• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Molecular identification of Deinocerites atlanticus (Adames, 1971) (Diptera: Culicidae) using cytochrome oxidase I

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Molecular identification of Deinocerites atlanticus (Adames, 1971) (Diptera: Culicidae) using cytochrome oxidase I"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

J Vector Borne Dis 55, March 2018, pp. 63–65

Deinocerites atlanticus (Adames, 1971) is a widely distributed mosquito, which has been reported in Pan- ama, Colombia and Venezuela1. The immature stage of this genus develops in the water accumulated inside holes, excavated by crabs; and adult mosquitoes are generally active at night. The females are considered opportunistic and ingest blood from a variety of vertebrates, including mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and birds2–3. Very few studies have been carried out on the behaviour, ecology, and biology of this species; and the role they play as a vector in transmitting possible diseases in vertebrates is largely unknown.

Normally, these mosquitoes are not considered as threat to public health, but some species are occasionally infected with arboviruses, including Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) and St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV)4. In Colombia, the species De. atlanticus has been studied to determine if the environmental condi- tions were favourable for the reappearance of VEEV in a rural area of the Manaure municipality (Guajira)5. Re- cently, VEEV was detected in specimens belonging to De.

atlanticus in a rural area from San Bernardo del Viento (Córdoba, Colombia)6. In this study, we used the DNA barcode methodology for molecular identification, in the mosquito species De. atlanticus collected in the rural area of San Antero, a coastal municipality from the Cordoba region (Colombia), because it has allowed to supply cer- tain limitations that the morphological identification of the species presents; complementing, corroborating and recognizing new species, which are stored in databases such as BOLD or GenBank, as well as studying species complexes and knowing the biological richness of the species that circulate in different geographical areas.

Mosquitoes used in this study were collected between July and September 2016 in a rural area from San Antero (Tijo, 9°21′ 59.63″ N, 75°48°51.91″ W) (Córdoba, Co- lombia). Adults were collected using manual aspirators and Shannon traps close to rural forest patches, farms and

mangroves. Three Shannon traps were installed (distrib- uted one per site, i.e. rural forest patches, farms, and man- groves) at a height of 1.5 m from the ground level. They operated from 1800 to 2100 hrs. Each trap recorded date, time, coordinates, and type of coverage. A total of 100 specimens belonging to Culicidae family were collected, of which 20 were selected for this study, as they were in good condition and according to the morphological char- acteristics belonged to the species De. atlanticus, using pictorial keys1, 7. Legs from specimens identified as De.

atlanticus were removed, the DNA was extracted using the protocol described by Atencia et al8. Amplification of the ~680 nt fragment of the DNA barcode region from the COI gene was achieved using the primer pair LCO-1490/

HCO-21989–10. PCR-mix contained, 1 × NH4SO4 buffer, 1 mM each DNTP, 5 mM of MgCl2, 0.5 µM each primer, 0,4 U of taq polymerase (Bioline, Maryland) and 4 µl of DNA template. Water of molecular biology quality was added to the mixture to make the total volume up to 50 µl. The PCR thermocycler parameters included a single cycle at 94 °C for 10 min followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 60 sec, 50 °C for 60 sec and 72 °C for 60 sec, termi- nating with a 72 °C cycle for 5 min as the final extension step and a 4 °C hold. PCR products were visualized on 1% agarose gels, containing ethidium bromide (diluted to 1/50), using a Dark Reader lector (Imagen, Alexandria).

PCR products were sequenced using the same LCO/HCO primers utilizing the sequencing services of Macrogen company (Seoul, Korea). Sequences were manually edit- ed in Bioedit v7.2.0 software (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/

BioEdit/bioedit.htm) and consensuses in the FASTA for- mat were aligned in ClustalW11. Genetic distances were estimated in MEGA12 v6.0 using the Kimura 2-param- eter model (K2P)13, and molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTU’s) were identified according to calculated genetic distances and clusters within a dendrogram in- ferred by the neighbour-joining (NJ) algorithm14 (K2P model bootstrap = 1000 replications)15. Culex (Melano-

Molecular identification of Deinocerites atlanticus (Adames, 1971) (Diptera: Culicidae) using cytochrome oxidase I

Angie Toro-Cantillo & Richard Hoyos-López

Grupo de Investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales y Resistencia Bacteriana, Universidad del Sinú, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Córdoba, Colombia

Key words Colombia; Córdoba; Culicidae; DNA COI-Barcode; Deinocerites; neighbour-joining

(2)

J Vector Borne Dis 55, March 2018 64

conion) erraticus (Say, 1823) was used as an outgroup because they are good references for inter-species genetic distances. Genetic diversity parameters were estimated by polymorphic sites, a number of haplotypes, haplotype diversity, nucleotide diversity, and Tajima neutrality tests using DnaSP v5.0 software16.

A total of 20 sequences were studied, of which eight belonged to rural forest patches, six to farms and six be- longed to mangroves. The sequences were compared with the sequences available in the GenBank database to verify the taxonomic identification. The sequences ob- tained have a length of 694 nt for De. atlanticus and cor- respond to positions 295 to 945 of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase I (Reference sequence in GenBank:

AF425846.1 – Ae. aegypti). Comparison revealed that, all 20 sequences were compatible with genus Deinocerites, with 100% similarity to the sequences of De. atlanticus stored in the GenBank database. No insertion-deletion events were evident in the sequences analyzed, and the presence of stop codons, characteristic of nuclear copies of mitochondrial genes (NUMT’s), was not detected.

In total five haplotypes were identified, showing a haplotype diversity of 0.68 and eleven polymorphic sites (Table 1); the intra-species genetic distances under Kimura-2 model parameters were low (0.007), indicating the presence of conspecific individuals of the same spe- cies. Interspecies genetic distances for De. atlanticus–Cx.

erraticus (0.105) corresponded to recorded estimates for species differentiation in mosquitoes17–18 and matched with species-specific MOTUs in the NJ dendrogram (Fig. 1).

The taxonomic identification and correct differentia- tion of Culicidae is a priority in vector incrimination and disease prevention19; however, the high morphological similarity between species and the existence of cryptic species complexes makes the use of molecular markers necessary in order to resolve these taxonomic problems and provide for the rapid recognition of vectors. The se- quences reported in this study could be of help in metage- nomic studies searching for arboviruses20–21, taxonomic confirmation22, and in the determination of role that mos-

Table 1. Haplotype distribution in sequences of Deinocerites atlanticus collected from a Municipality of Córdoba (Colombia)

Haplotype Haplotype distribution Sampling area

Hap_1 [1, 16] MF179306_De_atlanticus, MF179302_De_atlanticus Farms

Hap_2 [2–6, 9–14] MF179288_De_atlanticus, MF179289_De_atlanticus, MF179290_De_atlanticus, MF179291_De_atlanticus, MF179292_De_atlanticus, MF179295_De_atlanticus, MF179296_

De_atlanticus, MF179297_De_atlanticus, MF179298_De_atlanticus, MF179299_De_atlanticus, MF179300_De_atlanticus

Rural forest patches, Mangroves

Hap_3 [7] MF179293_De_atlanticus Rural forest patches

Hap_4 [8, 15, 17, 19] MF179294_De_atlanticus, MF179301_De_atlanticus, MF179303_De_atlanticus,

MF179305_De_atlanticus Farms

Hap_5 [18, 20] MF179304_De_atlanticus, MF179306_De_atlanticus Rural forest patches

Fig. 1: Neighbour-joining dendrogram estimated with sequences of cytochrome oxidase I obtained from De. atlanticus and Cx. erraticus (Kimura-2-parameter, bootstrap = 1000 repli- cates). The branch values indicate the bootstrap clusters in same MOTU (values >50). The final alignment was for 657 nucleotides.

quitoes play as vectors in transmitting arboviruses in ver- tebrates4, 23.

Comparing the sequences of this study with those stored in the barcode of life database (BOLD), inconsis- tencies with the species were evident; however, access to the sequences stored in BOLD is private making it diffi- cult to the access the relevant information of the sequences studied. In contrast, the sequences stored in GenBank pre- sented a 100% concordance for the species De. atlanticus.

The municipality of San Antero is characterized by an altitude of <100 m, containing multiple mangroves with well-irrigated soils due to streams, causing formation of several ponds, which are suitable spaces for the proper development of this species of mosquito, since its devel- opment occurs in water accumulated in holes excavated by crabs24. Their biting activity may extend to humans6. However, many essential aspects of De. atlanticus aff.

biology remains unknown. For De. atlanticus, arbovirus

(3)

65 detection is just one aspect of vector incrimination, and

more data are needed to define vector competence, iden- tify specific habitats, biting behaviour, and blood feeding patterns6. In Colombia, records of the species De. atlanti- cus, have been reported in a study, that examined whether the environmental conditions were favourable for the re- appearance of VEEV in a rural area of the Municipality of Manaure (Guajira). This study observed that De. atlanti- cus was the most abundant species (91%) of the collected specimens, making it a vector of importance in the study area, as the prevalent environmental conditions and epi- demiological situation could favour the reappearance of the VEEV virus in this locality.

Ethical statement

There is no any ethical consideration in this study.

Conflict of interest

There is no any conflict of interest to declare in this study.

REFERENCES

1. Adames AJ. Mosquito studies (Diptera: Culicidae) XXIV. A re- vision of the crabhole mosquitoes of the genus Deinocerites.

Contrib Amer Ent Inst 1971; 7(2): 156. Available from: http://

mosquito-taxonomic-inventory.info/sites/mosquito-taxonomic- inventory.info/files/Adames 1971.pdf (Accessed on September 11, 2017).

2. Harbach RE, Kitching IJ, Culverwell CL, Dubois J, Linton YM.

Phylogeny of mosquitoes of tribe Culicini (Diptera: Culicidae) based on morphological diversity. Zoologica Scripta 2012;

41(5): 499–514.

3. McIver S, Siemicki R. Fine structure of the antennal tip of the crabhole mosquito, Deinocerites cancer Theobald (Diptera: Cu- licidae). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 1976; 5(6): 319–34.

4. Betancourt A, Loaiza JR. An effective sampling tool for adult crabhole inhabiting Deinocerites mosquitoes. J Vector Ecol 2016; 41(1): 200–3.

5. Ferro C, Boshell J, Moncayo A, Gonzalez M, Ahumada M, Kang W, et al Natural enzootic vectors of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, Magdalena Valley, Colombia. Emerg Infect Dis 2003; 9(1): 6.

6. Hoyos-López R, Suaza-Vasco J, Rúa-Uribe G, Uribe S, Gallego- Gómez JC. Molecular detection of flaviviruses and alphaviruses in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from coastal ecosystems in the Colombian Caribbean. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2016;

111(10): 625–34.

7. Forattini OP. Culicidología Médica– Identificação Biologia Epi- demiologia. Sao Paulo, Brazil: EDUSP–Publisher of the Uni- versity of São Paulo 2002; 2: 549 Available from: https://books.

google.com.co/books?id=zCob XoCkYqcC&printsec=frontcove r&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=fals

ehttps://books.google.com.co/books?id=zCobXoCkYqcC&prin tsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onep age&q&f=false (Accessed on September 15, 2017).

8. Atencia M, Pérez M, Jaramillo M, Caldera S, Cochero S, Be- jarano E. Primer reporte de la mutación F1534C, asociada con resistencia cruzada a DDT y piretroides, en Aedes aegypti de Colombia. Biomédica 2016; 36: 20.

9. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA prim- ers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 1995; 3(5): 294–9.

10. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, Jeremy R. Biological identi- fications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 2003; 270(1512):

313–21.

11. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, Mcgettigan PA, Mcwilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0.

Bioinformatics 2007; 23(21): 2947 –8.

12. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6:

Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Bio Evol 2013; 30(12): 2725–9.

13. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16(2): 111–20.

14. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbour-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees’ 1987. Available from:

http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/4/4/406.long (Accessed on October 10, 2017).

15. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39(4): 783–91.

16. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009;

25(11): 1451–2. Available from: http://bioinformatics.oxford- journals.org/content/25/11/1451.full.pdf+html (Accessed on October 10, 2017).

17. Cywinska A, Hunter FF, Hebert PDN. Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Med Vet Entomol 2006; 20(4): 413–24.

18. Kumar NP, Rajavel AR, Natarajan R, Jambulingam P. DNA barcodes can distinguish species of Indian mosquitoes (Diptera:

Culicidae). J Med Entomol 2007; 44(1): 1–7.

19. Krzywinski J. Besansky NJ. Molecular systematics of Anoph- eles: From subgenera to subpopulations. Annu Rev Entomol 2003; 48: 111–39.

20. Tinker ME, Olano VA. Ecologia del Aedes aegypti en un pueblo de colombia, sur america. Biomedica 1993; 13(1): 5–14.

21. Valentini A, Taberlet P, Decollato VSG. DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends Ecol Evolt 2008; 24(2): 110–7.

22. Pérez A, Bejarano E, Sierra D, Vélez Í. Caracteres moleculares para la determinación taxonómica de tres especies de Lutzomyia (Diptera: Psychodidae), vectores potenciales de Leishmania presentes en el valle de Aburrá, Colombia. Rev Soc Entomol Ar- gent 2008; 67 (3–4): 99–108.

23. Cook S, Diallo M, Sall AA, Cooper A, Holmes EC. Mitochon- drial markers for molecular identification of Aedes mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) involved in transmission of arboviral dis- ease in West Africa. Evolution J Med Entomol 2005; 42(1):

19–28.

24. Cortes-Castillo D, Rangel O. Mangrove forests in a salinity gra- dient at Cispata bay–Boca Tinajones, Department of Córdoba- Colombia. Scielo 2011; 33(1): 155–76.

Correspondence to: Ms. Angie Toro-Cantillo, Cra. 1w No. 38-153, 4536534, Barrio Juan XXIII, Montería, Córdoba, Colombia.

E-mail: [email protected]

Received: 3 November 2017 Accepted in revised form: 22 January 2018

Toro-Cantillo & Hoyos-López: Molecular identification of De. atlanticus

Referensi

Dokumen terkait