• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

추정론 기말시험

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "추정론 기말시험"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Estimation Theory Final Test_Solution

December 8, 2010

1. A simplified spacecraft tracking problem is formulated by

c c c

c c c c

x w , w ~N(0, )

z x v , v ~N(0, q r

=

= +

).

)

(T10.2.1-1)

(a) Suppose that the measurements are taken every 0.5 second. Show that the discrete model for Eq. (T10.2.1-1) is given by

( 1) ( ) (

( ) ( ) ( ).

x k x k w

z k x k v k

+ = +

= +

k

)

(T10.2.1-2)

Determine the mean and variance of w k( ) and v k( ). (Solution) (10 points)

Given

, 0, 1, (0,

, (0, )

c c c c

x w A x G w A G w N q

z x v v N r

= ≡ + = =

= +

the discrete model is given by

( 1) A Tc ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

x k+ =e x k +w k =x k +w kAx k +Gw k (T2.1-1) (T2.1-2)

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

z k =x k +v kHx k +v k where

(

0

( ) )

( ) 0, 0.5

( ) 0, 2 .

c c

T T

A T A

c c

w k N e G QG e d Tq q

v k N r r

T

τ τ τ = =

⎛ = ⎞

⎜ ⎟

⎝ ⎠

(b) Find the steady-state Kalman filter solution for this problem assuming that and are white Gaussian and uncorrelated each other.

( )

w k v k( ) (Solutiom) (20 points)

Find P by solving the ARE

(2)

( )

( )

1

1

2

2

2

2 2

T T T

P A P P H HP H R HP A GQG P P P r P q

P q

P P r

⎡ ⎤

= ⎢⎣ − + ⎥⎦ +

⎡ ⎤

=⎣ − + ⎦+

= − +

+

T

2

2 2

P q

P r

+ =

2 0

2

PqPrq=

2

4 4 .

q q

P = ± ⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ +rq Since , P >0

( )

2

1 2

4 4 4 16

q q

P = + ⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ +rq = q+ q + rq . (T2.1-3) And

( )

( )

( )

( )

1

1

2

2

2

2

1 16

4 .

1 16 2

4

K P H HP HT R

P P r

P

P r

q q rq

q q rq r

= +

= +

= +

+ +

=

+ + +

(T2.1-4)

The transfer function for the steady-state Kalman filter, HSSKF( )z , is

[ ]

( )

1

( ) 1

SSKF

H z H zI A I K H AK K

z K

= − − =

− + (T2.1-5) Let q= =r 1 for comparison,

( ) 0.39

SSKF 0.61

H z

z

− . (T2.1-6)

(c) Find the causal Wiener filter solution for this problem and compare it with the result of (b).

(Solution) (20 points)

Suppose w k( )and v k( )are white, then

(3)

SW( )z =0.5q

From x k( + =1) x k( )+w( )k , ( ) ( ) 11

( ) 1

X w to x

W

S z

H z

S z Z

= =

(T2.1-7) And

1

1

1

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

1 1

0.5 1 1

0.5

(1 )(1 )

X W wto x wto x

S z S z H z H z

q z z

q

z z

=

=

=

(T2.1-8)

Let,

( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( ) s k x k z k s k v k

=

= +

Then,

1

1

( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( )

0.5 2

(1 )(1 )

( ) ( ) 0.5

(1 )(1 )

S X

Z S V

SZ S

S z S z

S z S z S z

q r

z z

S z S z q

z z

=

= +

= +

= =

(T2.1-9)

( 1) 1 1( ) ( ) ( )

SZ Wiener

Z Z

S z

H z

S z S z

+

+

=

(T2.1-10) (Note: Refer to Eq.(T2.1-7))

To compare with (b), let q=r=1, then

1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1

( ) 0.5 2

(1 )(1 )

0.5 2(1 )(1 )

(1 )(1 )

4.5 2 2

(1 )(1 )

1.22(1.64 )(1.64 )

(1 )(1 )

1.10(1.64 ) 1.10(1.64 ) (1 )

(1 )

( ) ( )

Z

Z Z

S z

z z

z z

z z

z z

z z

z z

z z

z z

z z

S z S z

+

= +

+

=

=

=

=

(4)

1 1

1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1

( ) 0.5 (1 )

1.10(1.64 )

( ) (1 )(1 )

0.45 (1 )(1.64 )

0.70 0.70

(1 ) (1 1.64 )

( ) 0.70

( ) 1

(1 ) 0.70

( )

1.10(1.64 ) (1 ) 0.39

1 0.61

SZ Z

SZ Z

Wiener

S z z

z

S z z z

z z

z Z

S z

S z z

H z z

z z

z

+

=

=

=

=

=

=

( ) 0.39

Wiener 0.61

H z

= z

(T2.1-11)

Comparing Eqs. (T2.1-6) and (T2.1-11), we see that HSSKF( )z =HWiener( )z . (d) Find the steady-state optimal smooth solution for this problem and compare

it with the result of (b).

(For (b), (c), and (d), let q= =r 1.) (Solution)

The forward filter is the same as (b), viz,

1 2

( 16

4 2

P q q r

K P

P r

= + +

= +

) q

(T2.1-12)

The backward filter is given by

1 1 1

1 1 1

1 0.5 2

T T T T

S A I S G G S G Q G S A H R H

S S S

q r

= + +

= − + +

(T2.1-13)

Solve Eq.(T2.1-13) for S to obtain

1 16

1 1 ( 0

S 4 S

r q

= + + >

)

The steady-state optimal smoother is obtained by

[ ]

[ ]

1 S

S S

K P S I P S

P I K P

∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

= +

= −

For a simple comparison, let q=r=1. Then,

(5)

( )

( )

[ ]1

1 1 17 1.28 4

1 1 17 1.28 4

1.28 1.28 1 1.28 1.28 0.62

(1 0.62) 1.28 0.49

S

S

P S K P

= + =

= + =

= × × + ×

=

= − × =

We can see that the steady-state error variance is reduced to 0.49 from 1.28.

2. Consider the following state and measurement equations

k k

k x w

x ⎥ +

⎢ ⎤

=⎡

+ 0 1

0 4

1 , ⎟⎟⎠,

⎜⎜⎝

⎛ ⎥

⎢ ⎤

⎡ 5 . 0 0

0 , 0 0

k ~

w x0 ~

(

0,P0

)

k k

k Hx v

z = + , vk ~

( )

0,1 .

(a) Determine if the steady-state Kalman gain K is asymptotically stable when

[

0 3

]

H = .

(Solution) (10 points)

4 0 0 0

, ,

0 0.5 0 1

0 0 0 0

0 0.707

0 0.5

A G I Q Q T

Q

⎡ ⎤

⎡ ⎤ Q

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥ = =⎢ ⎥ =

⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦

⎣ ⎦

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

= ⎢⎢⎣ ⎥⎥⎦ =⎢⎢⎣ ⎥⎥⎦

Reachability test for

(

A G Q,

)

.

0 0 0 0 0 0.707 0 0.707 1.

ρ⎡ ⎤

⎢ ⎥ =

⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦

"

"

Therefore,

(

A G Q,

)

is non-reachable.

Now, test detectability for

(

A H,

)

. When , .

[0 3]

H =

1 1

2 2

4 0 4 3

0 3

0 1 0 1 3

l l

A LH l l

⎡ ⎤ ⎡

⎡ ⎤ −

⎡ ⎤ ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢

⎢ ⎥

− = − ⎢ ⎥ = ⎥

⎢ ⎥ ⎢

⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ − ⎥

⎢ ⎥ ⎢

⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎥⎦

(6)

(

A H,

)

is non-detectable since we can not move the eigenvalue 4.

According to Theorem 5-1 and 5-2 in the note, the steady-state error with the Kalman gain K is asymptotically unstable. In addition, it is not guaranteed that for every choice of there is a bounded limiting solution P.

P0

(b) What if H =

[

3 3

]

?

(Solution) (10 points) When H =[3 3],

1 1

2 2

4 0 4 3 3

3 3

0 1 3 1 3

l l

A LH l l

1 2

l . l

⎡ ⎤ ⎡

⎡ ⎤ − −

⎡ ⎤ ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢

⎢ ⎥

− = − ⎢ ⎥ = ⎥

⎢ ⎥ ⎢

⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ − − ⎥

⎢ ⎥ ⎢

⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎥⎦

)

Two eigenvalues of A may be arbitrarily located by properly choosing and . Therefore,

(

is detectable. The steady-state error with the Kalman gain K is asymptotically unstable. However, for every choice of there is a bounded limiting solution P.

l1

P0

l2 A H,

3. The equation of motion of a pendulum hanging from a ceiling is given by the differential equation

2 2

( ) sin ( ) ( ), d t

t w t dt

θ + θ =

where is the angular position of the pendulum at time t. Discrete measurements of are given by , where the sampling

interval . Suppose that , , and

. Give the equations for the EKF that provides an estimate of

, , based on the measurements for . ( )t

θ

T (0, N

=1,2

( )t

θ z n( )=θ( )n +v n( ) ( ) ~ (0, 0.02) w t N

( )

z i =

=0.5 0.02)

,"

( ) ~ (0,1) v n N

1,2, , i " n (0) ~

θ ( )i

θ i

(Solution) (Kamen’s Problem 8.8)

4. Suppose that RV x is uniformly distributed on [-1, 1], and y=e2x. (a) What is the mean of y, y?

(Solution) (5 points)

{ } { }

111 2 1

(

2 2

)

1.813

2 4

x x

y E y E e e dx e e

= = =

= − =

(7)

(b) What is the first-order approximation to y?

(Solution) (5 points) 1st order approximation

( ) { } 1.

x x

y h x h E x

x =

+∂ =

(c) What is the second-order approximation to y?

(Solution) (5 points) 2nd order approximation

{ ( )} ( )

{ }

{ }

2

2

2 2

1 2!

1 1

=1 1 4 1.666.

2 2

x x

x x x

y E h x h x E D h D h

h E x P

x =

= + +

+ ∂ = + ⋅ =

5

3 ≈ (d) What is the unscented approximation to y?

(Solution) (5 points) Since

2 1

0, x 3

x = σ = and

(1) 1 (2) 1

,

3 3

x = x = − , we obtain

2 2

3 3

1 1.744.

u 2

y e e

= ⎜⎜ + ⎟⎟=

⎝ ⎠ .

(e) What is the variance of y? What is the unscented approximation to the variance of y?

(Solution) (10 points)

{ }

2 2

{ }

4

( )

2

var( )y =E yy =E e x − 1.813 =6.8225 3.2885− =3.534..

( )

2 2 2 2

2 2

( ) 3 3

1

1 1

var( ) 1.744 1.744 2.042.

2 2

i

u u

i

y h x y e e

=

⎡⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎤

⎢ ⎥

⎡ ⎤

=

⎣ − ⎦ = ⎢⎣⎜⎜⎝ − ⎟⎟⎠ +⎜⎜⎝ − ⎟⎟⎠ ⎥⎦≈

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

By Theorem 2.1 and Condition 2 of the present example, the purity of every morphism is equivalent to the fact that every morphism of finite sets factors as a split epimorphism

But by the central limit theorem for m-dependent stationary sequence (see for example Brockwell and Davis, 1990, page 213), the latter is asymptotically normal with mean zero

It is obvious that SYM and IIA are independent: A choice function that chooses the minimal distance point for every symmetric choice problem yet arbitrary otherwise satisfies SYM

In the present work, we shall show that the feasible (if present) steady state of a wide class of Lotka±Volterra systems is globally asymptotically stable if simple conditions on

The second theorem of this paper shows that it is possible to obtain an asymptotically normally distributed estimator of the short-run parameter by including an intercept in

SupersingularK3 surfaces and lattice theory Known results Theorem Pho and S.- Every supersingularK3 surface X in characteristic 5 with Artin invariant≤3 is birational to the double

Data 5 "You're in every conversation, every smoky situation" The hyperbole in the lyric in data 5 is shown in the part "You're in every." The hyperbole is found in the exaggerated

M/G/1 11 • Wolff theorem Poisson arrivals see time average − If the arrival process is Poisson, the steady state distribution just prior to arrival epochs is the same as that for the