Implementation of the university council's and college council's decisions in relation to the college. Evaluation of the college's professional work and submission of an annual report to the college council. The decisions of permanent or temporary committees are not final unless they are approved by the department council.
Quality Assurance Unit
Vice Head of Quality Unit
Coordination with the head of the quality unit in all quality matters, female students' section. Any other specializations delegated by the head of the quality unit in light of development and requirements.
Department's Quality Coordinators
Distribution and collection of all quality documents and reports at the level of the scientific departments. Collection of performance indicators and benchmarks for all university programs, following an annual process of measuring and developing program performance in light of the results of these indicators and the adequacy of improvement procedures for each program. Proposing the formation of internal and external review committees for academic programs in collaboration with program coordinators and the head of the Quality Unit and organizing procedures for external review of academic programmes.
Participating in the review of program descriptions, reports and college decisions with program coordinators periodically and ensuring that they are prepared according to forms approved by the National Authority for Academic Assessment and Accreditation and that they are in line with the National Qualifications Framework . Participating in meeting all criteria for program accreditation for all academic programs at the college. Implementation of university accreditation standard practices and monitoring the continuity of their implementation in the college, and savings.
Participation in the preparation of annual performance indicators and their measurement, reporting them and suggesting implementation points for improvement.
Quality and accreditation Committee
Oversee the preparation of the program, courses and their reports and documents aligned with NCAAA forms and requirements. Review of program documents and courses and suggestions for correction according to NCAAA requirements. Oversee the work of the internal audit, measurement and evaluation, the mission, objectives, vision and objectives of the program and the tutorial committee.
Reporting directly and periodically to the head of department on the results and output of the quality assurance activities.
Quality and accreditation Subcommittees
- Department's Quality Coordinators Committee
- Training and Technical Support Committee
- The Follow-up and Performance Measurement Committee
- The Internal Audit Committee
Determination of training needs in the area of quality assurance and academic accreditation for all faculty members (leaders - faculty members - administrators - students - graduates - beneficial community). Preparation of quality assurance training plans based on the needs of lecturers, including conferences, seminars, educational programs and workshops. Evaluation of the success of educational programs in the light of models prepared for this purpose.
Continuing to send the curriculum reports from the departments to the headquarters of the Quality Unit and coordinating with the head of the Quality Unit and the Committee of Quality Coordinators in the scientific departments in this regard. Continue to send curriculum evaluation results and student observations to department councils, curriculum coordinators, and teaching staff to review and take necessary corrective action. Monitor the implementation of college training plans in light of approved plans.
Monitoring the implementation of proposals for improvement of the analysis of the results of the reference comparison at the school and its programs. To review the programmatic independent study of graduate school programs with an expert committee and approve them by official boards, and to rank graduate school programs according to the level of success.
Program and Courses Specifications 1. Program Specification
Course Specification
- Course Teaching Plan
The Vice-Rectorate for Educational Affairs at Jouf University requires the preparation of a course teaching, which will be uploaded together with course specification and learning outcomes.
Course and Program Reports 1 Course Report
At the end of the first and second semesters of the academic year, the annual program of the program is prepared, which shows the progress of the graduate class within four years and determines the number of male and female graduates, and the percentage of employment for government and private sector graduates are also presented. The student performance for the current academic year for all levels and it also includes a student report. The program report also presents the evaluation of performance indicators and improvement plans for them.
Upon completion, the course report for the headquarters program is combined with the branch to produce a combined report. Preparation of the annual program report according to the template (T6) (T6 Annual Program Report V2020-Eng) designed by the NCAAA.
Field experience specification and reports
Course Files
Each course instructor will submit the course file to the quality unit, then the program coordinator and the internal audit committee for review.
Program’s Key Performance Indicators
Percentage of performance indicators of the objectives of the operational plan of the program that have reached the target annual level, compared to the total number of indicators targeted for these objectives in the same year. Number of students entering the bachelor's program who have completed the minimum period / total number of students at bachelor's level x 100. The number of intake students who have successfully completed the first year / total number of students in the first year x 100.
Percentage distribution of the number of faculty members in relation to male and female departments, branches and academic degrees. Number of faculty who left the college in the previous year for reasons other than retirement due to age / total number of faculty members x 100. Number of research published per faculty member in ISI-ranked journals / Number of total research published per faculty member x 100.
Number of faculty members (full-time) who have at least one selected research in the previous year / total number of faculty members (full-time) in the college x 100. The citation rate of faculty research to the total number of members in the same year.
Program’s Self-study
None of the funded research projects (internal or external), in which at least one faculty member of the program participated / year. Leader of standard is responsible for checking and rechecking the collected evidence based on standard touchstone. Leader of standard responsible for preparing the SES for the standard after regular meetings with the members.
Coordinator Quality and Accreditation Committee discussed the results per standard with the standards committees. The head of departments is responsible for monitoring the progress of staff work - integrated manuscript of self-assessment and events released by dean's office for quality and accreditation. Leader and member are responsible for writing the self-study report and responding to comments and suggestions from independent evaluators.
The mission and objectives of the program and the extent to which they are to be achieved are thoroughly analyzed according to quality assurance and accreditation standards as defined by the NCAAA. Six standards evaluation scales have been established for monitoring the quality assurance of the.
MISSION AND GOALS
These standards are designed to support continuous quality improvement and to publicly recognize programs and institutions that meet the required quality standards. This document can also be used to plan, self-audit and support programmatic quality improvement strategies in higher education institutions. This document provides self-assessment scales for programmatic quality assurance and academic accreditation standards, which include the following standards:.
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 3. TEACHING AND LEARNING
STUDENTS
TEACHING STAFF
LEARNING RESOURCES, FACILITIES, AND EQUIPMENT
This self-evaluation is supported by the independent opinion of an independent evaluator or evaluators outside the institution; increase credibility, objectivity and accuracy of evaluation.
The Framework of Quality Assurance Operational Plan List of Operational Goals and Sub-goals
- Enhancing the quality evaluation of educational processes of the program and strengthening the compliance of these processes with the standards of national and international
- Provides experiential trainings (internships) to graduates in order to enhance their professional strengths in conjunction with occupational development
- Provision of the state-of- the art laboratory facilities for practical training of the students in- order to enhance their psychomotor skills
- Improvement in the curriculum, teaching and learning resource/ materials in-order to provide students’ knowledge of the recent advances in the subject area
- Develop research skills among students
- Encourage research students to present and share their research findings at various forums Operational Goal (4): Prepare graduates to become leaders who improve the health and
- Aware students about the importance of pharmacist in public or community health 4.2. Ensure the students in community services
Periodic review of the program's internal quality assurance system through follow-up, evaluation and periodic reports is crucial for corrective measures to improve program performance. This will be carried out by applying a simplified and comprehensive model of the quality cycle (Deming cycle) which is the most important model used to determine different stages of quality system. It should be an in-depth examination of the environment in which the program operates, and any factor expected to mediate changes in the program activities.
The primary purpose of periodic reviews is to support the program's self-improvement efforts, and they are also used as a basis for NCAAA external reviews. Preparation of program and course specifications, as well as various program reports, which provide a detailed basis for planning and reviewing the quality of the program. It must record any changes to the program or courses that have been made to the program and course specification, with a record of the reasons for those changes.
This is done in two stages, the first stage is an electronic stage through google drive that was created by the Deanery of Quality and Accreditation (DQA), in which the program uploaded its documents for checking by internal experts. In the second phase, after reviewing the program documents, the quality professional teams of the University under the supervision of DQA will visit the program to ensure the implementation of AKKSHA standards for program accreditation.
Verification of quality of student evaluation process and standards of student achievement
The course auditor checks the correction and marking of the final examination answer sets of all students enrolled in the course. Furthermore, the course auditor examines the course file submitted by the course coordinator and fills in the following forms;. Form for Analysis and Evaluation of Test Paper: The form is a checklist containing items on readability, objectivity, diversity and quality of test questions such as whether diverse questions have been used, and if the questions measure understanding, and ability to think and assign knowledge fit.
Internal review report for evaluation of course quality: The form is checklist containing items on clarity of course objectives, consistency of targeted GLOs with course objectives, alignment of GLOs with PLOs, measurability of targeted GLOs, adequacy of teaching strategies to achieve and assessment methods to measure targeted CLOs. Course Report Audit Form: The form contains items to verify course learning outcome assessment and verification of student degree achievement. The program independent verification committee works centrally to follow up the process of verification of student performance across all departments.
Approval Data
