• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

TACT A T C "A AT .Uii Us pp 5415.32 .M84 2011

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "TACT A T C "A AT .Uii Us pp 5415.32 .M84 2011"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

A ' a.-; *~ry Q C IT AT* A * ! A T T r - ' ' A n K | y * A * " ? A * ' *'£>' '.'\f •

O k . Vi O - o w l ft . T A C T A T C

i. ? . V J -~J 1 - 0 2_ft>

"A AT

.Uii Us u n * t o r --»r A • ? I I

pp HF 5415.32 .M84 2011

(2)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Fist of all, grateful to the blessing of ALLAH by give me a good health during the period of completion my project paper and also ensure I undergone a smooth practical training for almost 6 month. I also would like to express my gratitude to the Head of Program of Bachelor in Business Administration (hons), who is also my advisor for my practical training Mr Franklin Hazley Lai. Thank you for all his advice, guided and time in the making completion of this project paper. It is a honour to be appoint under his supervision during the period of my practical training.

Other than that, thank you to my classmate Bmb5m1 for all the suggestion during the period of complete my project paper and to the valued respondent Thank you for the time in answered my questionnaire.

Thank You

iv

(3)

T A B L E OF CONTENT Particulars Page

Acknowledgements iv List of Table v List of Figures vii List of definition of Terms ix

Abstract x Chapter 1

1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Background of study 3

1.2 Problem statement 4 1.3 Research objectives 4 Chapter 2

2.0Literature Review 5 2.1 C S R initiatives 5 2.2 Economic Responsibilities 6

2.3 Legal Responsibilities 7 2.4 Ethical Responsibilities 8 2.5 Philanthropic Responsibilities 9

2.6 Theoretical Framework 11 Chapter 3

3.0 Research Methodology 13 3.1 Research Design 13 3.2 Sampling Design 14 3.3 Sampling Technique 14 3.4 Data Analysis Techniques 15 3.5 Validity and trustworthiness of data 15

3.6 Instrument 16 Chapter 4

4.0 Analysis Slnterpretation 18 4.1 Cross Tabulations 40 Chapter 5

5.0 Conclusions 42 5.1 Recommendation 44

(4)

LIST OF T A B L E S

Tables No Title of Table Table 4.1.1 The gender of respondents Table 4.1.2 The age of the respondent Table 4.1.3 The race of the respondent

The educational level of the respondent Respondent monthly income

Respondent service network provider Table 4.1.4

Table 4.1.5 Table 4.1.6

Table 4.2.1 Respondent select product and service by Telco companies that offer reasonable price

Table4.2.2 Respondent support Telco companies that provide wider range of coverage

Table 4.2.3 Respondent support Telco companies that provide diverse services as satisfied them

Table 4.3.1 Respondent preference on Telco companies that act in appropriate behaviour according to the goverment rules and regulation

Table4.3.2 Respondent select Telco companies that obey the employment act

Table 4.3.3 Respondent preference on Telco companies that comply with the radiation tariff

Table 4.4.1 Respondent support Telco companies that responsible to enviroment Table 4.4.2 Respondent support Telco companies that compete fairly to other

competitors

Table 4.4.3 Respondent support honest Telco companies

Table4.5.1 Respondent support Telco companies that donate a fixed percentage from thier profit to help the enviroment

Table 4.5.2 Respondent support Telco companies that support students to further studies

(5)

ABSTRACT

The research study is about to the customer selection of telecommunication company : from the point of C S R perspectives". The study was done to identify he correlation of C S R initiatives and customer selection towards Telco company and to identify the preference C S R initiatives by customer. The study will focus on the Carroll's pyramid which are the economic responsible, legal responsible, ethical responsible, and philanthropic responsible. From the study, valuable information and suggestion were gather which is important to improve C S R initiatives in the future. Moreover, the information can be use as a tool for Telco company to fulfil the need of the demanding consumer now day. Moreover, 200 respondents have been selected randomly around Kota Kinabalu which categorized as a convenience sampling method. Other than questionnaire, personal interviews also been conducted during the study where opinion and suggestion been collect. As a result, the research run through smoothly whereby the data can be acquire accurately.Finally, the entire research done to identify the correlation of C S R initiatives and customer selection towards Telco company and customer most preference C S R initiatives by customer which the result are valuable for firm and organization to improve their C S R initiatives, services and product in future times in order to compete in competitive market.

x

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

LIST OF TABLES Table Page 4.1 Gender of Respondents in Total 16 4.2 Respondents who own a Smartphone 17 4.3 Respondents who installed the Instagram Application on their

List of Tables Table 1: Household member's category 60 Table 2: The age of the household heads 61 Table 3: Gender of household heads 61 Table 4: Marital status 61 Table 5: Location

7.2 Table 4: Distribution of the respondents by years of service Table 5: Distribution of the respondents by job apllication outside the company Other data analysis List of Tables

ix LIST OF TABLES Table Page Table 1: Gender of beneficiaries 52 Table 2: Age of beneficiaries 52 Table 3: Educational background 53 Table 4: Access to financial support from

List of Tables Page Table 1: Spatial Distribution of the Sample Respondents by Category of the Respondents Table 2: Age Distribution of the Respondents Table-3: Years of Schooling

V | P a g e LIST OF TABLES Tables Title Page Table 1 Potential presence of organisms in manure and illness caused by them in humans 4 Table 2 Distribution of respondents

As such, the list of respondents being specified for personal interviews has been given in Table 1: Table 1: List of Personal Interview Respondent Position Agencies One State

vi LIST OF TABLES Table TITLE PAGE NO Table 1.1 Distribution of slums by locality 4 Table 4.1 Age distribution of the respondents 22 Table 4.2 Categories of educational