Program Name:
Project Titles: (List)
Program Leader:
Project Leader:
Implementing Agency:
Duration:
Cooperating Agency/ies:
Call for Proposal Name:
Rationale (sample only)
Program Diagram (how they relate to
each other)
NSDB (per project)
(Needs, Solutions, Differentiation, Benefits)
Needs
• Provide list here Solutions
• Provide list here
Differentiation
• Provide list here
Benefits
• Provide list here
Cooperating Agencies and/or Beneficiaries
(Local or International with Responsibilities)
Local International
Name of Partner/s Responsibilities Name of Partner/s Responsibilities
Indicate Project #: Objectives and Outputs
Objectives Expected Outputs
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
Roles and Responsibilities of Partner Agencies/Foreign Counterpart
Implementing Agency Name Partner Agencies/Foreign Counterpart
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
Indicate Project #: LIB
(Source of Funds: DOST- GIA or PCIEERD- GIA)
Implementing Agency Counterpart
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total PS
MOOE EO
Total
Indicate Project #: Workplan (Gantt
Chart)
Indicate Project #: 6Ps Output for the Whole Duration
Year 1
Publications
Products
Places/ Partnerships
People
Patent
Policy
Thank you for your attention.
Attachments/Additional Slides
• Differentiation from previous projects
• Endorsement from the Head of Agency
• Curriculum Vitae for the Program Leader and each of the Project Leaders
• Institution's Track Record (no template but previous and ongoing researchers and projects, MS and PhD count of the University/
Department and existing equipment may be listed)
• GAD Score (inputted in the DPMIS)
• Organization Chart (possibly with duties and responsibilities)
• Justification per equipment (can be in one document)
• Cooperating Agency/ies commitment letter/s
Division Comments
Division Comments Response/ Actions Done by the Proponents
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
TP Comments (if applicable)
TP Comments Response/ Actions Done by the
Proponents
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
PMT Comments (if applicable)
PMT Comments Response/ Actions Done by the
Proponents
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
PMT Scores
PMT Score Raw Score Weighted
Average
Salient Points
Socio-Economic Impact (35%)
Environmental Impact (10%)
Plans for Research / Project Results Utilization
(30%)
Marketability (25%)
TOTAL
Recommended for Funding or NOT
TP Scores
TP Score Raw Score Weighted
Average Salient Points Scientific Merit
(30%)
Methodology (30%)
Financial Soundness (15%)
Timeframe (15%)
Other Issues (10%)
TOTAL
Recommended for Funding or NOT
