CHAPTER 4 RESULTS OF THE STUDY
4.1 Descriptive Statistical Analysis with Revealed Preference (RP)
4.1.7 The significant level in the residential choice and transportation
Table 12 (Continue)
Interesting factor Very High High Moderate Low Very Low number_house
(Percentage)
78 (19.50)
126 (31.50)
145 (36.25)
44 (11.00)
7 (1.75) pop_density
(Percentage)
65 (16.25)
131 (32.75)
160 (40.00)
43 (10.75)
1 (0.25) distan_mall
(Percentage)
75 (18.75)
107 (26.75)
162 (40.50)
50 (12.50)
6 (1.50) size_condo
(Percentage)
138 (34.50)
167 (41.75)
88 (22.00)
6 (1.50)
1 (0.25) fitnes_pool
(Percentage)
145 (36.25)
154 (38.50)
92 (23.00)
7 (1.75)
2 (0.50) safety_condo
(Percentage)
272 (68.00)
110 (27.50)
17 (4.25)
1 (0.25)
0 (0.00) resale_price
(Percentage)
163 (40.75)
144 (36.00)
76 (19.00)
13 (3.25)
4 (1.00) rental_price
(Percentage)
111 (27.75)
179 (44.75)
85 (21.25)
17 (4.25)
8 (2.00) develop_company
(Percentage)
154 (38.50)
156 (39.00)
76 (19.00)
10 (2.50)
4 (1.00) area_no flood
(Percentage)
211 (52.75)
118 (29.50)
50 (12.50)
16 (4.00)
5 (1.25) area_no proteste
(Percentage)
184 (46.00)
111 (27.75)
70 (17.50)
19 (4.75)
16 (4.00) Source : The data was from the questionnaire
From the table 12 showed the statistical data of the respondents found that condominium price(condo_price) was in the great extent by choosing in level of excellent was 226 persons to account for 56.50 and good was 130 persons to account for 32.50, there was nobody in poor and very poor criteria. Expense for traveling to work(travel_expen) was in great extent by choosing in level of good was 169 persons to account for 42.25, and level of excellent was 140 persons to account for 35.00. There were 6 persons to choose in very poor level to account for 1.50 at the least. Distance for traveling to work(distan_work) was in great extent by choosing in the level of excellent was 165 persons to account for 41.25, and level of good was 157 persons to account for 39.25. There were 4 persons to choose in very poor to account for 1.00 at the least. The condominium location nearby rail station(near_station) was in great extent by choosing in the level of good was 132 person to account for 33.50, and level of excellent was 130 to account for 32.50. There were 2 persons to choose in very poor to account for 0.50 at the least. The public transportation(public_tran) was in great extent by choosing in the level of good was 133 persons to account for 33.25, and the level of fair was 112 persons to account for 28.00. There were 16 persons to choose in the level very poor to account for 4.00 at the least. The number of household members(number_house) was in great extent by choosing in the level of fair was 145 persons to account for 36.25, and the level of good was 126 persons to account for 31.50. There were 7 persons to choose in the level of very poor to account for 1.175 at the least. The population density(pop_density) was in great extent by choosing in the level of fair was 160 persons to account for 40.00, and the level of good was 131 persons to account for 32.75. There was a person to choose in the level of very poor to account for 0.25 at the least. Distance for traveling to shopping mall( distan_mall) was in great extent by choosing in the level of fair was 162 persons to account for 40.50, and the level of good was 107 persons to account for 26.75. There were 6 persons to choose in the level of very poor to account for 1.50 at the least. Size of condominium(size_condo) was in great extent by choosing in the level of good was 167 persons to account for 41.75, and the level of excellent was 138 persons to account for 34.50. There was a person to
choose in the level of very poor to account for 0.25 at the least. Common space fitness and swimming pool(fitnes_pool) was in great extent by choosing in the level of good was 154 persons to account for 38.50, and the level of excellent was 145 person to account for 36.25. There were 2 persons to choose in the level of very poor to account for 0.50 at the least. Safety in condominium(safety_condo) was in great extent by choosing in the level of excellent was 272 persons to account for 68.00, and the level of good was 110 to account for 27.50. There was no person to choose in the level of very poor. Price for resell was in great extent by choosing the level of excellent was 163 to account for 40.75, and the level of good was 144 persons to account for 36.00. There were 4 persons to choose in the level of very poor to account for 1.00 at the least. Rental price was in great extent by choosing the level of good was 179 persons to account for 44.75, and the level of excellent was 111 persons to account for 21.75. There were 8 persons to choose in the level of very poor to account for 2 at the least. The company development(develop_company) was in great extent by choosing the level of good was 156 persons to account for 39.00, and the level of excellent was 154 persons to account for 38.50. There were 4 persons to choose in the level of very poor to account for 1.00 at the least. The area is no flood was in great extent by choosing in the level of excellent was 211 persons to account for 52.75, and the level of good was 118 persons to account for 29.50. There were 5 persons to choose in the level of very poor to account for 1.25 at the least. The area is no protests was in great extent by choosing in the level of excellent was 184 persons to account for 46.00, and the level of good was 111 persons to account for 27.75. There were 16 persons to choose in the level of very poor to account for 4.00 at the least.
4.2 The analysis results for studying the factors which had an influence to residential