• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

CONFIDENTIAL

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "CONFIDENTIAL"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

CONFIDENTIAL

Book Writing Proposal Evaluation Agreement ( )

1- Proposal No : /

2- Evaluation Period : TWO WEEK From Date Of Receipt.

3- Evaluation Incentive :500 SR 4- Name of Referee:

Middle Name

First Name

Last Name

...

...

...

ﻝﺍ ﻡﺴﻻﺍ ﺔﻴﺒﺭﻌﻝﺍ ﺔﻐﻠﻝﺎﺒ لﻤﺎﻜ )

ﻥﻜﻤﺃ ﻥﺇ :(

……….………

5-Mail Address : ………..………..………..………..

………..………..………..………..

Phone No: ………..………..………..………..

E-Mail: ………..………..………..………..

I agree to evaluate within the given period 6 -

I decline to evaluate within the given period, and would like to suggest 7 -

the following referee :

Kindly provide us with the following information so we can directly deposit the evaluation incentive & inform you when done.

Name: :………

Account No.:……….

Name & Address Of The Bank:………..

……….

Please send This Page as soon as possible if you agree or decline to evaluate the proposal to: Vice-Dean Of Deanship of Scientific Research , P.O. Box 80230 Jeddah 21589, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia .

Or Fax to : 966-2-6951217 Or Through our e-mail: [email protected]

Signature :

(2)

Referee Specialization Form

(A) - The referee is kindly requested to provide the following :

General field of specialization :

Specific field of specialization :

Referee research activities and fields of interest :

Has the referee published any research in the field of the proposed book?

Yes No

If yes, please provide if possible some titles, place and date of publication(s).

1- ………

2- ………

3- ………

Referee name Signature

……….. ………..

(3)

(B) - The Referee is to set his grade for each of the following categories by using

( Excellent –Very Good – Good – Fair – Poor )

1- Estimate the author/authors competency:

The experience of the author/authors must cover the field of proposed book and the levels of their plan efforts are sufficient to obtain efficient performance to fulfillment the project under certain time.

2- Estimate the proposed book design:

Design of the proposed book is considered the main element which is focused on the capability of the author/authors to achieve the project goals and use the appropriate tools and methods to carry out the proposal successfully. So all details in book design should be clear. It is important to explain the way to treat each goal separately.

3- Estimate the scientific competency for the proposed book:

Scientific efficiency for the proposed book is considered as main elements to support the project. Can the proposed book provide good educational or scientific or knowledge level?

4- Estimate the work plan and time schedule:

The work plan must explain the performance of author/authors in the project and the scientific and job role for each author to fulfill the project successfully. Also the time schedule must provide the period for each step separately. Is the proposed time schedule is enough to carry out the proposed project or over estimated and the project dose not need all this time?

5- Estimate the references list:

Is the references list indicate that author/authors overtake(s) or cover(s) the modern science related to the proposed book field?

6- Estimate the authors number for the proposed book:

Is the number of authors is consistent to carry out the proposed book or over estimated?

7- Estimate the proposed budget:

Are the items stated in the proposed budget suitable to achieve the proposed book or they need to be reformulated or they are unsuitable at all?

8- Estimate the proposed budget justifications:

The justifications of the proposed budget should be clear. To what extent these Justifications are convenient or inconvenient.

(4)

Evaluation Form of Book Writing Proposal

Proposal No (____ / ____ )

The explanation to the given scores is essential to support your evaluation. Please use the next page for your justification.

Referee Name: Signature: Date:

Please, Remark Appropriate Area

Poor Fair

Good Very

Excellent Good Category

1- Competency of author/authors

2- Design of the

proposed book

3- Scientific Competency of the proposed book

4- Work plan and

time schedule

5- List of references

Not appropriate Needs modification

Appropriate

6- Number of Authors

Not appropriate Needs modification

Appropriate

7- Proposed Budget

Inconvenient Convenient

Very convenient

8- Justifications of the Proposed Budget

(5)

Please use this sheet ( or additional sheets ) to justify your score ( Typing is appreciated )

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Singapore 6 Good Good Good Good Thailand 41 Good Good Good Good Vietnam 47 Fair Fair Fair Fair Malaysia 40 Good Good Good Good Indonesia 54 Poor Fair Good Fair Philippines 67 Fair

Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor Suggestion if any How do you rate the Photocopying Facility provided inside the College?* How do you rate the Hostel Facility provided by the

Kriteria AUC Nilai AUC Interprestasi 0.90 – 1.00 Excellent Classification 0.80 – 0.90 Good Classification 0.70 – 0.80 Fair Classification 0.60 – 0.70 Poor Classsification 0.50 –

1 The Number and the Percentage of Students Positioned to Their Grade Grade Total % Very Good 1 2.3 % Good 3 7.1 % Fair 8 19 % Poor 30 71.4 % Based on the data analysis, the

Scoring Guideline Standard Form SCALE CATEGORY ˂ 60 Poor 60 – 73 Fair 74 – 87 Good 88 – 100 Excellent FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS The present study tried to examine the

In percentage form, 32.26% students who got excellent to very good score classification, 41.93% students who got good to average, 9.68% students who got fair to poor score

Oxidant/Disinfectant Overview Technology Chlorine Chloramines Ozone Oxidation Praimary Disinfection Residaul Maintenance Fair Unacceptable Good Fair Poor/Fair Good Good/Fair

Presentation Rubric CRITERIA Excellent Good Fair Poor Communication Presenter speaks clearly, effectively and confidently using suitable volume and pace.. Presenter speaks