• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Sarbanes-Oxley and Nonprofit Management

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Sarbanes-Oxley and Nonprofit Management"

Copied!
338
0
0

Teks penuh

Limitation of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: Although the publisher and author have used their best efforts to prepare this book, they make no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a specific purpose. California's SB 1262 Nonprofit Integrity Act to Fundraising Activities 162 Role of the Board of Directors and Executive Team in providing. Peg is grateful for the tireless energy Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and his staff assistant, Dean Zerbe, have devoted to raising public awareness of the nonprofit world's obvious need for sweeping reform.

Grassley's hearings in 2004 and 2005 illustrated that the American public deserves to have the same trust in the charities to which they donate money as they have demanded from the private sector corporations in which they invest. Nataliya did a great job compiling all the sordid details of the accounting and financial scandals, and also provided insight into Form 990 and its variants.

Ostriches, Luddites,

Everson (Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service), and the passage of the Nonprofit Integrity Act in California all indicate a growing distrust in the integrity of the nonprofit sector and. Outline the general requirements of SOX regarding auditor independence, the role of the audit committee, and the corporate responsibility for financial reports. Essentially, the legislation complements the purpose of the Securities Act of 1933 to provide "truth in securities" by improving the quality of financial reporting.

The purpose of the proposed legislation was “to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made under the securities laws and for other purposes.” The bill had 30 House cosponsors and passed the House on April 24, 2002, by a vote of 334 to 90. Sarbanes (D-Maryland), the chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, introduced S.

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

The total amount of the accounting support fees is equal to the PCAOB's budget as approved by the SEC, minus the amounts collected in the previous year from registration application fees and annual fees. While all members of the PCAOB must be financially literate, only two of the members must be or have been certified public accountants (CPAs). McDonough, Chairman: Formerly president and chief executive officer (CEO) of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Niemeir, Member: CPA, formerly with the SEC, where he was Co-Chair of the Financial Fraud Task Force and Chief Accountant in the Enforcement Division. Establishes its budget and manages the operations of the PCAOB and its staff; funding comes from company registration fees and accounting support fees for public companies or issuers.

Auditor Independence

As part of an inspection, the PCAOB requested information about the audits of two companies, New York Film Works, Inc. One of the accounting firm's employees had worked both on company audits and helped prepare financial statements. Auditors are prohibited from providing accounting services, such as the preparation of financial statements, to their audit clients, and data related to these services have been removed from the materials submitted to the KKPB.

The sanctions were limited to criticism because Goldberger and Postelnik voluntarily contacted the PCAOB and disclosed the violation (PCAOB, 2005). In addition, § 204 identifies specific information that the auditor must disclose to the audit committee before the audit report is issued.

Corporate Responsibility

Based on his/her knowledge and review, the financial statements and other financial information in the report fairly present the company's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. He or she and other certifying officials have evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of the filing date and included the results of the evaluation in the report. He or she and other certifying officers have reported to the auditors and the audit committee all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls, any weaknesses in internal controls, and any fraud in areas of internal controls.

Internal and Disclosure Controls As part of the report certification, the certifying officers must state that they have reported any weakness in the internal controls over financial reporting. As part of the report certification, members of senior management must also attest to the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures.

Enhanced Financial Disclosures

Section 301 gives the audit committee the responsibility to appoint, compensate and supervise the auditor and prohibits audit committee members from accepting, directly or indirectly, any compensation other than compensation directly related to their role as member of the board of directors. of the directors and its committees. Under Section 404, management is required to conduct quarterly reviews of the effectiveness of the company's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. Management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls and procedures based on management's evaluation of them.

External auditor's opinion on management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls and procedures. Experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements at or above the level of complexity of the company's financial statements.

Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002

The new offense also covers planned investigations and provides for fines, prison terms of up to 20 years, or both, for violations of the law. Section 802 provides for fines, prison terms of up to ten years, or both, for violations of the law. Under whistleblower protection, it is illegal for an employer to discriminate against an employee in any way if that employee is engaged in the protected activity.

Previously, the statute of limitations was three years from the moment the fraud was committed, or one year from the discovery of the fraud. Section 804 extended the statute of limitations to five years from the time the fraud was committed or two years after the fraud was discovered, whichever is earlier.

White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancements Act of 2002

Auditors may also be charged with a criminal offense if they fail to retain all audit and review workpapers and materials for a period of five years from the end of the fiscal year in which the audit was conducted. Under Section 806, employees of public companies and accounting firms who disclose private business or company information as evidence of accounting or audit violations or fraud to a regulator, federal regulator, law enforcement agency, or member of Congress enjoy extensive whistleblower protections. Section 906 requires the CEO and CFO to certify that the quarterly and annual reports containing the financial statements are filed with the SEC as required by Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act. of 1934, fully comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act.

In addition, they must certify that the reports fairly reflect the operations and financial condition of the company. The maximum penalties for willful and knowing violations under Section 906 are a fine of not more than that.

Corporate Tax Returns

Section 906 is one of the most controversial sections of Title IX, as it creates criminal penalties for a public company's CEO and CFO (or equivalent) in connection with the certification of quarterly and annual reports to the SEC. This certification is in addition to the certification required under Title III, Section 302.

Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002

Consider what types of documents your nonprofit would need to store/

Develop retention rules (based on legal requirements and the operational needs of your nonprofit) and ensure that these rules are clearly disseminated

Develop a process for finding and preserving documents that either will be or are part of an investigation or legal action. There must also be a mechanism

Some examples of documents that should be kept include: grant documents, tax and other financial documents, and copies of policies. Be sure to build in the requirements of any third-party reviewers, such as auditors or regulatory agencies, so that your system meets the expectations of those reviewers. This step should also include a review of the types of e-mail messages and instant messages that are routinely transmitted along with attachments.

The policy should also include steps to be taken to ensure that documents cannot be modified, for example by using PDF files or passwords. It is especially important that we maintain financial records to ensure that they present a true and fair view of the nonprofit's financial profile and/or other financial description. Regulators will expect to be able to rely on the accuracy of all your electronic records – no exceptions.

Specific employees in each department of your nonprofit organization should be assigned the responsibility and necessary authority and resources to maintain records within their department. It is essential that all these individuals have the same training and knowledge of organizational systems and any technology such as scanners, software and the like to ensure that documents are selected, stored, archived and retrieved in a consistent manner. , a standardized way. Work with IT and legal professionals to ensure these policies are comprehensive and appropriate for your nonprofit.

Develop a means by which the Document Retention system will be audited on a regular basis to ensure that all staff are in compliance with the provisions

All staff and volunteers who have access to any of the nonprofit's technology should be required to read and sign the Technology Policy. Therefore, we cannot ensure the accuracy of the Form 990 (annual Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax) provided to the Internal Revenue Service. As with any personnel matter, consultation with the nonprofit's legal counsel is essential in compiling the presentation of the findings.

Describe the role of the board and Executive Team in providing oversight and guidance for fundraising by a nonprofit organization. The potential donor provides the broker with a description of the vehicle, year, make and model. California law also placed the burden of closer oversight of all fundraising activities on the nonprofit (ie, the board).

The role of the board and executive team in providing oversight and guidance to a nonprofit's fundraising. For each of the items below, provide examples that prove your nonprofit's controls are in place. Paul, isn't the Whitney Museum of American Art one of the museums you donate money to every year?” Rita asked.

Discuss the roles of the board, management and staff in developing and maintaining an effective internal control system. In many of these incidents, the lack of an effective internal control system was at the heart of the problem. Every nonprofit faces a variety of external and internal risks that can threaten the achievement of the nonprofit's goals.

Risk assessment is the identification of the risks and their potential severity. Monitoring is a continuous process and leads to refinement of the internal control system.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Iman Setya Budi2 , Abdul Wahab3 1Program Studi Ekonomi Syariah, 60202, Fakultas Studi Islam, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin, 18510037 2Program