• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Conclusion

Dalam dokumen 9781845936778.pdf (Halaman 61-67)

increased proportion of travellers searching for meaningful experiences through contact with some aspects of the host culture.

Finally, travellers’ personality characteristics and their initial attitudes towards people visited have also clearly exerted an influence on the contact outcome. Thus, initially favourable attitudes to the host country overall led to more intense contacts with locals. The same can be observed for those with a more sociable and extroverted personality. This introduces a dilemma regarding the practical value of such contacts, if it is those who are already favourably inclined to the host at the outset that get to know them personally and through which contact reinforces these attitudes further, especially bearing in mind that the contact has minimal, if any, influence on more deeply rooted social attitudes such as ethnocentrism, racism or intercultural orientation. However, there is evidence that travellers who have, at the outset, relatively low level of ethno- centrism and heightened international orientation, are self-confident and outgoing, and these personality characteristics correlate positively with their travel experience. However, it is extremely difficult to ascertain whether their initially open-minded and relaxed attitudes that have brought them further afield or whether the cumulative effect of travel has resulted in formation of these attitudes.

Thus, the evidence presented here gives only a tentative support for those claiming that contacts facilitated through travel increase intercultural understanding. The evidence compiled here is perhaps more important for the tourism industry overall and for destination management and promotion in particular as claims that the tourism industry impedes the contact with local residents can be rejected. The arguments of those who have criticized the tourism industry for erecting barriers between travellers and their hosts might be valid for the prevailing style of travel organization some 20 or 30 years ago, but many modern-day tourists seek personal enrichment and cultural insights while travelling (Poon, 1994, 1998). In response to the changing expectations of travellers, the tourism industry throughout the developed world is seeking to restructure itself so that is able to provide tailor-made travel arrangements while retaining economies of scale (Petrillo, 2002).

The question remains whether or not the tourism industry could justifiably be called the world peace industry. To draw inferences to the issue of the world peace and harmony it has to be demonstrated that contacts at the individual level, such as those facilitated through travel, have an effect on the foreign policies mostly determined by the governments (Kelman, 1965). The recent occurrence of the ethnic violence and the small-scale armed conflicts perhaps best illustrate that, when there is a conflict over major political issues, these individual contacts are probably of little value.

It is another question altogether whether tourism fosters intercultural understanding. In general, the evidence to date indicates that this is also not the case, as post-trip attitudes have shown an inconsistent pattern of change.

However, if the question is whether tourism contacts are beneficial to this process, then the answer is clearly more positive. The fact that favourable post-trip attitudes were a consistent outcome of contact with the host population regardless of the destination choice or travel arrangements, suggests travel

clearly has a role to play in this regard. These changes, however, are very subtle and a large proportion of travellers are not able to ascertain the nature and degree of these changes. Furthermore, travellers do not report an increase in knowledge about the country visited following the trip or a change in their perceptions of the host nationals as a homogenous group. In some instances, the trip has not contributed to the lowering of perceptions of the cultural distance between travellers and the country visited. If the host nationals are continually perceived to be similar to each other, it means that they are continually perceived by travellers in a stereotypical fashion and the fact that they remain to be perceived as culturally different as at the beginning of the travellers’ journey questions the extent to which travel has resulted in a better understanding of travellers and their hosts.

There are some indications that travel may have some cumulative effect on the deeply rooted social attitudes of ethnocentrism and intercultural orientations.

Because of the methodological difficulties associated with this problem, it is difficult to determine whether travel was an outcome or a consequence of these attitudes. To ascertain this, it would be necessary to compare those that have not travelled overseas with those that are embarking on their first overseas travel, but this poses some significant challenges in terms of population definition and sample design. In any case, more studies, guided by the model proposed here, coupled with refinement of the contact measures and enriched through employing a qualitative research design, are needed. Post-trip focus groups or in-depth interviews would enable researchers to obtain better insights into the nature of experiences and their relevance to the impressions formed about people and country visited. Another avenue of further research could also be to compare how well tourist travel facilitates intimate contacts compared to other practices that could be initiated within a country’s multicultural policies to foster intercultural understanding and appreciation.

References

Allport, G.W. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge.

Allport, G.W. (1979) The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley, London.

Amir, Y. (1969) Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin 71, 319–342.

Amir, Y. (1976) The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and ethnic relations. In:

Katz, P.A. (ed.) Towards the Elimination of Racism. Pergamon Press. New York, pp.

245–308.

Amir, Y. and Garti, C. (1977) Situational and personal influence on attitude change following ethnic contact. International Journal of Inter-cultural Relations 1, 58–75.

Anastasopoulos, P.G. (1992) Tourism and attitude change: Greek tourists visiting Turkey.

Annals of Tourism Research 19, 629–642.

Britt, T.W., Boniecki, K.A., Vescio, T.K., Biernat, M. and Brown, L.M. (1996) Intergroup anxiety: a person×situation approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22, 1177–1188.

Bruner, E.M. (1991) Transformation of self in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 18, 238–

250.

Burkart, A.J. (1988) Tourism – a vital force for peace (Letter to Editor). Tourism Management 9, 254.

Carlson, J.S. and Widaman, K.F. (1988) The effects of study abroad during college on attitudes toward other cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 12, 1–7.

Cohen, E. (1972) Toward a sociology of international tourism. Social Research 39, 164–182.

Cohen, E. (1974) Who is a tourist? A conceptual clarification, Sociological Review 22, 527–

555.

Crawcour, E.S. (1977) Barriers to contact and understanding between Australia and Japan.

Australian Outlook 31, 392–405.

Crompton, J.L. (1979) Motivations for pleasure vacations. Annals of Tourism Research 6, 408–424.

Debagge, K.G. (1991) Spatial behaviour in a Bahamian resort. Annals of Tourism Research 18, 251–268.

de Kadt, E. (1979) The encounter: changing values and attitudes. In: de Kadt, E. (ed.) Tourism:

Passport to Development? Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 50–67.

Dukes, R., Lockwood, E., Oliver, H., Pezalla, C. and Wilker, C. (1994) A longitudinal study of a semester at sea voyage. Annals of Tourism Research 21, 489–498.

Fisher, R.J. and L.L. Price (1991) International pleasure motivation and post-vacation cultural attitudes. Journal of Leisure Research 20, 10–16.

Fodness, D. (1994) Measuring tourist motivation. Annals of Tourism Research 21, 555–581.

Freitag, T. (1994) Enclave tourism development: for whom the benefits roll? Annals of Tourism Research 21, 538–554.

Furnham, A. (1984) Tourism and culture shock. Annals of Tourism Research 11, 41–57.

Furnham, A. and Bochner, S. (1982) Social difficulty in a foreign culture: an empirical analysis of culture shock. In: Bochner, S. (ed.) Cultures in Contact: Studies in Cross-cultural Interaction. Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 161–198.

Gomez-Jacinto, L., Martin-Garcia, J.S. and Bertiche-Haud’huyze, C. (1999) A model of tourist experience attitude change. Annals of Tourism Research 26, 1024–1027.

Graburn, N.H.H. (1978) Tourism: the sacred journey. In: Smith, V.S. (ed.) Hosts and Guests:

the Anthropology of Tourism. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, pp.

21–36.

Hewstone, M. and Brown, R. (1986) Contact is not enough: an intergroup perspective on the

‘contact hypothesis’. In: Hewstone, M. and Brown, R. (eds) Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters. Basil Blackwell, New York, pp. 1–45.

Holland, S. (1991) Recreation and tourism: evolution of the social mission. In: Zeiger, J. and Caneday, L. (eds) Tourism and Leisure: Dynamics and Diversity. National Recreation and Parks Association, Alexandria, VA, pp. 66–81.

Hsieh, S., O’Leary, J.T. and Morrison, A.M. (1994) A comparison of package and non-package travellers from the United Kingdom. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 6, 79–100.

Islam, M.R. and Hewstone, M. (1993) Dimension of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability and out-group attitudes: an integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19, 700–710.

Iso-Ahola, S.E. (1982) Toward a social psychological theory of tourism motivation. Annals of Tourism Research 9, 256–262.

Kamal, A.A. and Maruyama, G. (1990) Cross-cultural contact and attitudes of Qatari students in the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 14, 123–134.

Kelman, H.C. (1962) Changing attitudes through international activities. Journal of Social Issues 18, 68–87.

Kelman, H.C. (1965) Social-psychological approaches to the study of international relations:

the question of relevance. In: Kelman, H.C. (ed.) International Behavior: a Social- psychological Analysis. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 565–607.

Knopf, R. (1991) Harmony and convergence between recreation and tourism. In: Zeiger, J. and Caneday, L. (eds) Tourism and Leisure: Dynamics and Diversity. National Recreation and Parks Association, Alexandria, VA, pp. 53–66.

Krippendorf, J. (1987) The Holiday Makers: Understanding the Impact of Leisure and Travel. Butterworth and Heinemann, Oxford.

Litvin, S.W. (1998) Tourism: the world's peace industry? Journal of Travel Research 37, 63–66.

Milman, A., Reichel, A. and Pizam, A. (1990) The impact of tourism on ethnic attitudes: the Israeli–Egyptian case. Journal of Travel Research 29, 45–49.

Mo, C.M. (1991) Developing an attitudinal scale for Cohen’s tourist role typology. Unpublished PhD, University of Oregon.

Nesdale, D. and Todd, P. (2000) Effect of contact on intercultural acceptance. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 24, 341–360.

Nettekoven, L. (1979) Mechanism of intercultural interaction. In: de Kadt, E. (ed.) Tourism:

Passport to Development? Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 135–145.

Pearce, P.L. (1982a) Tourists and their hosts: some social and psychological effects of inter- cultural contact. In: Bochner, S. (ed.) Cultures in Contact: Studies in Cross-cultural Interaction. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 199–221.

Pearce, P.L. (1982b) A Social Psychology of Tourist Behaviour. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

Petrillo, C.S. (2002) Position and strategic choices of Italian tour operators in European competition. Tourism 50, 51–66.

Pettigrew, T.F. (1986) The intergroup contact hypothesis reconsidered. In: Hewstone, M. and Brown, R. (eds) Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Pettigrew, T.F. (1997) Generalised intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23, 173–185.

Pizam, A., Jafari, J. and Milman, A. (1991) Influence of tourism on attitudes: US students visiting USSR. Tourism Management 17, 277–286.

Pizam, A., Uriely, N. and Reichel, A. (2000) The intensity of tourist–host social relationship and its effects on satisfaction and change of attitudes: the case of working tourists in Israel.

Tourism Management 21, 395–406.

Plog, S.C. (1987) Understanding psychographics in tourism research. In: Ritchie, B.J. and Goeldner, C.R. (eds) Tourism and Hospitality Research. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp.

203–213.

Plog, S.C. (1991) Leisure Travel: Making it a Growth Market … Again! John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Pool, I. de S. (1965) Effects of cross-national and international images. In: Kelman, H.C. (ed.) International Behaviors: a Social-psychological Analysis. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 106–128.

Poon, A. (1994) The ‘new tourism’ revolution. Tourism Management 15, 91–92.

Poon, A. (1998) Tourism, Technology and Competitive Strategies. CAB International, New York.

Prentice, R.C., Witt, S.F. and Wydenbach, E.G. (1994) The endearment behaviour of tourists through their interaction with the host community. Tourism Management 15, 117–125.

Ross, G.F. (1997) Destination motivation among backpacker visitors to Northern Australia.

Pacific Tourism Review 1, 7–15.

Rothbart, M. and John, O.P. (1985) Social categorisation and behavioural episodes: a cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues 41, 81–104.

Ryan, C. and Glendon, I. (1998) Application of leisure motivation scale to tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 25, 169–184.

Smith, C.B. (1994) Back and to the future: the intergroup contact hypothesis revisited.

Sociological Inquiry 64, 438–455.

Smith, V.L. (1989) Introduction. In: Smith, V.L. (ed.) Hosts and Guests: the Anthropology of Tourism. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1–17.

Stangor, C., Jonas, K., Stroebe, W. and Hewstone, M. (1996) Influence of student exchange on national stereotypes, attitudes and perceived group variability. European Journal of Social Psychology 26, 663–675.

Steinkalk, E. and Taft, R. (1979) The effect of a planned intercultural experience on the attitude and behaviour of the participants. International Journal of Inter-cultural Relations 3, 187–198.

Stokowski, P.A. (1992) Social networks and tourist behavior. American Behavioral Scientist 36, 212–221.

Sutton, W.A. (1967) Travel and understanding: notes on the social structure of touring.

International Journal of Comparative Sociology 8, 218–223.

Taft, R. (1977) Coping with unfamiliar cultures. In: Warren, N. (ed.) Studies in Cross-cultural Psychology, Volume 1. Academic Press, London, pp. 121–153.

Tomljenovic´, R. (2002) Tourism, intercultural understanding and world peace – real or imagined relationship. PhD thesis, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.

Tomljenovic´, R. and Faulkner, B. (1999) Tourism and intercultural understanding: a case of Croatian high school students visiting Spain, Greece and Czech Republic. Tourism 47, 108–131.

Tomljenovic´, R. and Faulkner, B. (2000) Tourism, intercultural understanding and world peace.

In: Faulkner, B., Moscardo, G. and E. Laws (eds) Tourism in the 21st Century:

Reflections on Experience. Continuum, London.

Wagner U., Hewstone, M. and Machleit, U. (1989) Contact and prejudice between Germans and Turks: a correlational study. Human Relations 42, 561–574.

Welds, K. and Dukes, R. (1985) Dimensions of personal change, coping styles and self- actualisation in a shipboard university. Annals of Tourism Research 12, 113–119.

© CAB International 2010. Tourism, Progress and Peace 35 (eds O. Moufakkir and I. Kelly)

3 Challenging Peace through

Tourism: Placing Tourism in the Context of Human Rights, Justice and Peace

F. H

iggins

-D

esbiolles1

and l. b

lancHarD2

1School of Management, University of South Australia, 2Centre for Peace &

Conflict Studies, University of Sydney, Australia

Introduction

Because tourism most frequently concerns the pleasure and leisure pursuits of the world’s privileged, it is seldom placed in the context of human rights, conflict resolution, justice and peace. However, it must not be forgotten that the right to tourism and travel are implicitly enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN, 1948) and is promised by a social tourism movement that has been active in countries throughout the world and promoted globally by the International Bureau of Social Tourism (BITS).

While the dominance of neo-liberalism since the 1980s has allowed the social welfare aspects of tourism to be overshadowed by its financial market potential, peace and justice advocates should not allow these developments to go unchallenged. This chapter reviews tourism’s capacity to contribute to human well-being, human rights recognition, conflict resolution, justice and peace. It will take a critical perspective, challenging the tourism industry’s public relations agendas of peace through tourism and pro-poor tourism (PPT) whose promise remains unfulfilled in a world of structural inequity and injustice. This analysis develops an understanding of how tourism can be harnessed to achieve important humanitarian goals, including peace, justice and respect for human rights.

Dalam dokumen 9781845936778.pdf (Halaman 61-67)