• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PPT Slide 1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "PPT Slide 1"

Copied!
29
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

ABO Subgroups and Discrepancies

Nada Jamjoom

Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences BLOOD BANK

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY

KAU

(2)

ABH Antigens

H antigen

(3)

ABO Antibodies

• ABO Abs are generally IgM class antibodies.

• For Group A and Group B individuals the predominant antibody class is IgM.

• Serum from Group O individuals contains not only anti-A and anti-B but also anti-A,B.

• Anti-A,B is a mixture of class IgG and IgM.

• The anti-A,B “immune” antibodies are predominantly IgG.

(4)

ABO Antibodies

Time of appearance:

•Generally present within first 4-6 months of life

•Reach adult level at 5-10 years of age Level off through adult life

•Begin to decrease in later years: >65 years of age

(5)

ABO Subgroups

Von Dungern in1911 described 2 different A Ag based on reactions between group A RBCs and anti-A and anti-A1 antisera.

Group A red cells that react with both anti-A & anti-A1 are classified as A1.

Group A red cells that react with anti-A and not anti-A1 are classified as A2.

The majority (80%) of the A and AB population are A1 or A1B; the remaining 20% are A2 or A2B.

The production of both types of antigens (A1 and A2) is a result of an inherited gene at the ABO locus & the immunodominant sugar on both A1 and A2 RBCs is N-acetyl-D-galactosamine.

(6)

Difference between A

1

and A

2

The difference between A1 and A2 is both quantitative and qualitative.

Quantitative difference

Inheritance of an A1 gene elicits production of high concentrations of the enzyme α-3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltranferase, which converts almost all of the H precursor structure to A1 antigens on the red cells.

The number of A1 antigen sites is higher than the number of A2

antigens sites on the red cell because A1 gene is a very potent gene that creates large numbers of A1 antigens sites on RBC.

(7)

Difference between A

1

and A

2

Qualitative differences

•1 to 8% of A2 individuals produce anti-A1 in their serum

•25% of A2B individuals produce anti-A1.

(8)

Difference between A

1

and A

2

Reagent anti-A is a mixture of two Abs ;

• Anti-A which react with both A1 and A2 cells.

• Anti-A1 which reacts with A cells but not with A2 cells in simple testing .

• The seeds of the plant Dolichos biflorus serve as a source of anti-A1 which is known as anti-A1 lectin.

• This reagent agglutinates A1 or A1B but does not agglutinate A2 or A2B cells.

(9)

A

1

versus A

2

Phenotype

Reactions of patient’s red cells with

Blood Group Anti-A (from B Sera) Anti-A1 Lectin

A1 + +

A2 + Negative

A1 has 2 antigens A and A1 A2 has only one, A antigen

(10)

Weak A and B Subgroups

• Other A subgroups: RBC of the A end, A3, Ax, Ay or A el. are only rarely seen in transfusion practice.

• Subgroup of B: infrequent than the weaker subgroup of A, identified by anti-B and anti-A,B. Subgroups B3 , Bx , Bm and Bel .

(11)

ABO Discrepancies

• A discrepancy occurs when the red cell testing does NOT match the serum testing results

• In other words, the forward does NOT match the reverse

• ABO discrepancies are usually technical in nature and can be simply resolved by correctly reporting the testing and carefully checking reagents with meticulous reading and recording of results.

(12)

ABO Discrepancies

• Most of the time, the problem is technical – Mislabeled tube

– Failure to add reagent

– Either repeat test on same sample, request a new sample, or wash cells

• Other times, there is a real discrepancy due to problems with the patient’s red cells or serum.

(13)

Technical Errors

Clerical errors

– Mislabeled tubes

– Patient misidentification

– Inaccurate interpretations recorded – Transcription error

– Computer entry error

Reagent or equipment problems

– Using expired reagents

– Using an uncalibrated centrifuge

– Contaminated or hemolyzed reagents – Incorrect storage temperatures

Procedural errors

– Reagents not added

– Manufacturer’s directions not followed – RBC suspensions incorrect concentration

– Cell buttons not resuspended before grading agglutination

ABO Discrepancies

(14)

Group I Discrepancies

• Group I discrepancies are between forward and reverse groupings because of weekly reacting or missing

antibodies.

• Group I discrepancies are the most common type.

• If a reaction in the reverse grouping is weak or missing

 Group I discrepancy.

• It means that the patient has depressed antibody production or cannot produce the ABO antibodies.

ABO Discrepancies

(15)

Examples of Group I Discrepancies

• Newborns

Do not form antibodies until they 3-6 months

• Elderly patients

Weakened antibody activity

• CLL, malignant lymphoma, using immunosuppressive drugs can cause hypogammaglobulinemia (little or no antibody production)

ABO Discrepancies

(16)

Resolution of Group I Discrepancies

• Eliminate all technical errors

• Determine patients age, diagnosis

• Incubate patient’s serum with reagent A1 and B cells for 15 to 30 minutes (RT) to enhance antibody reactions

• If negative, place serum-cell mixture at 4°C for 15 to 30 minutes

ABO Discrepancies

(17)

Group II Discrepancies

• These discrepancies are between forward and reverse groupings because of weakly reacting or missing

antigens.

• Group II discrepancies is the least common type.

ABO Discrepancies

(18)

Examples of Group II Discrepancies

• Subgroups of A and or subgroups of B may be present.

• Leukemias may yield weakened A or B antigens.

• Hodgkin’s disease

• “Acquired B” phenomenon is most often associated with lower GI tract disease

– Cancer of colon/rectum – Intestinal obstruction

Gram negative septicemia (i.e. E. coli)

ABO Discrepancies

(19)

Acquired B

• Bacteria (E. coli) have a deacetylating enzyme that modify the immunodominant BG A sugar….

Group A individual

N-acetyl galactosamine

Acquired B Phenotype

Bacterial enzyme removes acetyl group

Galactosamine now resembles D-galactose (found

in Group B)

ABO Discrepancies

(20)

Resolution of Group II Discrepancies

ABO Discrepancies

• Eliminate all technical errors

• Wash patient’s cells with saline

• The reaction can be enhanced by incubating the test mixture at RT for up to 30 minutes to increase the association of Ab with Ag.

• If negative, reduce the temperature to 4°C.

• Testing the patient’s serum against autologous RBCs

gives a negative reaction because the anti-B in the serum does not agglutinate autologous RBCs with the acquired B Ag.

(21)

ABO Discrepancies

• These discrepancies are between forward and reverse grouping due to protein or plasma abnormalities and result in Rouleaux formation.

• These can be caused by elevated levels of globulin from certain diseases such as multiple myeloma and

Hodgekin’s lymphoma.

• Wharton’s jelly ( a viscous mucopolysaccharide material present on cord bloods).

Group III Discrepancies

(22)

ABO Discrepancies

• Rouleaux or red cells result from a stacking of

erythrocytes that adhere in a coin-link fashion giving the appearance of agglutination.

• To resolve this kind of problem, washing the patient’s red cells with saline or adding a drop or two of saline to the tube in case of rouleaux formation.

• If the agglutination is true red cell clumping will remain.

• Cord blood must be washed 6-8 times in forward grouping ONLY.

Resolution of Group III Discrepancies

(23)

ABO Discrepancies

• These kind of discrepancies are between forward and reverse groping due to miscellaneous problems.

• Polyagglutination can occur due to exposure of hidden erythrocyte Ag (T antigen) in patients with bacterial or viral infection.

• Bacterial contamination in vitro or vivo produces an enzyme that alters and exposes the hidden Ag on red cell leading to T activation.

• This problem can be resolved by using monoclonal antibody typing reagent.

Group IV discrepancies

(24)

Common sources of technical errors resulting in ABO discrepancies

False Negative False Positive

Over centrifugation and over reading

Use of incorrect reagents or samples

Failure to add serum or reagents

Cell suspention is too heavy or too light

Inadequate identification of

samples or test tubes

Contaminated reagents Dirty tubes or

glassware ABO Discrepancies

(25)

Example I

Forward Grouping Reaction of Patient’s

Cells with

Reverse Grouping Reaction Patient’s

Serum with

Anti-A Anti-B A1 cells B cells Patient Negative +++ Negative Negative

Possible discrepancy: Group I discrepancy; because of weakly reacting or missing antibodies.

Patient’s probable group: B ABO Discrepancies

(26)

Forward Grouping Reaction of Patient’s

Cells with

Reverse Grouping Reaction Patient’s

Serum with

Anti-A Anti-B A1 cells B cells

Patient ++++ ++ ++ ++++

Example II

Possible discrepancy: Group III discrepancy; caused by Rouleaux formation Patient’s probable group: A

ABO Discrepancies

(27)

Example III

Forward Grouping Reaction of Patient’s

Cells with

Reverse Grouping Reaction Patient’s

Serum with

Anti-A Anti-B A1 cells B cells

Patient ++++ negative ++ ++++

Possible discrepancy: Group II discrepancy; because of weakly reacting or missing antigens

Patient’s probable group: A (subgroup A2) ABO Discrepancies

(28)

Example IV

Forward Grouping Reaction of Patient’s

Cells with

Reverse Grouping Reaction Patient’s

Serum with

Anti-A Anti-B A1 cells B cells

Patient ++++ ++ Negative ++++

Possible discrepancy: Group II discrepancy; caused by an acquired B Ag Patient’s probable group: A

ABO Discrepancies

(29)

Example V

Forward Grouping Reaction of Patient’s

Cells with

Reverse Grouping Reaction Patient’s

Serum with

Anti-A Anti-B A1 cells B cells

Patient ++ + ++++ ++++

Possible discrepancy: Group IV discrepancy; caused by T activation.

Patient’s probable group: O ABO Discrepancies

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Preparing for a Career in the Computer Industry • Computer professionals with common interests and a desire to extend their proficiency form computer-related professional

Indexed List Access Indexed List Access concluded concluded // replaces the value at the specified position // in this list with item and returns the // previous value public T

Polymorphism concluded Polymorphism concluded  Rather than using static binding which Rather than using static binding which would associate the method with the would associate the

Implementing the Bag Class Implementing the Bag Class concluded concluded // constructor creates an empty collection // with fixed capacity public Bagint capacity { // value

Introduction Multiple integrals arise in a number of areas of science and engineering, including computations of a Area of a 2D region b Volume c Mass of 2D plates d Force on a 2D

Zinc deficiency Pathophysiology: • Zinc deficiency occurs from – i nutritional factors such as consumption of food items with either low zinc contents or unavailable forms of zinc,

Integrated Telecom ITC Highlights  Established in 1Q of 2005 with HQ in Riyadh and regional offices in Jeddah and Al-Khobar  Awarded the 2nd Data communications license from CITC

Islamic Law and Islamic Law and Rules Rules 13 The Holy Book Quran Hadith, words or actions of the prophet Sunnah Ijma of the Clerics Consensu s Ijtihad personal study