INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING ETHICS (IEETHICS)

(1)

I N D U S T R I A L E N G I N E E R I N G P R O G R A M COURSE TITLE: INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING ETHICS (IEETHICS)

2nd Semester, Curriculum Year 2019-2020

Holy Angel University VMs

Vision: To become a role-model catalyst for countryside development and one of the most influential, best-managed Catholic universities in the Asia-Pacific region.

Mission: To offer accessible quality education that transforms students into persons of conscience, competence, and compassion.

School of Engineering and Architecture VMs Vision

A center of excellence in engineering and architecture education imbued with Catholic mission and identity serving as a role-model catalyst for countryside development

Mission

The School shall provide accessible quality engineering and architecture education leading to highly competent professional; continually contribute to the advancement of knowledge and technology through research activities; and support countryside development through environmental preservation and community involvement.

Institutional Student Learning Outcomes (ISLOs) 1. Show effective communication

2. Demonstrate appropriate value and sound ethical reasoning

(2)

4. Utilize civic and global learning

5. Use applied and collaborative learning 6. Employ aesthetic engagement

7. Show Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy Program Educational Objectives (PEOs)

Within a few years after graduation, graduates of our BS Industrial Engineering programs are expected to have:

1. Demonstrated technical competence, including design and problem-solving skills, as evidenced by:

 the sound technical designs and systems that conform with existing laws and ethical standards they produced

 the recognition and certification they received for exemplary achievement 2. Shown a commitment to life-long learning as evidenced by:

 the graduate degrees or further studies they pursue

 the professional certifications which are locally and internationally recognized they possess

 the knowledge and skills on recent technological advances in the field they continuously acquire 3. Exhibited success in their chosen profession evidenced by:

 the key level positions they hold or promotions they get in their workplace

 the good track record they possess

 the professional visibility (e.g., publications, presentations, patents, inventions, awards, etc.) they are involved with

 the international activities (e.g., participation in international conferences, collaborative research, employment abroad, etc.) they are engaged with

 the entrepreneurial activities they undertake 4. Manifested faithful stewardship as evidenced by:

 their participation in University-based community extension initiatives as alumni

 their contribution to innovations/ inventions for environmental promotion and preservation, and cultural integration

 their engagement in advocacies and volunteer works for the upliftment of the quality of life and human dignity especially the marginalized

(3)

Relationship of the Program Educational Objectives to the Mission of the School of Engineering & Architecture:

Industrial Engineering Program Educational Objectives (PEOs):

Within a few years after graduation, the graduates of the BS Industrial Engineering program should have:

Mission The School shall provide

accessible quality

engineering and architecture education leading to high professional competence.

The School shall continually contribute to the

advancement of knowledge and technology through research activities.

The School shall support countryside development through environmental preservation and community involvement.

1. Demonstrated professional competence, including design and problem solving skills as evidenced by:

 the sound technical designs and systems that conform with existing laws and ethical standards they produced

 the recognition and certification they received for exemplary achievement



2. Shown a commitment to life-long learning evidenced by:

 the graduate degrees or further studies they pursue

 the professional certifications which are locally and internationally recognized they possess

 the knowledge and skills on recent technological advances in the field they continuously acquire



3. Exhibited success in their chosen profession evidenced by:

 the key level positions they hold or promotions they get in their workplace

 the good track record they possess

 the professional visibility (e.g., publications, presentations, patents, inventions, awards, etc.)

 they are involved with international activities (e.g., participation in international conferences, collaborative research, employment abroad, etc.)

 they are engaged with the entrepreneurial activities they undertake

 

4. Manifested faithful stewardship evidenced by: 

(4)

 their participation in University-based community extension initiatives as alumni

 their contribution to innovations/ inventions for environmental promotion and preservation, and cultural integration

 their engagement in advocacies and volunteer works for the upliftment of the quality of life and human dignity especially the marginalized

Relationship of the Institutional Student Learning Outcomes to the Program Educational Objectives:

PEO 1 PEO 2 PEO 3 PEO 4

ISLO1: Show effective communication  

ISLO2: Demonstrate appropriate value and sound ethical reasoning  

ISLO3: Apply critical and creative thinking   

ISLO4: Utilize civic and global learning  

ISLO5: Use applied and collaborative learning    

ISLO6: Employ aesthetic engagement  

ISLO7: Show Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy   

(5)

BS Industrial Engineering Program Outcomes (POs) After finishing the program students will be able to:

a. Apply knowledge of mathematics, physical sciences, and engineering sciences to the practice of Industrial Engineering.

b. Design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data.

c. Design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability, in accordance with standards.

d. Function on multidisciplinary teams.

e. Identify, formulate and solve engineering problems.

f. Have an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.

g. Demonstrate and master the ability to listen, comprehend, speak, write and convey ideas clearly and effectively, in person and through electronic media to all audiences.

h. Have broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context.

i. Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning and to keep current of the development in the field.

j. Have knowledge of contemporary issues.

k. Use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.

l. Have knowledge and understanding of engineering and management principles as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.

m. Engage in service-learning program for the promotion and preservation to local culture and tradition as well as to the community.

n. Design, develop, implement and improve integrated systems that include people, materials, information, equipment and energy.

Relationship of the Engineering Program Outcomes to the Program Educational Objectives:

Industrial Engineering Student Outcomes (SOs)

At the time of graduation, BS Industrial Engineering program graduates should be able to: PEO 1 PEO 2 PEO 3 PEO 4 a. Apply knowledge of mathematics, physical sciences, and engineering sciences to the practice of

Industrial Engineering. 

b. Design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. 

(6)

c. Design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and

sustainability, in accordance with standards. 

d. Function on multidisciplinary teams. 

e. Identify, formulate and solve engineering problems. 

f. Have an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 

g. Demonstrate and master the ability to listen, comprehend, speak, write and convey ideas clearly

and effectively, in person and through electronic media to all audiences. 

h. Have broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,

economic, environmental, and societal context. 

i. Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning and to keep current of the

development in the field. 

j. Have knowledge of contemporary issues. 

k. Use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. 

(7)

l. Have knowledge and understanding of engineering and management principles as a member and

leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments. 

m. Ability to design, develop, implement and improve integrated systems that include people,

materials, information, equipment and energy. 

n. Engage in service-learning program for the promotion and preservation to local culture and tradition

as well as to the community. 

Code Descriptor Description

I Introductory Course An introductory course to an outcome

E Enabling Course A course that strengthens the outcome

D Demonstrative Course A course demonstrating an outcome Course Outcomes (COs)

1. Identify the significance of morality on the formation of right conscience and behavior;

2. Recognize the relations of the IE with the state, the public, the clients, employer, engineers, other professionals and participate in projects that promote ecological harmony; and

3. Apply the values and ethical principles learned and effect more harmonious social and work relations.

a b c d e f g h i J k l m n

CO1.Identify the significance of morality on the formation of right

conscience and behavior; E

CO2.Recognize the relations of the IE with the state, the public, the clients, employer, engineers, other professionals and participate in

projects that promote ecological harmony; and E

CO3.Apply the values and ethical principles learned and effect more

harmonious social and work relations. D

(8)

I. Course Description : Overview on values, value system, value formation and value clarification processes; work and responsibilities of an industrial engineer; relations of the industrial engineer with the state, the public, the clients, employer, engineers, and other professionals

II. Course Credit : 3 Units

III. Prerequisite : 5^thYear Standing

IV. Textbook : Harris, E., Prichard, S. et.al. (2019). Engineering ethics: concepts and cases (6th ed.). Australia: Cengage Education

V. Requirements : Seatworks

Assignments Critiques Case Studies Written Exam

Final Output (Research Proposal) VI. Learning Outline

Week/

Hours

CodeCO

Link Learning Output Student

Output Topics / Course Content Core values

Sub valuesand Methodology Evaluation/

Learning Assessment 1 hourWk 1 At the end of course

or topic the student will be able to:

Learn the importance of subject through the course outcomes

Recognize the different classroom policies

Get familiarized with and use the online learning platforms to

IEETHICS Subject Orientation

Course outcomes Classroom policies

Attendance

Assignments

Quizzes and major examinations

Case studies

Critique

Subject final output requirement

Christ-

centeredness Indicators:

Obedience and prayerfulness Excellence Indicators:

Competence, expertise, analytical, and logical

 Subject orientation conducted by teacher.

(9)

be used in class

Identify Fundamental

Concepts on Values

Defined Values

Identify Hierarchy of values

Identify Valuing Process

Grading System

Academic Dishonesty Online Learning Platform

Canvas LMS

Zoom Cloud Meetings

Societal responsibility Indicators:

Commitment andInvolvement

Wk 1-2

3 hours CO1

CO2 At the end of course or topic the student will be able to:

Identify Filipino Values and Character

Recognized Strengths and Weaknesses of Filipino Character

Identify The Many Faces of the Filipino

Identify Agents of Character Formation

Seatwork

Assignment

Written exam

Ciritque

Case Study

Filipino Values and Character

Strengths and Weaknesses of Filipino Character

The Many Faces of the Filipino

Agents of Character Formation

Christ-

Community Indicators:

Solidarity and Respect for others Integrity Indicators:

Accountability,

Transparency and Honesty Societal

Media-supported lecture/ PowerPoint presentation

Class discussions by teachers and

students (face-to- face/online)

Interactive student- centered activities like Think-Pair-Share, Brainstorming, Buzz Session etc.

Hands-on

demonstrations and exercises/ problem

setsCoaching (special assistance provided for students learning difficulty in the course)

Recitation

Written examinations

Alternative summative assessments

Answer Key

Assessment Rubric is to be used for theevaluation of theclassroom activities

(10)

responsibility Indicators:

(reflection papers/

critical analysis)

Asynchronous

teaching and learning using Canvas LMS Platform in providing offline content

resources (readings, lecture notes,

recorded lectures, detailed guides, etc., in print or digital format) and other activities.

Synchronous

teaching and learning through webinars, live broadcasts, chats and teleconferences for real-time teacher- student engagement.

Wk 2-3

5 hours CO1

Recognized Basic Values, Self-worth, Duty and obligation, Simplicity and Thrift, Cleanliness and Orderliness, Commitment, Honesty and Integrity, Social Responsibility,

Seatwork

Assignment

Written exam

Ciritque

Case Study

Basic Values

Self-worth

Duty and obligation

Simplicity and Thrift

Cleanliness and Orderliness

Commitment

Honesty and Integrity

Social Responsibility

Environmental Awareness

Christ-

Hands-on

Answer Key

(11)

Environmental

Awareness Community

Indicators:

Accountability,

Transparency and Honesty Societal responsibility Indicators:

Recitation

Alternative summative assessments (reflection papers/

critical analysis)

Asynchronous

Synchronous

(12)

Wk 4-5

6 hours CO1

Define Law, Ethics and Engineering Ethics

Seatwork

Assignment

Written exam

Ciritque

Case Study

Introduction to Law, Ethics

and Engineering Ethics Christ-

Accountability,

Hands-on

Recitation

critical analysis)

Asynchronous

Answer Key

(13)

Synchronous

6 P R E L I M E X A M I N A T I O N

3 hoursWk 7 CO1 CO2CO3

At the end of course or topic the student will be able to:

Identify Engineers Duties and

Responsibilities

Defined Engineering Ethics

Recognized Code of Ethics as applied to Industrial Engineers

Seatwork

Assignment

Written exam

Ciritque

Case Study

Engineers Duties and Responsibilities

Engineering Ethics

Code of Ethics as applied to Industrial Engineers

Christ-

Hands-on

Answer Key

(14)

Accountability,

Recitation

critical analysis)

Asynchronous

Synchronous

Identify Professional Ethics

Recognize Morality and Role Morality

Defined What is

Seatwork

Assignment

Written exam

Ciritque

Case Study

Professional Ethics

Morality and Role Morality

What is Profession?

Professional Ethics as Role

Issues in Engineering Ethics

The Business model &

Social Contract Model

Christ-

Interactive student-

Answer Key

Assessment Rubric is to be used for theevaluation of the

(15)

Profession?

Described

Professional Ethics as Role

Demonstrate Issues in Engineering Ethics

Described Business model & Social Contract Model

Demonstrate Why support Code Ethics?

Defined Codes:

Uses & Limitation

Why support Code Ethics?

Codes: Uses & Limitation Competence, expertise, analytical, and logical

Accountability,

centered activities like Think-Pair-Share, Brainstorming, Buzz Session etc.

Hands-on

Recitation

critical analysis)

Asynchronous

Synchronous

teaching and learning through webinars, live broadcasts, chats

classroom activities

(16)

and teleconferences for real-time teacher- student engagement.

Identify Concepts of Responsibility

Identify the Scope of Responsibilities

Demonstrate Methods in Solving Moral Issues:

Minimalist view, Reasonable care, Good work

Impediments to responsibility

Seatwork

Assignment

Written exam

Ciritque

Case Study

On Becoming Responsible Engineer

Concepts of Responsibility

Broadening the Scope of Responsibilities

Methods in Solving Moral Issues: Minimalist view, Reasonable care, Good

workImpediments to responsibility

Christ-

Accountability,

Hands-on

Recitation

critical analysis)

Asynchronous

teaching and learning using Canvas LMS

Answer Key

(17)

Platform in providing offline content

Synchronous

Wk 10

3 hours CO1 CO2CO3

Recognize Risk, Safety and Liability

Identify Codes &

engineering practice

Demonstrate risk and safety

Recognize Government Regulations Approach to risk

Demonstrate Becoming Responsible Engineer regarding risk

Seatwork

Assignment

Written exam

Ciritque

Case Study

Risk, Safety and Liability

Codes & engineering practice

Regarding risk and safety

Government Regulations Approach to risk

Becoming Responsible Engineer regarding risk

Christ-

Solidarity and Respect for others

Hands-on

setsCoaching (special assistance provided

Answer Key

(18)

Integrity Indicators:

Accountability,

for students learning difficulty in the course)

Recitation

critical analysis)

Asynchronous

Synchronous

Wk 11

3 hours CO1 CO2CO3

Identify Generic Concepts

Seatwork

Assignment

Written exam

Ciritque

Case Study

Generic Concepts

Honesty, Integrity and Reliability

Ways of missing truth

Why dishonesty is wrong

Christ-

Obedience and prayerfulness

Answer Key

Assessment Rubric is to be used for

(19)

Demonstrate Honesty, Integrity and Reliability

Recognize Ways of missing truth

Why dishonesty is wrong

Excellence Indicators:

Accountability,

Hands-on

Recitation

critical analysis)

Asynchronous

Synchronous

theevaluation of theclassroom activities

(20)

12 M I D T E R M E X A M I N A T I O N

Wk 13

3 hours CO1 CO2CO3

Describe Engineers as Employee

Demonstrate The Codes and Employer – Employee Relationship

DemonstrateThe Manager – Engineer Relationship

Describe Paradigmatic Engineering and Management Decisions

Recognized Responsible Organization Disobedience

Demonstrate Implementing Professional Employee Rights

Seatwork

Assignment

Written exam

Ciritque

Case Study

Engineers as Employee

The Codes and Employer – Employee Relationship

The Manager – Engineer Relationship

Paradigmatic Engineering and Management Decisions

Responsible Organization Disobedience

Implementing Professional Employee Rights

Christ-

Accountability,

Transparency and Honesty Societal responsibility

Hands-on

Recitation

Answer Key

(21)

Indicators:

critical analysis)

Asynchronous

Synchronous

Wk 14

3 hours CO1 CO2CO3

Demonstrate

Framing the problem

Demonstrate Common Morality

Define Moral Justification:

Universality and Reversability

Apply Analyzing A

CaseRecongnizedFactual

Seatwork

Assignment

Written exam

Ciritque

Case Study

Framing the problem

Common Morality

Moral Justification:

Universality and Reversability

Analyzing A Case

Factual Issues

Conceptual issues

General And Specific Moral Problems

Christ-

Community

Hands-on

demonstrations and

Answer Key

(22)

Issues

Identify Conceptual issues

Identify General And Specific Moral Problems

Indicators:

Accountability,

exercises/ problem

Recitation

critical analysis)

Asynchronous

Synchronous

(23)

Wk 15-16

4 hours CO1 CO2CO3

Identify Methods for Moral Problem Solving

Demonstrate Line Drawing

Identify Conflicting values: Creative middle way solutions

Seatwork

Assignment

Written exam

Ciritque

Case Study

Oral

Presentation

Methods for Moral Problem Solving

Line Drawing

Conflicting values: Creative middle way solutions

Christ-

Accountability,

Hands-on

Recitation

critical analysis)

Asynchronous

Answer Key

(24)

Synchronous

Wk 16-17

5 hours CO1 CO2CO3

Identify Organizing Principle

Identify Utilitarian thinking

Identify Three Utilitarian Approach

Identify The Ethics of Respect for Person

Identify Three RP Approaches

Identify Convergence, Divergence &

Creative middle way

Seatwork

Assignment

Written exam

Ciritque

Case Study

Oral

Presentation

Organizing Principle

Utilitarian thinking

Three Utilitarian Approach

The Ethics of Respect for Person

Three RP Approaches

Convergence, Divergence

& Creative middle way

Christ-

Accountability,

Hands-on

Recitation

Answer Key

(25)

critical analysis)

Asynchronous

Synchronous

18 F I N A L E X A M I N A T I O N

(26)

FINAL COURSE OUTPUT

Learning Outcomes Required Output/s Due Date

Apply ethical theories, principles and concepts in decision making situations where Industrial Engineers practice their profession.

Apply appropriate tools and techniques in the analysis and solution of case studies/problems related to the ethical responsibilities of an Industrial Engineer

Portfolio/compilation of all different case studies from the real world.

The references should be at least 5 journal articles and 2 books.

There will be an oral presentation.

Starting Week 16

RUBRIC FOR ASSESSMENT

Criteria Excellent

(100%) Good

(75%) Satisfactory

(50%) Needs Improvement

(25%)

Integration of Knowledge (20 pts)

The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding

remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.

The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part,

understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.

Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.

The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.

The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully

understood and applied concepts learned in the course.

Breadth of content and depth of and discussion (20 pts)

Fullness of content and in-depth discussion & elaboration in all sections of the paper.

Fullness of content and in-depth discussion & elaboration in most sections of the paper.

The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively.

Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections.

Cohesiveness (10 pts)

Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Author's writing demonstrates an

understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all

For the most part, ties together information from all sources.

Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Author's writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all

Sometimes ties together information from all sources.

Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent.

Author's writing does not

demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material

Does not tie together information.

Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships

(27)

sources. sources. obtained from all sources.

Spelling and grammar (10 pts)

No spelling &/or grammar

mistakes. Minimal spelling &/or grammar

mistakes. Noticeable spelling & grammar

mistakes. Unacceptable number of spelling

and/or grammar mistakes.

References (10 pts)

More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special- interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative.

5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are

authoritative.

Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer- reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are credible.

Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer- reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all web sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.

Oral Presentation

(30 pts) Presented the topic well, and in an organized way

Complete and logical sequencing of information

Answered all questions clearly Used English language

Presented the topic well but a little bit disorganized

Some of the questions were not answered clearly

Used English/Tagalog language

Not very well presented and a little bit disorganized

Majority of the questions were not answered clearly

Majority used Tagalog language

Not well presented and disorganized

Answers are not clear

Majority used Tagalog language

(28)

References:

Corey, G. (2019). Issues & ethics in the helping professions. Australia: Cengage Learning.

Luegenbiehl, H. (2017). Global engineering ethics. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

MacKinnon, B. (2015). Ethics : theory and contemporary issues 8th edition. Cengage Learning: Australia.

McGinn, R. (2015). The ethically responsible engineer : concepts and cases for students and professionals. Hoboken, New Jersey:

Wiley.

Murphy, C. (2015). Engineering ethics for a globalized world. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Pritchard, M. (2019). Engineering ethics : concepts and cases. Australia: Cengage Learning.

Robison, W. (2017). Ethics within engineering : an introduction. London: Bloomsbury Academic Online References:

HAU Books 24x7 AccessEngineering

E-books:

Bouckaert, L and Chatterji, M. (2015).Business, Ethics and Peace.Retrieved from eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) database.

Business, Ethics and Peace. (2014).Business Law and Ethics.Retrieved from eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) database.

EBSCORobertson, G. (2018).Business Ethics and Corporate Governance.Retrieved from eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) database.

Ryan, M. (2016).Human Value, Environmental Ethics and Sustainability : The Precautionary Ecosystem Health Principle.Retrieved from eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) database.

Sharabi, M. (2016).Generational Differences in Work Values and Ethics : An International Perspective.Retrieved from eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) database.

Sims, R. (2017).A Contemporary Look at Business Ethics.Retrieved from eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) database.

(29)

Expectations from Students

Students are held responsible for meeting the standards of performance established for each course. Their performance and compliance with other course requirements are the bases for passing or failing in each course, subject to the rules of the University. The students are expected to take all examinations on the date scheduled, read the assigned topics prior to class, submit and comply with all the requirements of the subject as scheduled, attend each class on time and participate actively in the discussions.

Furthermore, assignments such as reports, reaction papers and the like shall be submitted on the set deadline as scheduled by the faculty. Extension of submission is approved for students with valid reasons like death in the family, hospitalization and other unforeseen events. Hence, certificates are needed for official documentation. Students assigned by the University in extracurricular activities (Choral, Dance Troupe and Athletes) are excused from attending the class, however, said students are not excused from classroom activities that coincide the said University activities. Special quiz is given to students with valid reasons like death in the family, hospitalization and other unforeseen events. Hence, certificates are needed for official documentation. Likewise, special major examination is given to students with the same reasons above. Attendance shall be checked every meeting. Students shall be expected to be punctual in their classes. And observance of classroom decorum is hereby required as prescribed by student’s handbook.

Academic Integrity

It is the mission of the University to train its students in the highest levels of professionalism and integrity. In support of this, academic integrity is highly valued and violations are considered serious offenses. Examples of violations of academic integrity include, but are not limited to, the following:

1.Plagiarism– using ideas, data or language of another without specific or proper acknowledgment. Example: Copying text from the Web site without quoting or properly citing the page URL, using crib sheet during examination. For a clear description of what constitutes plagiarism as well as strategies for avoiding it, students may refer to the HAU Student Handbook 2019-2020, Table of Offenses and Corresponding Sanctions B.7. For citation styles, students may refer to APA Style 6th Edition.

2.Cheating – using or attempting to use unauthorized assistance, materials, or study aids during examination or other academic work. Examples: using a cheat sheet in a quiz or exam, altering a grade exam and resubmitting it for a better grade. For the Policy in Cheating, students may refer to the HAU Student Handbook 2019-2020, Appendix I.

3.Fabrication– submitting contrived or improperly altered information in any academic requirements. Examples: making up data for a research project, changing data to bias its interpretation, citing nonexistent articles, contriving sources. Student may refer to HAU Student Handbook 2019-2020, Table of Offenses and Corresponding Sanctions B.7.

(30)

Policy on Absences

1. Students should not incur absences of more than 20% of the required total number of class and laboratory periods in a given semester.

a. The maximum absences allowed per semester are:

For subjects held 1x a week, a maximum of 3 absences;

For subjects held 2x a week, a maximum of 7 absences; and For subjects held 3x a week, a maximum of 10 absences.

2. A student who incurs more than the allowed number of absences in any subject shall be given a mark of “FA” as his final rating for the semester, regardless of his performance in the class.

3. Attendance is counted from the first official day of regular classes regardless of the date of enrolment.

Other Policies

 Departmentalized when it comes to major exams such as Prelim, Midterms and Finals.

 Minimum of two (2) quizzes for every one (1) unit course will be given per semester.

 Drills, Exercises, Seat works, Projects, Recitation/Role playing will be given to the students and will be graded as part of class standing.

 Homework Policy will be given at the discretion of the faculty and will be graded as part of class standing.

Grading System (Campus ++):

Class Standing: 60%

 Recitation

 Homework

 Quizzes Major Exams: 40%

DatePrepared: Date

Effectivity: Prepared By: Reviewed By: Checked By: Certified By: Approved By:

May 2020 May 2020 Edward P. Lacson T, FacultyMBM

Engr. Ruselle Andrew P. Manalang

OBE Facilitator

Melani B. Cabrera, PIE Chairperson, Industrial

Engineering Program

Dr. Bonifacio V. Ramos Director,

University Library

Dr. Filipina I. De Guzman Dean, School of Engineering

and Architecture