• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Research Proposal Evaluation Agreement ( )

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Research Proposal Evaluation Agreement ( )"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

CONFIDENTIAL

Research Proposal Evaluation Agreement ( )

1- Proposal No : /

2- Evaluation Period : TWO WEEK From Date Of Receipt.

3- Evaluation Incentive :500 SR 4- Name of Referee :

First: ………. Middle: ………. Last: ………..

ﻟﺍ ﻡﺴﻻﺍ ﺔﻴﺒﺭﻌﻟﺍ ﺔﻐﻠﻟﺎﺒ لﻤﺎﻜ )

ﻥﻜﻤﺃ ﻥﺇ :(

……….………

5-Mail Address : ………..………..………..………..

………..………..………..………..

Phone No: ………..………..………..………..

E-Mail: ………..………..………..………..

I agree to evaluate within the given period

6 -

I decline to evaluate within the given period, and would like to suggest 7 -

the following referee :

Name : ………

Phone No : ………

E – Mail : ………

Mail Address: ………

………

Please send This Page as soon as possible if you agree or decline to evaluate the proposal to: Vice-Dean Of Deanship of Scientific Research , P.O. Box 80230 Jeddah 21589. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia .

Or Fax to : 966-2-6951217 Or Through our e-mail: [email protected]

Signature :

(2)

Referee Specialization Form

(A) - The referee is kindly requested to provide the following :

General field of specialization :

Specific field of specialization :

Referee research activities and fields of interest :

Has the referee published any research in the field of the proposal work? . If yes, Please provide if possible some titles , place and date of publication(s).

Referee name Signature

……….. ………..

(3)

(B) - The Referee is to set his grade for each of the following categories by using ( Excellent –Very Good – Good – Fair – Poor )

1- Estimate the competency of the research team :

The experience of the researchers must cover the field of research and the level of their plan efforts are sufficient to obtain efficient performance to fulfillment the project under certain time.

2- Estimate the design of project research :

Design the project is considered the main element which is focused on the capability of the researchers to achieve the project goals and use the suitable appropriate tools and methods to carry out the research successfully. So all details in project design must be clear . It is important to explain the way to treat each goal separately . All scientific

methods to carry out the research successfully must be specified in details.

3- Estimate scientific competency for the research:

Scientific efficiency for research is considered as main elements to support the research.

Can the research provide good scientific and quality level.

4- Estimate work plan and time schedule:

The work plan in proposed research must explain the performance of researchers in project and the scientific and job role for each researcher to fulfill the research successfully. Also the time schedule must provide the period for each step separately of proposed research.

5- Estimate list of references:

The list of references is focused that researchers overtake the modern science related to proposed research field.

6- Estimate the duration of project research:

The time period set by the principle investigator is consistent to carry out proposed Research . Is the proposal time over estimated?.

7- Estimate equipments and materials:

Is the research in need to all equipment and materials in the proposed budget.

(4)

Proposal No (____ / ____ )

The explanation to the given scores is essential to support your evaluation. Please use the next page for your justification .

Referee Name: Signature: Date:

Please, Remark Appropriate Area

Category

Very Good Fair Poor

Excellent Good

Competency of team research

Design of project

research

Scientific Competency of project research

Work plan and

time schedule

List of references

Not appropriate Appropriate

Project duration

Not appropriate Appropriate

Equipment and materials

Please use this sheet ( or additional sheets ) to justify your score ( Typing is appreciated )

(5)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

teaching reading for increasing the capability of the students so that the students who belong to poor or fair level can be improved into good or excellent level. 2)

The fuzzy rules were applied for each question in the survey with results suggesting the membership level as excellent, good, fair, or poor.. In the ®nal report, the membership

We estimate the good health summary index using the following measures of health: reported health status (fair or poor), asthma (ever, attack in the previous year, three or more

They gave the workshop an overall grade of B (good) for meeting the objectives and a grade of A- (excellent) for addressing the issues they wanted to learn.. Their comments

Kondisi kerja dibagi menjadi enam kelas, yaitu Ideal, Excellent, Good, Average, Fair, dan Poor. Kondisi yang ideal tidak selalu sama bagi setiap pekerjaan karena

Degree of Satisfaction: [ Min = 1 , Max = 5 ] Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor 5 4 3 2 1 Statement Points Easy access to sample panel تانيعلا ةنجل لىإ لوصولا

Rating of Return of the Buddha Visit 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Poor Fair Good Excellent Superior 90% of the most satisfied visitors— those who rated the exhibition as

Rubric Poor: 1 Fair: 2 Good: 3 Excellent: 4 Thesis statement Earth is the planet with life Jupiter is the biggest planet of them all Pluto is considered a dwarf planet