7. Discussion & Conclusion
7.2 Conclusion
7. DISSCUSION & CONCLUSION
7.1 Discussion
7.1.1 Impact of Design
This paper put forth research outputs such as future trend, mobility groups, future scenario, design requirements. From this it has examined a new type of mobility thorough ideation on mobility and with 3 Future Scenarios.
The research output may have impact, not only on mobility, but also on product and other as- pects of design. The numerous keywords and groupings found can be used as an inspiration for product design, service design and so on. Five Future Trends as a keyword for design development for any project, would help steer it into the right direction. Future Scenario, although based upon mobility, will give designers a glimpse of what to expect in the future.
The mobility design, Twin Premier, may have impact on the future outlook of autonomous vehicles. This paper has suggested a different type of mobility for 2, at most 4 passengers. It has a radically different interior layout made possible by electrification. The concept illustrates a flexible interior with a combination of moving interior components that can react to changing situations. It shows a radical change in which users can have the possibility to experience more inside the cabin.
7.1.2 Opportunity Seeking Approach
Electrification of vehicles has opened up new possibilities of design. Therefore, instead of prob- lem solving research, new opportunities and ideas were sought out that were relevant with the future context. There was adequate desktop research on the future context, followed by ideation which opened new doors to mobility design.
7.1.3 Limitations
Although the research was based upon Future Trends based on Desktop Research, the ideation used to seek new opportunities makes exploration very subjective. However it is from this subjective approach designers can have ample degree of freedom and therefore a more likely chance of a creative outcome.
Although the concept is derived from future research and their relevant contexts it has not been yet evaluated by the public. It would be assuring to conduct an evaluation survey with people outside
the project, to know their satisfaction and their thoughts upon the project. With this knowledge, the project could be further improvised for development.
Another minor limitation comes from the use of relevant modelling software during concept development phase. It is more convenient to create 3D models of complex designs with surface model- ing, aka Alias.
7.2 Conclusion
7.2.1 Project Summary
The project started with desktop research, to ideation, to concept development and to final mock-up. The paper first found 5 Future Trends which led to 2 different future studies. The first study being the 6 Mobility Groups and the second study being the 3 Future Scenarios. 6 Mobility Groups was an organization of current mobility concepts by Future Trend which helped to see the current market of future concepts. 3 Future Scenarios was an idea driven process based upon Future Trend research. The scenarios allowed for better visualization of the future context in depth and in the process, mobility concepts were ideated.
3 Future Senses were identified by combining the 6 Mobility Groups and the Concepts from Scenarios: Distinct Drive, Modularity and Moving Interior & Space. For each Future Sense, there were mobility ideas which were combined to make 4 different Concepts. From this one concept, Twin Prem- ier, to be developed in detail.
7.2.2 Expected contribution
There have been many future mobility concepts from different designers and companies. How- ever, there is little instance where these concepts are organized in a few keyword requirements. This paper identifies the requirements, 3 future senses, that summarize the different types and directions of existing mobility concepts. It is expected that the 3 Future Senses findings can accelerate the ideation process efficiently with diverse concepts. However, this does not acknowledge the fact that developing worthy concepts is still a time consuming process.
7.2.3 Future Works
Using the 3 Future Senses, more unique ideation would add to the exploration of mobility con- cepts, and combining interesting and relevant concepts into one would give birth to another interesting future concept.
Further development of Twin Premier would be necessary, more than just a mere mock-up.
Further development of the EV chassis, and development of User Interaction design would definitely be beneficial for the final design and study of future mobility.
This paper presented Twin Premier as a concept, with little considerations for mechanical com- ponents and manufacturability, such as hinges and battery sizes which are only estimates. If there was a next development stage, real-world considerations should be met, regarding components, safety and technological requirements.
REFERENCES
Baldry, C., & Hallier, J. (2010). Welcome to the house of fun: Work space and social identity.
Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31(1), 150–172.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X09351215
Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001
Holeywell, R. (2012). Senior Cohousing May be the Next Real-Estate Trend. Retrieved April 8, 2018, from http://www.governing.com/generations/gov-aging-residents-increasingly-turning-to- cohousing.html
Katzev, R. (2003). Car Sharing: A New Approach to Urban Transportation Problems. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00015.x Larminie, J., & Lowry, J. (2003). Electric Vehicle Technology Explained. Electric Vehicle Technology
Explained. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470090707
LAUB, J. &. (2011). Shrimp Armchair. Retrieved from https://www.cor.de/en/living/furniture/shrimp- armchair/
Marcus, A. (1984). Corporate identity for iconic interface design: The graphic design perspective.
Interfaces in Computing, 2(4), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/0252-7308(84)90055-2
Mitchell, W. J., Borroni-Bird, C., & Burns, L. D. (2010). Reinventing the Automobile: Personal Urban Mobility for the 21st Century. Amazon, 240. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1038/464163a
Montgomery, M. (2008). The urban transformation of the developing world. Science, 319(5864), 761.
Morris, & Eric. (2007). From Horse Power to Horsepower. ACCESS.
Pandremenos, J., Paralikas, J., Salonitis, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2009). Modularity concepts for the automotive industry: A critical review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 1(3), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2008.09.012
Schoemaker, P. (1995). SCENARIO PLANNING: A TOOL FOR STRATEGIC THINKING. Sloan Management Review/Winter, 25.
Scupin, R. (1997). The KJ Method: A Technique for Analyzing Data Derived from Japanese
Ethnology. Human Organization, 56(2), 233–237.
https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.56.2.x335923511444655
Shlott, S. (2016). Vehicle Interiors for Automated Mobility Strategies. ATZ, 118, 8–13.
Stopher, P. R. (2004). Reducing road congestion: A reality check. Transport Policy, 11(2), 117–131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.09.002
Talty, A. (2015). Skyrocketing Number of Millennials Living With Housemates. Retrieved April 8, 2018, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandratalty/2015/11/03/skyrocketing-number-of- millennials-living-with-housemates/#2c92d56c7265
Vischer, J. (2005). Space Meets Status: Designing Workplace Performance. Routledge.
APPENDICES
1. Trend Timeline
A3 Appendices 1.1
A3 Appendices 1.2
2. Trend Post-it Progress
A3 Appendices 2.1
A3 Appendices 2.2
3. The Five Future Trend, Concept Research
1. Tangible to intangible 2. On/Off Mix 3. Metahuman
Tulip Electric Car Toyota FV2 Kia Wearable K
BMW City-skiing Toyota Fun Vii Segway-Style Wearable
Toyota i-Road Renault RS 2027 ACCD Deux Ex Machina
Toyota i-Trill Honda NeuV Nissan Bladeglider
Toyota iReal Mercedes Vision Tokyo Honda: Walking Assist
Lexus SLIDE BMW Vision Next 100 Hyundai: HUMA
Audi Flywheel BMW I Inside Future Honda: UNI-CUB Nissan: Teatro for Dayz
Honda U3-X Volkswagen Sedric
RCA: Isolation Pod Honda_Be Relaxed Honda Wander Stand IDEO: Cody Delivery
GM: EN-V Mercedes Benz EQ
Peugeot PM Fujimura Toyota Concept i
4. Customization 5. Health/ Aging
Apple iGo Behance: Optimo
Pilkington Family Dynamic VW Netto
Mercedes F015 Absolute Design: Equal
Michelin Challenge DOMI JuHyunLee: NEWS
ECCO: Zero-Emission Oscar: WheelChair Assistant Habitat: personal transport Medirobot for disabled
ACCD: Inhabit Audi 2Lip
Volkswagen ID Crozz Eleketroscooter
Rolls-Royce: 103EX Hyundai Future Mobility Coventry: Mercedes Custom System
Coventry: Police Interceptor SMART Car & Camper
MINI: Next 100 IDEO: Ride-sharing Car
IDEO WOW Tommaso Gecchelin: Next V3.0
4. Six Mobility Groups, Concept organization
1. Modular 2. New Interior 3. Fun Driving
Mobility Hybrid Concept Mercedes-Benz Vision Tokyo Renault RS Vision
Audi Competition IDEO: Cody Nissan Bladeglider
Rolls-Royce 103EX ECCO: Zero Emission Lexus: Slide
Coventry: Mercedes Custom ACCD: Inhabit Toyota: i-Road
Coventry: Police Interceptor Habitat: Personal Transporta- tion
Toyota: i-Trill SMART Car & Camper BMW I Inside Future Toyota: FV2
Mercedes Vision Van Mercedes F015 ACCD: Deus Ex Machina
Volksagen: ID Crozz Michelin: DOMI Kia: Wearble K
Tommaso Gecchelin: next 3.0 IDEO: WOW Tulip EV
Absolute Design: Equal Pilkington: Family Dynamic Segway-Style Wearable Oscar: WheelChair Assistant
Ju Hyun Lee: NEWS Volkwagen Netto Behance: Optimo
4. Efficiency 5. New Interaction 6. New Technology
Peugeot PM Fujimura Toyota Fun Vii Mercedes Concept EQ
Honda : UNI CUB MINI: Next 100 Apple iGo
RCA: isolation Pod Nissan: Teatro for Dayz Volkswagen Sedric Honda Wander Stand BMW Vision Next 100 Peugeot Instinct
Honda: U3-X Toyota Concept i IDEO: Ride Sharing
GM: EN-V Honda: NeuV
Honda: Walking Assist Hyundai: HUMA
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, I would like to thank everyone involved in this project. The advisory committee professors, Yunwoo Jeong, Chajoong Kim, and Huisung Lee. Professor Yunwoo Jeong was involved throughout the project giving advice on the exterior and interior design of the vehicle. He has given me much advice for more than 3 years as my Advisor. I have learned so much from him which will not be forgotten throughout my coming careers. Professor Chajoong Kim and Professor Huisung Lee have helped me complete the paper, advising context flow and important errors that needed to be resolved.
Without them, this paper may not have made sense!
I am deeply grateful for all the team members of the project who have helped me bring about an interesting research outcome which has definitely led to a fun and unique final concept. They have helped me gain different insights and knowledge, broadening my vision while conducting the project.
Without them, the project would have been ‘less vibrant’.
I would like to thank all the CDE faculty members, who always help CDE students and profes- sors. My late graduation must have only been a burden for the faculty members, especially for Ms.
Jinkyung Kim, Ms. Hyojin Kim who have been kind and helpful as always. I am very grateful for them.
Also thank you to CDE colleagues, I am sure all good things are going to be thrown at them. It was a pleasure to learn with you guys, have team meetings together, have small and large conflicts, and also go on trips like Germany and Gwangju. They are all important memories to be kept and shared later.
This work was supported by the 'Promotion of Graduate School of Creative Design Engineer- ing' of the Korea Institute of Design Promotion with a grant from the Ministry of the Trade, Industry
& Energy, Republic of Korea.(N0001436)