Table S1. Clinical outcomes of the acceptable mismatch allocation model.
Recipient Age PRA Waiting Time (months) HLA mismatch
(A/B/DR) HLAMatchmaker acceptable mismatch
(years) (%) Actual Simulation Change Actual Simulation HLA Eplet
mismatches Luminex MFI
1 46 96 69 3
662/0/1 2/2/0 B35 2 964
1
stReallocated 52 0 36 57 + 21 1/1/1/ 1/2/0
2
ndReallocated 13 0 1 21 + 20 1/1/1 1/1/0
3
rdReallocated 23 66 48 53 + 5 1/1/1 0/2/1
2 33 94 144 129
151/0/2 1/2/2 B51 2 340
1
stReallocated 43 0 39 63 + 24 0/1/1 0/2/2
2
ndReallocated 64 2 3 12 + 9 1/1/1 1/2/1
3
rdReallocated 40 0 34 59 + 25 1/1/1 2/1/1
3 40 96 73 44
290/1/1 0/1/2 B18 2 389
1
stReallocated 33 94 144 148 + 4 1/0/2 2/1/1
2
ndReallocated 36 62 117 118 + 1 1/2/1 2/2/2
3
rdReallocated 70 0 55 69 + 14 2/2/1 2/1/1
4 51 84 58 33
251/1/0 2/1/1 DR13 2 NA
1
stReallocated 49 61 119 124 + 5 2/2/2 1/2/2
2
ndReallocated 54 0 33 40 + 7 1/1/1 1/1/1
3
rdReallocated 47 0 20 34 + 14 2/1/1 1/2/1
Table S2. Australian National Matching Score Calculation (1)
Australian National Matching Score
Base score if (HLA A + B + DR mismatches = 0)
and (Class 1 authorised Panel Reactive Antibodies not < 50%) (Level 1 match)
60,000,000
Base score if (HLA A + B + DR mismatches = 1)
and (Class 1 authorised Panel Reactive Antibodies > 80%) (Level 2 match)
59,000,000
Base score if (HLA A + B + DR mismatches = 2)
and (Class 1 authorised Panel Reactive Antibodies > 80%) (Level 3 match)
58,000,000
Base score if (HLA A + B + DR mismatches = 0)
and (Class 1 authorised Panel Reactive Antibodies < 50%) (Level 4 match)
57,000,000
Base score if (HLA DR mismatches = 0) and (HLA A + B mismatches = 1) and (Class 1 authorised Panel Reactive Antibodies not > 80%)
and centre credit difference (donor centre credit patient centre credit) ≤ 3 (Level 5 match)
56,000,000
Base score if (HLA DR mismatches = 0) and (HLA A + B mismatches = 2) and (Class 1 authorised Panel Reactive Antibodies not > 80%)
and centre credit difference (donor centre credit patient centre credit) ≤ 6 (Level 6 match)
55,000,000
Base score if score is null and centre credit difference (donor centre credit patient centre credit) < 20
(Level 7 match)
Paediatric +30,000
If donor centre = patient centre +50,000
Centre credit balance
+(1,000 + patient centre credit)
Each month Waiting on dialysis +1
Lower threshold for National Algorithm 54,000,000
Reference
1. The Transplant Society of Australia and New Zealand. Organ transplantation from
deceased donors consensus statement on eligibility criteria and allocation protocols; 2011
[cited 2012 June 01]; Available from: http://www.tsanz.com.au/organallocationprotocols/.
Table S3. Western Australian Matching Score Calculation (1)
Western Australian Matching Score
Base Score +40,000,000
Each HLA-DR mismatch -5,000,000
Each HLA-B mismatch -3,000,000
Each HLA-A mismatch -3,000,000
If homozygous at DR and waiting more than 5 years +5,000,000 Each month Waiting on dialysis +100,000
Reference
1. The Transplant Society of Australia and New Zealand. Organ transplantation from
deceased donors consensus statement on eligibility criteria and allocation protocols; 2011
[cited 2012 June 01]; Available from: http://www.tsanz.com.au/organallocationprotocols/.
Figure S1. Simplified structure and health states in the Markov models.
Table S4. Clinical parameter estimates in the Markov model.
Clinical data Base-case value
(range used in sensitivity analysis
References
Probability of transplantation
Highly-sensitised patient 0.154 NOMS (unpublished) Reallocated patient 0.846
Proportion of highly-sensitised benefiting 0.0130 Allocation model simulation Proportion of reallocated affected 0.0074 Allocation model simulation
Likelihood ratio of transplantation for highly-sensitised 1.40 (1.00-5.00) Allocation model simulation Likelihood ratio of transplantation for reallocated 1.49 (1.00-5.00) Allocation model simulation Age-specific all-cause mortality among patients on
dialysis
Ages (1)
0-19 0.036 20-39 0.086 40-59 0.133
≥60 0.232 Age-specific all-cause mortality among patients on the
waiting list
Ages (1)
0-19 0.022 20-39 0.043 40-59 0.065
≥60 0.100 Age-specific all-cause mortality among transplant
recipients Ages (1)
0-19 0.009 20-39 0.023 40-59 0.041
≥60 0.074 Hazard ratio for death after transplantation if
PRA>80%
1.526 (1.224-1.902) ANZDATA (unpublished)
Discount rate Benefits 0.05 (0.00-0.10) (2)
Costs 0.05 (0.00-0.10) (2)
References
1. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, Agodoa LY, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. New England Journal of Medicine 1999;
341(23): 1725-30.
2. Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing. Guidelines for the pharmaceutical
industry on the preparation of submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory
Committee. 2006. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing.
Table S5. Cost parameter estimates in the Markov model.
Cost data Base-case value (range
used in sensitivity analysis
References
Dialysis Proportion In-centre haemodialysis 0.219 $76,881 (1) Satellite haemodialysis 0.495 $63,505
Home haemodialysis 0.091 $47,775 Peritoneal dialysis 0.195 $51,640
Transplantation (initial – year 1) (1,2) Transplant procedure (recipient hospital) $34,581
Transplant procedure (donor hospital) $3,000 Induction therapy (Basiliximab) $6,300
Outpatient follow-up (36 visits) $15,192 Transplantation (after year 1)
Immunosuppression (3)
Azathioprine $1,167.17
Cyclosporine $8,497.76
Tacrolimus $20,260.70
Mycophenolate mofetil $6,110.68
Mycophenolic acid $6,272.38
Sirolimus $14,717.09
Everolimus $9,948.09
Prednisolone $204.48
Proportion of immunosuppression used (2) Year 1
Azathioprine 0.00
Cyclosporine 0.14
Tacrolimus 0.86
Mycophenolate mofetil 0.89
Mycophenolic acid 0.08
Sirolimus 0.01
Everolimus 0.01
Prednisolone 1.00
Subsequent years
Azathioprine 0.06
Cyclosporine 0.23
Tacrolimus 0.67
Mycophenolate mofetil 0.78
Mycophenolic acid 0.11
Sirolimus 0.03
Everolimus 0.03
Prednisolone 0.92
Cost of death (1,2)
Hospitalisation (14 days) $7,457
Medications (morphine,
prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, ondansetron, largactil, hyoscine)
$11,271
References
1. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Cost Report Round 14 version 6.0; 2012 Apr.
2. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) [cited 2012 01/11/2012]; Available from:
http://www.pbs.gov.au/pbs/home.
3. Clayton P, Campbell S, Hurst K, McDonald S, Chadban S. The 35
thAnnual ANZDATA
Report 2012: Chapter 8 Transplantation; 2012 June.