• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Table S1. DEMOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Table S1. DEMOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Table S1. DEMOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS

Variables All patients (n = 118)

Mean (range) age (years) 72 (65-86)

Mean (range) weight (kg) 59 (38-97)

Sex:

Male 73

Female 45

ASA score:

II 62

III 56

Smoking:

Yes 50

No 68

Chemoradiotherapy

Yes 6

No 112

No comorbidities 78

Comorbidities

Hypertension 24

Diabetes 7

Both 9

Protopathy

Tongue cancer 52

Carcinoma of floor of mouth 17

Gingival cancer 13

Buccal carcinoma 19

Oropharyngeal cancer 10

Carcinoma of palate 7

Abbreviations: ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists

(2)

Table S2. TYPES OF FLAP COMPLICATIONS

Complications n

Surgical:

Partial flap necrosis 3

Total flap necrosis 2

Haematoma 1

Flap infection 1

Ecchymosis 1

Dehiscence 1

Total 9

Medical:

Electrolyte disturbance 3

Pneumonia 2

Renal dysfunction 1

Total 6

Both medical and surgical 0

(3)

Table S3. UNIVARIATE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF CATEGORICAL VARIABLES

Complication (n=15)

No Complication

(n=103) 95% CI

Variables n % n % OR Lower Upper P

Sex:

Female 6 13.3 39 86.7 .874

Male 9 12.3 64 87.7 0.914 0.302 2.765

ASA score:

II 5 8.1 57 91.9 .119

Ⅲ 10 17.9 46 82.1 2.478 0.791 7.762

Smoking:

No 7 10.3 61 89.7 .361

Yes 8 16.0 42 84.0 1.660 0.559 4.926

Chemoradiotherapy

Yes 3 50.0 3 50.0 <.05

No 12 10.7 100 89.3 8.333 1.509 46.013

Comorbidities

No comorbidities 5 6.4 73 93.6 <.01

Hypertension 3 12.5 21 87.5 2.086 0.460 9.455 .340

Diabetes 1 14.3 6 85.7 2.433 0.243 24.337 .449

Both 6 66.7 3 33.3 29.200 5.575 152.927 <.001

Protopathy

Tongue cancer 1 1.9 51 98.1 .137

Carcinoma of floor of mouth 5 29.4 12 70.6 5.321 2.269 21.250 .324

Gingival cancer 3 23.1 10 76.9 7.905 1.441 15.300 .194

Buccal carcinoma 3 15.8 16 84.2 1.804 0.929 9.562 .237

Oropharyngeal cancer 1 10.0 9 90.0 1.064 0.324 5.667 .086

Carcinoma of palate 2 28.6 5 71.4 1.383 0.561 20.400 .069

Blood transfusion:

No 11 11.1 88 88.9 .249

Yes 4 21.1 15 78.9 2.109 0.593 7.501

Urinary volume:

Low rate 1 33.3 2 66.7 .124

Medium rate 3 5.2 55 94.8 2.875 0.246 33.600 .400

High rate 11 16.4 56 83.6 0.314 0.087 1.125 .075

Crystal/kg/hour:

Low rate 3 5.7 50 94.3 <.05

High rate 12 18.5 53 81.5 3.774 1.005 14.166

Colloid/kg/hour:

Low rate 9 17.0 44 83.0 .215

High rate 6 9.2 59 90.8 0.497 0.165 1.500

Colloid& FFP/kg/hour:

Low rate 8 14.5 47 85.5 .577

High rate 7 11.1 56 88.9 0.734 0.248 2.175

Abbreviations: ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; FFP, fresh frozen plasma.

(4)

Table S4. UNIVARIATE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS VARIABLES

Complication

(n=15) No Complication

(n=103) 95% CI

Variables Mean/ Me

dian SD/ Quar

tile Mean/ Media

n SD/ Quar

tile OR Lower Upper P

Weight, kg 56.5 7.6 59.4 10.7 0.971 0.916 1.029 .318

Age, yr 73.0 4.2 71.8 5.3 1.043 0.943 1.155 .412

Preoperative Hb, g/L 130.9 19.2 136.5 14.4 0.977 0.943 1.012 .188

Preoperative albumin, g/L 39.8 4.5 40.3 3.8 0.967 0.842 1.110 .633 Postoperative Hb, g/L 100.5 16.9 112.4 15.0 0.950 0.914 0.987 .009 Postoperative albumin, g/L 25.2 3.6 29.0 4.1 0.796 0.685 0.925 .003

Blood loss, ml 426.7 221.9 352.4 145.4 1.003 1.000 1.005 .099

Tourniquet time, min 64.3 6.9 52.3 12.9 1.168 1.067 1.279 .001

Operation time, min 385.3 146.9 382.5 113.3 1.000 0.996 1.005 .931

VAS 1 1-2 1 0-1 1.099 0.765 1.580 .609

Crystal during operation, ml 2483.3 918.4 2194.2 617.3 1.001 1.000 1.002 .120 Colloid & FFP during

operation, ml 800.0 394.6 809.7 393.5 1.000 0.999 1.001 .928

Fluids during operation, ml 3216.7 939.5 2966.0 694.0 1.000 1.000 1.001 .216 Crystal in 24 hours, ml 5106.7 695.6 4224.3 699.6 1.002 1.001 1.003 <.001 Colloid in 24 hours, ml 800.0 394.6 809.7 393.5 1.000 0.999 1.001 .928 Fluids in 24 hours, ml 5906.7 682.7 5034.0 778.2 1.001 1.001 1.002 .001

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; Hb, hemoglobin;

VAS, visual analogue scale; FFP, fresh frozen plasma.

(5)

Table S5. MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS.

95% CI

Variables OR Lower Upper P

Comorbidities .004

No Comorbidities

Hypertension 2.4 0.348 16.567 .375

Diabetes 6.954 0.435 111.05 .17

Both 76.256 7.243 802.81 <.001

Postoperative albumin 0.783 0.635 0.966 .019

Crystal in 24 hours 1.002 1.001 1.003 .003

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted in order to know the impact of independent variable together against dependent

Results of Logistic Regression Analysis Based on the result of parameter estimation in Table 9, logistic regression equation can be ex- pressed as follows: Audit Delay = -2,462

Logistic regression results for transnational practices Logistic regression results for transnational practices Logistic regression results for transnational practices Logistic

Multivariate logis- tic regression analysis adjusting for demographics and myocardial infraction presentation revealed that patients aged > 60 years showed more commonly presenting

VA= visual acuity, IOP= intraocular pressure, HFA = Humphrey visual field analyzer, MD = mean deviation, FT= foveal threshold, TD = total deviation, OCT= optical coherence tomography,

Untuk penyakit lainnya, skema model hybrid dengan metode Logistic Regression LR, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines MARS, Rough Set RS, dan Artificial Neural Network ANN terbukti

Supplemental Methods 2: Model specification and optimization for the logistic regression and Gradient Boosting models Logistic Regression Modeling The logistic regression models

Association between confounding variables and osteoporosis in male elderly subject Result of multivariate analysis using logistic regression showed that sclerostin remained the only