ANALYTICAL STUDY FOR PROPERTY EVALUATION OF PLASTICIZED POZZOLANIC CEMENT PLATE AND SSC
Vishwajeet Pawar
Research Scholar, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya Bhopal (M.P.) Prof. Rajesh Joshi
HOD, Department of Civil, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidalaya Bhopal (M.P.) Abstract - A large amount of CO2 is emitted to the atmosphere from the cement plants during the calcination of CaCO3 and also through the burning of fuel in the kiln. The environmental pollution can be reduced by replacing the cement with the pozzolanic materials like fly ash. Because of the micro-filler effect and due to the pozzolanic activity of the fly ash, improved strength and durability of hardened cement matrix have been observed. Superplasticizers (SPs) are high range water reducers which can improve the workability of concrete without increasing the water-cement ratio or it can maintain the same workability at a reduced water-cement ratio. But different families or brand of superplasticizers behave differently with cement. Hence before using particular cement and superplasticizer in the concrete, it is essential to check its compatibility. A methodology to select the compatible combination of cement and superplasticizer based on the saturation dosage at initial stage and at 30 minutes and manufacturer's recommended dosage of superplasticizer is suggested in this study. Saturation dosage of superplasticizer at 0 minute, 30 minutes after mixing is calculated from the observation of marsh cone and flow table tests study on mortar mixes of cement to sand ratio 1:1.5. For the compatible mixes, the cost-effectiveness is also checked.
Changes in the fresh (workability and setting time) and hardened stage (compressive strength) properties of the concrete with the addition of SP are also evaluated in this study.
Saturation dosage of superplasticizers in concrete was obtained based on the observations of flow table and slump cone test. A comparison of saturation dosage of superplasticizer in mortar and concrete is also performed to study the effectiveness of superplasticizer in mortar and concrete. From the comparison of saturation dosages, it is observed that there is an increase in superplasticizer demand in the concrete mix than that of mortar. Increase in compressive strength is also observed for superplasticized concrete mixes than that of control mix containing no superplasticizer. In all superplasticized mixes, increased workability and compressive strength is observed for mixes containing PCE based superplasticizer.
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General
The viability of the synthetic admixture in concrete relies upon different factors, for example, the group of superplasticizer, its union cycle and measurements, other than the surface region of the fastener, temperature, water-concrete proportion, blending strategy and so on. As the over doses of superplasticizer brings about unfavorable impacts like air entrainment, set impediment, draining and so on, it is expected to have a decent comprehension of concrete SP communication for better usage and to improve properties of cement. Thus it is essential to have a strategy for choosing the suitable admixture for the given concrete and the application. The similarity of SP with concrete can be checked by estimating ease of the superplasticized concrete mortar with time. Expansion in the
smoothness after superplasticizer immersion dose is immaterial.
Consequently immersion doses are considered for the choice of suitable superplasticizer doses.
Stream conduct of substantial blend is principally addressed by the concrete glue stage. Accordingly describing the stream conduct of concrete glue will assist in guaranteeing creation of cement with great functionality. With the coming of more liquid cement, for example, pumpable concrete or self- compacting concrete, it has turned into a need to gauge the substantial stream properties. This requires the investigation of rheology. Rheology is the review concerning the stream and change of state of a matter when exposed to an applied power. Rheological investigations
of cementitious suspensions at various temperatures and superplasticizer doses help to grasp the material conduct in new state.
2 DURABILITY STUDIES IN CEMENT MORTAR AND CONCRETE
Audit of the examinations did in mortar and cement to decide sorptivity, water assimilation, protection from corrosive, chloride and sulfate assault are remembered for the accompanying segments.
2.1 Water Absorption, Porosity and Sorptivity Characteristics of Mortar and Concrete
Strength and sorptivity upsides of fly debris concrete were concentrated by Gopalan (1995). Four grades of cement with 28th day compressive strength 20, 30, 40 and 50 MPa were utilized for this review. From the review, it was seen that the skin strength of concrete cement was higher than fly debris concrete. It was additionally seen that the sorptivity worth of fly debris concrete was higher than that of concrete cement of all strength grades.
The impact of starting restoring (4 days) on the sorptivity esteem was viewed as profoundly critical.
3 TEST METHODS FOR FINDING
SATURATION DOSAGE OF
SUPERPLASTICIZER IN THE MORTAR In this review, stream table and swamp cone tests were utilized to concentrate on the stream conduct of concrete mortar.
For mortar arrangement, sand (sundried) was blended in with concrete and 70% of the water expected for the blend and blended for two minutes. After this superplasticizer blended in with staying 30% of the water was added and blended for additional 3 minutes. The blending arrangement was taken on in view of the perceptions and assessment (Jayasree and Gettu, 2008) of different blending strategies.
4 EVALUATION OF CONCRETE PROPERTIES
Test subtleties to decide the new stage property, solidified stage property and setting season of cement are given in this segment.
4.1 Workability Studies in Concrete Stream table test and rut cone tests were utilized to gauge the usefulness of superplasticized concrete. Functionality test on concrete was performed by leading stream table test as per the code arrangements of IS 1199 (2004) utilizing stream table and form of aspects determined in the IS 5512 (2004). In that test, the substantial was filled in two layers and the form was lifted upward upwards and shocked multiple times in 15 seconds. The spread distance across was estimated in six headings and the normal was noted. The test gives the ease of cement regarding the spread breadth;
higher the spread measurement, higher is the smoothness of cement. The immersion point is the measurements past which further expansion of SP doesn't increment spread distance across however can create isolation; the immersion dose can be taken as the ideal dose for given substantial combination.
Functionality was likewise estimated by leading rut test on substantial combinations as per the methodology given in the IS 1199(2004) utilizing a downturn cone of aspect determined in IS 7320(2008). The rut esteem was estimated as the subsidence of cement on the evacuation of form.
5 RHEOLOGICAL STUDIES ON CEMENT PASTE
5.1 General
Rheology manages stream and deformity of issue under an applied power. The connection between applied power, deformity and time are very much made sense of concerning rheological properties. Rheological properties of the concrete glue will differ with variety in the elements of concrete glue and test temperature. These impacts are concentrated by directing the thickness test on superplasticized PPC blend and superplasticized OPC blend in with various rates of fly debris substitution.
Varieties of rheological properties of the blend at different fly debris rates and at various test temperatures are examined in this part.
6 MIX DETAILS
The materials utilized for the planning of the SCC blends were fly debris based
of most extreme size 12.5 mm, fine total, superplasticizer and water. One superplasticizer each from four unique families viz., SP1(SNF), SP2( LS), SP3(PCE) and SP4(SMF) were utilized. In light of the strong substance and thickness of the superplasticizer, the fundamental water revisions were finished on the separate blends. Smaller than normal downturn and swamp cone tests were performed on the superplasticized concrete glue blend to track down the immersion measurements of SP. In excess of 70 preliminaries were performed by changing the superplasticizer amount and by changing the coarse total and fine total amount. The preliminaries were performed by differing the amount of fine total, coarse total, sort of superplasticizer and its measurements. The fine total to add up to total rates was differed as 45, 50 and 55.
7 BACKGROUND LITERATURE
Not many of the significant works connected with demonstrating of new as well as solidified stage properties of concrete glue, elite execution concrete and so forth utilizing the fake brain network(ANN), various relapse examination (MRA), support vector machine(SVM), fluffy rationale and so on are audited in this part.
7.1 Rheological Properties of Cement Paste
Mohebbi et al. (2011) proposed an ANN model on the impact compound and mineral admixtures on the stream properties of self-uniting concrete glue in view of 200 preparation information. The 14 info boundaries were the water- fastener proportion, 4 sorts mineral admixture (calcium carbonate, metakaolin, silica smoke and limestone) amount, 5 unique superplasticizers (Polycarboxylate based and naphthalene based)dosage and 4 consistency altering admixture measurement. Small scale droop spread width and stream cone time were the result boundaries.
Rheological properties of oil well concrete slurry were demonstrated by Shahriar and Nehdi (2013) by different relapse examination (MRA) and furthermore utilizing fake brain organization (ANN).
8 MIX DETAILS
As per the code arrangements for leading the solidness test, the concrete mortar and substantial blends were arranged utilizing PPC (C3) as well as OPC with various fly debris substitution rate (15, 25 and 35%) at water-concrete proportion of 0.37. Substitution level of fly debris in OPC is fixed in view of the scope of substitution (15 to 35%) determined by IS 1489-section 1(2015). Superplasticizer measurements relating to immersion dose (determined in section 5) was kept up with in the blends. The blend subtleties are given in Table 8.1
Table 8.1 Type of mixes
Elements of M30 grade substantial blend planned according to IS 10262(2009) used to set up the test tests are given in Table 8.2. In the whole blends w/c proportion is kept up with 0.37.
Table 8.2 Concrete mix details
8.1 Test Details
Tests directed in the research center to decide the strength and solidness attributes of cement and mortar are depicted in this part.
8.1.1 Strength Characteristics a) Compressive strength
28th day compressive strength of cement was found out by leading pressure test (according to IS 516-2004) on substantial solid shapes of 150 x 150 x150 mm size.
Changes in the pore structure (because of air entrainment and because of better compaction) of superplasticized blends have been seen in a portion of the previous examinations (Jayasree proposal, 2008; Sakai et al., 2006;
Sidney, 2006). To concentrate on the connection between pore distance across and noticed strength, minuscule examinations for chose blends were performed. For this review, center piece of mortar shape of comparative fastener to fine total proportion was taken and the surface was smoothened with emery paper. The example was painted with a dim paint and saved for drying. At last, baby powder was spread on the highest point of the example for the better perceivability of the pores and perceptions were made under the magnifying instrument. The complete area of 2.6 mm x 2.2 mm (5.72 mm2) was canvassed in tiny view. Pore width and its region were estimated utilizing Motic Images Plus 2.0 programming. The charts were plotted for aggregate recurrence level of air voids versus air void size and worth comparing to D90was got.
b) Split tensile strength
The elasticity of cement is vital in development. Part elastic test was performed on the barrel shaped example of measurement 100mm and level 200mm as indicated by the code arrangements of IS 5816 (2004). Disappointment load were determined and elasticity was resolved utilizing the formulae
Where P is the load at failure of the specimen, D is the diameter of the specimen and
L is the length of the specimen.
8.1.2 Durability Characteristics
Tests led to decide the strength qualities of the substantial and mortar blends are made sense of in this segment.
a) Sorptivity test
Sorptivity of not entirely settled by directing tests as per the code arrangements of ASTM C 1585 (2004).
The standard round and hollow test example of size 100mm width 50 mm length was utilized for this reason. Sides of the example were fixed and kept in water (Figure 8.1). Mass difference in the example at 1min, 5min, 10min, 20min, 30min, 60min, 5hr, third day, seventh day and ninth day were noted and assimilation I was determined.
The assimilation, I, is the adjustment of mass separated by the result of the cross-sectional region of the test example and the thickness of water.
The unit of I is mm.
Where:
I = Absorption
mt= Change in specimen mass in grams, at time t
a = Exposed area of the specimen, in mm2 d = Density of water in g/mm3
The initial rate of water absorption (mm/minutes1/2) is defined as the slope of the line that is the best fit to I plotted against the square root of time (minutes1/2).
Fig. 8.1 Sorptivity test set up b) Acid test
The synthetic obstruction of the substantial was concentrated by playing out the analysis on block example as per the subtleties given in the distributed writing (Sahoo et al., 2017). Solid shapes of sizes 100mm were projected and
relieved for 28 days. Following 28 days relieving shapes were taken out and considered drying for 24 hours. For analysis, 1% concentrated sulphuric corrosive was utilized. The solid shapes were drenched in the corrosive answer for a time of 90 days. Following 90 days the examples were taken from corrosive arrangement, surface cleaned and gauged. The misfortune in strength of the example because of corrosive assault was determined by contrasting the compressive strength of example kept in water and that in corrosive.
c) Rapid chloride permeability test The fast chloride particle penetrability test gives a quick sign of the obstruction of cement to the entrance of chloride particles. This test is reasonable for the assessment of the strength of materials since it demonstrates the penetrability qualities of a material. This test was acted as per ASTM C 1202-05. Water saturated, 100 mm width and 50 mm thick substantial examples were utilized for the test (3 examples for each blend) and how much electric ebb and flow that disregards through every example a 6 h timeframe was observed. A possible contrast of 60V DC was kept up with across the finishes of examples, one of which was submerged in a 3% NaCl arrangement supply, the other repository was a 0.3 N NaOH arrangement. The test set up is displayed in Figure 8.2. The current was estimated at like clockwork up to6 h.
Fig. 8.2 RCPT test setup
i) Length expansion
The length extension trial of mortar bars presented to sulfate arrangement was completed by codal arrangement ASTM C1012/C1012M-15. To set up the sulfate arrangement 50 g of Na2SO4 was broken down in 900 ml of water and extra water added to make the answer for one liter.
Following one day the pH was checked and affirmed to be somewhere in the range of 6 and 8. Mortar block of 50 mm size and mortar bars of 25 mm x 25 mm x 285 mm size were projected (as per ASTM C109/C109M-16) and were kept in a room. Demoulded examples were kept in lime water and strength was estimated at standard span. The example in lime water was moved to sodium sulfate arrangement when it accomplished the strength of 20MPa.
Fig. 8.3 Demec mechanical strain gauge
8.2 Results and Discussion
Perceptions of lab test led to find the strength and sturdiness attributes of the blends are made sense of in this segment.
8.2.1 Strength Characteristics
Consequences of compressive and parted rigidity of substantial blends are remembered for this segment.
a) Compressive and split tensile strength
Results of 28 day compressive strength and split tensile strength tests are given in Table 8.3.
Table 8.3 Compressive strength and split tensile strength
From these qualities, it is deduced that there is just a peripheral contrast in compressive strength and split rigidity in OPC with the expansion of superplasticizer. In the majority of the blends, an expansion in the compressive strength and split elasticity is noticed.
This perception is predictable with the perception of different specialists (Jayasree and Gettu, 2010;
Ramachandran, 2002; Dhir and Yap, 1983; Seung-Bum, 1999; Kapelko, 2006;
Alsadey, 2015; Neville, 2005; Stuart et al., 1980; Sharma et al., 2011; Alsadey, 2012;
Tkaczewska, 2014). Improvement in the strength of the superplasticized substantial combinations could principally be because of the superior compaction got in the substantial by the expansion of superplasticizer and furthermore because of the improvement in the pore structure (Jayasree and Gettu, 2010).
Compressive strength at 28th day and 90th day for the blends containing PPC blend in with various groups of superplasticizers were considered and examination diagram is drawn (Figure 8.4). It is seen that in PPC blend there is an expansion in 28th day compressive strength with superplasticizer expansion.
The most noteworthy expansion in 28th day compressive strength (25%) than
based SP, trailed by SMF (15%), LS (7.5%) and SNF (2.5%).
Fig. 8.4 Compressive strength of PPC concrete mixes
The 28-day strength of the relative multitude of substantial examples with w/c proportion of 0.37 keeps on diminishing with expansion in fly-debris content from 15% to 35%. This was a direct result of the sluggish response pace of pozzolans at the underlying stage. A portion of the past works detailed the comparative discoveries (Roy et al., 2001;
Mehta and Gjorve, 1982; Tanyildizi and Coskun, 2008; Berndt, 2009;
Ramezanianpour and Malhotra, 1995;
Marthong and Agarwal, 2012; Turk et al., 2013; Kocak and Nas, 2014).
Long haul (90 days) compressive strength of blends in with various rate fly debris is thought about in Figure 8.5 and it is found that strength of the blend
debris content. Improvement in the strength at the later stage is seen in past examinations (Shi and Stegemann, 2000;
Chindaprasirt et al., 2004; Huang et al., 2013; Juengerand Siddique, 2015). This might be expected to the improved pozzolanic movement at the later stages.
Fig. 8.5 Compressive strength of OPC mixes blended with fly ash 8.2.2 Sulphate Resistance Test
Sulfate opposition of the mortar example is estimated by checking rate length development of mortar bar presented to sulfate arrangement and by checking the compressive strength decrease of examples presented to sulfate arrangement. Perceptions of these two tests are recorded in this segment
i) Expansion of mortar bar specimens The fundamental justification for the extension of the mortar bar is the development of the gypsum because of the response of sulfate with CH in the mortar and furthermore because of the arrangement of ettringite because of the response of gypsum with aluminate hydrate item (Mehta,1992;Bonen and Cohen Part I &II, 1992; Wang, 1994; Ping and Beaudoin Part I &II, 1992;Santhanam, et al., 2003; Piasta, et al., 2014; Atahan and Arslan, 2016;
Ramezanianpour and Hooton, 2013). The volume of gypsum and ettringite are being higher and it causes extension inside.
XRD examination report of control PPC example and PPC example exposed to sulfate assault are given in Figure 8.6.
There is expansion in the ettringite pinnacles and exhaustion of CH top is seen in sulfate went after example. This outcomes in break development there by a decrease in the strength of cement.
Fig. 8.6 XRD Analysis report of a) control PPC specimen and b) PPC
Specimen in sulphate attack
Fig. 8.7 %Increase in the length of mortar bar with time a) PPC b) 0% fly
ash c) 15 % fly ash d) 25% fly ash e) 35% fly ash
The consolidated impact of superplasticizer and fly debris expansion on the sulfate opposing properties of the mortar is additionally examined (Figure 8.7c to 8.7e). It is seen that with the expansion of fly debris, there is an improvement in the exhibition of the control blend than the superplasticized blends. In any case, at all fly debris substitution level, the blends in with PCE based superplasticizer showed lesser %
increment in conclusive length. For blends in with PCE based superplasticizer, the most elevated rate decrease in the rate length change than the control (Figure 8.7e) is seen at 35% fly debris substitution (60.25%). Be that as it may, on account of blends in with LS based superplasticizer, at all fly debris substitution levels, there is an expansion in the rate length change over the control blend.
8.3 Summary
Mechanical (compressive and split rigidity) and sturdiness trademark (sorptivity, corrosive opposition, chloride and sulfate obstruction) of fly debris and superplasticizer consolidated mortar and substantial blends are contemplated and it is seen that 28th day compressive strength of substantial increments with superplasticizer expansion. Yet, there is a decrease in strength with higher fly debris substitution rate. Improvement in the compressive strength of fly debris consolidated example at the later age (90 days) is seen in this review. Further developed solidness properties were seen with fly debris supplanting rate and furthermore with the expansion of superplasticizer. The consolidated impact of superplasticizer expansion and fly debris expansion on the mechanical and sturdiness qualities of the blends were contemplated and it is found that at higher fly debris substitution blends, control example perform better or similarly great as that of the superplasticized example. The adequacy of PCE based superplasticizer in further developing strength and sturdiness properties of the blend at higher fly debris substitution rate (35%) are additionally seen in this review. Similar concentrate on the properties of blends containing PPC and OPC with 25% fly debris is performed and a slight improvement in the presentation of blend containing PPC than OPC with 25% fly debris is noticed.
9 CONCLUSION 9.1 General
Outline of discoveries of the examinations talked about in the chapters 3 to 8 and proposals for additional exploration is remembered for this section.
9.1.1 Superplasticizer- PPC Compatibility Studies
Viable mix of concrete superplasticizer was chosen in view of the immersion dose of superplasticizer in the underlying stage and at 30 minutes. Among all superplasticizer utilized, LS based superplasticizer was not viable with any concrete. Loss of functionality is viewed as less for PCE based superplasticizer.
Lower immersion measurements is acquired for blend made with concrete of low alumina content. It is likewise seen that droop misfortune rate diminishes for blends containing concrete of higher sulfate content. Concrete with less misfortune start is more viable to all superplasticizer than that with high loss of start.
REFERENCES
1. Adam Neville (2004). ―The confused world of sulfate attack on concrete.‖ Cement and concrete research, 34, 1275-1296.
2. Adriano Papo and Luciano Piani (2004).
―Effect of various superplasticisers on the rheological properties of portland cement pastes.‖ Cement and concrete research, 34, 2097-2101.
3. Agarwal, S.K., Irshad Masood and Malhotra, S.K. (2000). ―Compatibility of superplasticizer with different cements.‖ Construction and building materials, 14, 253-259.
4. Aggarwal, Y. and Aggarwal, P. (2011).
―Prediction of compressive strength of SCC containing bottom ash using artificial neural networks.‖ World academy of science, engineering and technology, 5, 762-767.
5. Aghabaglou, A.M., Sezer, G.I. and Ramyar, K.
(2014). ―Comparison of fly ash, silica fume and metakaolin from mechanical properties and durability performance of mortar mixtures view point.‖ Construction and building materials, 70, 17-25.
6. Aiad, I. (2003). ―Influence of time addition of superplasticizers on the rheological properties of fresh cement pastes.‖ Cement and concrete research, 33, 1229-1234.
7. Aiqin Wang, Chengzhi Zhang and Wei Sun (2003). ―Fly ash effects: 1. Morphological effect of fly ash.‖ Cement and concrete research, 33(12), 2023-2029.
8. Aiqin Wang, Chengzhi Zhang and Wei Sun (2004 a). ―Fly ash effects: II. The active effect of fly ash.‖ Cement and concrete research, 34(11), 2057-2060.
9. Aiqin Wang, Chengzhi Zhang and Wei Sun (2004b). ―Fly ash effects: III. The micro aggregate effect of fly ash.‖ Cement and concrete research, 34(11), 2061-2066.
10. Aitcin, P. C (1998). ―High performance concrete.‖ E & FN spon, London.
11. Akram Tahir, M. and Sabir, M. (2005). ―A study on durability of fly ash cement mortars.‖ 30th conference on our world in concrete and structures: 23-24 August 2005,
12. Ali Rahimi and Recht (2007). ―Random features for large scale kernel machines.‖
Advances in neural network processing systems, 1177-1184.
13. Alsadey, S. (2012). ―Influence of superplasticizer on strength of concrete.‖
International journal of research in engineering and technology, 1(3), 164-166.
14. Alsadey, S. (2015). ―Effect of superplasticizer on fresh and hardened properties of concrete.‖ Journal of agricultural science and engineering. 1(2), 70-74.
15. Altun, F., Kisi, O. and Aydin, K. (2008).
―Predicting the compressive strength of steel fiber added lightweight concrete using neural network.‖ Computational material science, 42, 259-265.
16. Arel, H. S. and Thomas, B. S. (2017). ―The effects of nano- and micro-particle additives on the durability and mechanical properties of mortars exposed to internal and external sulfate attacks.‖ Results in physics, 7, 843–
851.
17. ASTM C 1202-05 ―Standard test method for electrical indication of concrete’s ability to resist chloride ion penetration.‖ ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA.
18. ASTM C 1585(2004), ―Method for measurement of rate of absorption of water by hydraulic-cement concretes.‖ ASTM international.
19. ASTM C 939 (1987). ―Standard test method for flow of grout for preplaced aggregate concrete (flow cone method).‖ Annual book of ASTM standard, American society for testing and materials, USA.
20. ASTM C1012/C1012M-15. ―Standard test for length change of hydraulic-cement mortars exposed to sulfate solution.‖ ASTM international.
21. ASTM C109/C109M-16. ―Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or 50-mm cube specimens).‖ ASTM International, West Conshohocken.
22. Atahan, H.N. and Arslan, K.M.(2016).
―Improved durability of cement mortars exposed to external sulfate attack: The role of nano & micro additives.‖ Sustainable cities and society, 22, 40-48.
23. Atahan, H.N. and Dikme, D. (2011). ―Use of mineral admixtures for enhanced resistance against sulfate attack.‖ Construction and building material, 25, 3450-3457.
24. Bagheri, A., Zanganeh, H., Alizadeh, H., Shakerinia, M. and Marian, M. A. S. (2013).
―Comparing the performance of fine fly ash and silica fume in enhancing the properties of concretes containing fly ash.‖ Construction and building materials, 47, 1402-1408.
25. Banfill, P. F. G. (2006). ―Rheology of fresh cement and concrete.‖ The british society of rheology, 61-130.
26. Banfill, P. F. G., Starrs, G., Derruau, G., McCarter, W. J. and Chrisp, T. M.(2006).
―Rheology of low carbon fibre content
reinforced cement mortar.‖ Cement and concrete research, 23, 773–780.
27. Berndt, M.L. (2009). ―Properties of sustainable concrete containing fly ash, slag and recycled concrete aggregate.‖
Construction and building materials, 23, 2606–2613.
28. Bing Tian and Menashi, D. Cohen (2000).
―Does gypsum formation during sulfate attack on concrete lead to expansion.‖Cement and concrete research, 30, 117–123.
29. Bonen, D. and Cohen, M.D. (1992 b).
―Magnesium sulfate attack on Portland cement paste—II. Chemical and mineralogical analysis.‖ Cement and concrete research, 22, 707–718.
30. Bonen, D. and Cohen, M.D. (1992a).
―Magnesium sulfate attack on portland cement paste-I. microstructural analysis.‖
Cement and concrete research, 22, 169–180.
31. Brandt, A. M., Olek, J. and Marshall, H.
(2009). ―Brittle matrix composites 9.‖
Woodhead publishing limited, Cambridge.
32. Caijun Shi and Yilung Mo (2008). ―High performance construction materials.‖ Science and application world scientific publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, Singapore.
33. Chandra, S. and Bjornstrom, J. (2002 b).
―Influence of superplasticizer type and dosage on the slump loss of Portland cement mortars- Part 11.‖ Cement and concrete research, 32, 1615 – 1619.
34. Chandra, S. and Bjornstrom, J. (2002 a).
―Influence of cement and SPs type and dosage on fluidity of cement mortars – Part I.‖
Cement and concrete research, 32, 1605 – 1611.
35. Chandwani, V., Agrawal, V. and Nagar, R.
(2015). ―Modeling slump of ready mix concrete using genetic algorithms assisted training of artificial neural networks.‖ Expert systems with applications, 42, 885–893.
36. Chatveera, B. and Lertwattanaruk, P. (2009).
―Evaluation of sulfate resistance of cement mortars containing black rice husk ash.‖
Journal of environmental management, 90, 1435–1441.
37. Chindaprasirt, P., Jaturapitakkul, C. and Sinsiri, T. (2005). ―Effect of fly ash fineness on compressive strength and pore size of blended cement paste.‖ Cement concrete composites, 27(4), 425–428.
38. Chindaprasirt, P., Homwuttiwong, S. and Sirivivatnanon, V. (2004). ―Influence of fly ash fineness on strength, drying shrinkage and sulfate resistance of blended cement mortar.‖
Cement concrete research, 34, 1087-1092.
39. Criado, M A. Palomo., A, Fernández-Jiménez.
and P. F. G, Banfill (2009). ―Alkali activated fly ash: effect of admixtures on paste rheology.‖ Rheologica acta, 48(4), 447-455.
40. David, A. Williams, Aaron, W. Saak and Hamlin, M. Jennings (1999). ―The influence of mixing on the rheology of fresh cement paste.‖ Cement and concrete research, 29, 1491-1496.
