• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Level and extent of convergence of various CS/CSS schemes, MGNREGA in different components and their impact on overall progress of the

package.

The Bundelkhand package envisaged convergence of funds from different sources for enhancing resources availability and ensuring complementarities of activities. Of the total package amount of Rs 7466 crore, about 3649 crore amounting to 48% was the ACA exclusively provided for the Bundelkhand region and the balance was to be sourced from other CS / CSS schemes, MGNREGA and BRGF / RKVY in that order. State government contribution to the package as per CS/CSS norms was a minor component. Beneficiaries’

contribution was envisaged in individual beneficiary oriented projects like dug wells, pump sets etc. On the whole a more than 50% of the resources for implementation of the package have to be sourced from outside the ACA.

Table 85 Fund convergence under Bundelkhand Package (Rs. Crore)

S.N Fund Component Madhya

Pradesh Uttar

Pradesh Bundelkhan d

1 Additional Central Assistance

(ACA)

1953.20 1695.76 3648.96

2 CS/CSS Schemes 953.65 1318.59 2272.24

3 BRGF / RKVY 225.00 25.00 250.00

4 MGNREGA 595.00 471.00 1066.00

5 State Share 12.04 12.04 24.08

6 Beneficiary Contribution 121.11 83.61 204.72

Total 3860.00 3606.00 7466.00

MADHYA PRADESH UTTAR PRADESH BUNDELKHAND NON ACA FUND

135

Figure 14 Share of ACA and Non ACA fund in Bundelkhand Package

Under ACA as also the CS, the flow of funds is smooth in the sense that 25 - 50% of the funds are placed in advance with the states and further flow is ensured once the benchmarks set for utilisation is achieved. The Sector wise / date wise release of ACA funds to MP and UP is presented I Exhibits 1 and 2 respectively at the end of this chapter. The ACA funds and the funds under CS /CSS schemes and RKVY / BRGF are routed through the consolidated funds of the respective states. Only the MGNREGA funds are with the district administration and the funds flow is contingent upon completion of certain designated tasks by the rural people.

By its very nature the activities under MGNREGA are taken up by rural households in their respective villages while the activities supported by ACA / SC / SCC schemes are undertaken by the line departments under the package. The outcome and implementation of the package is very much dependent on the flow of funds from non ACA sources.

The releases against the allocated amounts from different sources are presented in Table 86.

Table 86 Release of funds from different sources under Bundelkhand Package

Source Madhya Pradesh Uttar Pradesh

Allocation Release as on 31

March 2013

Release as on 31

March 2014

Allocation Release as on 31

Dec 2012

Release as on 31

March 2014

ACA 1953.20 1880.32 1942.36 1695.76 1212.54 1212.55

CS /CSS 848.00 293.21 455.20 258.92 419.00

RKVY/MNREGA 210.00 33.01 NA 358.60 44.68 6.68

The release of funds under MNREGA has substantially lagged behind the releases under ACA and CS / CSS schemes. Bulk of CS / CSS funds relate to IMWP under which the funds are released over a period of 7 years and therefore the gap in releases under CS/CSS as shown above should not be seen as constraint to implementation of the package.

In Uttar Pradesh, MNREGA funds were to be used in activities like earth works under lining of canal projects, renovation of dug wells and tanks, watershed management activities in forest areas. The slow release of funds from MNREGA to some extent would have affected the progress of the activities as could be seen from the table 87.

Table 87 Physical progress of activities involving convergence of MGNREGA funds in UP

Activity Physical target Achievement Remarks

RRR of canals 39 Only 17 completed;

22 under progress Full ACA amount released Construction of New dug

wells / blast wells

8834 3219 (36%) 75% ACA released

Recharge of dug wells / tanks/ ponds

30864 5442 (17%) 75% ACA released

Renovation of dug wells 11194 2665 (24%) 75% ACA released Planning Secretary, Government of UP also opined that involvement of MNREGA funds in the package has affected the progress of some of the activities.

136

At the same time in MP the involvement of MNREGA resources do not appear to have affected the progress of implementation of the related activities as could be seen from Table 88.

Table 88 Physical progress of activities involving convergence of MGNREGA funds in MP

Activity Physical target Achievement Remarks

Construction of Stop dams

353 213 Full ACA amount

released Distribution of Water

lifting devices (pump sets)

40000 31332 Full ACA amount

released A better coordination between various departments would have helped achieve the satisfactory position in Madhya Pradesh.

Overall while convergence is good as it enhances the availability of funds from different sources in a focussed manner to targeted sectors /activities, involving MGNREGA funds in projects with specific time frame may hamper implementation in a smooth manner. Further MNREGA works are typically non skilled, while majority of the activities contemplated involve skilled labour. Therefore it is suggested that MNREGA funds need not be dovetailed with other programmes of GoI. Where such convergence becomes essential, the state should ensure better coordination between the implementing departments.

137

Exhibit 1 : Sector wise / Date wise Release of ACA Funds to Madhya Pradesh

Sector / Date of release Amount released in Rs crore

Agriculture 513

28/03/2011 270

15/03/2013 243

Animal Husbandry 72.7

30/08/2010 20.88

05/09/2011 29.46

28/02/2013 10.36

29/03/2013 12

Environment and Forest 107

31/03/2010 23.52

14/02/2012 46.03

27/02/2012 37.45

Rural Drinking water supply 100

27/06/2011 60

05/03/2012 40

Water Resources 878.16

31/03/2010 266.6

30/08/2010 39.871

12/11/2010 114.93

20/01/2011 175.5

09/03/2011 17.75

01/02/2012 119.67

28/02/2013 35.4

08/03/2013 6.274

20/03/2013 66.699

29/03/2013 35.466

Watershed management 210

30/03/2010 71.4

31/03/2012 138.6

Grand Total 1880.86

138

Exhibit 2 : Sector wise / Date wise Release of ACA Funds to Uttar Pradesh

Sector / Date of release Amount released in Rs crore

Agriculture 320

28 March 2011 320

Animal Husbandry 43.06

30 March 2010 26.74

30 August 2010 16.32

Animal husbandry activities 12.24

31 March 2012 12.24

Energisation of Private Tube Wells 69.77

29 March 2013 69.77

Environment and Forest 61.56

30 March 2010 3.16

09 March 2011 18.44

08 March 2013 9.96

30 March 2013 30

Rural Drinking Water Supply 70

27 June 2011 50

27 December 2012 20

Water Resources 400.25

30 March 2010 200.72

13 January 2011 51.7

09 March 2011 3.23

14 June 2011 10

13 March 2012 57.3

27 December 2012 77.3

Watershed management 235.66

30 March 2010 101.66

28 September 2010 59

09 December 2011 75

Grand Total 1212.54

139

Chapter 12 Monitoring of the Package

The monitoring of the implementation of the package at Government of India level is done as under:

 Regular visit of technical officers of NRAA

 Visit by CEO of NRAA to the states for technical monitoring

 Review meeting with Planning Secretary and Senior Officials of the State Government by NRAA CEO

 Meetings of Advisory Body for the Package at Planning Commission

At the state level, the state governments are required to monitor the projects as per their internal guidelines and NRAA has not prescribed any structured monitoring of the projects being implemented by the state departments.