• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

View of EFFECT ON UNSTEADY MHD BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW PAST OVER A SHRINKING SHEET WITH HEAT TRANSFER AND MASS SUCTION

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "View of EFFECT ON UNSTEADY MHD BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW PAST OVER A SHRINKING SHEET WITH HEAT TRANSFER AND MASS SUCTION"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

ACCENT JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS ECOLOGY & ENGINEERING

Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal IMPACT FACTOR: 2.104 (INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL) UGC APPROVED NO. 48767, ISSN No. 2456-1037

Vol.02, Issue 03, March 2017, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE

1

EFFECT ON UNSTEADY MHD BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW PAST OVER A SHRINKING SHEET WITH HEAT TRANSFER AND MASS SUCTION

Bhagwan Singh

Govt. Mahila College Budaun U P Sooraj Pal Singh

Department of Mathematics Govt. P G College Bazpur Uttrakhand

Abstract - The purpose to the present problem is to study the unsteady effect on MHD boundary layer flow past over a shrinking sheet with mass transfer and mass suction The generating equation for boundary layer flow and energy are reduced into linear differential equation by means similar transformation. Solution of resulting equation are solved and obtain various parameter are present and discussed. The velocity and temperature profile, concentration and skin friction profile are shown graphically with the help of tables.

Keywords: MHD boundary layer flow, Magnetic parameter, Prandtl number, Specific heat of fluid, Suction parameter, Magnetic field parameter, etc.

1 INTRODUCTION

The problem of MHD boundary layer flow has attracted in Engineering science as Aerodynamics, Astrophysics, geophysics and Chemical engineering MHD fluid flow and heat sources in channels with constant wall temperature was discussed by Ostrach(1). In recent year MHD flow problem have become more important in industrial field. MHD boundary layer behavior over a shrinking surface a significant type of flow having considerable. Practical application used in chemical engineering. Boundary layer flow in porous medium owing to combined heat and mass transfer. Lai and Kulacki(2). The study of two dimensional flow through a porous medium bounded by vertical infinite surface With constant heat flux in presence of free convective current was studied. Sharma and Kumar(3) Have studied unsteady effect on MHD free Convection and mass transfer through porous medium With constant suction. The boundary layer flow of an incompressible viscous fluid over a shrinking sheet has received considerable attention modern day researchers because of increasing applications to many engineering system Wong(4) first pointed out the flow over a shrinking sheet. Then Miklavcic(5) obtained an analytic, solution for unsteady viscus hydrodynamics flow over a permeable shrinking sheet then Hayat(6) derived both exect and series solution describing the MHD boundary layer flow of second grade fluid over a shrinking sheet

―Nadeen and Awis(7) studied thin film flow of an unsteady shrinking sheet through porous medium with variable value

velocity. Viscus flow over an unsteady shrinking sheet with mass transfer was studied by ―Fang and Zhang(8) investigated the heat transfer characteristic of the shrinking sheet problem with a linear velocity.

―Midya(9) studied MHD Viscus flow and heat transfer over a linearly shrinking porous sheet. Effect of chemical reaction heat and mass transfer of non-linear boundary layer past a porous shrinking sheet in presence of suction was discussed numerically by ―Muhaimin(10). MHD boundary layer past a porous shrinking sheet with suction. Rajesh [12]

investigates chemical reaction and radiation effects on the transient MHD free convection flow of dissipative fluid past an infinite vertical porous plate with ramped wall temperature. Paper, we consider the problem of a laminar electrically conducting fluid as a boundary layer flow past a stretching plate and heat Transfer. Kumar Anuj, Manoj [13] investigates MHD boundary layer flow past a stretching plate with heat transfer. In the present we consider the Effect of unsteady MHD boundary layer flow past a stretching plate with heat transfer.

MHD boundary layer flow past over a shrinking sheet with heat transfer and mass suction was studied by

―Jhankal and Kumar(11). In this section we have considered the problem effect on unsteady MHD boundary layer flow past over a shrinking sheet with heat transfer and mass suction.

(2)

ACCENT JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS ECOLOGY & ENGINEERING

Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal IMPACT FACTOR: 2.104 (INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL) UGC APPROVED NO. 48767, ISSN No. 2456-1037

Vol.02, Issue 03, March 2017, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE

2 1.1 Used Symbols

𝜇 = Viscosity of the fluid 𝜌 = Density of the fluid Qe= Electrical conductivity

= Dimensionless Variable K = Thermal conductivity

𝜗 = Kinematic Viscosity of the fluid 𝜃 = Temperature of the fluid

B0 = Constant applied magnetic field c = Shrinking Constant

M = Magnetic failed parameter

Q =Volumetric rate of the heat generation S = Suction parameter

Pr = Prandtl number

Tw = Temperature of the wall 𝑇= Free stream temperature

𝑢, 𝑣 = Velocity component of the fluid along X and Y directions.

2 MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION Let we suppose that two dimensional unsteady MHD boundary layer flow over a shrinking sheet. The X axis is taken along the sheet in the upward direction and Y axis is taken in normal to it. A transverse constant magnetic field applied in direction of Y axis. The governing equation of continuity, equation of motion and energy equation for MHD flow. The Reynolds number taken small and taken v* = - v0

𝜕𝑉

𝜕Y∗ = 0

(1)

𝜕u∗

𝜕t∗ + 𝜕u∗

𝜕y∗ =𝜗 ∂y∗2u∗2ℚB02

𝜌 u* (2)

𝜕T∗

𝜕t∗ + v* 𝜕T∗

𝜕y∗ = 𝐾

𝜌𝐶𝑝

2T∗

∂y∗2 +

𝜌𝐶𝑝 (T — 𝑇 ) (3) Where 𝜌 be the density, 𝜗 be the kinematic viscosity and B0 is the magnetic induction K be the thermal conductivity then boundary condition of this problem are

u* = 𝑢𝑤 , T*= T𝑤 at y* = 0 , T* = 0 (4) u* → 0, T* = 𝑇 at y* = , T* → 0 On introducing following non dimensional quantities.

y* = 𝜗

V0𝑦 , u* = u v0 , T* = t V𝜗02 , T* — 𝑇 = 𝜃(T𝑤 — 𝑇 ) (5) Solving equation (2) & (3) with help of (5) We have

2u

∂y2 + ∂u∂y∂u∂t —Mu = 0 (6)

2θ

∂y2 + Pr∂θ

∂y —Pr∂θ

∂t = 0 (7) And corresponding boundary conditions are.

u = ℚ, 𝜃 =1 at y = 0, t = 0 (8) u → 0, 𝜃 = 0 at y → , t = 0

Where M = ℚ𝜗 𝐵𝜌𝑉 02

02 , Pr = 𝜌𝐶𝐾𝑝 Now we assume the solution of these equations U(y, t) = u0 (y) 𝑒−𝑛𝑡 and 𝜃 (y,t)= 𝜃0( y) 𝑒−𝑛𝑡

(9)

By solving equation (6),(7) with the help of (9)

u0′′ + u0’ —u0 ( M—n ) = 0

(10) 𝜃0′′ + Pr 𝜃0 +Pr 𝑛𝜃0 = 0 (11) And corresponding boundary conditions are

U0 = ℚ, 𝜃0 = 1 at y = 0, (12) U0 → 0, 𝜃0 = 0 at y → ,

Now solving equation (10) &(11) then U0 = 𝑒A1𝑦 and u = 𝑒A1𝑦𝑒−𝑛𝑡 (13) 𝜃0 = 𝑒A2𝑦 and 𝜃 = 𝑒A2𝑦𝑒−𝑛𝑡 (14) Where

A1 =−1± 1+4( 𝑀−𝑛)

2 = [1± 1+4( 𝑀−𝑛)

2 ] (15) A2 = −Pr± Pr22−4( 𝑛Pr) = [Pr± Pr22−4( 𝑛Pr) ]

(16) Skin friction coefficient at the plate is given by

𝜏 = [ 𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑦]at y= 0 = A1𝑒−𝑛𝑡 (17) Table -1 according to equation (13)

Y A1 M n t u

0 1.96628 2 0.1 2 0.818730 1 1.96628 2 0.1 2 5.849054 2 1.96628 2 0.1 2 41.78594 3 1.96628 2 0.1 2 298.83153 4 1.96628 2 0.1 2 2132.60603

(3)

ACCENT JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS ECOLOGY & ENGINEERING

Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal IMPACT FACTOR: 2.104 (INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL) UGC APPROVED NO. 48767, ISSN No. 2456-1037

Vol.02, Issue 03, March 2017, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE

3 Fig. 1 Now we take different values of t

then according to (13) Table -2

y A1 M n t u

0 1.96628 2 0.1 2 0.818730 1 1.96628 2 0.1 4 4.788417 2 1.96628 2 0.1 6 28.00827 3 1.96628 2 0.1 8 163.8251 4 1.96628 2 0.1 10 958.26082

Fig.-2

Again we take different value of t then table-3 according to (13)

y A1 M n t u

0 1.96628 2 0.1 5 1.64872 1 1.96628 2 0.1 10 2.62814 2 1.96628 2 0.1 15 11.38731 3 1.96628 2 0.1 20 49.34517 4 1.96628 2 0.1 25 213.81261

Fig.-3

Table 4 According to equation (14)

y A2 Pr n t 𝜃

0 1.89442 2 0.1 2 0.818730 1 1.89442 2 0.1 2 5.44348 2 1.89442 2 0.1 2 36.19062 3 1.89442 2 0.1 2 240.61544 4 1.89442 2 0.1 2 1599.74577

Fig. 4

Again differen value of t and Pr table-5

y A2 Pr n t 𝜃

0 1.18920 1 0.1 5 1.64872 1 1.18920 1 0.1 10 1.20828 2 1.18920 1 0.1 15 2.40704 3 1.18920 1 0.1 20 4.79512 4 1.18920 1 0.1 25 9.55247

Fig. 5

Graph between y and 𝜏 for Skin friction coefficient according equation (17)

Table -6

Y A1 M n t 𝝉

0 1.96628 2 0.1 2 1.60985 1 1.96628 2 0.1 2 11.49995 2 1.96628 2 0.1 2 82.15793 3 1.96628 2 0.1 2 586.95222 4 1.96628 2 0.1 2 4193.30058

Fig. 6 3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

(4)

ACCENT JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS ECOLOGY & ENGINEERING

Peer Reviewed and Refereed Journal IMPACT FACTOR: 2.104 (INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL) UGC APPROVED NO. 48767, ISSN No. 2456-1037

Vol.02, Issue 03, March 2017, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE

4 The effect of temperature and the effect of velocity both are depend on the value of y and t. If the value of y increase then decreasing the u by fig. 1. Parameter M and n change the velocity of unsteady boundary layer also change, the dimensionless temperature profile as well as the thermal unsteady boundary layer thickness quickly reduces as increasing Pr. Similarly thermal boundary layer thickness decreases for some higher values of heat source parameter heat absorption occurs at the sheet. The rate of heat transfer increases with Prandtl number.

REFERENCES

1. Bidin, B., Nazar, R., (2009). Numerical Solution of the Boundary Layer Flow Over an Exponentially Stretching Sheet with Thermal Radiation. Eur. J. Sci. Res., 33(4), 710-717.

2. Kee Soo Han, Hyung Jin Sung andMyungKyoon Chung, ―Analysis of heat transfer in a pipe carrying two-phase gas- particle

3. suspension,‖ International Journal of Heat and Mass transfer, volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 69-78(1991).

4. Pal, D. (2010). Mixed convection heat transfer in the boundary layers on an exponentially stretching surface with magnetic field. Appl.

Math. Comput., 217, 2356-2369.

5. El-Aziz, M.A. (2007). Viscous dissipation effect on mixed convection flow of a micropolar fluid over anexponentially stretching sheet. Can. J. Phys., 87, 359-368.

6. Gireesha, B.J. Ramesh, G.K. Abel, S.M., Bagewadi, C.S. (2011a). Boundary layer flow and heat transfer of a dusty fluid flow over a stretching sheet with non-uniform heat source/sink. Int. J. of Multiphase Flow, 37(8), 977-982.

7. Gireesha, B.J., Manjunatha, S., Bagewadi, C.S. (2011b). Unsteady hydromagnetics boundary layer flow and heat transfer of dusty fluid over a stretching sheet. Afrika Matematika, 22, (Article in Press).

8. Gireesha, B.J., Roopa, G.S., Bagewadi, C.S.

(2011c). Boundary layer flow of an unsteady dusty fluid and heat transfer over a stretching sheet with non uniform heat source/sink. Engineering, 3.

9. E. Magyari and B. Keller (1999): Heat and mass transfer in the boundary layers on an exponentially stretching continuous surface.

J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 32: 577-585.

10. B.C. Sakiadis (1961): Boundary-layer behavior on continues solid surfaces: II. The boundary-layer on continuous flat surface, AIChE J.vol. 7, pp. 221-225.

11. L. Crane (1970): Flow past a stretching plate.

Z. Angew Math Phys (ZAMP), vol.21, pp.645- 647.

12. K.B. Pavlov (1974): Magnetohydrodynamic flow of an incompressible viscous fluid caused by the deformation of a plane surface, Magn. Gidrondin, vol.4, pp.146-152.

13. A. Chakrabarthi and A.S. Gupta (1979): A note on MHD flow over a stretching permeable surface, Q.Appl.Math.vol. 37, 1979, pp. 73-78.

14. T. Chiam (1993): Magneto hydrodynamic boundary layer flow due to a continuous moving flate plate. Comput. Math. Appl. vol.

26, pp.1-8.

15. N.F.M. Noor, O. Abdulaziz and I. Hashim (2010): MHD fow and heat transfer in a thin liquid film on an unsteady stretching sheet by the homotopy analysis method, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 63, pp. 357–373.

16. A. Y. Ghaly (2002): Radiation effects on a certain MHD free convection flow. Chaos, Solutions and Fractals, 13, pp. 1843-1850.

17. A. Raptis (2004): Effect of thermal radiation on MHD flow. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 153, pp. 645-649.

18. I. C. Liu (2005): A note on heat and mass tranfer for a hydromagnetic flow over a stretching sheet. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 32, pp. 1075-1084.

19. C. H. Chen (1998): Laminar mixed convection adjacent to vertical, continuously stretching sheets. Heat and Mass Transfer, 33, pp. 471- 476.

20. A. Ishak, R. Nazar and I. Pop (2008):

Hydromagnetic flow and heat transfer adjacent to a stretching vertical sheet. Heat Mass Transfer, 44, pp. 921-927.

21. R. Kandasamy, Wahid Abd.B. Md.Raj, and Azme B. Khamis (2006): Effects of chemical reaction, heat and mass transfer on boundary layer flow over a porous wedge with heat radiation in the presence of suction or injection, Theoret. Appl. Mech., Vol (33) No (2), pp.123.

22. P. G. Saffman, ―On the stability of laminar flow of a dusty gas,‖ Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 13, pp. 120–128, 1962.

23. K. M. Chakrabarti, ―Note on boundary layer in a dusty gas,‖AIAA Journal, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1136–1137, 1974.

24. N. Datta and S. K.Mishra, ―Boundary layer flow of a dusty fluid over a semi-infinite flat plate,‖ Acta Mechanica, vol. 42, no. 1-2, pp.

71–83, 1982.

25. M. Jalil and S.Asghar, ―Flowof power-lawfluid over a stretching surface: a Lie group analysis,‖ International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, vol. 48, pp. 65–71, 2013.

26. H. I. Andersson, ―MHD flow of a viscoelastic fluid past a stretching surface,‖ Acta Mechanica, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 227–230,1992.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

S., Acrivos A., “Slow Flow Past Periodic Arrays of Cylinders with Application to Heat Transfer”, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, Vol.. S., Yao C., “Transport Processes

Last Name First Name NAME OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SHS STRAND MACARIOLA MIGUEL ANDREI Notre Dame of Marbel University - Integrated Basic Education Department SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY,