Contents lists available atScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Leptonic CP violation in flipped SU(5) GUT from Z 12 − I orbifold compactification
Junu Jeong
a,b, Jihn E. Kim
a,c,d,∗, Soonkeon Nam
caCenterforAxionandPrecisionPhysicsResearch(InstituteofBasicScience),KAISTMunjiCampus,193Munjiro,Daejeon34051,RepublicofKorea bDepartmentofPhysics,KAIST,291Daehakro,Yuseong-Gu,Daejeon,14141,RepublicofKorea
cDepartmentofPhysics,KyungHeeUniversity,26Gyungheedaero,Dongdaemun-Gu,Seoul02447,RepublicofKorea dDepartmentofPhysicsandAstronomy,SeoulNationalUniversity,1Gwanakro,Gwanak-Gu,Seoul08826,RepublicofKorea
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t ra c t
Articlehistory:
Received9January2019
Receivedinrevisedform4February2019 Accepted21February2019
Availableonline26February2019 Editor:M.Cvetiˇc
Keywords:
Stringcompactification FlippedSU(5)GUT PMNSmatrix Kim-Seoform Jarlskogdeterminant
We obtain a phenomenologically acceptable PMNS matrix in a flipped SU(5) model, possessing the Z4R discretesymmetry, fromthe compactification ofheterotic string E8×E8.To analyze the Jarlskog determinantefficiently,weincludethesimpleKim-SeoformforthePontecorbo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata matrix.Wealsonotedthat|δPMNS|63oforthenormalhierarchyofneutrinomasseswiththePDGbook parametrization.
©2019TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.
1. Introduction
The most urgent theoretical issue in the standard model(SM) is probing the symmetry structure from which the observed flavor phenomenacan beunderstood.It isdesirableifsuchsymmetry resultsfromanultra-violet completedtheory.Atpresent, stringtheory isconsidered tobethemostattractiveoneamongvariousultra-violetcompletedtheories,chieflybecauseitunifiesgravityonthesame groundasgaugetheories.TheSMisobtainedfromcompactificationofsixextradimensions[1–6],andthesymmetrystructureofflavors istheonerealizedbelowthecompactificationscale.
Previously,moststudiesalongthisdirectionwerecenteredonobtainingthreefamiliesinthestandard-likemodels[7,8].1 Sincethere aretoomanyYukawacouplingsinstandard-likemodels,hereweattempttoworkina grandunification(GUT) models.TheGUTgroup weusehereisthe rank5flippedSU(5)GUT[11,12],SU(5)flip≡SU(5)×U(1)X,which wasobtainedfromcompactifications viafermionic string[13] andZ12−I orbifold[14].The simplestGUTSU(5)fromstringcompactification isnotaccompanying an adjointrepresentation atthelevel1constructionwheretheHiggsmultipletneededforbreakingSU(5)downtotheSMislacking.Therank5SU(5)flip requires 10⊕10forbreakingitdowntotherank4SMgaugegroup,andthemodelof[10] containsthem.
Timeis ripe enough to study the details of the flavor structure fromstring compactification to see whether they convergeto the observeddata.The studyisnowpossibleintheZ4R model[9] basedon[10] wheretheneededZ4R quantumnumbersofalllightchiral fields are presented.In the quark sector, the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix [15,16] has been studied in ourprevious paper[17].
Inthispaper,wepresentanumericalstudyonthePontecorbo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS)matrix[18,19] viamanyU(1)’sarising in stringcompactification.Theheterotic stringE8×E8 hasrank16gaugesector.Themodelpresentedin[10] hastheSU(5)flipfromE8 and
*
Correspondingauthor.E-mailaddress:[email protected](J.E. Kim).
1 Formorereferences,see[9].
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.02.035
0370-2693/©2019TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Fundedby SCOAP3.
Fig. 1.A neutrino interaction with the SM fields only.
Table 1
U(1)chargesofmatterfieldsintheflippedSU(5).ξiandη¯icontaintheleft-handedquarkandleptondoublets,respectively,inthei-thfamily.
State(P+kV0) i RX(Sect.) QR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Qanom Q18 Q20 Q22
ξ3 (+ + + − −; − − +)(08) 0 10−1(U3) +1 −6 −6 +6 0 0 0 −13 +1 −1 +1
¯
η3 (+ − − − −; + − −)(08) 0 5+3(U3) +1 +6 −6 −6 0 0 0 −1 +1 −1 +1
τc (+ + + + +; − + −)(08) 0 1−5(U3) +1 −6 +6 −6 0 0 0 +5 +1 −1 +1
ξ2 (+ + + − −; −16,−16,−16)(08) +41 10−1(T40) −1 −2 −2 −2 0 0 0 −3 −1 −1 −1
¯
η2 (+ − − − −; −16,−16,−16)(08) +41 5+3(T04) −1 −2 −2 −2 0 0 0 −3 −1 −1 −1
μc (+ + + + +; −16,−16,−16)(08) +41 1−5(T04) −1 −2 −2 −2 0 0 0 −3 −1 −1 −1
ξ1 (+ + + − −; −16,−16,−16)(08) +41 10−1(T40) −1 −2 −2 −2 0 0 0 −3 −1 −1 −1
¯
η1 (+ − − − −; −16,−16,−16)(08) +41 5+3(T04) −1 −2 −2 −2 0 0 0 −3 −1 −1 −1
ec (+ + + + +; −16,−16,−16)(08) +41 1−5(T04) −1 −2 −2 −2 0 0 0 −3 −1 −1 −1
HuL (+1 0 0 0 0;0 0 0)(05;−21 +1
2 0) +31 2·5−2(T6) −2 0 0 0 −12 0 0 0 −1 −1 −1
HdL (−1 0 0 0 0;0 0 0)(05;+21 −1
2 0) +31 2·5+2(T6) +2 0 0 0 +12 0 0 0 −1 −1 −1
SU(5)×SU(2) fromE8,andwe can consider 6extra U(1) gauge groups. Thesemany U(1)’s make itpossible to haveflavor dependent Yukawacouplings.2
StringcompactificationinourexampleallowsalltheneededYukawacouplingsintheSMasnon-renormalizableforms.Therehasbeen an ambitious attempt[21] to relate the originofthe
μ
termwith themagnitudes ofneutrino massesby introducing justone singlet chiral field beyondthe minimal supersymmetricSM. Thistry allowed only renormalizable couplings. Therefore,withso many singlets participatingthroughnon-renormalizableYukawacouplingsinourmodel,thisdesignisnotapplicable.Therelationsinourmodelmight beintertwinedinanelaboratewaysincetheZ4R discretesymmetryautomaticallygivestheμ
termattheelectroweakscale[22].Since ourZ4R isasubgroupofanAbeliangaugegroupU(1)6,itcannotbeanon-Abeliandiscretesymmetrysuchastheinteresting A4 symmetry [23].The massmatrices leading to the Kim-Seo(KS) parametrization [24] ofthe CKM and PMNSmixing matriceshave a smallnumber ofcomplexelements,bymaking onerowconsistofrealnumbers.Attheplaces wherecomplexentriesareallowed,we allocatetheCP phase.TheKSformhasanotheradvantagethattheJarlskogdeterminantis J= −ImV31KSV22KSV13KS [25].Towardamodelbuilding,thenext stepistoobtainphenomenologicallyacceptablemassmatrices.IntheflippedSU(5),theneutrinomassmatrixissymmetric,canbemade real,andhenceweproposeinthispapertoputtheCPphaseinthechargedleptonmassmatrix.
ThestringmodelgivestheYukawacouplingsforthechargedleptonmassesandneutrinomasses.Thus,inSec.2wepresentthelepton massmatricesfromtheflippedSU(5)model,i.e.allowedbythequantumnumbersofRef. [9],intheformsrelatedtotheKSmixingmatrix.
Then,we locatepossiblephasesinthecomplexvacuumexpectationvalues(VEVs)ofthe SMsingletfields
σ
i.NextinSec.3,we relate theseleptonicmassmatriceswiththePMNSmatrixandcompareitwiththedatapresentedintheParticleDataBook[26].InSec.4,we presentnumerical analysesandobtain|δPMNS|<62.8o forthe normalhierarchyofneutrinomasseswiththePDGbookparametrization [26].Section5isaconclusion.ThemagnitudeontheweakCPviolation J [27] isbrieflydiscussedinAppendixA.2. Suggestionfromtheflipped SU(5)model
IfweconsideronlytheSMparticles,neutrinomassesarisefromthediagramshowninFig.1.Anyfurtherattachmentstothisdiagram areSM singletscalars.Ifwe considerthequantumnumbers underSU(2)W×U(1)Y,two neutrinoshave1−1⊕3↑−1 where ↑means that the 3rd component of the weak isospin is +1. Possible additional scalar attachments to Fig. 1 must carry quantum number 1+1 or 3↓+1 together withtwo Hu0’s, and 1+1 is ruled out because 1+1 breaks U(1)em. 3↓+1 allows the scalar attachments, shown as Hu⊕ Hu in Fig. 1. Depending ondetails of highenergyfields, implied by thequestion markinthe gray, two typesof neutrinomassesare named,TypeIseesaw[28] andTypeIIseesaw[29].TypeIIIseesaw[30] requiresmorelightparticlesattheelectroweakscale.Fromthe SU(5)flipspectrashowninRef. [20],wenote thatthereisnoSU(2)tripletrepresentation;henceonlyTypeIseesawisallowed fromour stringcompactification.
2 Amongthese,theanomalousU(1)canworkasaflavorsymmetry[20].NotethatinadditiontotheseweuseU(1)’sfromtheextradimensionstowardZ4Rdiscrete symmetryinRef. [9].
Table 2
U(1)chargesofL-handedneutralscalars(but σ7,8forR-handed).Wekeptuptooneoscillatorrepresented asNumberofresultingfields(number of oscillating mode).For example,n(11¯)meansthatthereresultsnmultiplicitieswithoneoscillator −125.For Q18,20,22charges,herewelistedonlythoseofL-handedfields,participatinginthe Yukawacouplings.σ2,3,4,11,15,21,22,23,24havephasei=0,whichcanbeusedtobreakZ4RdowntoZ2R.
State(P+kV0) i (NL)j P·RX(Sect.) QR Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Qanom Q18 Q20 Q22
∗1 (+ + + − −;03)(05;−41−1 4 +2
4) 0 2(11) 210−1(T3)L +4 0 0 0 0 +9 +3 −733 −1 +1 −1
∗1 (+ + + − −;03)(05;−41−1 4 +2
4) +32 1(13) 110−1(T3)L +4 0 0 0 0 +9 +3 −733 −1 +1 −1
2 (+ + − − −;03)(05;+41+1 4 −2
4) 0 2(1¯1) 210+1(T3)L −4 0 0 0 0 −9 −3 +733 −1 −1 −1
2 (+ + − − −;03)(05;+41+1 4 −2
4) +31 1(1¯3) 110+1(T3)L −4 0 0 0 0 −9 −3 +733 −1 −1 −1
σ1 (05;−32−2 3 −2
3)(08) +41 0 2·10(T04) −4 −8 −8 −8 0 0 0 −12 −1 −1 −1
σ2 (05;−32+1 3 +1
3)(08) 0 3(1¯1) 3·10(T04) 0 −8 +4 +4 0 0 0 −2 −1 −1 −1
σ3 (05;13 −2 3
1
3)(08) 0 3(1¯1) 3·10(T04) 0 +4 −8 +4 0 0 0 −8 −1 −1 −1
σ4 (05;13 1 3−2
3)(08) 0 3(1¯1) 3·10(T04) 0 +4 +4 −8 0 0 0 +10 −1 −1 −1
σ5 (05;010)(05;12−1
2 0) +21 0 2·10(T6) +4 0 +12 0 +12 0 0 +14 −1 −1 −1
σ6 (05;001)(05;−21 1
20) +21 0 2·10(T6) 0 0 0 +12 −12 0 0 −4 −1 −1 −1
σ7 (05;0−10)(05;−21 1
20) +21 0 2·10(T6)R +4 0 +12 0 +12 0 0 +14 −1 +1 −1
σ8 (05;00−1)(05;12−1
2 0) +21 0 2·10(T6)R −2 0 0 +12 −12 0 0 −4 −1 +1 −1
σ11 (05;−21−1 2 −1
2)(05;34−1 4 −1
2) +32 2(11+13,11¯+13¯) 2·10(T3) −6 −6 −6 −6 +12 −9 −3 −730 +1 +1 −1 σ11 (05;−21−1
2 −1 2)(05;34−1
4 −1
2) 0 4(11+13,11¯+13¯) 4·10(T3) −6 −6 −6 −6 +12 −9 −3 −730 −1 +1 +1 σ12 (05;−21
1 2 1 2)(05;34−1
4 −1
2) +31 2(11+13,11¯+13¯) 2·10(T3) −2 −6 +6 +6 +12 −9 −3 +740 +1 +1 −1 σ12 (05;−21
1 2 1 2)(05;34−1
4 −1
2) +32 2(11+13,11¯+13¯) 2·10(T3) −2 −6 +6 +6 +12 −9 −3 +740 −1 +1 +1 σ13 (05;12
1 2−1
2 )(05;−41 3 4−1
2) +31 2(11+13,11¯+13¯) 2·10(T3) −6 +6 +6 −6 −12 −9 −3 +1247 +1 +1 −1 σ13 (05;12
1 2−1
2 )(05;−41 3 4−1
2) +32 2(11+13,11¯+13¯) 2·10(T3) −6 +6 +6 −6 −12 −9 −3 +1247 −1 +1 +1 σ14 (05;12
1 2−1
2 )(05;−41 −1 4
1
2) +32 2(1¯1)+1(13¯) 3·10(T3) +4 +6 +6 −6 0 +9 +3 +758 −1 +1 +1
σ15 (05;−21−1 2 −1
2)(05;+43 −1 4 −1
2) +32 2(11+13,11¯+13¯) 2·10(T3) −6 −6 −6 −6 +12 −9 −3 −730 +1 +1 −1 σ15 (05;−21−1
2 −1
2)(05;+43 −1 4 −1
2) 0 2(11+13,11¯+13¯) 4·10(T3) −6 −6 −6 −6 +12 −9 −3 −730 −1 +1 +1 σ16 (05;−21+1
2 +1
2)(05;+43 −1 4 −1
2) +31 2(11+13,11¯+13¯) 2·10(T3) −2 −6 +6 +6 +12 −9 −3 +740 +1 +1 −1 σ16 (05;−21+1
2 +1
2)(05;+43 −1 4 −1
2) +32 2(11+13,11¯+13¯) 2·10(T3) −2 −6 +6 +6 +12 −9 −3 +740 −1 +1 +1 σ17 (05;+21+1
2 −1
2)(05;−41 +3 4 −1
2) +31 2(11+13,11¯+13¯) 2·10(T3) −6 +6 +6 −6 −12 −9 −3 +1247 +1 +1 −1 σ17 (05;+21+1
2 −1
2)(05;−41 +3 4 −1
2) +32 2(11+13,11¯+13¯) 2·10(T3) −6 +6 +6 −6 −12 −9 −3 +1247 −1 +1 +1 σ18 (05;12 +1
2 −1
2)(05;+43−1 4 −1
2) +32 2(1¯1)+1(13¯) 2·10(T3) +4 +6 +6 −6 0 +9 +3 +758 −1 +1 +1
σ21 (05;−61−1 6 −1
6)(05;14 1 4 −1
2) 0 1(1¯1) 10(T10) +2 −2 −2 −2 0 +9 +3 +712 −1 −1 −1
σ22 (05;−65 1 6 1 6)(05;14
1 4−1
2) 0 1(1¯1+13) 10(T50) +2 −10 +2 +2 0 +9 +3 −72 −1 +1 +1
σ23 (05;16 −5 6
1 6)(05;14
1 4−1
2) 0 1(1¯1+13) 10(T50) +2 −10 +2 +2 0 +9 +3 −744 −1 +1 +1
σ24 (05;16 1 6−5
6)(05;14 1 4−1
2) 0 1(1¯1+13) 10(T50) +2 −10 +2 +2 0 +9 +3 +782 −1 +1 +1
TheSM fieldsfrom[9] areshowninTable1,andtheSM singletfields,includingthose in10−1 and10+1 ofSU(5)flip,areshownin Table2.ConsideringtheSM singletattachments to Fig.1,letusconsidertheneutrinomassoperatorsallowed bythequantumnumbers ofTables1and2.Firstly,thediagonalmassesare
Mν33
∝
M˜
133d2
ϑ
5+3(
U3,
0; +
1)
5+3(
U3,
0; +
1)
5−2(
T6,
13
; −
2)
5−2(
T6,
13
; −
2)
10−1(
T3,
13
; +
4)
10−1(
T3,
0; +
4)
Mν22∝
M˜
142d2
ϑ
5+3(
T40,
14
; −
1)
5+3(
T40,
14
; −
1)
5−2(
T6,
13
; −
2)
5−2(
T6,
13
; −
2)
10−1(
T3,
13
; +
4)
10−1(
T3,
0; +
4)
·
10( σ
5,
T6,
1 2; +
4)
(1)
wherethelastnumberafter;isthe QR charge,andM˜3 andM˜2 aredeterminedby?inFig.1.Weneed QR=2 modulo4aboveford2ϑ integration.Mν
11,Mν 12,Mν
21havethesamestructureasMν
22.Notethattheselectionruleismakingthephaseanintegermultiple,whichis satisfiedabovefori,viz.0+0+13+13+13+0=1 and 14+14+13+13+13+0+12=2.Then,theabovemassesareestimatedas
Mν33
∼
v2E WM˜
M33210,
Mν22∼
v2E WM102| σ
5|
M
˜
42,
(2)whereM10= 10−1 = 10+1 .Then,neutrinomixingmassesaregenerallyoforder v2E W/M˜ sincetheSMsingletVEV
σ
5 canbeatthe GUTscalewithoutbreakingZ4R.Fortheoff-diagonalmassesbetweenU3 andT40neutrinos,weneed QR=0 modulo4ford2ϑd2ϑ¯ integration.
Mν32
,
Mν31∝
M˜
16d2
ϑ
d2ϑ ¯
5+3(
U3,
0; +
1)
5+3(
T40,
14
; −
1)
5−2(
T6,
13
; −
2)
5−2(
T6,
1 3; −
2)
·
10−1(
T3,
0; +
4)
10−1(
T3,
0; +
4) ·
10( σ
1,
T40,
14
; −
4)
∗10( σ
14,
T3,
2 3; +
4)
∗.
(3)
Then,theabovemassmixingisestimatedas Mν13,23
∼
v2E WM210| σ
1σ
14|
M
˜
×5,
(4)whereM˜× issomemassscaledeterminedbytheaboveequations.Notethat∗2,1 and
σ
1 canhavetheGUTscaleVEVsbecauseallof themcarry QR=0 modulo4,andweobtainasimilarorderofmassforallofMν11,12,22,33,13,23.ComparingMν
11,22,31,32andMν 33, Mν11
,
Mν22Mν33
≈ σ
5M
˜ ,
Mν 31
,
Mν32M33ν
≈ σ
1σ
14M
˜
2,
(5)wenotethattheneutrinomasshierarchycanbethenormalhierarchy(inthesensethat
ν
τ istheheaviest)iftheVEVsofσ
singletsare comparablysmall,|σ
1|,|σ
5|<M.˜Sinceweobtainedallentriesintheneutrinomassmatrix,hereweinvestigatehowtheCPphasecanbeinsertedinthemassmatrix ofthe Qem= −1 leptonsandintheneutrinomassmatrix.
2.1. NeutrinomassmatrixinspiredbyflippedSU(5)
InRef. [9] basedontheflippedSU(5)modelof[10],apossibleidentificationZ4R hasbeenachieved,forbiddingdimension-5Bviolating operatorsbutallowing theelectroweakscale
μ
termanddimension-5Lviolating Weinbergoperator.IntheflippedSU(5), theneutrino massesariseintheform−
LνI J=
fI J(ν)({ σ })
5+I,i35+J,3j5k−2(
Hu)
5l−2(
Hu)[
10−1(
HGUT)
10−1(
HGUT)]
i jkl+
h.
c.,
(6) wherethecouplings f(ν)I J arecomplexparameters, I and J areflavorindices,i,j,k,l,mareSU(5)indices,andthesubscriptistheU(1)X quantumnumberofSU(5)flip.5−2 isusuallydenotedasHuL,and10−1,togetherwith10+1,istheten-pletneededforbreakingtherank 5gaugegroupSU(5)×U(1)ataGUTscaledowntotherank4SMgaugegroup.
Consider 5+I,i35+J,3j inEq. (6) which is symmetricunder I and J.Thus, the neutrino massmatrix is symmetric.The Majorana phase factoredout in Eq. (20) is fromtheheavy neutrinos, whichwill not affectourstudyof CC interactions ofSec. 3.We assume that the neutrinomassmatrix,beingsymmetric,isreal.Thus, V(ν)canbeconsideredtobeanorthogonalmatrix O(ν).
2.2. MassmatrixofchargedleptonsinspiredbyflippedSU(5)
Ascommentedabove, wecanalways take V(ν) asa realmatrix O(ν).Thus,the PMNSmatrixgivenintheKSform, Eq. (25),can be representedas
VKS(l)†
=
V(e)O(ν)T=
⎛
⎝
q11r11+
q12r12+
q13r13,
q11r21+
q12r22+
q13r23,
q11r31+
q12r32+
q13r33,
q21r11+
q22r12+
q23r13,
q21r21+
q22r22+
q23r23,
q21r31+
q22r32+
q23r33,
q31r11+
q32r12+
q33r13,
q31r21+
q32r22+
q33r23,
q31r31+
q32r32+
q33r33,
⎞
⎠
(7)wheretheelements Vi j(l)=qi j andO(ν)
i j =ri j arecomplexandrealnumbers,respectively.Makingthe1strowrealfortheKSform,q11,q12 andq13arerequiredtobereal.
Theunitarymatricesrelatingtheweakeigenstateslamdmasseigenstatesi ofthechargedleptonsarenamedasV forL-handedfields andU forR-handedfields,
lL
=
3j=1
Vlj(l)l(jLmass)
,
lR=
3j=1
Ulj(l)l(j Rmass)
,
(8)where¯lLmass=(1,2,3)L intermsofmasseigenstates1,2,3,andlmassR =(N1,N2,N3)R.Themassmatrixbecomes
¯
lL(
Ve(l)MmassU(el)†)
lR (9)intheweakeigenstatebasis.SinceR-handedleptonsarenotparticipatingintheCCinteractions,theleptonR-handedunitarymatrixU(l) canbetakenastheidentitymatrix.Thus,themassmatrixintheweakbasisbecomes
M(l)
=
V(l)⎛
⎝
m˜
e,
0,
0 0,
m˜
μ,
0 0,
0,
1⎞
⎠
U(l)†=
⎛
⎝
q11m˜
e,
q12m˜
μ,
q13q21m
˜
e,
q22m˜
μ,
q23 q31m˜
e,
q32m˜
μ,
q33⎞
⎠ =
⎛
⎝
real,
real,
real complex,
complex,
complex complex,
complex,
complex⎞
⎠
(10)whereVi j(l)=qi j andweobtainedq11,q12andq13arerealnumbers.
We show that the quantumnumbers of themodel presented in[9] allows an effectivemass matrix formEq. (10) forthe charged leptons.
−
LlI J=
fI J(l)({ σ })
5+I,i31−J55+2,