, C.L. (1977). Learning potential approaches to the mentally retarded. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38 (1-B), 378-379.
Sanaeifar, S.H. & Divcolaii, M.S. (2019). Actualizing language learners’ potentials through mediation: Cumulative vs concurrent group dynamic assessment and students’ self- management of learning tasks. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(7). 802-809.
Saniei, A., Birjandi, P., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2015). On the Practicality of Group Dynamic Assessment: A Seminal Enterprise Deserving Closer Scrutiny. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(2), 39-46.
Sarani, A. & Izadi, M. (2016). Diagnosing L2 receptive vocabulary development: A microgenetic study. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 35(2), 161-189.
Sarnio, P. (1994). A comparative study of dynamic and static testing in abstinent alcoholics.
Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(2), 272-280.
Sato, M. (2017). Oral peer corrective feedback. Corrective Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning: Research, Theory, Applications, Implications, 66.
Savron, B.L. (1989). Modifying similarity thinking: Implications for the generalization of knowledge. International Journal of Dynamic Assessment & Instruction, 1(1), 27-47.
Sawaki, Y. (2017). The effects of different levels of performance feedback on TOEFL iBT®
reading practice test performance. DOI 10.1002/ets2.12159, Educational Testing Service, TOEFL Committee of Examiners ETS Research Report Series.
Schack, T. & Guthke, J. (2003). Dynamic testing. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 40-60.
Schardt, A., Whitten, C., & Gamlin, P.J. (1996). A walk in our moccasins: Applying dynamic
13 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
approaches in a remote Native community. In M.G. Luther, E.Cole, et al. (Eds.). Dynamic assessment for instruction: From theory to application (pp. 316-325).
Schevel, E-M (2008). Adaption der "Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS) fur den deutschen Sprachraum [Adaptation of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale {ACFS} for German speakers]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitat Osnabruch, Germany.
Schottke, H., Bartram, M., & Wiedl, K.H. (1993). Psychometric implications of learning potential assessment: A typological approach. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma & A.J.J.M. Ruissenaars (Eds.). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues (pp.
153-173). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Scissons, M.B.A. (1989). Dynamic assessment of learning potential of Indian adolescents in algebra. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Saskatchewan (Canada).
Schlatter, C. (1994). Enseignement de la pensée inductive: une étude sur la variation des effets d'apprentissage selon le niveau d'explicité des aides. Mémoire de licence déposé à l'Université de Genève, FPSE, Section des Sciences de l'Education.
Schlatter, C. (1999). Le Test d'Apprentissage de la Pensée Analogique. Fondation théorique et empirique d'un outil d'évaluation pour personnes présentant un retard mental modéré. Thèse de doctorat soutenue à l'Université de Genève, Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de
l'Education.
Schlatter, C. (en préparation). Efficacité de différents niveaux d’aides pour l’entraînement au raisonnement inductif. In F.P. Büchel (Ed.), Pensée inductive et handicap mental. Lucerne:
SZH.
Schlatter, C. & Buechel, F.P. (2000). Detecting reasoning abilities of persons with moderate mental retardation: The Analogical Reasoning Learning Test (ARLT). In C.S.Lidz J.G.Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 155-186).
Amsterdam:Elsevier Science.
Schlatter, C., Büchel, F.P., & Thomas, L. (1997). Test d'apprentissage de la pensée analogique pour adolescents handicapés mentaux modérés. Revue Francophone de la Déficience
Intellectuelle, 8(1), 37-54.
Schloss, P.J., Smith, M.A., Hoover, T., & Wolford, J. (1987). Dynamic criterion-referenced vocational assessment: An alternative strategy for handicapped youth. Diagnostique, 12(2), 74- 86.
Schneider, E. & Ganschow, L. (2000). Dynamic assessment and instructional strategies for learners who struggle to learn a foreign language. Dyslexia, 6 (1), 72-82.
Schottke, H., Bartram, M. & Wiedl, K.H. (1993). Psychometric implications of dynamic assessment: A typological approach. In J. Hamers, A. Ruijssenaars, & K. Sijtsma (Eds.).
Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues (pp. 153-174).
Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
14 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Sclan, S.G. (1987). Dynamic assessment and thought disorder in paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenic patients. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(7-B), 3126.
Seabi, J. (2012). Feuerstein’s mediated learning experience as a vehicle for enhancing cognitive functioning of remedial school learners in South Africa. Australian Journal of Educational &
Developmental Psychology, 12, 35-45.
Seethaler, P. M. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. & Compton, D. L. (2012). Predicting first graders'
development of calculation versus word-problem performance: The role of dynamic assessment.
Journal of Educational Psychology,104(1), 224-234.
Seethaler, P.M., Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. (2015). Does the value of dynamic assessment in predicting end-of-first grade mathematics performance differ as a function of English language proficiency? Elementary School Journal, 15(4), 289-308.
Seiverd, K.D. (1994). Dynamic assessment vs. traditional intelligence assessment in low- achieving minority and nonminority children. Dissertation Abstracts International Section B:
The Sciences & Engineering, 54(7-B), 3865.
Selcuk Acar, Sedat Sen, and Nur Cayirdag. Consistency of the Performance and
Nonperformance Methods in Gifted Identification: A Multilevel Meta-Analytic Review. Gifted Child Quarterly 0016986216634438, first published on February 26, 2016
doi:10.1177/0016986216634438
Sentz, J., Stefaniak, J., Baaki, J. & Eckhoff, A. (2019). How do instructional designers manage learners’ cognitive load? An examination of awareness and application of strategies.
Educational Technology Research and Development, 1-47.
Seok-Hoon, A.S. (2001). Parental involvement in child assessment: A dynamic approach. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education International Conference (Fremantle,Western Australia; December 2-6). ED463876
Seok-Hoon Seng, A., Kwee-Hoon Pou, L., & Tan, O-S (Eds.) (2003). Mediated learning experience with children: Applications across contexts. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) [[email protected]]
Serena, V.M. & Stefano, T. (no date). The concept of the zo-ped in the perspective of a concrete application: The evaluation of the obtained results. online:
http://psych.hanover.edu/vygotsky/veggetti.html
Sergi, M.J. Kern, R.S., Mintz, J. & Green, M.F. (2005). Learning potential and the prediction of work skill acquisition in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31, 67-72.
Sewell, T.E. (1987). Dynamic assessment as a nondiscriminatory procedure. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.).
Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 426-443).
New York: Guilford.
15 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Seyed Erfani, Sh. & Agha Ebrahimiyan, A. (2013). Web 2.0 incorporated dynamic assessment to assess writing ability of Iranian EFL learners. Global Journal of Human Social Science, 13(14), 49-55.
Shabani, K. (2014). Dynamic Assessment of L2 Listening Comprehension in Transcendence Tasks. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1729-1737.
Shabani, K. & Malekdar, S. (2016) The effect of peer scaffolding on Iranian EFL learners’
listening comprehension. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 49-65.
Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development:
Instructional Implications and Teachers' Professional Development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237-248.
Shafiee, S., Talakoob, F. & Fatahi, M. (2018). Effects of dynamic assessment on the acquisition of the rhythm of English: The case of EFL learners’ attitudes. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(5), 181-191.
Shafipoor, M. & Latif, F. (2020). A mixed method study of interventionist DA: A case of
introvert vs. extrovert EFL learners’ academic essay writing. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 13(26), 118 -139.
Shakki, F, Derakhshan, A. & Ziabari, R.S. (2016). The interplay between language skills and dynamic assessment. DOI: 10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9221
Shakki, F., Derakhshan, A., & Ziabari, R.S. (2016). The interplay between language skills and dynamic assessment. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 141-157.
Shaller, G. (2006). Teaching and tracking emergent literacy instruction in Head Start.
Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 67 (2-B), 1168.
Shamir, A. & Lazerovitz, T. (2007). Peer mediation intervention for scaffolding self-regulated learning among children with learning disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(3), 255-273.
Shamir, A., & Tzuriel, D. (in press). Children’s meditational teaching style as a function of intervention for cross-age peer-mediation. School Psychology
International.
Sharafi, M. & Sardareh, S. A. (2016). The effect of dynamic assessment on elementary EFL students’ L2 grammar learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(3), 102-120.
Shaughnessy, M.F. (2004). An interview with Joe Elliott and Carol Lidz. North American Journal of Psychology, 6(2), 349-360.
16 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29 (7), 4-14.
Shohamy, E. (2017). Critical language testing. Language Testing and Assessment, 1-15.
Shokoufeh Vakili & Saman Ebadi | Maria Popescu (Reviewing editor) (2019) Investigating contextual effects on Iranian EFL learners’ mediation and reciprocity in academic
writing, Cogent Education, 6:1, 1-26, DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2019.1571289
Shrestha, P. (in progress). Dynamic assessment of academic writing among learners in open and distance education. Department of Languages Faculty of Education and Language Studies, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, United Kingdom.
Shrestha, P. (2011). Dynamic assessment of academic writing for business studies. EdD Doctoral thesis, The Open University, Milton Keynes.
Shrestha, P. & Azim, F. (2014). International trends in English language assessment:
Implications for Bangladesh. In: English Language Skills Assessment in the Primary and Secondary Education Sectors in Bangladesh Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shrestha, P. & Coffin, C. (2012). Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 55–70.
Shrestha, P.N. (2017). Investigating the learning transfer of genre features and conceptual knowledge from an academic literacy course to business studies: Exploring the potential of dynamic assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 25, 1-17.
Shrestha, Prithvi (2011). Dynamic assessment of academic writing for business studies.
Unpublished EdD thesis, The Open University, Milton Keynes.
Shrestha, Prithvi and Coffin, Caroline (2012). Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development. Assessing Writing, 17(1), pp. 55–70.
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.11.003
Shu-Hsien, H., Ting-Ting, W., Hui-Chub, C. & Gwo-Jen, H. (2008). A decision tree approach to conducting dynamic assessment in a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Fifth IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technology in Education, (wmute 2008), pp. 89-94.
Shurin, R. (1999). Concurrent and discriminant validity of a dynamic assessment procedure with special needs and typical preschool children. Master's thesis: Touro College, New York, NY.
ED435681
Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2017). Review of computer‐based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(1), 1-19.
Siekmann, S. & Charles, W. (2011). Upingakuneng (when they are ready): Dynamic Assessment in a third semester Yugtun class. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18 (2), 151-168.
17 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Sijtsma, K. (1993a). Psychometric issues in learning potential assessment. In J.H.M. Hamers, K.
Sijtsma, et al. (Eds.). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 175-193). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Sijtsma, K. (1993b). Classical and modern test theory with an eye toward learning potental testing. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma et al. (Eds.). Learning potental assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 117-133). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Silverman, H. (1985). Dynamic cognitive assessment:An alternative to intelligence testing.
Canadian Journal of Special Education, 1(1), 63-72.
Singer, V.L.R. (2014). A dynamic assessment of single word learning in two year old late talkers.
Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Canterbury, Department of Communication Disorders, Science Times and Dissertations. http://hdl.handle.net/10092/9924
Sittner Bridges, M., Catts, H.W. The use of a dynamic screening of phonological awareness to predict risk for reading disabilities in kindergarten children. J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul- Aug;44(4): 330-8.
Siwathaworn, P., & Wudthayagorn, J. (2018). The impact of dynamic assessment on tertiary EFL students’ speaking skills. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 142-155.
Skuy, M., Apter, A., Dembo, Y., Kaniel, S. & Tzuriel, D. (1992). Cognitive modifiability of adolescents with schizophrenia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 583-589.
Skuy, M., Kaniel, S. & Tzuriel, D. (1988). Dynamic assessment of intellectually superior Israeli children in a low socio-economic status community. Gifted Education International, 5, 90-96.
Skuy, M. & Shmukler, D. (1987). Effectiveness of the Learning Potential Assessment Device for Indian and "colored" South Africans. International Journal of Special Education, 2, 131-149.
Slenders, A.P.A.C. & Resing, W.C.M. (1994). Het leerpotentieel van allochtone moelijk lerende en basisschoolleerlingen. [The learning potential of ethnic minority children in primary education and in schools for children with severe learning difficulties]. In G. Kanselaar (Ed.).
Onderwijsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen. Utrecht: Universiteit van Utrecht (pp. 64-66).
Slenders, A.P.A.C. & Resing, W.C.M. (1997). Leerpotentieelonderzoek bij allochtone leerlingen:
een eerst verkenning met de Leerpotentieeltest voor Inductief Redeneren. [Research on learning potential with children of ethnic minority groups: The Learning Potential Test for Inductive Reasoning]. Pedagogische Studien, 74, 183-196.
Sloan, K.A. (1990). Task-relevant and task-irrelevant approaches to the assessment of learning potential. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(4-A), 1172.
Smid, W., van Beek, D. & Wever, E. (2012). Plegers van seksuele delicten: Etiologie, assessment en interventies. / The etiology, assessment and treatment of sex offenders. Gedragstherapie, 45(2), 227-255.
18 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Smit, M. (2010). Educational psychologists’ views on the relevance of dynamic Assessment for their practice. Unpublished Masters of Educational Psychology Degree, Stellenbosch University.
(downloadable from the internet).
Smith, S.A. (2018). Dynamic assessment for ESL. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, NY: Wiley . https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0945 Snell, M.E. (2002). Early Reading First: Scaffolding early literacy. A Manual for The Dynamic Assessment of Nonsymbolic Communication Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
Snell, M.E. (2002). Using dynamic assessment with learners who communicate nonsymbolically. AAC: Augmentive & Alternative Communication, 18(3), 163-176.
Snell, M.E., & Loncke, F. (2002). A manual for the dynamic assessment of nonsymbolic communication. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia.
Snider, L.A. (2020). The CASC framework: An assessment model for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, ProQuest Number: 28086818
Snow, R.E. (1990). Progress and propaganda in learning assessment. Contemporary Psychology, 35, 1134-1136.
Soliman, A., Moghazy, M. & Elsayed, K. (2009). Metacognitive strategy training improves driving situation awareness. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37 (9),1161-1170.
Solovieva, Yu. & Quintanar, L. (2004). The usage of the zone pf proximal development during diagnosis of the development of intellectual activity. In S. Castañeda (Ed.), Education, learning and cognitition. Theory in the practice. (pp. 75–92). Mexico: Manual Moderno.
Solovieva, Y. & Quintanar, L. (2016). The zone of proximal development during assessment of intellectual development in pre-school children. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(4).
Son, G., & Kim, S. (2017). The Potentials of Dynamic Assessment for the Development of English Speaking Performance. 영어교과교육, 16, 47-82.
Sønnesyn, G. (2011). Dynamic assessment of learning within curricular subjects; mathematical knowledge. In J. Lebeer, A. Candeias, & L. Gracio (Eds.). With a different glance: Dynamic assessment of functioning of children oriented at development and inclusive learning (pp.206- 218). Antwerp, Belgium: Garant-Uitgevers.
Spector, J.E. (1992). Predicting progress in beginning reading: Dynamic assessment of phonemic awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 353-363.
Spector, J. M. (2016). The potential of smart technologies for learning and instruction.
19 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
International Journal of Smart Technology and Learning, 1(1), 21-32.
Speece, D.L. & Cooper, D.H. (1990). Ontogeny of school failure: Classification of first-grade children American Educational Research Journal, 27, 119-140.
Speece, D.L., Cooper, D.H., & Kibler, J.M. Dynamaic assessment, individual differences, and academic achievement. Learning & Individual Differences, 2(1), 113-127.
Spero, J. M. (2013). Comparison between a dynamic assessment procedure and the WMLS-R in distinguishing language abilities among Hispanic children in first grade. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 73(12-A(E)), No Pagination Specified.
Stacey, G. (2017). A professional decision you have to make: a sociocultural exploration of practice and impact within educational psychologists’ use of dynamic assessment.
Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Birmingham, College of Social Sciences, ID code 7412.
Stad FE, Vogelaar B, Veerbeek J, Resing W.C.M. (2017) Young Children’s Transfer of Series Completion in a Dynamic Test Setting: Does Cognitive Flexibility Play a Role?. Int J Sch Cog Psychol 4: 199. doi:10.4172/2469-9837.1000199
Stad, F.E., Wiedl, K.H. & Resing, W.C.M. (2016). Dynamic testing of children’s series
completion ability: Cognitive flexibility as a predictor of performance. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 6(2), 143-.
Stad, F.E., van Heijningen, C.J.M., Wiedl, K.H. & Resing, W.C.M. (2018) Predicting school achievement: Differential effects of dynamic testing measures and cognitive flexibility for math performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 117-125.
Stad, F.E. , Wiedl, K.H., Vogelaar, B., Bakker, M., & Resing, W.C.M. (2018). The role of cognitive flexibility in young children’s potential for learning under dynamic testing conditions. European Journal of Psychology of Education.
Stanfa, K. M. (2011). Differentiating among students: The value added of a dynamic assessment of morphological problem-solving. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 72(5-A), 1616.
Stanley, N.V. (1993). Gifted and the "zone of proximal development." Gifted Education International, 9(2), 78-81.
Stanley, N.V. et al. (1995). Identification of gifted with the Dynamic Assessment Procedure (DAP). Gifted Education International, 10(2), 85-87.
Steele, S C., Willoughby, L M., & Mills, M T. (2013). Learning word meanings during reading:
Effects of phonological and semantic cues on children with language impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,15(2), 184-197.
Sternberg, R.J. (2006). Dynamic assessment (Korean edition). Hak Jisa Publ.
20 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Sternberg,, R. J. (2017). Context-sensitive cognitive and educational testing.Educational Psychology Review, 1-28.
Sternberg, R.J. & Grigorenko, E.L. (2002a). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge (UK): University of Cambridge.
Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., Birney, D.P., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L., & Jeltova, I. (2007).
Dynamic instruction for and assessment of developing expertise in four ethnic groups
(RM07226). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., Ngorosho, D., Tantufuye,E., Mbise, A., Nokes, C., Jukes, M., &
Bundy, D.A. (2002). Assessment intellectual potential in rural Tanzanian school children.
Intelligence, 30(2), 141-162.
Sternberg, R.S. & Grigorenko, E.L. (2001). All testing is dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7(2), 137-170.
Stevens, G.P. (1993). Differential dynamic assessment of reading: An alternative to traditional reading assessment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54 (6-A), 2106.
Stevenson C. E. (2012). Puzzling with potential. Dynamic testing of analogical reasoning in children. (Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukkerij.
Stevenson, C.E. (2016). Role of working memory and strategy-use in feedback effects on children’s progression in analogy solving: An explanatory item response theory account.
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-26.
Stevenson, C.E., Bergwerff, C.E., Heiser, W.J. & Resing, W.C.M. (2014). Working memory and dynamic measures of analogical reasoning as predictors of children’s math and reading achievement. Infant and Child Development, 23(1), 51-66.
Stevenson, C. E.; Heiser, W. J.; Resing, W. C. M. (2016a). Dynamic testing: Assessing cognitive potential of children with culturally diverse backgrounds. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 27-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.025
Stevenson, C.E., Heiser, W., & Resing, W.C.M. (2016b). Dynamic testing of analogical reasoning in 5- to 6-year-olds: Multiple-choice versus constructed-response training items. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (January).
Stevenson, C.E. & Hickendorf, M. (2018). Learning to solve figural matrix analogies: The paths children take. Learning and Individual Differencs, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.04.010 Stevenson, C.E., Hickendorff, M., Resing, W.C.M., Heiser, W.J. & de Boeck, P.A.L. (2013).
Explanatory item response modeling of children’s change on a dynamic test of analogical reasoning. Intelligence, 41(3), 157-168.
21 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Stevenson, C. E., Touw, K. W. J., & Resing, W.C.M. (in press). Computer or Paper Analogy Puzzles: Does Assessment Mode Influence Young Children’s Strategy Progression? Educational and Child Psychology, 28, special issue.
Stevenson, C.E., Hickendorff, M., Resing, W.C.M., Heiser, W.J. & De Boeck, P.A.L. (2013).
Explanatory item response modeling of children’s change on a dynamic test of analogical reasoning. Intelligence, 41, 157-168.
Stoffers, L.M., Hamers, J.H.M., Hessels, M.G.P., & Van Luit, J.E.H. (1989). Third Interim report of the project Learning potential test for Ethnic Minorities Derde Interimverslag van het project Leertest voor etnische Minderheden]. Utrecht: Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht.
Storch, N. (2017). Sociocultural Theory in the L2 Classroom. The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 69.
Stott, D.H. (1987). Relating learning styles to learning capability. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 215-236). New York:
Guilford.
Strand, E. (2017). Appraising Apraxia: When a speech-sound disorder is severe, how do you know if it’s childhood apraxia of speech? The ASHA Leader, 22(3), 50-58
Stringer, P. (2004). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability. The Learning Propensity Assessment Device: Theory, instruments and techniques. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 74(4), 634-635.
Stringer, P. (2018). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: is potential ever realized?
Educational Review, 70(1), 18-30.
Stringer P., Elliott, J. & Lauchlan, F. (1996) 'Dynamic assessment and its potential for
educational psychologists: Part 2 - The Zone of Next Development? Educational Psychology in Practice, 12(4), 234-239.
Stubbe Kester, E., Peña, E., & Gillam, R. (2001). Outcomes of dynamic assessment with
culturally and linguistically diverse students: A comparison of three teaching methods. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology. 2, 42-59.
Stubbemann, R. (2017). Validating the accuracy of language screening instruments in
identifying preschool children in Ed Paso, Texas. Master of Science thesis, Program in Speech- Language Pathology, The University of Texas at El Paso, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2017.10281161.
Studer, C. (2013). Incorporating learning into the cognitive assessment framework. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section B: The Science and Engineering, 74(4-B9E)), no pagination specified.
Suherman, A. (2020). The effects of Dynamic Aaaessment on reading skill performance: A study of Indonesian EFL learners. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and
Teaching, 4(2).
22 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Sumi, S. & Miyazawa, Y. (2017). Application of the graded response model of item response theory to computerized dynamic assessment in L2 English education. The Journal of Information and Systems in Education, 16(1)
Summers, R. (2008). Dynamic assessment: Towards a model of dialogic engagement".
Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/521 Unpublished dissertation, University of South Florida.
Summers, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment: Towards a model of dialogic engagement.
Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. 3736.
Supancheck, P.M. (1990). Effects of a dynamic assessment approach with developmentally delayed children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(2-A), 462.
Swanson, H.L. (1992). Generality and modifiability of working memory among skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 473-488.
Swanson, H.L. (1994). The role of working memory and dynamic assessment in the classification of children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9(4), 190-202.
Swanson, H.L. (1995a). Using the cognitive processing test to assess ability: Development of a dynamic assessment measure. School Psychology Review, 24, 672-693.
Swanson, H.L. (1995b). Effects of dynamic testing on the classification of learning disabilities:
The predictive and discriminant validity of the Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13(3), 204-229.
Swanson, H.L. (1995c). Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test (S-CPT). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Swanson, H.L. (1995d). Using the Cognitive Processing Test to assess ability: Development of a dynamic measure. School Psychology Review, 24, 672-693.
Swanson, H.L. (2000). Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test: Review and applications. In C.S.
Lidz and J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 71- 107. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier.
Swanson,H.L. (2005). Children with reading disabilities: Does dynamic assessment help in the classification? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28 (1).
Swanson, H. L. (2010). Does the dynamic testing of working memory predict growth in nonword fluency and vocabulary in children with reading disabilities? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9(2), 139-165.
Swanson, H.L. (2013). Linking children and adolescent assessment to effective instruction: An evidence-based perspective from the experimental literature. In Saklofske, Donald H. (Ed);
Reynolds, Cecil R. (Ed); Schwean, Vicki L. (Ed). The Oxford handbook of child psychological assessment. Oxford library of psychology., (pp. 822-839). NY: Oxford University Press.
23 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Swanson, H.L. (2016). Working memory and strategy instruction in children with learning disabilities. In R. Schiff & R. M. Joshi (Eds.). Interventions in learning disabilities: A handbook on systematic training programs for individuals with learning disabilities, 227-241.
Switzerland: Springer International.
Swanson, H.L. & Howard, C.B. (2005. Children with reading disabilities: Does dynamic assessment help in the classification? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(1), 17-34.
Swanson, H.L. & Lussier, C.M. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 321-363.
Symons, S.E. & Vye, N.J. (1986). Instructional components of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (67th, San Francisco, CA, April 16-20). ED276771
T
BACK TO TOPTabatabee, M., Alidoust, M., & Sarkeshikian, A. (2018). The effect of interventionist and cumulative group dynamic assessments on EFL learners’ writing accuracy, Applied Linguisics Research Journal, 2(1), 1-13.
Tadesse, A. and Davidsen, P. (2019), "Framework to support personalized learning in complex systems", Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of- print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-11-2018-0250
Taheri, P. (2016). Dynamic assessment: A more comprehensive approach to interpret and capture L2 listening comprehension development. International Journal of Sciences and Research, 72 (12). 10-25.
Taheri, R. & Dastjerdi, H.V. (2016). Impact of Dynamic Assessment on Iranian EFL learners’
picture-cued writing. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4 (13), 129-144.
Tajeddin, Z., Alemi, M. & Pakzadian, S/ (2012). Dynamic assessment and interlanguage pragmatics: Effects on the production of speech acts. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Tanggaard, L. & Glåveanu, V.P. (2014). Creativity assessment as intervention: The case of creative learning. Akademisk Kvarter (Academic Quarter), 9.
Tanner, H. & Jones, S. (2002). Assessing children's mathematical thinking in practical modeling situations. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 21 (4), 145-159.
Tatik, T. (2000). A concurrent validity study between the Application of Cognitive Functions
24 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Scale and the Leiter-Revised International Performance Test. Master's thesis; Touro College, New York, NY. ED445033
Tavakoli, M., & Nezakat-Alhossaini, M. (2014). Implementation of corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language classroom through dynamic assessment. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(1), 211-232.
Taylor, R.M. (1983). Evaluation of direct instruction Follow Through using a learning potential assessment instrument. Dissertation Abstracts International, 43(9-A), 2917-2918.
Taylor, T.R. (1994). A review of three approaches to cognitive assessment, and a proposed integrated approach based on a unifying theoretical framework. South African Journal of Psychology, 24(4), 184-193.
Tellegen, P.J. & Laros, J.A. (1993). The Snijders-Oomen nonverbal intelligence tests: General intelligence tests or tests for learning potential? In J.H.M.Hamers, K. Sijtsma, et al. (Eds.).
Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 267-283).
Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Tenhula, W.N., Strong Kinnaman, J.E., Bellack, A.S. Is learning potential associated with social skills in schizophrenia?. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2007;44:827–836.
Tenner, A. (2008). Dynamic assessment of word attack skill in phonologically disabled readers.
Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 69 (5-A), 1719.
Teo, A. & Fu Jen, F. (2012). Promoting EFL students’ inferential reading skills through computerized dynamic assessment. Language Learning & Technology, 16 (3), 10–20.
http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2012/action.pdf
Teo, P. & Roudenburg, J. (2013). Extensions of cognitive ability assessment with dynamic testing using self-regulated learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(2), 230-250.
Teoh, W. Q., Brebner, C., & McAllister, S. (2017). Bilingual assessment practices: challenges faced by speech-language pathologists working with a predominantly bilingual population.
Speech, Language and Hearing, 1-12.
Thatcher, Kantor P., Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K. Comparing two forms of dynamic assessment and traditional assessment of preschool phonological awareness. J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug;
44(4):313-21.
Thomas, D. (2014). Examining phonemic awareness in children with expressive phonological disorders. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 75(5-B )(E).
Thomas, D., Lance, D.M. & Rainey, J.L. (2018). Phonemic awareness assessment of children with and without speech sound disorders: A comparison study. Clinical Archives of
Communication Disorders, 3(2), 113-126.
25 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Thorpe, P.K. (1998). A hierarchical linear modeling approach towards the dynamic assessment of mathematical conceptual learning. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 59(6-B), 3101.
Thouesny, S. (2011). Modeling second language learners’ interlanguage and its variability: A computer-based dynamic assessment approach to distinguishing between errors and mistakes.
Unpublished PhD dissertation. Dublin City University, Dublin.
Thouesny, S., & Bradley, L. (2014). Applying dynamic assessment principles to online peer revisions in written English for specific purposes. In S. Jager, L. Bradley, E. J. Meima, & S.
Thouesny (Eds). Principles and Practice; Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference, Groningen, The Netherlands (pp. 368-373). Dublin: Research-publishing.net.
doi:10.14705/rpnet.2014.000247
Thurman, S.K. & McGrath, M.C. (2008). Environmentally based assessment practices: Viable alternatives to standardized assessment for assessing emergent literacy skills in young children.
Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 24(1), 7-24.
Tiekstra, Marlous; Minnaert, Alexander; Hessels, Marco G. P. (2016). A review scrutinising the consequential validity of dynamic assessment. Educational Psychology, Vol 36(1), 112-137.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.915930
Tiekstra, M., Bergwerff, L. & Minnaert, A. (2017). Voices from practice: When is the gap between diagnosis and intervention apparent? Educational & Child Psychology, 34(1), 55-65.
Ting, M.‐Y.; Kuo, B.‐C. (2016). A knowledge-structure-based adaptive dynamic assessment system for calculus learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2),105-119.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12119
Tissink, J., Hamers, J.H.M., & Van Luit, J.E.H. (1993). Learning potential tests with domain- general and domain-specific tasks. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, et al. (Eds.). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 243-266). Lisse:
Swets & Zeitlinger.
Tochahi, E.S. & Sangani, H.R. (2015). The impact of interactionist mediation phase of dynamic assessment as a testing tool to deviate anxious learners towards facilitative anxiety. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192 (24), 460-466.
Toglia, J., & Cermak, S. A. (2009). Dynamic assessment and prediction of learning potential in clients with unilateral neglect. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 569–579.
Toglia, J. P. (1989). Approaches to cognitive assessment of the brain injured adult: Traditional methods and dynamic investigation. Occupational Therapy Practice, 1, 36-37.
Toglia, J.M. (2004). Dynamic assessment and unilateral neglect. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 65(4-A), 1336.
26 | P a g e
N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 2 0
Toomaneejinda, A. (2017). Zone of Proximal Development, Dynamic Assessment and learner empowerment. Language Education and Acquisition Research Network (LEARN) Journal, 10(1), 175-184.
Topping, K. & Fisher, A.M. (2003). Computerized formative assessment of reading comprehension: Field trials in the UK. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(3), 267-279.
Touw, K.W.J., Vogelaar, B., Bakker, M. & Resing, W.C.M. (2019). Using electronic technology in the dynamic testing of young primary school children: predicting school achievement.
Education Technology Research Development (67), 443-465.
Touw, K.J.W., Vogelaar, B., Verdel, R., & Resing, W.C.M. (2017). Children’s progress in solving figural analogies: Are outcomes of dynamic testing helpful for teachers? Educational
Psychology, 34(1), 21-38.
Tsuei, M.P. (2008). A web-based curriculum-based measurement system for class-wide ongoing assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 47-60.
Tunteler, E. & Resing, W.C.M. (2007). Effects of prior assistance in using analogies on young children's unprompted analogical problem solving over time: A microgenetic study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 43-68.
Tupper, D.E. (1984). The dynamic assessment of learning potential in cognitive rehabilitation.
INS Bulletin, November, p. 49.
Tsvetkova, M. (2020). Dynamic assessment in the foreign language classroom. Orbis Linguarum, 18,(1), 173-185.
Tziona L. (2013). The Effect of Dynamic Assessment on the Performance of Students in Oral Proficiency Tests in English as a second language. Unpublished dissertation; Tel Aviv University (Israel).
Tzuriel, D. (1989). Inferential cognitive modifiability in young socially disadvantaged and advantaged children. International Journal of Dynamic Assessment and Instruction, 1, 65-80.
Tzuriel, D. (1992). The dynamic assessment approach: A reply to Frisby and Braden. Journal of Special Education, 26, 302-324.
Tzuriel, D. (1996a). Mediated learning experience in free-play versus structured situations among preschool low- medium- and high-SES. Child Development and Care, 126, 57-82.
Tzuriel, D. (1996b). Inferential thinking modifiability in young socially disadvantaged and advantaged children. In M.G. Lother, E. Cole et al. (Eds.). Dynamic assessment for instruction:
From theory to application (pp. 146-157). North York, ON:Captus.
Tzuriel, D. (1997). A novel dynamic assessment approach for young Children: Major dimensions and current research. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 83-102.
