• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Evaluation of pain assessment tools intensive care units

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Evaluation of pain assessment tools intensive care units"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

3 1392

:

!

" #

% & '

1

(( )* +

% - - & '

2

. / 0 *

% - - & )34* '

3

5 6 7"

4

*

% - - & )34* '

9: * #

% - - & )34* '

5 6

6

% - - & )34* '

=>?!

. ! " .

# $ %&' ( )* + , &$ - )(. . - %/ !/ /0/#

1/1%1 2 1 . 3

4 + 5 /$ 6. !/%7(# - )(. -8 2 9 !%7+ : 7+8 5

.

2 +/ 7( !/9&5 < /=: 2 > ( * ! .

1 1 1 / /?

5 .6@ A # PubMed, Cochran ,CINHAL

Science Direct, Scopus,

Ovid 1&' )15)

)' Google Scholar 1? B. C+ # D)E) FG H I 5 - / , JK 4 7+ )' &' + 2 L -

. + ) L M/=L5 N + O ( P 5 FG H Q/HL5

(/ 2 . 40

: . T H

1 1T ? :

1 1 2 U )A 6: /V , /H 7( T T , /H M +)

W + 7/ # U=95F T- : ): -G &? : 6: /V 2 F6*

1>

. )

1 1 2 2 - #X)Y* - U/5Z B. /% ')5 .

1%1: 1 !19& 2 > - %/ ) [ ( T 3 &5 ! & - %/ (: 5 ( %+ >

\

. ( %+

7( :

=@ A

- U U 9 #4)=. A]+ 1

- - [5 A]+ # 9]+ %=.F / )B. 2

3

:\/+ 9 &# ( )b& (& )+*) - - [5 A]+ # 9]+ # ( :

- - [5 A]+ # 9]+ # ( :4

- - [5 A]+ # 9]+ # ( :5

- - [5 A]+ # 9]+ # ( :6

(2)

= A

) !

$%& % ' ( ) * +, .( 2011

, / ) ,01 2 ' 1 $3 ( * +, 2 '

+ +3 ) +3

% % 3 2 3 4 ! .( 2010

563 7 8 9)) : ! ;< +,

> -

$ ? $3 ( 2010 563 $ 8 $& !+@ A , B * $& !

;< +,

C ? + ) , !+D 3 : !

2005 ( , HI H ( J 64

563 2 $& ,* $& +&

!+%D 3

3 8 ) +& $3+')

K LM A1 2 ) / 1 .( 2012 N +% % %O%) , @ , > P 8 Q R !

, $A ( * $& 3 $D Q @ , N + S ) ) , 8 &+9 ) L 01

T0%D% U +%V%W / + 8 $3 )

A D ) $X * +D

, HI 3 +Y& .( 2004

5%6%3 !+%D% 3 Z $& &

;< +,

C ? + ) [ + , +3 R & Z $3 : !

3 * / 1 $& [ N \ \X) ( 2005

]+, 5 QR ^1 3 _ XJ + ,

, + ,

T 3 2 )

% & H) N , J ! 3 a .( 2003

, $DR+? D H3 L ) $A $3 bAM + , +3 ? *

563 3 * .

$%3 b%AM : ! ;< +,

, + ) $3 > P 8 Q R cW + $3 , +) 56;, ( d+e, T ; $3 ! _V + O) A1

C% % %? + ) DR

5%6%3 2 ! _V 5 & f ) 1 $& , $ H) X) 3 + , 5' .( 2005

%

T ) + ? , +< $ ) , +D & Q D + d+Z * D !+D 3 +8 -

% VA i 1998

+ 2012 .(

) +A

$c8 V, ( 2008

$& +& /01 / ' W T+D & 3 * , $& ! ) 35

%D + J 55

, 2 6) c< * * +D &

) 0J . *

563 D + +Y& $& +& /01 ( 2003

0J : !

j0) 3 . & 3 * Z ;) C [, 3 3 $ kf

$ $DR+? N J !

3 + !

+D C, 1 > 1 $3 563 2 !+D 3 3 ! +3 ] Q3 ! *

) l+V,

N +%S .( 2006

%3 L * m cW / D8 , & , D& @ $ 8 ;,( ! n +1 * ;, +) C, +S , + , 8 3 @ ,

%D% % % %3 , < T Z 5 QR Q ! eD< C [, $3 +' , C, 1 2 k $& $ m ca) 3 / ;A9R ) +? , 3 D W ', j+ o

%H% ( $%A * $& Q, _ XJ Lp , 3 * .( 2003

, 563 !+D 3 N , T Z 5 & $3 )

% %@%1 Q , 5 & , $ H) N , T Z 5 & : ! ;< +, ! %

A?) 3 W 5 QR D 3

k f i 2004 $%& 2% $%3 $ ) 3 .( 2006

5' ! DR ! \, , U X, 3 3 +S , ,0& q ;) ! +<+3 H c , 1 $3 &o, N0 [,

, N +W 3 2

\, 2 * $& &

,

! DR \, $3 )

FLACC (Face, Leg, Activity,

Cry, Consolability) , $DR+? & $3 * 5 H ' Z $3 $&

% ! %D%R \,

BPS

(Behavior Pain Scale) : ;< +, [, Q3

CPOT Critical-Care Pain Observation )

Tool) ,0&+ M \, ) NVPS

Non Verbal Pain Scale)

) N0% %, 3 * LD k8

Pain

Assessment and Intervention Notation Algorithm)

% %,0%&+% %M 3 * Q3 NPAT

Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool) 563 !+D 3 T 3 3 5 H $&

$%3 %< $& : !

q ;) ! +<+3

8 ) , @D 3

% + , r 6[) $3 1 3 .( 2012

. , +3 R+c, : ;< +, 563 5' ! Q3 $8 \, 2

B )

* /5' ! Q3 2 ) ! P A&* @D 3 , D +, 2

! % ;< +, 563 +3/!+ ?

) 10Z ! k :

PubMed, Cochran ,CINHAL Science Direct, Scopus,

%) %, Ovid

(3)

+ 3

1392

Google Scholar !

t W , 3 Nu \, q ;) Q , +3 9 / ' ,* X, 3

. DX, C AX) U 6D b , v;)+, Nu \, w \X) +? ! a1 +p 5 :

= C

'D * CJ Nu \, c)

% +%3 $%3 \D , $& )u \, Q3 R+c, $3 / < $& )u \, 3 $8 \, 40

Nu \, 2 c) $& $c8 V, 3 @D 5' Q3 2 )

B% Q3 5 H . 3 1 32

563 +3

$%3 %\%\X, v ) mAD6, ! [& H ( 3 Nu \, * x+6D , $& : ! ;< +,

. U 6D +3 R+c, ! +3 H N ;S

D#

j U 6D

3 * 2 ! +3 @D , !

P $3 ! +R $3+') k kf * , 5 ! ;, +3

7 N % %

, C +k v )

563 3 * $3 $8 \, 2 . + ? , : ! ;< +,

LA ) < R 3 +3 . * +

58 f 3 ( 8 3 v + $V $3 : ! ;< +, 563 !+D 3

563 D + . + ! * !

%;%< +%,

, @D > P 8 Q R Ly01 ? ! DR Ly01 8 3 N a< * +D[ 3 3 2 +3 ! +3 : !

% %f $& &

,C, B Q3 5 . +;Dc,

BPS ,CPOT FLACC

NVPS, , PAIN algorithm

563 $& D NPAT

% +% , ! D + 2 ' . +? ,*( 7 ! +' + +3 ! +3 & & u ? Q3 : ! ;< +,

. +& R+c, + , 5' +;Dc, ! Q3 1 $3 +;, ! Q3 +,

) A?

2004

) : ;< +, [, Q3 (

563 !+D 3 Ak 3 ! +3 ( CPOT

! % %;< +,

! Q3 2 . [ +3 > P 8 Q R ! c, +3 ( Q, :

* +? > C, 563 + $& 563 Hf 4

L%D% ( Hf C, )0 D 3 ! ?* LD ( $ C, / & + 0a1 { ;\ 3 N &+ +Hf 8 ) N @D, ! DR

+ 2 +)u 3 . ($3 D & 3 ! +3 LA ) N < $3 D 3 ! +3 , 3 > $& !

[ + k3 )

+ 3 !u 3

! H3 . +@J / 1 [ $& + 2 +D & 8

) *

$c8 V, ( 1390 -

!+ ? * H !

Q3 $& [ $3 D * 3 bA< + C 1 X) 3 150

% +3 ! < Q3 > CPOT

) 3 < 2 . 3 2

!+ ? & $3 + S ) +3 ( 1391

%;%S D + + A 1 +3 CPOT

%3 % * $% ,* D + + A 1 ;H3 $3 +' , Q3 2 $& [ ! _V 5 & 3 3 ', 3 *

) c& $c8 V, B D 2 . ) N , < / ' * c3 3 ',

%3 +;Dc, * ) ( 2013

. & Q3 2

! DR \,

BPS) ) Payen v )

T . $y 2001

Payen

+%3 Q3 2 +3 3

!

Q%3 2 $& [ 3 , $ H) X) k $& + $ * + + $ , +) 3 40

\, 2 . ! Q3 3 2 +3

* Q < + $& AJ < 3 ) 1

%, % * % %D%, 4 . +%?

+ < $ * b & * D, C< t ', + +Y& ( C< ) 3

3 , ( +Y& ) 12

) Q3 !+ ? 3 j* ,( + S ) +3 3 Q !+@J .( 2010

5% %& f 3 5 BPS

% +% , r 6[) Q3 2 3 ( j* ,( * c3 D + $& $' D 2 $3 D + v ) ! _V

% % % !+%@J) $D ) $ ,* 2 D + 3 +S , (! _V 5 & f )LA ) < R 3

2 .( 1391 Aïssaoui

%;< +, 563 !+D 3 3 !+ ? * 2| V, +;Dc, Q3 > Q3 2 $& [

() 3 , D LA ) $3 ! < $& : ! 2005

Ahlers .(

Q%3 2% $%& [ Q

+;Dc, b , 3 7 ! +' + ) 3 5'

(4)

+A ) 2010

) ) ! DR \, .(

FLACC Merkel v )

T P . $y 1998

FLACC N A& m@6,

N J ! c, $3 Face ! c, $3 Legs

Activity 8 cR ! c, $3

+& $ +? ! c, $3 Cry consolability

$3

! 1 ', $& D ! c, ) +@J * < + 3 < 5

, * D, 2 + C< .

* [ $& 3 D& !

+ +Y& +@J / 1

10 . 3 !u 3 * [ $&

Merkel

Q3 2 3 Q

! +3 $& $c8 V, 2 . [ +,( & &

7 & 89 ) , 2

$3 3 / ' 3 $DR+? +< + X) $& $8 7

, $ H) , L ) ! +3 3 v;)+, ! DR 3 * ! +3 U f f > Q3 2 $& $' D 2 / %;%A%9%R ) % %&

& & 3 * < J .( 2003 6

- Q3 2 $& [ $c8 V, +& @D Q3 2 * 4

< J ) @, X, 2 & &

!+% %? * u 3 XJ ! Q3 2 2 ( 1391

%3* $%3 Q3 2 & ) . +? R+c, + !P 8 , +) T ; 3 : ! ;< +, 563 !+D 3 & &

! %

D . ' ( 8 D ! y 8 O)+ f ! +R) mAD6,

Nilsson Q%3 2% $& [

2 ) 3 !+ ? * +;Dc, Q3 >

% % % A ) 3 , Q : ! ;< +, 563 !+D 3 T 16

2008 ) ,0&+ M \, .(

v ) ( NVPS Odhner T

$3 Q3 2 . $y 2003

$%& % %, L \) < 2

% 3 , > P 8 Q R < / < ~ ? 7+X)/ 8 cR N J Nu :C, $& 3 , ! DR < T <

) +@J * < + . 3 , @ ) c) bA< 3+W [R C, $&

+% % +%Y%& % C< . , + 2

( C< )+@J 3 D&

10 . 3 , ( +Y& ) Odhner

Q3 2

!+D 3 kD f 3 59

+ ) [ : ! ;< +, 563 2003

Marmo and Fowler .(

T +%3 Q3 2 ;D1 2010

! +8 R , , ) +< ) ) , : ! ;< +, 563 !+D 3 T 3 3 25 2010

.(

) N0 , 3 * LD k8

PAIN algorithm) T

v ) 2001 Puntillo

C, $y

%3 % * < 3

C, 3 * < . C [) W 3 , X 3 !+ ? L e) y C X) H 3 )

! % $% %[ N %&+ )! DR ( ? + ~ w +c) [R @ ) c) bA< 3+W c) 5 QR ) > P 8 Q R : c3 , + o , 3 * , p + > 2D , Q3 2 . 3 , (... N J

% % % %A D ) *

1997 ) ,0&+ M 3 * Q3 .(

T . NPAT v ) 2010

Klein C, Q3 2 . $y

N &+ N < 5

) +@J + m Z * 3 + . 3 , 3 cW /~ ? N J ! $ [ ,0& ! $ [

$%3 ! + ) , 10

2 A&) c8 3 !u 3 * [ +)u 3 3 D& 1 $& € eD 2010

Li .(

% +3

8) Q3 2 3 +;Dc, $3 N c8 V, B D T ; 3 Q3 2 ;D1 2008

.(

E =3 * , $A , ;H3 ^1 3 / , +S , +3

< $& H ( T 3 3 3 € e $3 w < +3 / 1 . +?

, D 2 ;< +, 3 q ;) ! +< +3 $3

^X3 $3 $ ) 3 2 +3 3 . o? ! +3 !+ o +; b< 1 { 1 )

, +p $3 ( _ XJ + ,

563 5' ! Q3 * @D $&

( +3 & ( Q, * $& : ! ;< +,

D 3 u | , 3 +R ! L& ,*

5' ! Q3 / ' N c8 V, $3 1 3 ) ,

563 !+D 3 3

( 2%D% ) 3 D + € e63 , C + $3 : ! ;< +,

! +%3 %

$ Q 5 & QR ;< +, @ & $3 ( N , T Z t < 5 & $3 +' , + ,

. ! !+D 3 !

C F

[ 3/ + T >@ . ( ! &+ 2 Ug : h

.- &$ + 2

- 1%1/1 F /? 2 + ( ] )

2) 8 : ((: ' 2 O= $ 'M%. L5 -

. %]$ +

1390 :

(5)

2 3

1392

= =. %$ )+

? 2 ] /? 9 /l 5 ., . - [ / H> m

- 1%1/1 (

.F /$ =7 . 7 2 l - # 9=%. / ) n : o

1391 ) : 3 ( 18 : 65 - 54 .

, 1/1H1 /? 9 /l 5 . /][ )9/+ E /=.- /+ = / T ] %/$ !/&L 6V /+ $6T - G H q )%L >q

. )[/ ] # %=. (=YT . / ) n : o - %/ # T 7(

1391 ) : 1 ( 28:22 - 3 .

1 - 1: 2 !/$ T (: 9T " L+ /l 5 .2 ([ ) ! )+ %L )%L /]% @ q

- : ):

6 - .F /$ ]+ . 4 1391

) : 4 ( 18 : 9 - 1 .

7G* F

AHLERS, S. J., VAN DER VEEN, A. M., VAN DIJK, M., TIBBOEL, D. & KNIBBE, C. A. 2010. The use of the Behavioral Pain Scale to assess pain in conscious sedated patients. Anesthesia & Analgesia, ../..33-.01 ,

AISSAOUI, Y., ZEGGWAGH, A. A., ZEKRAOUI, A., ABIDI, K. & ABOUQAL, R. 2005. Validation of a behavioral pain scale in critically ill, sedated, and mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesia &

Analgesia, ./...<1=-.<1/ ,

APFELBAUM, J. L., CHEN, C., MEHTA, S. S. & GAN, T. J. 2003. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesthesia &

Analgesia, B1.C</-C3< ,

ASLAN, F. E., BADIR, A. & SELIMEN, D. 2003. How do intensive care nurses assess patients’ pain?

Nursing in critical care, G.=1-=0,

BRUNNER, L. S., SMELTZER, S. C. C., BARE, B. G., HINKLE, J. L. & CHEEVER, K. H. 2010. Brun- ner & Suddarth's textbook of medical-surgical nursing, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

CHANQUES, G., JABER, S., BARBOTTE, E., VIOLET, S., SEBBANE, M., PERRIGAULT, P.-F., MANN, C., LEFRANT, J.-Y. & ELEDJAM, J.-J. 2006. Impact of systematic evaluation of pain and agitation in an intensive care unit*. Critical care medicine, 3<..=BB-.=B. ,

GELINAS, C., FORTIER, M., VIENS, C., FILLION, L. & PUNTILLO, K. 2004. Pain assessment and management in critically ill intubated patients: a retrospective study. American Journal of Critical Care, .3..3=-.0= ,

HALL-LORD, M. L., LARSSON, G. & STEEN, B. 1998. Pain and distress among elderly intensive care unit patients: comparison of patients' experiences and nurses' assessments. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 01..30-.03 ,

HANKS, G., CHERNY, N. I., CHRISTAKIS, N. A., FALLON, M., KASSA, S. & PORTENOY, R. K.

2011. Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. FAMILY MEDICINE, <3..3. ,

KEANE, K. M. 2013. Validity and Reliability of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool: A Replication Study. Pain Management Nursing, .< ,e0.=-e00C.

KLEIN, D. G., DUMPE, M., KATZ, E. & BENA, J. 2010. Pain assessment in the intensive care unit: De- velopment and psychometric testing of the nonverbal pain assessment tool. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 3B.C0G-C0. ,

LI, D., PUNTILLO, K. & MIASKOWSKI, C. 2008. A review of objective pain measures for use with criti- cal care adult patients unable to self-report. The journal of pain, B../-0,

MARMO, L. & FOWLER, S. 2010. Pain assessment tool in the critically ill post–open heart surgery patient population. Pain Management Nursing, ....</-.3< ,

NILSSON, S., FINNSTRQM, B. & KOKINSKY, E. 0//G. The FLACC behavioral scale for procedural pain assessment in children aged C.=–years. Pediatric Anesthesia, .G.11<-1=1 ,

ODHNER, M., WEGMAN, D., FREELAND, N., STEINMETZ, A. & INGERSOLL, G. L. 2003. As- sessing pain control in nonverbal critically ill adults. Dimensions of critical care nursing, 00-0=/ , .0=1

PRONOVOST, P. & GOESCHEL, C. 2005. Improving ICU care: it takes a team. Healthc Exec, 0/.00-.< , PUNTILLO, K. A., MIASKOWSKI, C., KEHRLE, K., STANNARD, D., GLEESON, S. & NYE, P. 1997.

Relationship between behavioral and physiological indicators of pain, critical care patients' self- reports of pain, and opioid administration. Critical care medicine, 0C...==-..CB ,

PUNTILLO, K. A., MORRIS, A. B., THOMPSON, C. L., STANIK-HUTT, J., WHITE, C. A. & WILD, L.

R. 2004. Pain behaviors observed during six common procedures: Results from Thunder Project II*. Critical care medicine, 30.<01-<0. ,

(6)

SESSLER, C. N., GRAP, M. J. & RAMSAY, M. A. 2008. Evaluating and monitoring analgesia and seda- tion in the intensive care unit. Crit Care, .0 ,S0.

SHANNON, K. & BUCKNALL, T. 2003. Pain assessment in critical care: what have we learnt from re- search. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, .B..=0-.C< ,

SOLE, M. L., KLEIN, D. G. & MOSELEY, M. J. 2012. Introduction to Critical Care Nursing6: Introduc- tion to Critical Care Nursing, Elsevier Health Sciences.

SOLTANIAN, A. R. & SERESHT, M. N. 2012. The effectiveness of Behavioral Pain Scale in the assess- ment of pain in patients with low level of consciousness. Anesthesiology and Pain, 3./-00, TOPOLOVEC-VRANIC, J., CANZIAN, S., INNIS, J., POLLMANN-MUDRYJ, M. A., MCFARLAN, A.

W. & BAKER, A. J. 2010. Patient satisfaction and documentation of pain assessments and man- agement after implementing the adult nonverbal pain scale. American Journal of Critical Care, .B.3C<-3<C ,

URDEN, L., STACY, K. & LOUGH, M. 2010. Critical Care Nursing: Diagnosis and Management, St.

Louis: Mosby. Inc.

URDEN, L. D., STACY, K. & LOUGH, M. 2006. Critical care nursing. Diagnosis & Management.

WIBBENMEYER, L., SEVIER, A., LIAO, J., WILLIAMS, I., LATENSER, B., ROBERT LEWIS, I., KEALEY, P. & ROSENQUIST, R. 2011. Evaluation of the usefulness of two established pain assessment tools in a burn population. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 30.=/-C0 ,

(7)

4 3

1392

Evaluation of pain assessment tools intensive care units

Mohamad Abbasi

1

, Ph.D Reza Norozzade

2

, MSc

* Bahman Aghai

3

, MSc Ali Maarefvand

4

, MSc Mohammad Nategh

5

, MSc Yaser Saaid

6

, MSc

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study was a review on common pain assessment tools which are used in critical care units.

Background. Pain is an unpleasant physiological and psychological feeling and a complex phenomenon which is common among patients in critical care units. Nowadays, the importance of pain is to the extent that the American Pain Association named it as the fifth vital sign. Pain relief is an important issue to improve patient outcomes in the intensive care units. Accordingly, nurses must be sensitive in precise pain assessment.

Method. In this review article, six pain assessment tools were selected based on the keywords "pain", "pain relief", and "pain assessment tools" from the databases Ovid, PubMed, Cochran, CINHAL, Science Direct, Scopus, and Google Scholar .

Findings. Among articles on pain assessment tools, 40 articles were selected. There are six common pain assessment tools used in critical care units including Critical Pain Observation Tool (CPOT), Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS), behavioral pain assessment tool (FLACC), Non-Verbal Pain Scale (NVPS), Pain Assessment and Intervention Notation (PAIN) algorithm and Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool (NPAT) which are used in adult and pediatric patients with verbal impairment and for painful procedures.

Conclusion. According to the importance of pain management in intensive care units, nurses must partic- ularly apply valid tools for pain assessment to facilitate healing process and use of pain medications proper- ly.

Keywords: pain, intensive care, pain assessment tool

Review Article

1 Assistant professor, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran

2 Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Nursing, Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Master of Science in Critical Care Nursing, Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (*Corresponding Author) E-mail: [email protected]

4 Master of Science in Critical Care Nursing, Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 5 Master of Science in Critical Care Nursing, Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 6 Master of Science in Critical Care Nursing, Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

A descriptive cross-sectional design was used to determine the level of knowledge, perceived attitude and reported utilization of pain assessment scale in the management

However, when the senses are duped and the patient is heavily sedated with sedatives as is the case in the Intensive Care Unit ICU setting, the demand or an urge for pain relief is

Evaluation of Medication Errors in Preparation and Administration of Intravenous Medicines in Intensive Care Units in Imam Reza and Shohada Hospitals in Tabriz Hadi Hamishehkar1,

Drug Utilization Evaluation of Antibiotics in Intensive Care Units of a Referral Teaching Hospital Rasool Soltani1,2*, Atousa Hakamifard3, Sarah Mousavi1, Zohreh Amani4