OF WASHINGTON. 125
Mr.
Caudell presented forpublication the following paper:THE SYNONYMY OF CEDIPODA CINCTA THOMAS.
By A. N. CAUDELL.
In 1870,*
Thomas
described hisCEdipoda
cincta,andacurious condition has followed, forwe now
havetwo
species based on thatonedescriptionMcstobregma cinctum and Trimcrotropis
ciucta. It is obvious thatonemust
be changed, astwo
specificnames
cannot properly be based on one description.Six years after
making
the original descriptionThomas
re ferred his species with doubt to the genusMestobregma^ and
four yearslatertreatedofitunderthatgenus J Butatthattimethe genera
were
notclearlydefinedand
thecharactersused byThomas
asof generic value
were
inadequateforthe separation of thetwo
in sectsunderdiscussion. In 1884, SaussurelocatedThomas'
species, from his description, in the genusTrimerotropis\ A careful
study ofThomas'
descriptionsshows
thattheyapply much
better
to a species of Trimerotropis than to a member
of the genus
Mestobregma. While many
of the characters given apply
equally well to either, certainones apply onlyto Trimerotropis.
Such
are thefollowing:Disk
of the posterior lobe of the pro-notum
nearlyflatand
withthe posterior angle greater than a right angle;median
carinaof the thorax onlya raised line; posterior femora notreaching the tip of theabdomen
in the female.No
character mentioned in the description is inapplicable to a
mem
ber of the genus Trimerotropis,
and
the type mentioned byMcNeillH
belongs to that genus.Taken
all together, itseems
well to considerTrimerotropis
cincta to bethe species eligibly basedon Thomas'
original description. This beingaccepted, it leaves the insectnow known
asMestobregma cinctum
to bedealt with.
As
anew
specificname seems
inevitable, I propose thename
thomasi.The synonymy
of thetwo
species will thus stand as follows:1.
Trimerotropis
cinctaThomas.
CEdipoddcinctaThomas.
Mestobregma cinctum
Thomas
(notBruner, Scudder,etc.).2.
Mestobregma thomasi
Caudell.Mestobregma cinctumBruner, Scudder, etc. (notThomas).
*Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., pp 8o-8r, 1870.
fBull. 111.Mus.Nat. Hist., i, p.65, 1876.
\Kept. Ent. 111.,ix. pp. 90, 95, 113-114, iSSo.
Prodr. CEdip., pp. 171-172, 1884.
||TheinsectSaussure hadbeforehim, however, wasnotThomas'species, butonedescribedsomeyearsprevious by Scudder as Trimerotropisvin-
ctilata.
fProc. U. S. Nat. Mus., xxm,pp. 414-415, 1901.