F usion Reactor Technology I
(459.760, 3 Credits)
Prof. Dr. Yong-Su Na
(32-206, Tel. 880-7204)
Week 1. Magnetic Confinement
Week 2. Fusion Reactor Energetics (Harms 2, 7.1-7.5)
Week 3. How to Build a Tokamak (Dendy 17 by T. N. Todd) Week 4. Tokamak Operation (I): Startup
Week 5. Tokamak Operation (II):
Basic Tokamak Plasma Parameters (Wood 1.2, 1.3) Week 7-8. Tokamak Operation (III): Tokamak Operation Mode Week 9-10. Tokamak Operation Limits (I):
Plasma Instabilities (Kadomtsev 6, 7, Wood 6) Week 11-12. Tokamak Operation Limits (II):
Plasma Transport (Kadomtsev 8, 9, Wood 3, 4) Week 13. Heating and Current Drive (Kadomtsev 10)
Week 14. Divertor and Plasma-Wall Interaction
Contents
Week 1. Magnetic Confinement
Week 2. Fusion Reactor Energetics (Harms 2, 7.1-7.5)
Week 3. How to Build a Tokamak (Dendy 17 by T. N. Todd) Week 4. Tokamak Operation (I): Startup
Week 5. Tokamak Operation (II):
Basic Tokamak Plasma Parameters (Wood 1.2, 1.3) Week 7-8. Tokamak Operation (III): Tokamak Operation Mode Week 9-10. Tokamak Operation Limits (I):
Plasma Instabilities (Kadomtsev 6, 7, Wood 6) Week 11-12. Tokamak Operation Limits (II):
Plasma Transport (Kadomtsev 8, 9, Wood 3, 4) Week 13. Heating and Current Drive (Kadomtsev 10)
Week 14. Divertor and Plasma-Wall Interaction
Contents
Tokamak Operation Scenario
Current
Ramp-up High Power
Phase Plasma Quench Plasma
Initiation
JET pulse 69905 (BT = 3.1 T)
Tokamak Operation Scenario
JT-60U
H-mode
• 1982 IAEA F. Wagner et al. (ASDEX, Germany)
- Transition to H-mode: state with reduced turbulence at the plasma edge - Formation of an edge transport barrier: steep pressure gradient at the edge
H-mode
• 1982 IAEA F. Wagner et al. (ASDEX, Germany)
- Transition to H-mode: state with reduced turbulence at the plasma edge - Formation of an edge transport barrier: steep pressure gradient at the edge
τ
E≈ a χ
2H-mode
8
• Established in stellarators as well
Wendelstein 7-AS
V. Erckmann et al, Physical Review Letters 70 2086 (1993)
H-mode
Hoover dam
• 1982 IAEA F. Wagner et al. (ASDEX, Germany)
- Transition to H-mode: state with reduced turbulence at the plasma edge - Formation of an edge transport barrier: steep pressure gradient at the edge
Time Temperature
Basic Tokamak Variables
• Energy confinement time
τ
E• τ
Eis a measure of how fast the plasma looses its energy.
• The loss rate is smallest, τ
Elargest
if the fusion plasma is big and well insulated.
1/e
Time Temperature
Basic Tokamak Variables
• Energy confinement time
H-mode
Hoover dam
• 1982 IAEA F. Wagner et al. (ASDEX, Germany)
- Transition to H-mode: state with reduced turbulence at the plasma edge - Formation of an edge transport barrier: steep pressure gradient at the edge
H-mode: How to?
13
• Separation of plasma from wall by a limiter and a divertor
• Advantage of the divertor configuration
- First contact with material surface at a distance from plasma boundary - Reducing the influx of ionized impurities into the interior of the plasma
by diverting them into an outer „SOL“
Strike point
Tokamak
H-mode: How to?
H-mode: How to?
• Role of wall condition
P
th= 2.84M
-1B
t0.82n
200.58R
1.0a
0.81H-mode: How to?
H-mode: Why?
• 1982 IAEA F. Wagner et al. (ASDEX, Germany)
- Transition to H-mode: state with reduced turbulence at the plasma edge - Formation of an edge transport barrier: steep pressure gradient at the edge
H-mode: Why?
Theoretical physics
H-mode: Why?
Theoretical physics
Experimental physics
Basic Tokamak Variables
• Safety factor q = number of toroidal orbits per poloidal orbit
Magnetic field lines Magnetic flux surfaces
21
B
pB
B G G K +
=
φR B
r B
π π θ φ ι
φ θ
2 2 Δ =
= Δ
Rotational transform
number of toroidal windings number of poloidal windings
= q
θ φ
ι π
B B R
= r
= 2
Δθ ? when ΔΦ=2π
- The effect of the twisted magnetic field lines–each of which completely traces out a magnetic flux surface by its revolutions around the toroidal and poloidal axes–is to create a system of nested toroidal flux surfaces which guide ion motion.
θ φ
θ φ
B rd B
Rd =
q-profiles
0 1 2 3 4 5
0 0.5 1
r/a
H-mode ELMy
Tokamak Operation Modes
Conventional Operation Mode – H-mode
• Naturally peaked current profile
• Mild pressure gradient with steep edge pedestal
• Monotonic q-profile
• Positive magnetic shear
q
0< 1: Sawtooth instability, periodic flattening of the pressure in the core Stability of H-mode plasmas related safety factor profile: q(r)
H-mode: Limitations
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.5 1
r/a
H-mode, q-profile
q = 1
0
Sawtooth
time (s)
0 2 4 6 8
8 6 1 10 1
Ip(MA)
PNBI(MW) PRF(MW)
WMHD(MJ)
Nel x1.1019
Ti(keV) Te (keV)
pulse 20438
- nonlinear low-n internal mode - internal (minor) disruption - enhanced energy transport
in the plasma centre
q
0< 1: Sawtooth instability, periodic flattening of the pressure in the core Stability of H-mode plasmas related safety factor profile: q(r)
q = 3/2 and q = 2:
Neoclassical Tearing Modes (NTMs):
• limit the achievable β ≡ 2µ
0p/B
2• degrade confinement (+ disruptions)
• often triggered by sawteeth.
H-mode: Limitations
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.5 1
r/a
H-mode, q-profile
q = 1
0
q = 3/2
q = 2
• ITER work point is chosen
conservatively: β
N≤1.8 !
Neoclassical Tearing Mode (NTM)
ASDEX Upgrade
φ
β φ
β aB
I
N t(%)=
Neoclassical Tearing Mode (NTM)
• Pressure flattening across magnetic islands due to large transport coefficients along magnetic field lines
p
Neoclassical Tearing Mode (NTM)
0.4 0.8 1.2
Pressure(kPa)
6620
Temperature(keV)
Radius (m) 0.7
0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
0 EFIT q=2 surface
magnetic estimate
12cm inboard 2/1 island
• Pressure flattening across magnetic islands due to large transport
coefficients along magnetic field lines
Neoclassical Tearing Mode (NTM)
q
0< 1: Sawtooth instability, periodic flattening of the pressure in the core Stability of H-mode plasmas related safety factor profile: q(r)
q = 3/2 and q = 2:
Neoclassical Tearing Modes (NTMs):
• limit the achievable β ≡ 2µ
0p/B
2• degrade confinement (+ disruptions)
• often triggered by sawteeth.
H-mode: Limitations
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.5 1
r/a
H-mode, q-profile
q = 1
0
q = 3/2
q = 2
• ITER work point is chosen conservatively: β
N≤1.8 !
K. Miyamoto, “Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics” Taylor & Francis (2007)
q
0< 1: Sawtooth instability, periodic flattening of the pressure in the core Stability of H-mode plasmas related safety factor profile: q(r)
q = 3/2 and q = 2:
Neoclassical Tearing Modes (NTMs):
• limit the achievable β ≡ 2µ
0p/B
2• degrade confinement (+ disruptions)
• often triggered by sawteeth.
H-mode: Limitations
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.5 1
r/a
H-mode, q-profile
q = 1
0
q = 3/2
q = 2
• ITER work point is chosen conservatively: β
N≤1.8 !
q
95(∝ 1/I
p) = 3: Safe operation at max. I
PPeriodic collapses of
the ETB (ELMs)
q
95=3
Edge Localised Mode (ELM)
• Example of sawteeth and ELMs JET, Pulse 52022
Edge Localised Mode
Disruption
Edge Localised Mode (ELM)
Edge Localised Mode (ELM)
t(s)
t(s)
Power Supply Limit
Inherent drawback of Tokamak!
Faraday‘s law
ds dt B
v d
S
⋅
−
= ∫
H-mode: Limitation
36
Plasma Current
PF Coil Flux [Wb]
[MA]