View of A CONCEPTUAL RESEARCH ON FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ON PROFITABILITY

(1)

Vol. 02, Issue 02, February 2017, Available Online: www.ajeee.co.in/index.php/AJEEE

1

A CONCEPTUAL RESEARCH ON FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ON PROFITABILITY Sunil Kumar Soni, Assistant Professor

Faculty of Commerce, Sonamati Mhavidyalya, Billahaur, Kanpur

Abstract:- Fiscal administration need the possibility to impact productivity in the short run and additionally in the long run both through incurrence about fetches through encouraging era for income. This Examine paper plans should research those association the middle of fiscal administration and profitability of the domestically-listed vast petrochemical organizations. Those variables viewed as are in length term obligation on value Ratio, current Ratio, stock Ratio, debt holders proportion Furthermore benefit following assessment on deals proportion. The information might have been investigated utilizing numerous relapse strategies. The comes about acquired recommend that long expression obligation on value proportion seems to bring huge Be that negative association for benefit. This heads us on have confidence that the Undertakings Hosting more level obligation part have a tendency to be that's only the tip of the iceberg gainful. It further focuses out that stock Furthermore debt holders don't have noteworthy impact on the profitability. This examination might assistance those corporate chiefs Furthermore academicians to create exceptional knowledge to fiscal administration done their endeavor to streamline the profitability.

Keywords:- Long Term Debt, Inventory, Debtors, Profitability, India.

1. INTRODUCTION

Money related administration need been accepting expanded consideration from both academic groups and also professionals basically because of its enormous possibility done bringing practicality and superior execution As far as productivity of the endeavor. This possibility will be constructed under both parts for money related administration viz.

Assembly about finances and organization from claiming subsidizes.

Once person end, assembly from claiming finances at different scales call for incurrence about fitting fetches same time during the opposite end, organization for subsidizes must make precisely carried On An way such-and-such profitable assets, settled or current, are made need aid skilled of generating wanted stream for returns of the association.

This process, therefore, is perplexing and multi-dimensional. A few variables for example, money & attractive securities, inventories, debtors, progresses made, conceded income expenditures, settled assets, investments, saves Also surplus, equity offer capital, offer premium, debenture and different in length term borrowings, transient borrowings, creditors, bank developments Also procurements assume their part.

Each about these variables need distinctive frequencies Also changing degrees for impact on the benefit of the

endeavor. The undertaking for exploiting full potentials for money related administration is In this way not difficult.

Not concentrating at variables may be an alluring likelihood or that Choice about intuition-based variables prone will make productive in the perspective for element benefits of the business planet. Those issues of ascertaining imperative variables might be better tended to through an research-based methodology.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

Examination researchers bring broadly visited diverse hones about money related administration on create superior seeing something like the affiliation exist the middle of money related administration and the benefit of the business endeavor.

For example, Different analysts for example, (Ross, 1977), (DeAngelo &

Masulis, 1980), (Thies & Klock, 1992), (Stohs & Mauer, 1996) and (Fama &

French, 2002) need critically investigated those capital structure for Different ventures starting with diverse perspectives.

(Pandey, 1985), (Bhat, 1980) gazed to of the association "around those measure from claiming firm, profitability, risk, development and the capital structure.

Kim Hiang Liow (2010) investigated firm’s value, growth, benefit Furthermore capital structure. On the

(2)

2 other end, (Lazaridis & Tryfonidis, 2006), (Vishnani & Shah, 2007) Also (Khalaf, 2012) Furthermore (John, 2014) investigated diverse parts about attempting money for finer seeing from claiming their Acquaintanceship with benefit of the endeavor. The Examine inputs by Different creators are quickly depicted the following.

(Ross, 1977), (Leyland & Pyle, 1977) need watched that the directors are not just punished for insolvency as well as would reward to expand in the valuation of securities. Ross supporters that that capital structure and the quality of the firm bear certain companionship.

As stated by Leyland Pyle, those promoters’ stake cam wood is utilized similarly as an sign for nature. That determination about money structure toward the business endeavor signs the outside moguls for the vicinity of deviated data energetic about the insiders.

(Kishore, 1978) inspected those capital structure of the open Undertakings Furthermore proposed that thinking ought to make favored over thumb principle same time outlining the capital structure of the open Undertakings. Money ability of the endeavor must be given due imperativeness same time figuring out the acquiring breaking points.

(DeAngelo & Masulis, 1980) advocated that that vicinity about corporate charge shields for example, such that devaluation and investment expense credits implies that there exists business sector harmony for which each firm meets expectations out an exceptional ideal capital structure to itself. Money structure decision wherein corporate also differential individual levy exist, the supply side alterations organizations enter under determination about harmony estimating for obligation Also equity.

Bhat, Ramesh (1980) investigated the impacts of business risk, size, growth, payout policy, debt-service capacity, profitability and degree of operating leverage on the capital structure decisions of the firm. They examined 62 companies from engineering industry using multiple regression technique and found that business risk, dividend policy, profitability and debt service capacity of

the firm had significant influence on debt- equity choice.

(Titman, 1984) used product market route to analyze financial distress and capital structure. If the product or service is durable in nature, the customers might be interested in financial health of the company. The higher debt component in a company’s capital structure does not send a positive signal in the product market whereas it adversely affects the product’s competitive advantage. Hence, companies with larger debt component in capital structure are likely to experience financial difficulties leading to bankruptcy. This means that the firm’s capital structure critically influences profitability of the enterprise.

(Pandey, 1985) conducted an in- depth study about the impact of industrial patterns, trend and volatility of leverage, size, profitability and growth on the debt equity mix of the business enterprise using a sample of 743 companies from across the 18 industrial groups. He observed the absence of any significant structural relationship among leverage, profitability and growth.

(Harris & Raviv, 1991) examined a link between firm’s capital structure and managerial control, voting rights. They noticed that the optimal capital structure is determined by the strategic role of the debt in providing the manager with critical resources to acquire voting rights, particularly when the managers are liquidity-constrained to buy enough votes in large firms. The incumbent managers may use the debt equity mix as an anti- take-over measure by exploiting the fact that common stock carries voting rights, but debt does not carry voting rights.

(Thies & Klock, 1992) observed that risk bears negative association with long term debt. However, risk bears positive relationship with short term debt as high variability transfers financing from long term debt to short term debt and equity.

(Stohs & Mauer, 1996) in their study found that the size of the firm and capital structure are positively related.

(Shin & Soenen, 1998) examined the relationship between the net trade cycle as a measure of working capital and Return on Investment (ROI) in U.S firms.

They observed a negative association between the length of net trade cycle and

(3)

3 Return on Assets (ROA). In addition, this inverse relationship between net trade cycle and return on assets differed from industry to industry.

(Fama & French, 2002) studied how dividend decisions and debt decisions impact the value of firm.

According to them, such decisions do convey information about firm’s profitability. They observed negative relationship between the firm’s value and dividend payout. However, a firm’s value and debt were found to have positive association.

(Deloof, 2003) conducted a study of 1,009 Belgian firms from 1992-1996 to examine the impact of working capital management on the profitability. They noticed a significant relationship among profitability record receivables, inventories Furthermore record payables Furthermore recommended that administrators to belgian organizations might move forward benefit though they lessen record receivables, inventories and account payables should a sensible least.

(Sarma, Thenmozhi, & Preeti, 2004), clinched alongside their study, recognized that the organizations with higher power want non-traditional obligation over universal debt. As stated by them, the organizations for non- traditional obligation relevantly viewed as those criteria for example, such that profitability, money ratio, instability about income Also insolvency expenses.

(Pandey, 2004) investigated over the relationship the middle of capital structure Also profitability for 208 Malaysian organizations starting with 1994 to 2000 Also watched saucer- shaped association between capital structure Furthermore benefit.

(Lazaridis & Tryfonidis, 2006) investigated those cooperation the middle of working money oversaw economy and benefit of diverse Undertakings Furthermore watched that debtors, inventories Loan bosses required some companionship with productivity. That association of the accounts receivables and record payables were positively related for the benefit also required helter skelter measurable noteworthiness.

However, the affiliation from claiming stock with the productivity might have been statistically inconsequential. They recommended that record receivables Also

record payables are those zones that need more terrific thoughtfulness regarding enhance those profitability of the endeavor.

(Vishnani & Shah, 2007), in their study, watched negative affiliation the middle of profitability execution indicators and working money oversaw economy.

(Kim Hiang Liow, 2010) for their involved contemplate for firm’s value, growth, productivity capital structure for organizations watched that bigger measured organizations performed superior starting with see purpose for business valuation and were in a position should produce sure monetary influence impacts for exceptional benefit polishes indicators.

(Satyanarayana, Ramanandh, &

Sampathkumar, 2011) watched that present advantages have negative relationship with benefit. (Osama & l. An., 2011) analyzed 53 jordanian organizations recorded for amlodipine besylate stock trade Furthermore watched that those record receivables, stock and record payables needed negative Yet noteworthy companionship with productivity of the organizations.

Similarly, (Khalaf, 2012), clinched alongside as much ponder on jordanian organizations watched that venture for present benefits Furthermore benefit need aid negatively related.

(John, 2014), Previously, as much investigation of manufacturing organizations recorded for Ghana stock Exchange, recognized that debt holders required huge negative association for benefit while those stock needed sure affiliation for benefit.

3. NEED FOR THE STUDY

Similarly as relevantly brought crazy by the written works review, percentage writers for example, (Kishore, 1978);

(Sarma, Thenmozhi, & Preeti, 2004) have inspected money structure from separate perspectives. A couple others similar to Bhat r (1980) (Pandey, 1985) need recognized different variables for example, span about firm, development Also instability about profit. An association about writers recorded similarly as (Shin

& Soenen, 1998), (Deloof, 2003), (Lazaridis & Tryfonidis, 2006), (Vishnani

& Shah, 2007) (John, 2014) have

(4)

4 investigated the companionship from claiming attempting capital benefit.

However, those capital structures for long run time allotment and attempting money with short run time allotment necessities should make at the same time analyzed for reference to their Acquaintanceship for productivity and the extent from claiming impact they push on the benefit of the endeavor.

To this motivation in this research paper, long term debt to equity proportion (henceforth, LTDER), current proportion (henceforth, CR), stock proportion (henceforth, IR) debt holders proportion (henceforth, DR) and benefit then afterward duty on bargains (henceforth, PATSR) need aid utilized similarly as variables. The subtle elements from claiming each proportion may be provided for On addendum – 1. Amongst the said variables, LTDER, CR, ir Furthermore DR need aid free variables same time PATSR may be a subordinate variable.

3.1 Hypotheses Development

Based on the literature review and the variables stated above, the following hypotheses were developed:

1. Ho: LTDER has no significant influence on PATSR

H1: LTDER has significant influence on PATSR

2. Ho: CR has no significant influence on PATSR

H1: CR has significant influence on PATSR

3. Ho: IR has no significant influence on PATSR

H1: IR has significant influence on PATSR

4. Ho: DR has no significant influence on PATSR

H1: DR has significant influence on PATSR

4. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 4.1 Research Objectives

The research objectives, therefore, are 1. To develop better understanding of

the relationship of LTDER, CR, IR and DR with PATSR and extent of influence they exert on profitability of the enterprise.

2. To develop better insights into financial management practices and their impact on the profitability of the enterprise.

4.2 Research Techniques

The companies in the petroleum, chemical and fertilizer industries are only considered here which is further listed on Bombay Stock Exchange and/or National Stock Exchange. The data for the variables LTDER, CR, IR, DR and PATSR were collected for a period of 10 years to weed out cyclical effects of the economy.

The data required was historical and voluminous in nature. The said data was collected from published audited annual reports, data bases such as CAPITA line, and of Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. and National Stock Exchange Ltd.

The collected data was processed using various statistical techniques to examine the relationship of independent variables with dependent variable and to know the extent of influence exerted by independent variables over dependent variables. F-test was conducted and multi co linearity amongst independent variables was checked using matrix of co- efficient of correlations and VIF statistics to lend better reliability to the results.

5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

1. The institutionalized β about autonomous variables with their particular direction, qualities Also noteworthiness level need aid delineated over table 1.

Concerning illustration stated LTDER need a solid negative relationship with PATSR since those institutionalized β about LTDER stands at –0. 461. The importance level of 0. 011 makes β (LTDER) statistically Verwoerd huge. Accordingly that weight of the confirmation recommends that those invalid theory H0 (LTDER) will be rejected while those exchange theory Ha (LTDER) will be acknowledged. This implies that LTDER exerts noteworthy impact again PATSR. A build done LTDER will bring a decay of the profitability toward number for times the worth of the institutionalized β about (LTDER).

Thusly LTDER shows up to a chance to be a paramount determinant for PATSR.

2. The institutionalized β about CR, as demonstrated to table 1, remains at +0. 010 which

(5)

5 demonstrate that cr need sure yet altogether feeble association with PATSR. Then again the noteworthiness level from claiming 0. 955 renders β (CR) will a chance to be statistically unimportant.

The weight of the evidence, therefore, prescribes that that invalid theory H0 (CR) will be acknowledged inasmuch as those exchange theory Ha (CR) may be dismisses. This implies that cr doesn't push at whatever noteworthy impact for PATSR. A transform in cr will be not inclined on realize whatever transform in PATSR.

3. As expressed for table 1, the institutionalized β from claiming IR, remains at +0. 157 which demonstrate that ir need sure Anyway powerless association for PATSR. Nonetheless morals those hugeness level for 0. 385 don’t much permit this low worth β (IR) to a chance to be statistically critical. Therefore that weight of the confirmation recommends that that invalid theory H0 (IR) may be acknowledged while those exchange theory Ha (IR) is dismisses. This implies that a transform for ir practically doesn't bring any impact through PATSR.

4. Those institutionalized β about DR, Likewise expressed for table 1, remains during -0. 161. This demonstrates that DR need negative cooperation for PATSR and the low worth of the co- efficient further recommends that that association may be powerless.

For addition, the hugeness level about 0. 379 make it statistically inconsequential. That weight of the evidence, therefore, proposes that the invalid theory H0 (DR) make acknowledged and the exchange theory Ha (DR) be rejected. This intends DR doesn't push at whatever noteworthy impact ahead PATSR. A transform clinched alongside DR is not probable will realize at whatever transform to PATSR.

5. The comes about of the fluctuation investigation need aid provided for in the table 2 reveals to that f = 2.

863 need aid at a noteworthiness level from claiming 0. 042 with DF (4, 28) which demonstrates that the sum institutionalized relapse co-efficient need aid non-zero.

6. The multi co linearity amongst those autonomous variables need been checked through grid for Co- efficient from claiming Correlations provided for Previously, said grid from claiming co-efficient about correlations uncovers that none of the four autonomous variables need co- efficient bigger over +0. 7. This may be further affirmed by VIF detail provided for to table 1. Every last one of VIF facts are under 10 Also are focused around their imply. Consequently there will be no reason for concern starting with viewpoint of multi co linearity amongst the free variables.

7. Those test outputs portrayed In focuses (5) and (6) above, give respectable dependability of the effects and the rising numerous relapse mathematical statement may be Likewise takes after.

PATSR = + 6. 305 – 0. 461 (LTDER) + 0. 010 (CR) + 0. 157 (IR) - 0. 161 (DR). Those balanced R2 i.

E. Those co-efficient for determination is 0. 189 demonstrating that those variables in the mathematical statement clarify 18. 9 % for varieties On PATSR and to those unexplained varieties in the PATSR, some other variables would answerable.

8. Those spellbinding detail applicable of the examination are delineated done table 4. The predictive quality of the examination will make more amazing whether those information sets of the organizations need aid should make concentrated on nearly on look like those example for spellbinding facts provided for in the said table.

6. FINDINGS

6.1 Capital Structure

The Long-Term Debt to Equity Ratio, an indicator of the capital structure of the company, is found to have negative

(6)

6 relationship with Profit to After Tax to Sales Ratio. The significance level of β (LTDER) makes it very relevant. This leads us to infer that the corporate in this sector consider capital structure as important variable influencing the profitability.

The research findings of (Titman, 1984) confirmed the presence of negative and significant association between the capital structure and profitability.

However, (Ross, 1977) and Leland and Pyle (1977) also identified significant but positive relationship between capital structure and profitability. On the contrary, (Pandey, 1985) noticed the absence of significant relationship between the two variables. On the other hand, Bhatt (1980) observed that profitability of the firm significantly influences the choice of capital structure.

6.2 Working Capital

The Current Ratio (Current Assets to Current Liability Ratio), an indicator of working capital of the company, is found to have positive association with Profit to After Tax to Sales Ratio. However the significance level of β (CR) renders it irrelevant. This leads us to infer that the corporate in this sector do not consider working capital as an important variable influencing the profitability. This is in sharp contrast to the findings of (Vishnani

& Shah, 2007), (Osama & L.A., 2011) who observed negative relationship between the working capital and profitability.

6.3 Inventory

The Inventory Turnover Ratio bears a positive relationship with the profitability of the enterprise. However, the unacceptable significance level does not allow it to be important. It means that the corporate do not view inventory turnover as a significant determinant of profitability. The corporate inventory holdings probably do not carry much importance. This is in sharp contrast to research findings of (Shin & Soenen, 1998) and (Deloof, 2003) who identified inventory as significant variable that shows negative relationship with profitability. On the other hand, (Lazaridis

& Tryfonidis, 2006) noticed negative association between inventory and profitability, but did not find it to be significant.

6.4 Debtors

The Debtors Turnover Ratio bears a negative relationship with the profitability of the enterprise. However, its unacceptable significance level does not allow it to be relevant. This indicates that the corporate do not view Debtors as a significant determinant of the profitability of the enterprise. The corporate do not assign much value to the credit to be extended to customers.

This is contrary to the research findings of (Shin & Soenen, 1998), (Deloof, 2003), (Lazaridis & Tryfonidis, 2006) and (John, 2014) who noticed debtors as significant variable that holds negative association with profitability.

However, (Lazaridis & Tryfonidis, 2006) noticed debtors to have significant positive association with profitability.

6.5 Recommendations & Managerial Implications

The results, discussions and findings made us to the following recommendations and implications:

 The corporate managers in the petrochemical sector need to concentrate on Long Term Debt to Equity Ratio to enhance the profitability of the company. The long term debt is to be kept as low as possible. In other words, equity will have to be given greater importance. This has broader implications in the sense that for the corporate world, shareholders will gradually replace institutional loan providers as Performance Appraisers. The corporate managers will have to pay greater attention to the long-term interests of shareholders. This in turn will require greater transparency and reliability in financial reporting besides higher levels of corporate objectives- oriented performance. This would provide a very valuable support in the development of performance- oriented culture.

 It provides a good base for academicians for further research in areas like financial restructuring to improve profitability, management of funds in medium and small size

(7)

7 companies, comparison of practices for financial management adopted by the companies in developed and developing nations.

6.6 Future Research Directions

The present study focuses on companies in the petrochemical sector listed on Bombay Stock Exchange and/or National Stock Exchange in India. The impact of financial management in other sectors of economy such as textiles, banking, insurance, engineering, infrastructure,

information technology,

telecommunication, etc. can be critically examined by carrying out replication studies, before generalizing the results.

A universal research study to compare financial management practices adopted by the companies in developed nations and developing nations can also be carried out. Further the research can also be undertaken by considering more variables such as growth rate of economy, participation in international trade etc.

REFERENCES

1. Bhat, R. (1980). Determinants of Financial Leverage: Some Further Evidence. The Chartered Accountant, 451-456.

2. DeAngelo, H., & Masulis, R. W. (1980).

Optimal Capital Structure under Corporate and Personal Taxation. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(1), 3-29.

3. Deloof, M. (2003). Does Working Capital Management Affect Profitability of Belgian firms? Journal of Business Finance &

Accounting, 3, 573-587.

4. Fama, E., & French, K. (2002). Testing Trade- off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt. Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1-3.

5. Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1991). The Theory of Capital Structure. Journal of Finance, 46(1), 297-355.

6. John, M. K. (2014). Working Capital Management and Profitability: A Study of Listed Manufacturing Companies in Ghana. Research Journal of Accounting and Finance, 5(22), 122-133.

7. Khalaf, T. (2012). Impact of Working Capital Management Policy and Financial Leverage on Financial Performance:

Empirical Evidence from Amman Stock Exchange Listed Companies. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 1(8), 1-8.

8. Kim Hiang Liow. (2010). Firm Value, Growth, Profitability and Capital Structure of Listed Real Estate Companies: An International Perspective. Journal of Property Research, 27(2), 119-146.

9. Kishore, B. (1978). Measurement of Debt Capacity - A Suggested Approach. Institute of Public Enterprises (IPE) Journal, 1, 1-4.

10. Lazaridis, I., & Tryfonidis, D. (2006).

Relationship between Working Capital Management and Profitability of Listed Companies In the Athens Stock Exchange.

Journal of Financial Management and Analysis, 19, 26-35.

11. Leyland, H., & Pyle, D. (1977). Information Asymmetries, Financial Structure and Financial Disintermediation. Journal of Finance, 32, 371- 388.

12. Osama, S., & L.A., F. (2011). Impact of Working Capital Efficiency on Profitability – An empirical Analysis on Jordanian Manufacturing Firms. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 66, 67-76.

13. Pandey, I. (1985). The Financial Leverage in India: A Study. Indian Management (March), 21-34.

14. Pandey, I. (2004). Capital structure, Profitability and market Structure:

Evidence from Malaysia. Asia pacific Journal of Economics & Business, 8(2), 78- 98.

15. Ross, S. (1977). The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive Signaling Approach. Bell Journal of Economics, spring, 8(1), 23-40.

16. Sarma, L., Thenmozhi, M., & Preeti, S.

(2004). Effect of Non- Traditional Debt on Financial Risk: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Firms. The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 10(October), 5-19.

17. Satyanarayana, C., Ramanandh, K., &

Sampathkumar, K. (2011). Relationship between Working Capital and Profitability – A Statistical Approach. International Journal of Research in Finance and Marketing, 1(7), 1-16.

18. , H., & Soenen, L. (1998). Efficiency of working capital and corporate Profitability.

Financial Practice and Education, 8, 37-45.

19. Stohs, M. H., & Mauer, D. C. (1996). The Determinants of Corporate Debt Maturity Structure. Journal of Business, 69(3), 279- 312.

20. Thies, C. F., & Klock, M. S. (1992). The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice.

Review of Financial Economics, 1(2), 40-53.