!"
#
$ %
&#'&
()
#*' +
#',
#*'
" !
# $*
"
% & ' ( $ ( *)
+ , -!
.
! "#$ % &
( )* + , - "#$ % & '
& & . /
( 1$ 2 3 45 6 $ 7 85 ( 9:# + &0
) ,
$ , <
$
"7 :
>
/
@ / 0AB C ,
$ 3 <
$ D : 'E / 0 / 0A (
/ 0 , . /( )* + ". /( , :6 * , G H 4:I #& 2 J 4.
K+ L M 4* N+
3:O C
P:5 Q$! 2 -
&
. , L, - S6T * 5 UV , J 4. "$ $ / : M " 5 . 5 .2 V W2
" , 4. X .
& J 4. X , L, - $ YPL Z $ ,
$
, J, 4* , , J 4.
. ,
O : 8 1$ [
5 L J # Q Z- P \ 2 4* 4- , ,
Z7 , J, 2 ] ^ L
"6 _:$ " .P5
" * J $ `7 , :6 , $ 8 4 * * L .
\ 4.2 V 1$ ] a L W2
* : , J 4. *, - * 1 D +
, K:
$
b c
+
$
* 4d, ec :6 +J
C 3:O C P:5
J * .
, X K: , f ,
$
g 1$ , J 4
+ 4*
$ c f L
$
D + \ .2 V , 1
4 P + 4* 1 +YPL 1
J , $ M 4. 4* * : " 5
& h # $ , Q$Z 7 4. L .
1$ ,
V6 D - f , K: * 4.2 V
4$ M * J 4. * 1 D + $ 7 85 ( 4 % , , i
* \P: j :I , .
$
&k L :6 +J * C
3:O C P:5
" J 4/
. *
. L
+$ 7 f , L,
" J 4:7 & * l +J, - b +$ 7 1$ , .P5 g7 4* * : , b+ 4* / 4 # \ .
4 _:$
4- 1 D +
"$ 2 +L
, " J 4. * D + ,
$
" J 4 .
* 4+ M mJ \ J 1$
".
"P#O , D + D + : * +5 L
4- J *
4 * K: ,
9 P3 J Z$,
$ `7 & &
& , O .
:
$ 2 4* g 1$ n b \
+
$
&k WM, c
$ 6 4+
* \ .
*
$ ]
J 4. 4+ ]
:
* .P5 g7 4*
, 9L 7
.
/1 *
% 2 :
V6 D - $ 7 85 ( 4 J 4. "#$ % , . +d * $ ,
+$ 7 ,
: / 4 # \
* X o# +#$
1K : pqrstusvprw x- 7
: B > ''yiEE@
E-mail: s.rezasoltani@gmail.com
4
* J, J 4.
1$ :P L J 4$ ,
&, * ) 5 4- " G #
"
(Merwe and Hendrik, 1997)
.
* J 4.
4 * 9:# - * G H 2 ] " , Z$, L
, ". /( , :6 , ) 5 .2 V /
$ 3:O z L M 4* N+ { 36 1 C
P:5
(Liu et al., 2007) J .
4 * W2 J Z$,
9 P3 1$ * , PL 45 &
, " - 4-
" 1 *, - 2 1$ : * , *
(Adhvaryu, 2010)
.
$
f , 1
.2 V L
4* < M " 5 .:
4. L m M 1$
, #* *, - J N 5 UV , J f ,
" J 4:J W& m$ 4 * 4* L .
g*
$ , J N .2 V
4*
* $ ,
4 V+ |$! 2 - ss
4. *, - * , J
P:# \ 4$ZN f , 4* J
Nuri and )
Jouzi, 2002
(
* 1$ ZO 4 V+ |$! 2 - * $ ,
1 2 * gV+ K:
4. 2 * } 1 . " 5 r
(Gharekhlou, 2009) J
1 D + \
K: * J h 82 PJ , , /2 - 4. * , . +d * $ , Q$ , V6 D - f , s
t,
2005) (Karam,
- , J .
.2 V $
, Z J N
$
X 4
"#$ J 4. L
V
$ 7 85 ( 9:# *, - * mN+ ~
v,
(Abbaspour and Gharaguzlu, 2006)
4.2 V
/ 4 # \ +$ 7
4 * , •
Z$, J
(Zebardast, 2001) 4 V+
" -€ \* O .
:#& .2 V $
"$ $ • ‚ , *
" 4:7 $WM N 5 UV , J 4. *, -
Merwe and Hendrik, 1997; Awad and Ela, 2003;)
1. Boolean Logic
2. Multi Criteria Evaluation (MCE) 3. Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) 4. Geographic Information System (GIS) 5. Remote Sensing (RS)
6. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Svoray et al., 2005; Taleai et al., 2007; Yang et
al., 2008; Adhvaryu, 2010; Pütz, 2011; Zhang et al., 2011
( f , L / - 1$
+ , Z*
L,
"7 L
$ b 9:#
$ 7 85 (
f ,
u K2 4
9 P3 / : M L + Q &
J D 1 , . +d * $ ,
+$ 7 w
:#& *, - / 4 # \ - M
Malczewski, 2006; Makropoulos and Butler, )
2006; Boroushaki and Malczewski, 2008;
Zarghami and Szidarovszky, 2008; Boroushaki and Malczewski, 2010; Chen et al., 2011; Nadi and Delavar, 2011
.(
+L 5 1$ * .2 V 4*
* : J *
. { 36 4*
4+
L
$ b L K 9
L , : 7
h I:
.
4+ M h I: _:$ H L,
2 L
$
"
+*
* +YPL
$ , * ,
& , O ƒ * .
g* + 4* 4d & Z $ , J N .2 V
Q .2 V
h # * $
&
, 2
* 1$ :
.2 V
Abbaspour & Gharaguzlu, 2006; )
Gharekhlou, 2009; Nuri and Jouzi, 2002
(
" 4*
j.‚ 1 2 * gV+ K:
1$ , 4- , 5 $ L
43 1$ )7, , . g
J . 1 2 * f , ,
h I: * " 4*
L, . $ 4+ L
a V.
, 5 * Q +$ 7 , / + $WM
4+ M 4- d L
g V L, . l * 1
h I: .VO J
. 2 * f ,
& " 4* 1
" 45 , *, - "2 P .
f , 1$ ,
X /O , b , Q h I: , 3 4 Y L
P , O
&
. 4*
, /
$ 1
4* DI:+ L
* b , %$ J , )VO , V* f , 1$ 4 +:#L h I:
. 1 4- ( + , • ‚ 1$ 4:/2
9- D +
$ +:#L V6 * PL L )
D ^ 4[
$
" 4 + (
D |$
, , O 4- d J
+ j :I L, . , * 8 g$ (
" # L, . , .
f , P , 4- 2 , L
7. Delphi method
8. Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA)
!"
#
$ %
&#'&
()
#*' +
#',
#7&
7 ) V6 D - + ,
( j ( 4V 4*
4: :#&
g( + +*
) 'ii C B
$ C B ( , O
9 P3
" T * &
(Eastman, 2010)
. f , 1$ ,
4*
& & „ (
8 4* \] n$ : ,
< M 4- P N$
L X /O \* O
" *
$
…
L, . 7 )* 4 : $ , 8 4 P5
4 /( 8
(Malczewski, 1999) +*
. W2
L, K: g 1$ , 4/+5
M "7
\#c C
r+/
L, * * , M "7
1&
C
s+/
"
. c
L , : 7 gb+ *
h I: t
( * .:# g( + K
• 4* 45 D +
. L,
%
$
* :#
:6 +J 3:O
C
P:5
* L
" ‚ f , .
, X † , ( 4*
{ 36 , - T / 4.2 V
1 D + \
/2 - 4. * K:
V6 D - f ,
. % 7 $ 7 85 ( 9:# % , ,
\ J , . )
1 " * O x+5 D J
, * 4 ] 7 J * 4 ] 7 ] L
( , O , * ,
"7 &
2005) (Karam,
.
g 1$ , $
€ +J, - K % L, .
‡ ] L
"7 & , O K: , 1$ +$ * J .
* W2
1:7 & +$ * +J, - % J 1 . L
b a :6 ‚, . )7, , . j :I
J .
J ,
$
* % 8 4+
/( , "6 # ".
4 * l * c
L M . m +/ * J 1
$ m , ] 1
&
*, [ 4PL L
~1cP . 4PL 1:7 & b , * L,
* Hˆ
*, [
vL
"2 6 J
. J , 2
$ +[ %
D ^
L # ˆ
L j :I
$
4* O _ , ‰
c
$
*
* .:# g( +
*, [ 6 b ,
P
$
, +
$
% 7 , 1 .
L,
*, [ { 6 ,
1. Pixel- based 2. Polygon-based 3. Fuzzy Logic 4. Multi-Objectives 5. Multi-Criteria
b ,
&
€ I W2
$ L, ‰
"7
$ 4[ 4d, ec
#*
, L
*, [ L 4/+5 , [ L
! 2 [
$ 3:O ‰ P:5
, UV ,
$
\cJ 4* Z
& b , jV.+
PL ZG
#* "
* L 6 , .
K:
$ M f , ‰
\#c C 7 +/
,
* , T "O UV a V.
$ 9L 7 , [ 1 +[
.
& ‚ mL kM ,
$ : , 1 J *
.
* :
$ 1
c .2 V / * , c * 4[ "
$
*
$ 4d, ec
b
$
* jV.+ h I: c mL kM 1 4+
J 4.
J 9L 7 .
$ 1
$
&k , { 36 4* L
* ‚ 4[ :
J 4* 1
$
4‚
PL " 1 $ "
* $ .
* 5*
%
/ * 6 '
Z[ 4* :
$ J "
:. *
AE , ' [
$ 7 85 3:I , )* :
rsF /
´ ~s
°~s tv 2 PJ ‹ 45, sF
/
´sv
°s~
vr
X ( 45, O J
J )O
"
)
\QJ r .(
X ,
0Ei .P5
"
$
: 1
rt,swr,wvw K
" * .
Z-
: J
L , l O J
$ ,
, 1 7
[ PJ J
$
.P5 Z[
: : 9 +J *
.
4 : ,
L * f /2 L [ 4:J, $ 7 85 \
, *
h 1 . , Hˆ m $ [ "J * ^
, L
.
m : L h , Z • K , \
, . 4* X PJ • K , mL [ * " 5 1 PL 4*
m$ Z7 h +5
Z * $
:P[ & , * J
.
g( + , 4d : $ L h " .O
"J , 4d :#L -
• L & mJ M D5 L
" J $ ] 4P .
Π6 : * Z : L
H• "
4P %$ J
mI* , :#L - h ( L
4P 9 O 2 PJ
+5 , * * * *
*
+J * . Π6 gP :#L - , 1$ * +*
Π6 ++- \ 1$ :P * m$ 7
h # J
. /P- * +5 , 4Q 2 ,
& , * ] ++-
J * .
Z- ,
, , „ 7 " .‚ 1 * % "2 4- :
" 9- : * %$ J .
*
‚ , : * \ 2 1 PL 4
: Q , -
4:7 $ 4. 4 1$ , L
) www.amar.org.ir .(
70 8 9
' / * 6
1 D + * $ ,
4 * , & r
Z$,
*, - "$ $
* $ , 4- N " 1 L
, *, - L 4* 4:#* 1 L
# , *
"
a L J *
*, - L D + * $ ,
* 4/ 3
D ]
" b
$ \] , W&
Liu et al., )
.(2007
* $ , +$ 7 , )O ,
.* , . +d
4 PN a L $ +J - , * $ , L, .
, O 45
\* O L : , M L, . 1$ 4- &
9 P3 a L * } / , , P- mN+
+:#L &
+J * & \* O ) 5 $ * .
4 , , . L
\ L, . 4 •
4
4 "$ L
&
(Larijani, 2007)
.
*
$ +7 4[ "J 45
4 PN 1 . * 5 & 7 L, .
, 5 * $ ,
. 4* L, . 4 PN 4- " U‚
/( 4 .
" 4:#* \ , { 6 .
, *
1. Land Suitability Assessment
:2 + , .2 V } * *
* %/
, • ‚ L, . h I: , P+L , + 4*
"7 & b , { 6 4 o# |$ * 4V* , , * $ ,
(Malczewski, 1999)
.
* X 4 , 4N : ,
b 5 L , : )* + * ,
, 4- K :I L 8: L, . +J, -
4 * 4. Z$,
, "2 6 : , J
J h I:
. J 4:7 & b , L 8: L, .
\ J , * 1$ , 1 D + \ *
i , . :
1 • K , " 5 D J
Π6 +J
9 O +J
Q# g( + 4 ] 7 L & mJ M \#& 4 ] 7 , 5 4 ] 7 ] 7 L
4 6 , 4 4 ] 7 L
*, - 4 ] 7 & „ * O , 7 } V6 :.+] L
h gP .
* f " + $ L
"
Merwe and Hendrik, 1997; Ahsan, 2003; )
Makhdoum, 2003; Karam, 2005; Tofigh, 2005;
Svoray et al., 2005; Mansor et al., 2006;
Monavari and Tabibian, 2006; Abasspour and Gharaguzlu, 2006; Liu et al., 2007; Lotfi et al.,
!"
#
$ %
&#'&
()
#*' +
#',
#7#
.(2009
X 5 , J 1 . L, . $ L, .
s
J m$ P
.
$ `7 \ *
* $ ,
Z , . +d : , D2 O #$, $ , Z7
J K:
. , b+ 1$ 4*
4$T
4 L
%
Arc Info (Version 9.3)
" 7
shape
% 4*
J \ :+ #$, $ .
4PL * 4
L 3:I 9:#
UTM #Q$
$ 3 3+ L )
\#Q M ( ,
4 L X . tp , tp J 4:7 & b , : .
"$
, * Z g 1$ , J K: L
l * } * * )* +
$
"
5 L
J 1 . , - 1 O , .
$ 1
$
"
, L
X 5
"Ž K g( + \ J " J •, J
4 6 4 K3
$T M h ‚ 7 L
4] L
L
\
\ QL } V6 Z 6
\G :#& &
M
. J * 1$ ,
gV+ K: * 4
4] 4* 1 2 * 4* K] f , "$ , L
{ 3:6 |$ f , , 4. " * O 4- ( + J .
4] D 1$ 4*
, "$ , L
J aW 4.2 V .
: /
%
/ \ L, . , : .* 4 ,
\$
"$ * l 4*
* , 4: M r
B 'ii )* %
*, - K$ . "$ ` J N s
.
, :
L
4* L, :- 7 x N: L \$ / , b+ 4*
" , ‚ T 4#$ \* O 4* L
(Eastman, 2006b)
. , 4Q+$ 4* 45 * &
K]
l +: 4+
, O K: , L
4$T , 5 J , " T &
j :I L
9L * D + , 4#$ \* O L 4* , . 4 J \$ / .
g O * 4*
4$T 9 L I* &
L
4 j :I
l J D - 9L * , . L
$ * L
* D + , +J * 4:J , O $ Q$
. 4#$ \* O *
4 -
f , 1$ +d $ Q$ * , . L
1. Byte
2. User Defined
- K:
. 4 : , 1$ , , , . L
*
4 N$ * 4- ( • 4$ M
l : , L
4 /( "
- +*
. 4 /( 1$
Z$ P * } / , , +*
+ P( * P P3 + . P P3
)
P P3 T P: * +:/ P P3
7 ( , O
, .
4 l 1 PL *
, , . L ,
D2 O
4: 7 T P: + . L
- +*
(Malczewski, 1999)
.
* , * 1$ ,
, :
tL ,
J K: 7 f
. 4*
4 P 7 , b+
$ 1 . , :- 7 L
" , ‚ "$ ` )* \QJ • L, . 4 : , +J, - b K: * 4.2 V 1$ , 4-
J 1 . )* + .
\cJ , 0
7 "$ ` )*
" J m$ P P- L .
- L K
1
Π6 +J
L & mJ M " 5 9 O +J
€ +J, - % Z
J , : ‡ ]
.
:*
%
%
*
% ;
l 4* * $ , L, . 4Q xM 4#$ \* O L
|$ L /# " PL $ * J \$ / , :
a L * 4V* , , , - 1 . b ,
. 1$ ,
D 4 # +$ 7 f , mL kM
(AHP)
J K: k$ , . L /# 1 . * .
1$ ,
4 PN f , 4#$
L
" PL $ 4*
\P 4* b , * $ , * L, . /#
$ . 1$
4#$
* xe $ 4* L N$
L ) 4-
" |$ * * /5 )P5 (
\ J . L, .
L, . |$ L * " 4* /# L , . +d * $ , \ * ] , L
+:#L . " ] "O 45, 1 . * L
Z
, & • , * Q$ , +/ * 4- ~
v k$
, o
a &
4/ •
K: &
J .
• 4Y +d
X . , &
/ B J * :P- $ L
U ]
3. Standardization
4. Consistency Ration (C.R) 5. Eigenvector
6. Graph Theory
, ] 1$ ^ , "
4* J /# L
" , ‚ +* $ 8 $ * L, . L
N
J N
Lotfi et al., 2009; Svoray et al., 2005; )
Karam, 2005
.(
, b+ 4* Z g 1$ , 4* * :
+J, - 1 * b • P5 .P5 g7
4 + M
* +/ $ L L
% 4 L : , M
B J \ PQ l +J, - .
• L, . xe
4: $ & 4/ 4 + M L , &
4 + M
4- $ L :P- , & •
/ B
\* O
+$ * J h I: * X /O
4/ L
J ) X 5 s .(
l q : : P- 4#$ * 4- r
4*
$
"7 & , O K: , L : , M
\cJ , '
" J •, .
1. Saaty (1980)
A
>
i 0
0 / i
/
>
/ A
/
* O 6
O , V*
4
# , V*
4 , V*
O O 6
*
" PL : *
" PL :P-
7 ) 9 4
<
=
&>
(
: xM
4 , :
1 . , . L
, . +d * $ , +$ 7 N .* 4 L, :- 7
"
. Z& 1$ : * h I: * $ , 1$ a L
$
$ 4+
4/ , +/ * \#Q M $ Q 1$ : * g$ ( +*
" ] , . +d * $ , .
f , * .: L
d * $ , \
, 5 , . +
.
D - f ,
V6 n$ , ,
* $ , \ , 17 1$
9 P3
" , . +d &
. f , 17 1$
L )P5
s $WM
L : f ,
Z t
(Karam, 2005) J .
+ 4 D - +$ 7 1$
, 4: M L, :- 7 , ] 4* L 8: ‘K Q 9L 7 Z 9L * , L, :- 7 /5 Q 4Q * +-
# .
|$ * , :- 7 |$, 1 G M " * V
$ , :- 7 T * " * V * " 1QP " .O J /5 .
% 9L * L, :- 7 /5 d
, , :- 7 L /# " PL 4- L, :- 7 L
, * J
.
ƒ * D - • 1$ 4- 1P‚
\ 4- J
} 7 , 4* L
|#$, ‚ $ &
2. Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) 3. Scoring
ANDgV+
J * . )O , 1 17 |$ WLC
&
\ • 4- "
)* • 1 * , L
AND
)
\O
OR ( )
†- ( , O 4 +.$ L
4 |#$, ‚ $
|#$, $ $WM
(Eastman, 2010)
. ,
$ g K , b+ 4* f , 1
4$T
$ 4$T 4 "$ L
$
"
L
1 2 * )( gV+ 4 V+
)
ANDgV+
( , / 4* $
h ` ]
$
"
g* V L 4V* ,
K:
J .
g K ,
$
"
4PL gV+ 1$ K: * L
* * L, . b ,
4:7 &
(Eastman, 2006a) J .
r
C= cj (
4V* , 1$ , :
:C
$ "$
cj
:
, . :
"$
j
: h ` ] 4$ P V6 D - K: * xe N , b+ 4* ,
4V* , g* V * $ , +$ 7 '
J \P :
s
S =Lwjxi cj (
, 1$ , 4V*
:
:S
" * V
Wj
: , :- 7
!"
#
$ %
&#'&
()
#*' +
#',
#7
xi
: f , , :- 7 7
cj
:
"$ , . : : h ` ] 4$ P L, :- 7 |$ L :* , ] 1$ 4*
)
\ ( ,
h ‚ 6 Ž +:
\] n$ : )P5 * xe J
h ` ] , h ‚
$
"
D + g( + L
aW
&
, *, - * 4 V+ D + 4
" 4* b
$ )
\cJ v
(Eastman, 2006a) ( .
4*
\QJ , g 5 \ - , (
0 m$ P
" J .
70 . 9
2 ? @ : A 7 6 / 6 &
B mJ " 7
$
"
i , 4:7, , [ 4* \ , .
$ X 5 , mL kM 1 L
'
" J •, .
4:/2
*
$ 4[ "J 45
$ c
* O
"
L 4:7, , [ 4* f ,
,
$ WM, c mL kM 1
$
"
.
$
4* , 1
4c 1P‚ 4:7, , [
& ++[ 5 : +L
$ 1
" mL kM ,
$
\* O SI ‰
8 X /O : +[
$ 5 n
$ , , [
, \* O 4[ , 5 4*
"[ J a ( , & ++[
,
$
* .
‚ , .: 1
J * .
+YPL
` )* 1
$ 7 "
" 5 K: ,
, : T
$ 4 L .
\cJ , , y
J
"
.
$
)* 1
Z
$
\* O SI ‰
8
"
& b "2 6 * L
€ j :I
$ : )K+
$ 5 n
$
9L 7 [ , ,
, .
1 . a L
, 4/ 3 )* +
* +J, -
K:
f , D - V6 ,
1 . g( + 5 * J 4. *, -
)P5 , L (
, : L
X : L 4*
GIS% - 1:6
& $ 4 # / L, .
$ L, .
1:6 x$
4#$
5 L, .
M - x$
4#$
5
% l +J, -
1 . L , .
* C
"
9
* 6 D E D
2 0 / F %
$ 3 f , )
2 * gV+
(
j$,
$
"
\G :#& L )
K] f , (
\G :#& •, 6 )
K] ^ f , )* + (
4 K3 4 6 h ‚ 7 L
@ : -
$ 3 4 *
Ahsan, 2003
' J "Ž K g( + : -
$ 3 4 *
Ahsan, 2003; Monavari and Tabibian, 2006
0
QL } V6
BB :
*
$ 3 4
Merwe & Hendrik, 1997
y 4+ M Z 6 \ L BB
:
$ 3 4 *
Liu et al., 2007
i
"K } V6 0BB
:
$ 3 4 *
Ahsan, 2003
@
$T M L 0BB
:
$ 3 4 *
Ahsan, 2003; Mansor et al., 2006
* C ) 9
7 ( % :*
j$ , , :- 7
, :- 7 , :- 7 $
, :- 7 $
D J y0y
/ B
'
" 5 B i>
/ B
0
• K , B''A
/ B m$ 7 4* ’+ " #
@ /
B B/BA0> +J1 y
“ * * , "
y / B
Œ 6 • 'i
/ B
m$ 7 4* Π6 " # y
/
B B/BA0> +JΠ6 i
‚ , " * O 0i
/ B
@ 7
\#& 4 ] 'B''
/ B
>
9 O B''A
/ B
E L & mJ M
Bi>i / B
A Q# g( + 4 ] 7
Bi>i / B
B , 5 4 ] 7
L Bi>i
/ B
4 6 , 4 ] 7 4L * L
L BA0>
/ B )$ +] 4 ] 7
@i /
B B/B0@ 1 .7 L *, - 4 ] 7 '
. 4 ] 7 0i
/ B
& X : } V6 4 ] 7 0i
/ B
„ * X : } V6 4 ] 7 y
/
B B/B''A ! L"6 $ 4 ] 7 0
& 4 ] 7
„ * L 'i
/ B
y h gP
+ $ L Bi>i
/ B
i
* f "
B''A / B
4*
$
, P \ 4 - 5 .* D 1
\QJ 0
V6 D - f , K: * 4V* , g* V ,
'
4
\]
, ‚ , , 4- J
SI J 4. *, - * 4.
&
)
\QJ i .(
* , . +d * $ , \] 4 2 4
: , 1 D + 1 . )
Q a L *
* $ J 4. * D +
( 4 K "
f , $ 4- : , " 7 * 1 * $ L
B 'ii
" , , )
\QJ i j2 ” .(
] + 4 - 4 1$ ,
$ 3 )
\#Q M L ( , O , j ( , 4- &
Q h I:
, Q# g( + 4. * k$ L
1QP .
4 o#
h I: 4: M $ 3 ,
!"
#
$ %
&#'&
()
#*' +
#',
#7*
255
0
400 1200 3000
G F ) (
255
50
JK )K >
J >
JKK >
! E :
>
255
0
)J
" >
>
! E :
! (
% L
M :
@ /: ' )
! E D # 7#N (
255
10 0
OP 8P >
8QP >
! E : / C
*
%
255
100
0
QP
>
! E : RS
#
255
20
TP
>
TQP
! E : U M VE W X
* : N
255
20
TPP OP
D
* Y Z [, C R&(
/
*
\ ]
#
255
50
45 85
D(
)
>
D(
(
255
0
9 15
A ) C (
255
100
50
QP
>
Q
>
8PP
! E : M *
*
% ,
%
70
^ 9 / : E D _( `
&2 %
" .O
" .O P 1 * , { 6 Q L
" $ L
45, |$ L 4-
" SI , , " * V
+:# 9L , N , 4 PL h V g( + 4- 4.VO 4.VO L 2 , ] 4* _T P.
J mIM .
, \Q 1$
xM "$ |$ - 47 ‚ *
- aW ". "$ + D -
. 1$ , W2
4Q2 g
|d - L )
|d - 0BBB
, :QL ( 4*
Q h I: , ". 4 o# " PL \ 2 D + L
$ & aW Q# 4.
. +J, [ b l *
D ] b 4+ M 4] 1$
:P[ ". * L
0BBB
* , :cL
“ J 4. *, -
5 L J
$ D + +:#
. +d 1 +YPL
. ‚
|d - f , * L iB
"$ , " 4* Z
6 D + 4. *, - * L, :[ 7
J aW J
.
* 1 D + $ 4
"$ 2 ‚ , J 4.
4. * D + ,
: * ". * J 0BBB
\#Q M f , , :QL
:&,Z*
iB , 4- L
+ 4*
Q * $ +/
* $ J 4. " 5 L
4 * K: , & P O
J Z$,
4 V+
& , O )
J
\Q i h ” .(
\QJ , i ) h ( * , . +d * $ , \] n$ :
: J 4. * 1 D + 1 .
" J m$ P .
\QJ , 4- , V PL
L
* . ‚ +d mJ \ J $ 4N : &
" I2 " * V 45, ".
. X 5 , 0
‚ +d " * V ".
.
J m$ P L
"
.
a' (
[ ( 7
J 9
2 @ : A 7 6 b
!"
#
$ %
&#'&
()
#*' +
#',
#7'
* C . 9
* Nc
/ [ d ; e @
". , PJ ) , :QL (
\O f ,
\#Q M
†- f ,
\#Q M
i / yE B iB
''y
' E
/ 0E>
iB ' A
0 /
0i0@
iB ' '
y 0E
/ 0y E iB
''0
i i
/ 00A@
>i ' i
@ 'y
/ 0 >
iB '00
)P5 BE
/ yy B'yy C
C
f6
* b N
g 1$ n$ :
V6 D - f , 4- L
k$ ] 36 4* 45 * , f
, * ,
* 4* } * ‚ 4
4 V+ J Z$,
*, -
J * 4:J * V .
1 2 * gV+ 4* "/# f , 1$
a V. ,
Q " : * $WM
9L 7 4: M , :6 , , L, . , :
‘K , " * V 45, , *, 9 ( W2 +-
$ P .
$ +YPL f , 1
{ 3:6 Q 1
L
L, :- 7 4* , K:
/5 4* N+ , - 1$ 4- L
9L * L, :- 7 J
. ƒ * D - • 1$
4- J
\ 2 * Q$ , |#$, ‚ $ & } 7 , 4* L
+J * .
$ 4* 4 o# 1
$ +L k 4[
b L
"O l
$
#c
K :I 5, +:#
: ,
#* , PL ZG ,
" "
. .2 V : * ,
*, - D + * $ , { 36 , $ , J N
1 2 * gV+ K: " 4* J 4.
j.‚
& " .* , PL f , 1$ 2 , 5 $ L
" * 45 , *, - "2 P .
f , ,
* 1 2 * 4
"
h I: *
$ 4+ L
Q +$ 7 , / + $WM a V. L, .
* $
4+ M 4- d , 5 L
l * 1
h I: .VO g V L, .
J . 2 , 1$
V6 D - f , , 4- "
j ( 4V 4* , 4: :#&
g( + +*
) 'ii C B
$ C B ( , O
9 P3
" T * &
.
& & „ ( 4* f , 1$ ,
4- P N$ 8 4* \] n$ : ,
< M L
" * X /O \* O
$ : , 8 4 P5
7 )* 4 : $ 8 , . L
4 /(
+*
.
* W2 L
c ‚ f ,
L , : 7 gV+ *
g( + h I:
( * .:#
K . • 4* 45 D + L,
%
$
* :#
:6 +J 3:O
C P:5 J *
.
L , : $
$ 1
\ J g . \
$ 7 85
$ 5 M \
M \#c
$
* * , 4
M
&
C M
$ K: 4
$
b f , ‰
WM, c +
$
P , 4*
L V6 PJ "
, 9L 7 L
P
* 4 2 3 a (
L
&, 4 o#
J 4.
J * . , f ,
$
& 4* , J 4
D2 O ,
$ 4 & 4* P 4‚ X ‰ 4[
( j . P3 9
&
* + :*
m 4*
+J, [ 8 4* T * UV
X /O \* O L
. 4 : 7 , L,
T e*
$ 4 L 5
$
( P ,
$
: +
/* , 6 , [ 4N ++
.
, O b g 1$ $ O 4V
L
] ] + + 4* , .
" " # \ .
4* J , `O * $ +/ + 4* , . L h #
P )O , +$
* 4V* , , +L€ L
9 P3 4- +:#L Z d
&
, * +
m * , * b a :6 X P: +J / gK:
" L : , M $ .
" * * g 1$ , W2 ,
+$ *
j :I +J, - % J 1 . L
" J L b a :6 ‚, . 1$ )7, , . .
$ L, 1 , Z* "7 g7 X 3 " 5
+J, [
& 7 L
€
$ )K+
$ P3 9
&
h #
: a V. J
$ , , " * n L
7 SI Z
$ m L
. f ,
$ L, 1 +L "7
* : P 45 4[ J
$ P3 9 9
&
+/ *
M
\#c L
$
* tp
, ] :
&
6 4[
l 4* , \ Z
$ z ,
, L
$ 1
: "2 P3
9
&
*, [ { 36 , L
V6 ‹, .:
‹ 4[
$ UV
* , , 1
P
&
#*
# ,
\ J . 5
# L
3 „ * h X :
$ 4. g L
V6 +:#L . ,
$ X , K: c h d, d 1 L
,
$ 4 b
[
$
r # 1
/ + 4* Z
9L 7 . J
1. Shortest Path
References
Abasspour, M., Gharaguzlu, A., 2006. Urban Development Model by Using Environmental Modeling and GIS and RS. Geo Sciences, 57, 54-61.
Adhvaryu, B., 2010. Enhancing urban planning using simplified models: SIMPLAN for Ahmedabad, India. Progress in Planning, 73, 113-207.
Ahsan, M., 2003. Collection of Urban Planning regulations and laws, First Volume: From beginning to 1999, Tehran: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Urban Planning and Architecture Adjutancy, Urban Planning and Architecture Research Center of Iran, 672p.
Awad, A.R., Ela, M.T.A., 2003. Urban planning for low-income groups with developed optimization models. Advances in Engineering Software, 34, 607–619.
Boroushaki, S., Malczewski, J., 2008. Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in Arc GIS. Computers and Geosciences, 34, 399-410.
Boroushaki, S., Malczewski, J., 2010. Using the fuzzy majority approach for GIS-based multi criteria group decision-making. Computers & Geosciences. 36, 3, 302-312.
Chen, Y., Li, K.W., Liu, S., 2011. An OWA-TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision analysis.
Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 5, 5205-5211.
Eastman, J.R., 2006a. IDRISI Andes Guide to GIS and Image Processing, Manual Version 15.00, IDRISI production, Clark Labs, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA. 327p.
Eastman, J.R., 2006b. IDRISI Andes: Tutorial, IDRISI production, Manual Version 15.00,Clark Labs, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA. 284p.
Eastman, J.R., 2010. Applied Remote Sensing and GIS with Idrisi. Translated and compiled by: Mahini, A.S., Kamyab, H. Mehr mahdis Publications, Tehran. 582p.
Gharekhlou, M., Pourkhabaz, H.R., Amiri, M.J., Sabokbar, H.A.F., 2009. Urban land evaluation of Ghazvin region with geographic information system. Urban and Regional Studies and Researches, 2, 51- 68.
Karam, A., 2005. Land suitability analysis for physical development in Northwest of Shiraz, applying Multi Criteria Analysis (MCE) with GIS. Geographical Researches, 54, 93-106.
Larijani, A.J., 2007. Ecotourism Capability Assessment of the Behshahr Area Using Land Erodibility and Stability Indices by Using GIS. M.Sc. Thesis. Science and Research Campus. Islamic Azad University. Tehran, 170p.
Liu, Y., Lv, X., Qin, X., Guo, H., Yu, Y., Wang, J., Mao, G., 2007. An integrated GIS-based analysis system for land use management of lake areas in urban fringe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82, 233- 246.
Lotfi, S., Habibi, K., Koohsari, M. J., 2009. An Analysis of Urban land development using Multi-Criteria Decision Model and Geographical Information System (A Case Study of Babolsar City). American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 5(1), 87-93.
Makhdoum, M., 2003. Fundamental of Land use Planning, University of Tehran Press. 289p.
Makropoulos, C.K., Butler, D., 2006. Spatial ordered weighted averaging: incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision–making. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21, 69-84.
Malczewski, J., 1999. GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. Translated by: Parhizkar, A., Gilandeh, A.G. Samt Publication, Tehran, 597p.
Malczewski, J., 2004. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress in planning,
!"
#
$ %
&#'&
()
#*' +
#',
#'&
62, 3-65.
Malczewski, J., 2006. Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis. International journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 8, 270-277.
Mansor, S., Ahmed, N., Shiriff, R., 2006. GIS Based Multi criteria Approaches to Housing Site Suitability Assessment, shaping the Change, XXIII FIG Congress, Munich, Germany, October 8-13.
Merwe, V.D., Hendrik. J., 1997. GIS-aided land evaluation and decision-making for regulating urban expansion: A South African case study. Geo Journal, 43, 135-151.
Monavari, M., Tabibian, S., 2006. Identification of environmental factors for site selection of new cities in Iran. Journal of Environmental sciences and Technology, 8, 3, 1-9.
Nadi, S., Delavar, M.R., 2011. Multi criteria, personalized route planning using quantifier-guided ordered weighted averaging operators. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 13(3), 322-335.
Nuri, J., Jouzi, S.A., 2002. Ecological land evaluation in 22nd region of Tehran municipality for urban development. Journal of Environmental sciences and Technology, 12, 33-43.
Pütz, M., 2011. Power, scale and Ikea: analyzing urban sprawl and land use planning in the metropolitan region of Munich, Germany. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 14, 177-185.
Svoray, T., Bar, P., Bannet, T., 2005. Urban land-use allocation in a Mediterranean ecotone: Habitat Heterogeneity Model incorporated in a GIS using a multi–criteria mechanism. Landscape and Urban Planning, 72, 337-351.
Taleai, M., Sharifi, A., Sliuzas, R., Mesgari, M., 2007. Evaluating the compatibility of multi functional and intensive urban land uses. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 9, 375-391.
Tofigh, F., 2005. Spatial Planning: International Experience and Its relevance for Iran, Tehran: Urban Planning and Architecture Research Center of Iran, 520p.
Yang, F., Zeng, G., Du, C., Tang, L., Zhou, J., Li, Z., 2008. Spatial analyzing system for urban land use management based on GIS and multi criteria assessment modeling. Progress in Natural Science, 18, 1279-1284.
Zarghami, M., Szidarovszky, F., 2009. Revising the OWA operator for multicriteria decision making problems under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 198(1), 259-265.
Zebardast, E., 2001. An application of analytical hierarchy process in regional and urban planning.
Honarhaye Ziba, 10, 13-20.
Zhang, X., Wu, Y., Shen, L., 2011. An evaluation framework for the sustainability of urban land use: A study of capital cities and municipalities in china. Habitat International, 35(1), 141-149.
http://www.amar.org.ir/
An Improved Integrated Model of Urban Development for Tehran Province
S. Reza Soltani1*, S. M. Monavari1, A. Salman Mahiny2and A. A. Alesheikh3
1Department of Environment and Energy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2Department of the Environment, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran
3Department of GIS Engineering, Geomatics Engineering Faculty, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
(Received: 28-08-2011 – Accepted: 17-06-2012) Abstract
Unplanned urban development imposes significant pressure on land resources and land use structures and brings about many negative socio-economic and environmental consequences.
Therefore, comprehensive studies should be applied to support urban land use management in the world and especially in developing countries. In Iran, like many other developing countries, urban development is fast and often unharnessed. Tehran province is the main focus of urban sprawl, in which strong economic state and allocation of facilities and infrastructures encourage mass migration of people and cause unplanned construction and changes in spatial structure of the region.
In this study, an integrated approach towards urban land suitability assessment in Tehran province including social – economic and ecological aspects has been implemented. The employed method and the developed model can be considered as an efficient sample of achieving sustainable urban development and regulating the physical development in Iran. In this research, a Weighted Linear Combination Method was conducted in a Geographical Information System considering 15 criteria, including social–economic and ecological factors. For weighting the criteria, the Analytic Hierarchy Process was used including opinions of ten experts. At the end, a land suitability map was produced showing suitable area for urban development. These areas include six arenas with suitable extent and desirable suitability in southern part of the province that can be used by urban planners and spatial decision makers. As the results are systematic and reproducible, they can be regarded as means of collaboration and consensus making among urban developers and decision makers.
Keywords: Multi criteria evaluation, Environmental capability, Urban development, Geographic information system, Weighted linear combination, Analytic hierarchy process, Tehran province
E-mail: s.rezasoltani@gmail.com Tel: +989123725018
Fax: +981712245886
*Corresponding author:
